Intelligent Design Quotes
Quotes tagged as "intelligent-design"
Showing 1-30 of 85
![Douglas Adams](https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/authors/1616277702i/4._UX200_CR0,15,200,200_.jpg)
“This is rather as if you imagine a puddle waking up one morning and thinking, 'This is an interesting world I find myself in — an interesting hole I find myself in — fits me rather neatly, doesn't it? In fact it fits me staggeringly well, must have been made to have me in it!' This is such a powerful idea that as the sun rises in the sky and the air heats up and as, gradually, the puddle gets smaller and smaller, frantically hanging on to the notion that everything's going to be alright, because this world was meant to have him in it, was built to have him in it; so the moment he disappears catches him rather by surprise. I think this may be something we need to be on the watch out for.”
― The Salmon of Doubt: Hitchhiking the Galaxy One Last Time
― The Salmon of Doubt: Hitchhiking the Galaxy One Last Time
![Neil deGrasse Tyson](https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/authors/1662154804i/12855._UX200_CR0,50,200,200_.jpg)
“People cited violation of the First Amendment when a New Jersey schoolteacher asserted that evolution and the Big Bang are not scientific and that Noah's ark carried dinosaurs. This case is not about the need to separate church and state; it's about the need to separate ignorant, scientifically illiterate people from the ranks of teachers.”
―
―
![Isaac Newton](https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/authors/1221013125i/135106._UX200_CR0,37,200,200_.jpg)
“Gravity explains the motions of the planets, but it cannot explain who sets the planets in motion.”
―
―
![Isaac Newton](https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/authors/1221013125i/135106._UX200_CR0,37,200,200_.jpg)
“This most beautiful system of the sun, planets and comets, could only proceed from the counsel and dominion of an intelligent and powerful Being...
This Being governs all things, not as the soul of the world, but as Lord over all; and on account of his dominion he is wont, to be called Lord God παντοκρατωρ or Universal Ruler.”
― The Principia : Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy
This Being governs all things, not as the soul of the world, but as Lord over all; and on account of his dominion he is wont, to be called Lord God παντοκρατωρ or Universal Ruler.”
― The Principia : Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy
![Bill Gates](https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/authors/1716309216i/23470._UX200_CR0,0,200,200_.jpg)
“DNA is like a computer program but far, far more advanced than any software ever created.”
― The Road Ahead
― The Road Ahead
![Michael Crichton](https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/authors/1359042651i/5194._UX200_CR0,16,200,200_.jpg)
“I want to pause here and talk about this notion of consensus, and the rise of what has been called consensus science. I regard consensus science as an extremely pernicious development that ought to be stopped cold in its tracks. Historically, the claim of consensus has been the first refuge of scoundrels; it is a way to avoid debate by claiming that the matter is already settled. Whenever you hear the consensus of scientists agrees on something or other, reach for your wallet, because you're being had.
Let's be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus. Consensus is the business of politics. Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world. In science consensus is irrelevant. What is relevant is reproducible results. The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus.
There is no such thing as consensus science. If it's consensus, it isn't science. If it's science, it isn't consensus. Period.”
―
Let's be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus. Consensus is the business of politics. Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world. In science consensus is irrelevant. What is relevant is reproducible results. The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus.
There is no such thing as consensus science. If it's consensus, it isn't science. If it's science, it isn't consensus. Period.”
―
![Sheri S. Tepper](https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/authors/1333062700i/20560._UX200_CR0,32,200,200_.jpg)
“The scripture worshippers put the writings ahead of God. Instead of interpreting God's actions in nature, for example, they interpret nature in the light of the Scripture. Nature says the rock is billions of years old, but the book says different, so even though men wrote the book, and God made the rock and God gave us minds that have found ways to tell how old it is, we still choose to believe the Scripture.”
― The Fresco
― The Fresco
![Devon Sampson](https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/authors/1229035120i/2743869.jpg)
“If god meant for people to talk into cellphones, he would've put our mouths on the side of our heads.”
―
―
![Paul C.W. Davies](https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/authors/1316082763i/1876666._UX200_CR0,35,200,200_.jpg)
“Scientists are slowly waking up to an inconvenient truth - the universe looks suspiciously like a fix. The issue concerns the very laws of nature themselves. For 40 years, physicists and cosmologists have been quietly collecting examples of all too convenient "coincidences" and special features in the underlying laws of the universe that seem to be necessary in order for life, and hence conscious beings, to exist. Change any one of them and the consequences would be lethal. Fred Hoyle, the distinguished cosmologist, once said it was as if "a super-intellect has monkeyed with physics".
To see the problem, imagine playing God with the cosmos. Before you is a designer machine that lets you tinker with the basics of physics. Twiddle this knob and you make all electrons a bit lighter, twiddle that one and you make gravity a bit stronger, and so on. It happens that you need to set thirtysomething knobs to fully describe the world about us. The crucial point is that some of those metaphorical knobs must be tuned very precisely, or the universe would be sterile.
Example: neutrons are just a tad heavier than protons. If it were the other way around, atoms couldn't exist, because all the protons in the universe would have decayed into neutrons shortly after the big bang. No protons, then no atomic nucleuses and no atoms. No atoms, no chemistry, no life. Like Baby Bear's porridge in the story of Goldilocks, the universe seems to be just right for life.”
―
To see the problem, imagine playing God with the cosmos. Before you is a designer machine that lets you tinker with the basics of physics. Twiddle this knob and you make all electrons a bit lighter, twiddle that one and you make gravity a bit stronger, and so on. It happens that you need to set thirtysomething knobs to fully describe the world about us. The crucial point is that some of those metaphorical knobs must be tuned very precisely, or the universe would be sterile.
Example: neutrons are just a tad heavier than protons. If it were the other way around, atoms couldn't exist, because all the protons in the universe would have decayed into neutrons shortly after the big bang. No protons, then no atomic nucleuses and no atoms. No atoms, no chemistry, no life. Like Baby Bear's porridge in the story of Goldilocks, the universe seems to be just right for life.”
―
![Michael Denton](https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/authors/1452861573i/341701._UY200_CR29,0,200,200_.jpg)
“The complexity of the simplest known type of cell is so great that it is impossible to accept that such an object could have been thrown together suddenly by some kind of freakish, vastly improbable, event. Such an occurrence would be indistinguishable from a miracle.”
― Evolution: A Theory in Crisis
― Evolution: A Theory in Crisis
![Michael J. Behe](https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/authors/1283241835i/27523._UY200_CR29,0,200,200_.jpg)
“In the abstract, it might be tempting to imagine that irreducible complexity simply requires multiple simultaneous mutations - that evolution might be far chancier than we thought, but still possible. Such an appeal to brute luck can never be refuted... Luck is metaphysical speculation; scientific explanations invoke causes.”
― Darwin's Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution
― Darwin's Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution
![Robert J. Sawyer](https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/authors/1543370297i/25883._UX200_CR0,50,200,200_.jpg)
“There is no indisputable proof for the big bang," said Hollus. "And there is none for evolution. And yet you accept those. Why hold the question of whether there is a creator to a higher standard?”
― Calculating God
― Calculating God
![Voltaire](https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/authors/1393683411i/5754446._UX200_CR0,12,200,200_.jpg)
“We are intelligent beings: intelligent beings cannot have been formed by a crude, blind, insensible being: there is certainly some difference between the ideas of Newton and the dung of a mule. Newton's intelligence, therefore, came from another intelligence”
―
―
![Michael Crichton](https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/authors/1359042651i/5194._UX200_CR0,16,200,200_.jpg)
“I would remind you to notice where the claim of consensus is invoked. Consensus is invoked only in situations where the science is not solid enough. Nobody says the consensus of scientists agrees that E=mc2. Nobody says the consensus is that the sun is 93 million miles away. It would never occur to anyone to speak that way.”
―
―
![Michael J. Behe](https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/authors/1283241835i/27523._UY200_CR29,0,200,200_.jpg)
“The conclusion of intelligent design flows naturally from the data itself—not from sacred books or sectarian beliefs. Inferring that biochemical systems were designed by an intelligent agent is a humdrum process that requires no new principles of logic or science. It comes simply from the hard work that biochemistry has done over the past forty years, combined with consideration of the way in which we reach conclusions of design every day.”
― Darwin's Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution
― Darwin's Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution
![William A. Dembski](https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/authors/1294248849i/101108._UY200_CR49,0,200,200_.jpg)
“The fundamental claim of intelligent design is straightforward and easily intelligible: namely, there are natural systems that cannot be adequately explained in terms of undirected natural forces and that exhibit features which in any other circumstance we would attribute to intelligence.”
― The Design Revolution: Answering the Toughest Questions About Intelligent Design
― The Design Revolution: Answering the Toughest Questions About Intelligent Design
![Robert J. Sawyer](https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/authors/1543370297i/25883._UX200_CR0,50,200,200_.jpg)
“It is either coincidence piled on top of coincidence," said Hollus, "or it is deliberate design.”
― Calculating God
― Calculating God
![Mark Haddon](https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/authors/1337988298i/1050._UX200_CR0,50,200,200_.jpg)
“people believe in God because the world is very complicated and they think it is very unlikely that anything as complicated as a flying squirrel or the human eye or a brain could happen by chance.”
― The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time
― The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time
![Michael Shermer](https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/authors/1221964940i/47788._UX200_CR0,27,200,200_.jpg)
“...evolution is not a religious tenet, to which one swears allegiance or belief as a matter of faith.. It is a factual reality of the empirical world. Just as one would not say 'I believe in gravity," one should not proclaim 'I believe in evolution.”
―
―
![Michael J. Behe](https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/authors/1283241835i/27523._UY200_CR29,0,200,200_.jpg)
“The most essential prediction of Darwinism is that, given an astronomical number of chances, unintelligent processes can make seemingly-designed systems, ones of the complexity of those found in the cell. ID specifically denies this, predicting that in the absence of intelligent input no such systems would develop. So Darwinism and ID make clear, opposite predictions of what we should find when we examine genetic results from a stupendous number of organisms that are under relentless pressure from natural selection. The recent genetic results are a stringent test. The results: 1) Darwinism’s prediction is falsified; 2) Design’s prediction is confirmed.”
―
―
![Christopher Hitchens](https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/authors/1434046956i/3956._UY200_CR23,0,200,200_.jpg)
“You might think that, by now, people would have become accustomed to the idea of natural catastrophes. We live on a planet that is still cooling and which has fissures and faults in its crust; this much is accepted even by those who think that the globe is only six thousand years old, as well as by those who believe that the earth was "designed" to be this way. Even in such a case, it is to be expected that earthquakes will occur and that, if they occur under the seabed, tidal waves will occur also. Yet two sorts of error are still absolutely commonplace. The first of these is the idiotic belief that seismic events are somehow "timed" to express the will of God. Thus, reasoning back from the effect, people will seriously attempt to guess what sin or which profanity led to the verdict of the tectonic plates. The second error, common even among humanists, is to borrow the same fallacy for satirical purposes and to employ it to disprove a benign deity.”
―
―
![Jonathan Wells](https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/authors/1281923004i/52728._UX200_CR0,51,200,200_.jpg)
“The controversy between Darwinism and intelligent design has the characteristics of major scientific revolutions in the past. Darwinists are losing power because they treat with contempt the very people on whom they depend the most: American taxpayers. The outcome of this scientific revolution will be decided by young people who have the courage to question dogmatism and follow the evidence wherever it leads.”
― The Politically Incorrect Guide to Darwinism and Intelligent Design
― The Politically Incorrect Guide to Darwinism and Intelligent Design
![Jonathan Wells](https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/authors/1281923004i/52728._UX200_CR0,51,200,200_.jpg)
“Ewww... intelligent design people! They're just buck-toothed, Bible-pushing nincompoops with community-college degrees who're trying to sell a gussied-up creationism to a cretinous public! No need to address their concerns or respond to their arguments. They are Not Science. They are poopy-heads. There. I just saved you the trouble of reading 90 percent of the responses to the ID position... This is how losers act just before they lose: arrogant, self-satisfied, too important to be bothered with substantive refutation, and disdainful of their own faults... The only remaining question is whether Darwinism will exit gracefully, or whether it will go down biting, screaming, censoring, and denouncing to the bitter end.
— Tech Central Station contributor Douglas Kern, 2005”
― The Politically Incorrect Guide to Darwinism and Intelligent Design
— Tech Central Station contributor Douglas Kern, 2005”
― The Politically Incorrect Guide to Darwinism and Intelligent Design
![Michael J. Behe](https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/authors/1283241835i/27523._UY200_CR29,0,200,200_.jpg)
“Is the conclusion that the universe was designed - and that the design extends deeply into life - science, philosophy, religion, or what? In a sense it hardly matters. By far the most important question is not what category we place it in, but whether a conclusion is true. A true philosophical or religious conclusion is no less true than a true scientific one. Although universities might divide their faculty and courses into academic categories, reality is not obliged to respect such boundaries.”
― The Edge of Evolution: The Search for the Limits of Darwinism
― The Edge of Evolution: The Search for the Limits of Darwinism
![Robert J. Sawyer](https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/authors/1543370297i/25883._UX200_CR0,50,200,200_.jpg)
“No one disputes that seeming order can come out of the application of simple rules. But who wrote the rules?”
― Calculating God
― Calculating God
![Guillermo González](https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/authors/1391009792i/225936.jpg)
“There's no obvious reason to assume that the very same rare properties that allow for our existence would also provide the best overall setting to make discoveries about the world around us. We don't think this is merely coincidental. It cries out for another explanation, an explanation that... points to purpose and intelligent design in the cosmos.”
― The Privileged Planet: How Our Place in the Cosmos Is Designed for Discovery
― The Privileged Planet: How Our Place in the Cosmos Is Designed for Discovery
![William A. Dembski](https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/authors/1294248849i/101108._UY200_CR49,0,200,200_.jpg)
“Whenever explaining an event, we must choose from three competing modes of explanation. These are regularity, chance, and design... To attribute an event to design is to say that it cannot reasonably be referred to either regularity or chance.”
― The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance through Small Probabilities
― The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance through Small Probabilities
![Jonathan Wells](https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/authors/1281923004i/52728._UX200_CR0,51,200,200_.jpg)
“Teaching students the evidence for and against Darwinism is not the same as teaching intelligent design. The U.S. Congress has officially endorsed teaching students 'the full range of scientific views' about Darwinian evolution.”
― The Politically Incorrect Guide to Darwinism and Intelligent Design
― The Politically Incorrect Guide to Darwinism and Intelligent Design
![Jonathan Wells](https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/authors/1281923004i/52728._UX200_CR0,51,200,200_.jpg)
“If Darwinists are opposed to mentioning scientific problems with their view, you would think they would be even more opposed to mentioning intelligent design. Yet Darwinists have been discussing ID in public school science classes for years... Biology textbooks have been mentioning intelligent design since the late 1990s—but only to misrepresent and disparage it.”
― The Politically Incorrect Guide to Darwinism and Intelligent Design
― The Politically Incorrect Guide to Darwinism and Intelligent Design
All Quotes
|
My Quotes
|
Add A Quote
Browse By Tag
- Love Quotes 97k
- Life Quotes 75.5k
- Inspirational Quotes 72.5k
- Humor Quotes 43.5k
- Philosophy Quotes 29.5k
- Inspirational Quotes Quotes 27k
- God Quotes 26k
- Truth Quotes 23.5k
- Wisdom Quotes 23.5k
- Romance Quotes 23k
- Poetry Quotes 22k
- Death Quotes 20k
- Happiness Quotes 18.5k
- Life Lessons Quotes 18.5k
- Hope Quotes 18k
- Faith Quotes 18k
- Quotes Quotes 16.5k
- Inspiration Quotes 16.5k
- Spirituality Quotes 15k
- Religion Quotes 15k
- Motivational Quotes 15k
- Writing Quotes 14.5k
- Relationships Quotes 14.5k
- Life Quotes Quotes 14k
- Love Quotes Quotes 13.5k
- Success Quotes 13.5k
- Time Quotes 12.5k
- Motivation Quotes 12k
- Science Quotes 11.5k
- Knowledge Quotes 11k