Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sunak2310

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sunak2310

Sunak2310 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed

09 July 2024

[edit]

– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

The editing area of these three recently created IDs is same (Abhishek Sharma (cricketer, born 2000) related). While an obvious COI is apparent, the person behind might be the same as well. The image was first added by the suspected sockpuppeteer, readded by a new user after deletion at commons [1], again re-added by another [2]. Note the addition of supposed girlfriends and liaisons (not adhering to WP:BLPPRIVACY) [3], something similar done by the sockmaster [4], for which they even edit warred [5] after @JBW:'s revert [6]. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:03, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also note the similar style of creatiing empty user pages [7], [8], [9]. Not to mention the habit of edit warring and disregard of policies and guidelines. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:06, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]
  • Thank you for this report, Fylindfotberserk. The similarity of these accounts on en.wikipedia is enough to raise strong suspicions, but I also noted that Baazigar1993 and BlackthornePaul are both globally locked for cross-wiki abuse, so I looked at the global editing history. There are 18 projects on which all three accounts have edited in their very short careers, and the similarities among the accounts over all those projects are stunning, making this one of the most glaringly obvious sockpuppet cases I have ever seen. I have blocked Sunak2310, and I shall semiprotect for a while the article which has been the focus of their attention. I don't think there's any point in a CheckUser; it isn't necessary for these accounts, and they have all edited soon after being created, which doesn't suggest that sleepers are likely. JBW (talk) 20:56, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@JBW: Most welcome. I wonder what are they upto, editing in all those 18 projects! Anyway, thanks for notifying me, I'll keep an eye. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 21:01, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]