Erik's Reviews > Royal Assassin
Royal Assassin (Farseer Trilogy, #2)
by
by
![1639329](https://images.gr-assets.com/users/1658888239p2/1639329.jpg)
Didn't finish this one.
In my original review of book one, I had three main criticisms: inorganic romance that felt forced and undeveloped, too much interiority that led to glacial pacing, and a corrupt and ineffectual monarchy that led to Fitz being best understood as a gestapo-in-grooming.
But I pushed on to this one until I encountered all three issues back-to-back-to-back. And that was all she wrote.
This is one of those books that simply fails for people who strongly skew non-conformist. It really only works if you buy into the sympathetic perspective the author pushes for Fitz. But I'm a non-conformist, and I don't. It's not enough to claim there's a romance. It's not enough to claim Fitz is largely virtuous. I need it shown and proven. I need to be able, with my own cognizance, to decide that Fitz is virtuous. But he isn't. He's a spineless lapdog of a corrupt monarchy.
In my original review of book one, I had three main criticisms: inorganic romance that felt forced and undeveloped, too much interiority that led to glacial pacing, and a corrupt and ineffectual monarchy that led to Fitz being best understood as a gestapo-in-grooming.
But I pushed on to this one until I encountered all three issues back-to-back-to-back. And that was all she wrote.
This is one of those books that simply fails for people who strongly skew non-conformist. It really only works if you buy into the sympathetic perspective the author pushes for Fitz. But I'm a non-conformist, and I don't. It's not enough to claim there's a romance. It's not enough to claim Fitz is largely virtuous. I need it shown and proven. I need to be able, with my own cognizance, to decide that Fitz is virtuous. But he isn't. He's a spineless lapdog of a corrupt monarchy.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
Royal Assassin.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Started Reading
July 29, 2021
– Shelved
July 29, 2021
– Shelved as:
bottom-shelf
July 29, 2021
– Shelved as:
scififantasy
July 29, 2021
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-4 of 4 (4 new)
date
newest »
![Down arrow](https://s.gr-assets.com/assets/down_arrow-1e1fa5642066c151f5e0136233fce98a.gif)
message 1:
by
Chels
(new)
-
rated it 1 star
May 23, 2022 04:31AM
![Chels S](https://images.gr-assets.com/users/1584285370p1/5354680.jpg)
reply
|
flag
![Erik](https://images.gr-assets.com/users/1658888239p1/1639329.jpg)
But there's a big moral difference between a Russian soldier and a Ukrainian soldier. Likewise, I found it a problem that Fitz' assassinations seem largely motivated by simply maintaining the power of the current monarchy. Which is corrupt and ineffective.
![Klemen](https://images.gr-assets.com/users/1544645542p1/47988986.jpg)
The pacing is quite egregious, bit I felt the confessional, day-to-day nature of it added to the intrigue and suspense in a way that made the book hard to put down for me.
I enjoyed the romance aspects of the book though and felt them earnest.