Briefing | Armageddon used to this

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has eroded the nuclear taboo

This war is unlikely to go nuclear. But it is increasing the risk that future conflicts will

In 1999 nina tannenwald, a political scientist at Brown University, wrote a paper analysing something she had observed among generals, politicians and strategists: the “nuclear taboo”. This was not, she argued, simply a matter of general queasiness or personal moral qualms; it had important consequences. The lack of nuclear wars in the years since America’s destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, she argued, was not simply a matter of deterrence. It had also relied on a growing sense of the innate wrongness of nuclear weapons putting their use beyond the pale.

This article appeared in the Briefing section of the print edition under the headline “Thinking the unthinkable”

A new era

From the June 4th 2022 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from Briefing

The Chinese authorities are concealing the state of the economy

But the Communist Party’s internal information systems may also be flawed

“Hell on earth”: satellite images document the siege of a Sudanese city

El-Fasher, until recently a place of refuge, is under attack


The ripple effects of Sudan’s war are being felt across three continents

It is a sign of growing global impunity and disorder


Anarchy in Sudan has spawned the world’s worst famine in 40 years

Millions are likely to perish

Kamala Harris has revealed only the vaguest of policy platforms

Her record suggests she would be a pragmatist

Talent is scarce. Yet many countries spurn it

There is growing competition for the best and the brightest migrants