Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dase3002

Dase3002

Dase3002 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

03 June 2024[edit]

– This SPI case is open.

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

WattMega (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • SPI Tools

Exact same WP:HOAX vandalism across articles with siginificant overlap. The behavior is telling with the content of the edits being absolutely madeup and inserted into articles for the heck of it. Asking for CU to further establish this.Perhaps also related to the disruptive IP hopper who operated from 49.207.192.0/18 (now range blocked). Gotitbro (talk) 18:59, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Spicy: Comparision of similar hoax edits on different pages (master/sock): M1, S1; M2, S2; M3, S3; M4, S4; M5, S5; M6, S6; M7, S7; M8, S8; M9, S9; M10, S11; M12, S12. I think these should be conclusive enough. Gotitbro (talk) 18:07, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

Clerk declined - Dase3002 has been inactive long enough to be Stale. CheckUser won't tell us anything useful here. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:53, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Additional information needed - Gotitbro, in order to facilitate and expedite your request, please provide diffs to support your case. Please give two or more diffs meeting the following format:
At least one diff is from the sockmaster (or an account already blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet of the sockmaster), showing the behaviour characteristic of the sockmaster.
At least one diff per suspected sockpuppet, showing the suspected sockpuppet emulating the behaviour of the sockmaster given in the first diff.
In situations where it is not immediately obvious from the diffs what the characteristic behaviour is, a short explanation must be provided. Spicy (talk) 17:37, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, restoring case status so the evidence can be reviewed. Spicy (talk) 18:09, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]