Finance & economics | Free exchange

This year’s Nobel prizes prompt soul-searching among economists

The rise of randomised controlled trials looks to some like a retreat from the biggest questions

NOBEL PRIZES are usually given in recognition of ideas that are already more or less guaranteed a legacy. But occasionally they prompt as much debate as admiration. This year’s economics award, given to Abhijit Banerjee, Esther Duflo and Michael Kremer, was unusual both for the recency of the contributions it recognised and the relative youth of the recipients. (For a review of “Good Economics for Hard Times”, by Mr Banerjee and Ms Duflo, see Books and arts section.) Intentionally or not, it has inflamed arguments about the direction of the profession.

This article appeared in the Finance & economics section of the print edition under the headline “Works in progress”

Hong Kong in revolt

From the November 23rd 2019 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from Finance & economics

Can anything spark Europe’s economy back to life?

Mario Draghi, the continent’s unofficial chief technocrat, has a plan

Has social media broken the stockmarket?

That is the contention of Cliff Asness, one of the great quant investors


American office delinquencies are shooting up

How worried should investors be?


China is suffering from a crisis of confidence

Can anything perk up its economy?

America has a huge deficit. Which candidate would make it worse?

Enough policies have been proposed to make a call

Why Oasis fans should welcome price-gouging

There are worse things in life than paying a fair price