Why “Freakonomics” failed to transform economics
The approach was fun, but has fallen out of favour
“Economics is a study of mankind in the ordinary business of life.” So starts Alfred Marshall’s “Principles of Economics”, a 19th-century textbook that helped create the common language economists still use today. Marshall’s contention that economics studies the “ordinary” was not a dig, but a statement of intent. The discipline was to take seriously some of the most urgent questions in human life. How do I pay my bills? What do I do for a living? What happens if I get sick? Will I ever be able to retire?
Explore more
This article appeared in the Finance & economics section of the print edition under the headline “Gang warfare”
Finance & economics March 23rd 2024
- How China, Russia and Iran are forging closer ties
- Japan ends the world’s greatest monetary-policy experiment
- Why America can’t escape inflation worries
- First Steven Mnuchin bought into NYCB, now he wants TikTok
- America’s realtor racket is alive and kicking
- Why “Freakonomics” failed to transform economics
- How to trade an election
From the March 23rd 2024 edition
Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents
Explore the editionMore from Finance and economics
Japan’s strength produces a weak yen
Currency meddling will prove futile
At last, Wall Street has something to cheer
Consumer banks, on the other hand, are starting to suffer
Americans are wrong to wish for an era of stable bipartisanship
Even though political instability is an economic threat