When is it OK to shoot a child soldier?
Canada writes rules for troops who face armed nine-year-olds
![](https://www.economist.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=1424,quality=80,format=auto/sites/default/files/images/2017/03/articles/main/20170401_amp001.jpg)
ONE of the worst dilemmas soldiers face is what to do when they confront armed children. International law and most military codes treat underage combatants mainly as innocent victims. They offer guidance on their legal rights and on how to interrogate and demobilise them. They have little to say about a soul-destroying question, which must typically be answered in a split second: when a kid points a Kalashnikov at you, do you shoot him? Last month Canada became the first country to incorporate a detailed answer into its military doctrine. If you must, it says, shoot first.
This article appeared in the The Americas section of the print edition under the headline “When to shoot a child soldier”
More from The Americas
![](https://www.economist.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=1424,quality=80,format=auto/content-assets/images/20240907_AMP505.jpg)
Antony Blinken swoops into a violent hotspot close to home
In Haiti a new security force is aiming to suppress gang violence
![](https://www.economist.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=1424,quality=80,format=auto/content-assets/images/20240907_AMP503.jpg)
Electing top judges has been a disaster in Bolivia
The fight over the courts has poisoned politics
![](https://www.economist.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=1424,quality=80,format=auto/content-assets/images/20240907_AMP001.jpg)
Claudia Sheinbaum will inherit a poisoned chalice in Mexico
Her predecessor’s last act is a dangerous overhaul of the constitution
The all-powerful judge taking on Elon Musk
Is the legal cure of banning X worse than the disease?
AMLO’s dangerous last blast threatens Mexico
The outgoing president will use his last month in power to change the constitution
Nicolás Maduro digs in with the help of a pliant Supreme Court
His inner circle is another barrier to compromise