Apatt's Reviews > Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?

Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? by Philip K. Dick
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
2457095
's review

it was amazing
bookshelves: favorites, sci-fi, pre-80s-sf

Probably my favorite Philip K. Dick book, Goodreads' favorite too by the look of it. As you are probably aware the classic sci-fi movie Blade Runner is based on Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?. Great as the movie is when I first saw it I was very disappointed as it bears very little resemblance to this book. The filmmakers jettisoned most of what makes this book so special and focused only on the android hunting aspect though at least it does explore the moral issues involved. The movie’s visuals are certainly stunning, and the world of Blade Runner is beautifully designed. However, it not the world of Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?

Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? is set in a dystopian Earth much dilapidated after “World War Terminus”, most of the populace have already emigrated to the colony on Mars. This is not a post-apocalyptic setting, however, as government, the police, and businesses are still functioning though everything seems to be quite shabby. Radioactive dust has killed off most of the animals and the dust is still everywhere, not to mention the masses of “kipple”, basically rubbish that seem to grow by itself.

This is the cover of my old copy of this book. Love it!

This coveting of animals is one very crucial aspect of the book not used in the film adaptation. Ownership of real animals (as opposed to electric ones) is a status symbol, much more so than fancy cars which nobody seems to be interested in. The protagonist Rick Deckard is a bounty hunter for the San Francisco Police Department whose job is to hunt down and exterminate androids that escaped their life of servitude on Mars to live among humans on Earth in the guise of humans. His dream is to own a large real animal, but at his salary, he has to settle for the eponymous electric sheep.

The questionable morality of hunting down androids is nicely explored here. They are machines but they are also living, thinking beings, they have souls, or in a more secular term, sentience. Human life on Earth is generally miserable but they do have some interesting ways of alleviating their mood. The most direct way is by the “Penfield mood organ” with a dial for adjusting moods to numerous settings, then there is the “empathy box” that let you live the life of a Messiah while you are plugged in; entertainment on TV is basically just one show “Buster Friendly and his Friendly Friends” somehow broadcasting live 24/7.

This is one of the most well written Philip K. Dick books, Dick’s writing style is often criticised as poor or clunky, and his dialogue is often said to be stilted. I think his critics are missing the charms of his minimalist prose style which is an ideal vehicle for the bizarre stories he had to tell. His admittedly stilted dialogue seems to be very fitting for the universe his often eccentric characters occupy. Also, now and then he suddenly slips in the odd poignant passages like “You will be required to do wrong no matter where you go. It is the basic condition of life, to be required to violate your own identity. At some time, every creature which lives must do so. It is the ultimate shadow, the defeat of creation; this is the curse at work, the curse that feeds on all life. Everywhere in the universe.”. He was quite capable of writing elegant prose when it suited him. However, the stories and the ideas were more important to him.

A cyberpunk-ish cover

Some of the dialogue is also oddly hilarious:
“I can't stand TV before breakfast.”
“Dial 888,” Rick said as the set warmed. “The desire to watch TV, no matter what's on it.”
“I don't feel like dialing anything at all now,” Iran said.
“Then dial 3,” he said.


Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? has some of Dick’s best characterization. The characters are more vivid than most of his other books. Deckard and the “chickenhead” (brain damaged) J.R. Isidore are particularly believable and sympathetic. The androids are generally rather callous but quite pitiful all the same. There are also moments where reality seems to wobble wonderfully in the patented PKD style but this time without the aid of any hallucinogen.

I can not praise this book enough, it really is one of the all-time greats. It is a pity that Hollywood is now planning to make Blade Runner 2 instead of making - for the first time - a faithful adaptation of Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?.

Note: Interestingly Dick foresaw an android model called "Nexus 6", but I bet he did not imagine they would look like this.


Graphic novel cover
116 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

November 23, 2014 – Started Reading
November 23, 2014 – Shelved
November 26, 2014 – Shelved as: favorites
November 26, 2014 – Shelved as: pre-80s-sf
November 26, 2014 – Shelved as: sci-fi
November 26, 2014 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-32 of 32 (32 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Joe (new) - rated it 3 stars

Joe Terrific review, Apatt. I couldn't believe this one wasn't on my reading list yet. I've never read any of Dick's work and have been tiptoeing around his bibliography, hoping to start with one that doesn't strike me so stilted or poor that I give up on him. This sounds like a safe place to start.


message 2: by Apatt (last edited Nov 27, 2014 05:08AM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Apatt Joe wrote: "Terrific review, Apatt. I couldn't believe this one wasn't on my reading list yet. I've never read any of Dick's work and have been tiptoeing around his bibliography, hoping to start with one that ..."

Thanks so much Joe. When I want to get an idea of the most popular books for any specific author I always go to that author's profile page on Goodreads. Their books are ranked by the number of times added by users to their shelves. I also look at the average rating for each book, anything above 4 is generally highly rated. Occasionally I disagree with the majority but most of the time I find the rating to be fairly reliable.

"Do Android" is quite representative of PKD's work, if you don't like it I imagine you are not likely to like his other books.


message 3: by Michael (new)

Michael Good one! Hits on the good points and great quotes too. I think I like the purity of "Three Stigmata" best (though I still haven't read Ubik, which you reviewed so nicely). Hope you succeed in getting more people to read him.

I probably said it before that PKD used speed to rush his writing but hated hallucinogens (according to the biography I Am Alive and You Are Dead: A Journey into the Mind of Philip K. Dick).


Apatt Michael wrote: "Good one! Hits on the good points and great quotes too. I think I like the purity of "Three Stigmata" best (though I still haven't read Ubik, which you reviewed so nicely). Hope you succeed in g..."

Thanks Michael, that biography looks fascinating. I've heard Valis is sort of autobiographical too but I've not managed to finish that one yet!


spikeINflorida Great review Apatt. I, like Joe's comment, skirted around PKD's books for years. Big mistake. Androids/Sheep was such an awesome read! The images are still in my head. I've got Ubik up next.


Apatt spikeINflorida wrote: "Great review Apatt. I, like Joe's comment, skirted around PKD's books for years. Big mistake. Androids/Sheep was such an awesome read! The images are still in my head. I've got Ubik up next."

Thank you Spike! I'm making a PKD reading list so I hope to become some kind of PKD expert by next year! :D
I think you will love Ubik, it's great that most of his books are kinda short!


spikeINflorida Me too! A friend recommended "Clans of The Alphane Moon" for a similar vibe. Another friend gushed about "Flow My Tears The Police Man Said". So many books...so little time *sigh*


Apatt spikeINflorida wrote: "Me too! A friend recommended "Clans of The Alphane Moon" for a similar vibe. Another friend gushed about "Flow My Tears The Police Man Said". So many books...so little time *sigh*"

I gotta add Clans of The Alphane Moon, already read Flow my Tears, excellent!


message 9: by Jokoloyo (last edited Nov 15, 2015 02:51AM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Jokoloyo LOL! Your note regarding Nexus 6 Android is hilarious! So true. I want to make a comment about Nexus 6 too, but you got it first.

I mentioned your note on my own review. If you have concern, please let me know and I will edit it as soon as possible.


Matthias Very well-worded praise for a book worthy of it Apatt! And funny as well, loved that link at the end :-D


Love of Hopeless Causes Hence why Google was sued over the Nexus name. Here's a link to an audible adaption that is very enjoyable and demonstrates what a movie adaption might sound like. https://youtu.be/HhNSR0WaYzc


Apatt Jay wrote: "Hence why Google was sued over the Nexus name. Here's a link to an audible adaption that is very enjoyable and demonstrates what a movie adaption might sound like. https://youtu.be/HhNSR0WaYzc"

Thanks for the link, Jay!


7jane The movie and the book are definitely different, but I love both in the difference-ness. I even got some spiritual comfort from the reading. And the film soundtrack is great (I have two - usual and the expanded one) :) <3


Apatt 7jane wrote: "The movie and the book are definitely different, but I love both in the difference-ness. I even got some spiritual comfort from the reading. And the film soundtrack is great (I have two - usual and..."

They are like twins separated at birth maybe ;)


7jane Apatt wrote: "7jane wrote: "The movie and the book are definitely different, but I love both in the difference-ness. I even got some spiritual comfort from the reading. And the film soundtrack is great (I have t..."

Yeah, things in common but each has its own stuff also.


Love of Hopeless Causes Deckard is human in, "Androids," and replicant in, "Blade Runner." Also the replicants as characters are shallow in, "Androids," and deep in, "Bladerunner," even Rachel Rosen. Same with the cops, Gaff and Holden are barely mentioned in the book, Whereas Bryant was amazing in the film, and the Russian and Phil Resh get dropped from the movie. J.R.Isidore is a genius on film and a chickenhead in the book!
Harrison Ford gains a loving characteristic in the film, but Deckard loses characteristics in the book: the need for animals and making the distinction between human and near-human.
If you like Vangelis, try Ennio Morricone of, "The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly," fame on Pandora.


message 17: by Cecily (new)

Cecily An Apattian medley of erudition and quirkiness.

My problem is that I know the book is very different from the film, but I love the film. In a perverse way, that makes me wary of the book (the other way round is quite common for me).


message 18: by Kevin (new)

Kevin Ansbro A most excellent review Apatt, much of which would have passed over my head were I not now familiar with Dick's idiosyncratic style.


Apatt Kevin wrote: "A most excellent review Apatt, much of which would have passed over my head were I not now familiar with Dick's idiosyncratic style."

Thanks Kevin. It all started when I had spotted Dick while in the UK ;)
Look at Cecily being pervy!


message 20: by Kevin (new)

Kevin Ansbro Apatt wrote: "Kevin wrote: "A most excellent review Apatt, much of which would have passed over my head were I not now familiar with Dick's idiosyncratic style."

Thanks Kevin. It all started when I had spotted ..."


...all this talk of pervs and Dicks. What is Goodreads coming to?


Apatt Kevin wrote: "Apatt wrote: "Kevin wrote: "A most excellent review Apatt, much of which would have passed over my head were I not now familiar with Dick's idiosyncratic style."

Thanks Kevin. It all started when ..."


More to the point, where is it coming from, and where is it going to?


Andrew Ten broek Mercerism and mood pills all the way! A pity they left that out of the movie completely indeed. Though I still think Blade Runner is one of the best sci-fi movies ever to be produced. Certainly of the ones based on novels. Have you read The Man In The High Castle too, which Amazon has turned into a series now?


message 23: by Apatt (last edited Aug 30, 2016 01:59AM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Apatt Andrew wrote: "Mercerism and mood pills all the way! A pity they left that out of the movie completely indeed. Though I still think Blade Runner is one of the best sci-fi movies ever to be produced. Certainly of ..."

Unfortunately, The Man In The High Castle didn't quite do it for me, though it is one of his most celebrated works. I prefer Ubik, The Three Stigmata of Palmer Eldritch, Flow My Tears, the Policeman Said and trippy stuff like that. I didn't like Valis , though, much of it was unreadable.


Andrew Ten broek Ah ok, I still need to read your favorites some time and Valis as well. The Man In The High Castle isn't so much trippy as it is more of an alternate reality or parallel universe kind of tale indeed. Since I used to watch the tv show "Sliders", I liked the novel.


Derek Apatt wrote: "Unfortunately, The Man In The High Castle didn't quite do it for me..."

I just started it this week. I'm enjoying it so far: much more than the trippy stuff.


Apatt Derek wrote: "Apatt wrote: "Unfortunately, The Man In The High Castle didn't quite do it for me..."

I just started it this week. I'm enjoying it so far: much more than the trippy stuff."


It is one of his most popular ones, I just didn't like it much.


message 27: by Cecily (new)

Cecily Apatt wrote: "Thanks Kevin. It all started when I had spotted Dick while in the UK ;)"

Yeah, we're infamous for our cuisine. School dinners stuff, especially.


Effie (she-her) "The filmmakers jettisoned most of what makes this book so special and focused only on the android hunting aspect though at least it does explore the moral issues involved. "

I couldn't agree more!! Everyone says what an amazing movie the Blade Runner is, but I was so disappointed. They missed the wholepoint of the book and just made anaction movie.


Apatt Effie wrote: ""The filmmakers jettisoned most of what makes this book so special and focused only on the android hunting aspect though at least it does explore the moral issues involved. "

I couldn't agree more..."


Thank you, Effie. The movie's visuals, acting and atmosphere are great, but the plot bears very little relation to this book.


Derek Cecily wrote: "Apatt wrote: "Thanks Kevin. It all started when I had spotted Dick while in the UK ;)"

Yeah, we're infamous for our cuisine. School dinners stuff, especially."


You can tell which vegetables I didn't encounter until after we moved to Canada. They're the ones I'll eat...

Effie wrote: "Everyone says what an amazing movie the Blade Runner is, but I was so disappointed. They missed the whole point of the book and just made an action movie"

I don't think they missed the whole point, but they certainly didn't make a movie of Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?, but that's OK, because they called it something else. I believe I read that Alan Nourse even made a little money off their use of the name, even though you can't copyright a title.


message 31: by Ivana (new)

Ivana Books Are Magic I adore this one.


Apatt Ivana wrote: "I adore this one."

Me too, Ivana! PKD's best IMO.


back to top