Olivia's Reviews > Never Let Me Go
Never Let Me Go
by
by
I think this book would have had a much bigger impact if I hadn’t watched the film first. The dynamic between the characters was very interesting and Ishiguro has a lot of insight into human nature. I enjoyed the prose and thought the book well written but the plot lacking.
Never Let Me Go has a fascinating premise but Ishiguro doesn’t explore the world, consequences and ethics enough (or at all) instead he focuses on a simple plot that didn’t pull me in.
However, I do think I would have enjoyed it more going in blind.
Never Let Me Go has a fascinating premise but Ishiguro doesn’t explore the world, consequences and ethics enough (or at all) instead he focuses on a simple plot that didn’t pull me in.
However, I do think I would have enjoyed it more going in blind.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
Never Let Me Go.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Comments Showing 1-3 of 3 (3 new)
date
newest »
message 1:
by
Philip
(new)
-
rated it 3 stars
Dec 21, 2017 03:29PM
How did you feel about the movie?
reply
|
flag
I watched it when it originally came out and I remember going in with entirely wrong expectations and being thrown once I realised its dystopian and depressing! It’s very faithful to the book and hence doesn’t really explore the ethics and consequences of the premise either. Which I think would be the really interesting part.
I totally agree with you about the plot being a little basic! Loved the social role of the POV character, made for great gradual reveal of circumstances, did not love the simple plot.
I actually didn't mind that Ishiguro didn't explore the ethics and consequences, because (a) you're either okay with that system or you're not -- it didn't mirror real life circumstances enough for me to think it merited interrogating, and (b) I think it would have slipped into being annoyingly didactic.
I also think characters like Miss Lucy and Miss Emily and Madame also provided a nice little window into "society's" discussion so it wasn't altogether tabled.
I actually didn't mind that Ishiguro didn't explore the ethics and consequences, because (a) you're either okay with that system or you're not -- it didn't mirror real life circumstances enough for me to think it merited interrogating, and (b) I think it would have slipped into being annoyingly didactic.
I also think characters like Miss Lucy and Miss Emily and Madame also provided a nice little window into "society's" discussion so it wasn't altogether tabled.