Ben Winch's Reviews > The High Window

The High Window by Raymond Chandler
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
5647943
's review

really liked it
bookshelves: american, pulp, anglo

For those of you who haven’t yet read Chandler, I’m here to tell you, the man can write. You read him for the words, for the atmosphere, not for plot. The High Window itself has nothing special to recommend it; it’s another instalment, one of many roughly equally as good. (First time around The Lady in the Lake was my favourite; my wife, who read them all this year, liked The Long Goodbye.) But it’s the one I re-read last week (cos it’s tight, short, cuts to the punch) so it’ll do.

The Belfont Building was eight stories of nothing in particular that had got itself pinched off between a large green and chromium cut-rate suit emporium and a three-storey and basement garage that made a noise like lion cages at feeding time. The small dark narrow lobby was as dirty as a chicken yard. The building directory had a lot of vacant space on it. [...] There were two open-grille elevators but only one seemed to be running and that not busy. An old man sat inside it slack-jawed and watery-eyed on a piece of folded burlap on top of a wooden stool. He looked as if he had been sitting there since the Civil War and had come out of that badly.


Thing is, Chandler (it seems) could churn out this stuff in his sleep. Every building’s a Belfont Building, or as vivid; every elevator operator a Civil War veteran, or as colourful; every character – from the “long-limbed languorous” showgirl (“From thirty feet away she looked like a lot of class. From ten feet away she looked like something made up to be seen from thirty feet away.”) to the “hard boy” (“A great long gallows of a man with a ravaged face and a haggard frozen right eye that had a clotted iris and the steady look of blindness.”) – as realised as can be for as long as their in sight. And here’s the clincher: “in sight”? So who’s watching? Probably the greatest near-non-entity hero/anti-hero short of Kafka’s K., P.I. Philip Marlowe, who puts the “eye” in private eye, whose gaze, thanks to British poet turned Black Mask pulp-magazine workhorse Raymond Chandler’s near-impossible deftness, is as sharp and resplendent as they come. How does he do it? Give this hard-bitten hard-boiled hard-drinking tough guy such eloquence? It’s something to see. And somehow, though (or because) we know virtually nothing about him, this fragile word-edifice that is Marlowe convinces us utterly. We love the guy. Who cares if the plots barely add up, or if by the time they do we’re past caring? When he talks tender to the femmes fatales I defy you (women especially – Chandler, against the odds, and despite low-grade ingrained chauvinism indicative of his times, is a ladies’ man) not to feel a shiver. It’s limited in range; but for the slightest tweaks it never changes, but for what it is it’s of a very high order, beyond Hammett (Chandler’s inventor), beyond genre, unique (despite the imitators) as few so-called genre writers ever have been. When at the end of The High Window he drives the innocent young woman victim to her parents’ home in Wichita and says goodbye, I almost teared up at his laconic summation:

I had a funny feeling as I saw the house disappear, as though I had written a poem and it was very good and I had lost it and would never remember it again.


Sure, maybe that’s all Chandler is, a poem he’s forgotten. But what a poem! It could break your heart.
27 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read The High Window.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

Started Reading
2015 – Finished Reading
August 21, 2015 – Shelved

Comments Showing 1-14 of 14 (14 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Fionnuala (new)

Fionnuala Loved this Chandler homage, Ben.


message 2: by Ben (new) - rated it 4 stars

Ben Winch Ta Fi, I love me some Chandler.


message 3: by Michael (new)

Michael So wonderful! Can't wait to see how Tabucchi and Chandler will come together in your new COQ Work. By the way, Chandler has been translated into German by Hans Wollschläger, the very same man who also translated Joyce's ULYSSES.


message 4: by Ben (new) - rated it 4 stars

Ben Winch Danke Michael! Sounds like Herr Wollschläger is a man of taste. And don't worry, there's a very Chandleresque piece in COQworks #2, or at least it starts out as such. Also trying to work Tabucchi in there too. But one of the strangest hybrids is the Russell Hoban (Kleinzeit) does hardcore porn trip-to-hell story I was working on this week. I've been reading Bataille's Blue of Noon to see how that affects it, plus plenty of comics throughout all the stories, Sin City and Lone Wolf and Cub being the latest. It's an interesting stew!


message 5: by Fionnuala (new)

Fionnuala Ben wrote: "...But one of the strangest hybrids is the Russell Hoban (Kleinzeit) does hardcore porn trip-to-hell story.."

I'm beginning to fear for the angle of COQ#2's hypotenuse,


message 6: by Ben (new) - rated it 4 stars

Ben Winch Just a simple flash from A to B.


message 7: by Liam (new)

Liam Just out of curiosity, have you ever read any of Arthur Upfield's books?


message 8: by Ben (new) - rated it 4 stars

Ben Winch Nope, never have. Will look into them.


message 10: by Liam (new)

Liam Ben wrote: "Nope, never have. Will look into them."


That's actually quite interesting- Arthur W. Upfield is, as far as I can tell anyway, the best known Australian mystery writer worldwide... I suspect you might really enjoy his work; I liked it enough that I've read all his books at least 2 or 3 times, and what's more, both my parents have also read & enjoyed them. I don't know what this says about my family, but 23 years ago when my parents were getting divorced (and I was simultaneously moving out of their house for the final time) one of the most contentious issues was how to divide up various mystery series. Because all three of us had routinely kept our eyes open for, and purchased, any books we didn't have by several authors (and having forgotten who paid for what), figuring out who got to keep which books was an enormous pain in the ass. Upfield's and Robert van Gulik's books were the most contentious, as they were significantly more difficult to find than those by Agatha Christie, Rex Stout or Robert B. Parker...

Incidentally, I would highly recommend van Gulik's work as well; his books are fairly unique within the mystery genre (van Gulik was himself quite unique, not to mention eccentric & extremely brilliant), and are something of an acquired taste, but I actually like his books even more than Upfield's...


message 11: by Ben (new) - rated it 4 stars

Ben Winch Edenfoil, good to have you back.

Liam, yeah I realised when I looked up Upfield that I have come across his name before, but never read anything by him. Also he's barely known at this point in history in Australia, at least not in the mainstream, though maybe among mystery enthusiasts...?

Incidentally a mystery enthusiast is something I'm not. I like a lot of crime post-Hammett (especially Himes, Thompson, Goodis) and I love Poe, but not for his mystery stories. I've tried some classics - Father Brown and Sherlock Holmes and maybe some others - but I'm not really into them so far. I guess I'm more about texture than twists. That said, I'll keep an eye out for both van Gulik and Upfield, since my dad is big into mystery writers and it saddens me to see him reading that off-the-rack potboiler crap that tops the charts these days just cos he can get it cheap at the charity shop. So between us I'm sure we'll get some use out of these guys.

Meantime, send me your address so's I can send you a copy of Vanishing Points, would ya? And I'll get back to you about that Argentine Artaud-fan rocker soon.


message 12: by Liam (last edited Aug 23, 2015 01:23PM) (new)

Liam Hey Ben, sorry- I fully intended to finally answer your message last night, but got sidetracked listening to your music & fell asleep in my chair (for the third night in a row; don't know what's up with that...), I'll get to it today, I promise.

The main reason I recommended Upfield's work is that, despite the apparent disdain which "serious" Australian writers & critics had for him at the time he was writing, his books are, certainly by modern standards, quite literary & well-written. I don't know how true to life his characterisation is of the various Australian milieux & their inhabitants, having never been down under (according to my father, who in early 1969 spent his extension leave from Viet Nam driving across Australia in a rented Austin-Healey Sprite, Upfield's descriptions do ring true), but he clearly had a great love for the "Outback" particularly; another aspect of his work which I found fascinating is the social commentary aspect, with reference to race and culture especially...


message 13: by Liam (last edited Aug 23, 2015 01:40PM) (new)

Liam Ben wrote: "Edenfoil, good to have you back.

Liam, yeah I realised when I looked up Upfield that I have come across his name before, but never read anything by him. Also he's barely known at this point in his..."



I remember liking Hammett's 'Maltese Falcon' as a kid; likewise some of Chester Himes' books, although like Upfield & van Gulik, his books were mostly out of print and difficult to find. I haven't read anything by either Hammett or Himes in at least 25 years. I really ought to see if I can find a copy of 'A Rage In Harlem' so I can read it again, as I don't think I own a copy. Maybe I'll try to borrow it from my old man... Apropos of that thought, the line about your father cracks me up, 'cause I'm guilty of that as well- I tend to use the sort of "bestseller" type detective or spy genre fiction as a sort of palate cleanser whenever I get burned out on history & biography & such. The charity re-sale shops are where I usually buy that sort of book as I hate spending any more money on them than absolutely necessary, hahaha...


message 14: by Ben (last edited Aug 24, 2015 07:43PM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Ben Winch My favourite Himes is Cotton Comes to Harlem but they're all great, even his early mainstream prison novel Cast the First Stone. Hammett, like any great inventor, is patchy, but every novel he wrote is so different from the last (as compared to, say, Chandler). Maltese Falcon is probably the best, but The Glass Key is good and I loved the novella Nightmare Town. He's a brilliant writer on a technical level if nothing else - the way he solves certain problems of how to drive narrative is just about unequalled. But I guess he burned himself out early on. It's easy to see how: he was a perfectionist. Oh, and re my dad and crime fiction, what worries me is for him it doesn't seem just a palate cleanser any more - it's his whole reading existence! Well, not quite. But he's come a long way from his Pynchon/Barth/Marquez days, that's for sure.

As to what the Australian critics thought of Upfield, I imagine at that time in history they were probably outright snobs, trying to live up to some received notion of what literature was lifted secondhand from the British. But I don't know. Let's just say it's hard to imagine many of them being worldly...


back to top