How will America deal with three-way nuclear deterrence?
It risks a new arms race, not only against Russia but also against China
![](https://www.economist.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=1424,quality=80,format=auto/media-assets/image/20221203_USD001.jpg)
THE LANKY Minuteman intercontinental ballistic missile and its squat naval cousin, Trident, stand sentinel near Omaha, outside the headquarters of America’s Strategic Command, which is in charge of America’s fearsome nuclear arsenal. Inside, STRATCOM’s personnel say they have been at “battle stations” since the start of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February, watching for any sign that Vladimir Putin might act on his threats to use nukes. For Admiral Charles Richard, the commander, the war in Ukraine marks a new era in which big powers use nuclear weapons to coerce rivals. But “this is just the warm-up,” he declared on November 3rd. “The big one is coming. And it isn’t going to be very long before we’re going to get tested.”
This article appeared in the United States section of the print edition under the headline “The conundrum of three-way nuclear deterrence”
United States December 3rd 2022
- How will America deal with three-way nuclear deterrence?
- America’s syringe exchanges might be killing drug users
- The Democrats muster an orderly leadership succession
- Women are revitalising funeral services in America
- A winemaker’s lawsuit against Napa County is about more than sour grapes
- Elon Musk is showing what a waste of time Twitter can be
More from United States
![](https://www.economist.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=1424,quality=80,format=auto/content-assets/images/20240914_USP508.jpg)
Kamala Harris makes Donald Trump look out of his depth
The presidential debate was a success for the vice-president
![](https://www.economist.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=1424,quality=80,format=auto/content-assets/images/20240914_USP506.jpg)
Astrologers are predicting the result of America’s election
Spreading their forecasts through social media can be lucrative—and divisive
![](https://www.economist.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=1424,quality=80,format=auto/content-assets/images/20240907_USP510.jpg)
How Boston became the safest big city in America
Murder is declining across the country, but Boston has led the way
Checks and Balance newsletter: The enduring game of political ads in America
Lessons from Pennsylvania
Why Kamala Harris has the advantage in debating Donald Trump
She’s better at it
Where is Kamala Harris’s convention bounce?
And what its absence means for election forecasting