John Mauro's Reviews > Sea of Tranquility

Sea of Tranquility by Emily St. John Mandel
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
26741582
's review

it was ok

One of my most anticipated new releases of the year, Sea of Tranquility by Emily St. John Mandel, turned out to be a watered-down rewrite of Cloud Atlas. If I were David Mitchell, I don't know whether I'd feel flattered or just profoundly ripped off.

Sea of Tranquility has exactly the same narrative structure as Cloud Atlas, consisting of interconnected stories that occur across different timelines, starting in the past and spanning into the future. Like Cloud Atlas, the opening storyline centers on a seafaring scholar traveling to the New World, whose "street smarts" pale in comparison to his "book smarts." Like Cloud Atlas, the next storylines involve a composer, an author, and a projection into a sci-fi future. Like Cloud Atlas, each storyline is interrupted partway through to begin the next nested story, and then all the stories wrap up in the second half of the book. The main difference is that the nested stories in Sea of Tranquility are only four layers deep, rather than six layers deep in Cloud Atlas.

Emily St. John Mandel's writing is beautiful, as usual. However, she uses exactly the same writing style for all storylines covering three hundred years of history. The same 2020 writing style is applied to the historical account from 1912 and to the futuristic stories taking place in 2203 and 2401. She doesn't even attempt to alter her writing style to reflect these time differences. This is in sharp contrast to David Mitchell, who dramatically adjusted his writing style to reflect each different time period. This included making a projection of how he thought the English language would evolve in the near and far futures. Mitchell accomplished this task brilliantly, although it certainly made Cloud Atlas more difficult to read than Sea of Tranquility. In this way, the writing in Sea of Tranquility is simultaneously beautiful and lazy. I wish Emily St. John Mandel would have tried harder to capture the differences in writing style that one would expect over a span of 300 years.

Like David Mitchell, Emily St. John Mandel is attempting to build an interconnected universe of characters spanning across books. However, the execution is quite clunky in Sea of Tranquility. The 2020 timeline overlaps with her previous novel, The Glass Hotel, and unfortunately the characters in the 2020 timeline of Sea of Tranquility spend about half of their dialogue recapping key plot points from The Glass Hotel. Also, the interconnections among the nested stories of Sea of Tranquility are made using a rather unconvincing time travel plot device, in contrast to the more subtle connections that David Mitchell provides in Cloud Atlas.

I really wanted to love this book. I gave five stars to The Glass Hotel, which was brilliant in its subtle use of magical realism. Emily St. John Mandel's previous post-apocalyptic novel, Station Eleven, was also vastly superior to Sea of Tranquility. I preordered Sea of Tranquiltiy months in advance, in eager anticipation of its release date. This was such a letdown. I would have been far better off just rereading Cloud Atlas.
609 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Sea of Tranquility.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

November 27, 2021 – Shelved
November 27, 2021 – Shelved as: to-read
April 5, 2022 – Started Reading
April 5, 2022 –
page 86
33.2% "This book has very strong Cloud Atlas vibes."
April 5, 2022 –
page 128
49.42% "This book is very well written but it's uncomfortably similar to David Mitchell's "Cloud Atlas"..."
April 6, 2022 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-50 of 119 (119 new)


message 1: by Sotto (new)

Sotto Voce Helpful and thoughtful review there. Thanks.


John Mauro Sotto wrote: "Helpful and thoughtful review there. Thanks."

Thanks for your kind comment, Sotto! Hope all is well with you!


message 3: by Rosh (new) - added it

Rosh Excellent review, John!


John Mauro Thank you, Rosh! I appreciate your kind comment!


message 5: by Amina (new)

Amina John, sorry this wasn’t a fit. I’m reading Cloud Atlas now.


John Mauro Hope you enjoy Cloud Atlas, Amina!


message 7: by Colin (new)

Colin Baldwin When out expectations are high about a book, John! Know the feeling if they are not met, but plenty more good ones out there, eh? CB


John Mauro Yes indeed, Colin! Still lots of great books on my TBR shelf, so I will move on and explore more. Warm wishes.


Abyssdancer (Hanging in there!) Thank you for such an honest review … I’ve been looking forward to reading this book, but maybe I’ll put it off for a while … I like your commentary about the use of different writing styles for each time period …


message 10: by John (new) - rated it 2 stars

John Mauro Abyssdancer wrote: "Thank you for such an honest review … I’ve been looking forward to reading this book, but maybe I’ll put it off for a while … I like your commentary about the use of different writing styles for ea..."

Thanks a lot for your kind comment, Abyssdancer! One of the reasons I love Emily St. John Mandel's other books, in addition to her beautiful writing style, is the originality of the story. I felt like this was sorely missing here. I appreciate what she was trying to do, but it was just far too similar to Cloud Atlas and compared unfavorably to that previous novel. I hope you are enjoying your current read! All the best.


message 11: by NILTON (new)

NILTON TEIXEIRA Great honest review.
I’m still waiting for a copy from the library.


message 12: by John (new) - rated it 2 stars

John Mauro Thanks for your kind comment, Nilton! I was disappointed but this one but fortunately have moved on to another new release which I'm enjoying a lot more. Have a great weekend!


Fmcklp Good points, a disappointing piece of work by Mandel. Also, will she be forever writing about pandemics as a plot device? It was already tiresome before the actual pandemic and is getting thoroughly clichéd and lazy now.


message 14: by John (new) - rated it 2 stars

John Mauro Hi Fionn, thanks for your comment, and very good point about her use of pandemics as a plot device. I groaned internally several times at the persistent pandemic references. I also wish she would move on to other topics. Thanks again for your comment, Fionn.


message 15: by ✨ Anna ✨ (new) - added it

✨ Anna ✨ |  ReadAllNight Very constructive review, John! Maybe I'll just check out The Glass Hotel and Cloud Atlas for now.


message 16: by John (new) - rated it 2 stars

John Mauro Thanks, Anna! Yes, I'd definitely recommend those two books over this one. Happy reading!


Vincent Raimondi this is a really good review but very long!!! is there a tldr or wikipedia page??? i didnt read! please help me


message 18: by John (new) - rated it 2 stars

John Mauro Hi Vincent, if you are finding the review to be too long, then I'd recommend avoiding the book itself. But at least they're both a lot shorter than War and Peace. Hope all is well with you. Best wishes. 😁


message 19: by Sofia (new)

Sofia Great review! I wonder if this was supposed to be a tribute to Cloud Atlas or if it's just a rip-off. The similarities are shocking.


message 20: by John (new) - rated it 2 stars

John Mauro Sofia wrote: "Great review! I wonder if this was supposed to be a tribute to Cloud Atlas or if it's just a rip-off. The similarities are shocking."

Thank you, Sofia! Perhaps it was both a tribute and a rip-off. It certainly felt like more of the latter when I was reading it. One of the things I like about Emily St. John Mandel's books, in addition to her beautiful writing, is her originality. I thought this aspect was missing her, as the book was so derivative, unfortunately.


Julie Oh no. What is it with the Cloud Atlas rip-offs? Cloud Cuckoo Land was another that tried to be Cloud Atlas, and failed, because only Cloud Atlas can be Cloud Atlas. Harumph. I was so looking forward to this, but admit I had no idea what it was about...


Julie Also, great review. Thank you! I adored The Glass Hotel, as well.


message 23: by John (new) - rated it 2 stars

John Mauro Julie wrote: "Oh no. What is it with the Cloud Atlas rip-offs? Cloud Cuckoo Land was another that tried to be Cloud Atlas, and failed, because only Cloud Atlas can be Cloud Atlas. Harumph. I was so looking forwa..."

Oh no, I have Cloud Cuckoo Land sitting on my bookshelf, just waiting to be read, and I'm really excited about that one too. I hope it won't be another letdown!


message 24: by John (new) - rated it 2 stars

John Mauro Julie wrote: "Also, great review. Thank you! I adored The Glass Hotel, as well."

Thank you, Julie! I'm glad you liked the review. The Glass Hotel is still one of my favorites. :-)


message 25: by Melike (new) - added it

Melike Thank you for this thorough and thoughtful review. I will avoid this one for now.


message 26: by John (new) - rated it 2 stars

John Mauro Melike wrote: "Thank you for this thorough and thoughtful review. I will avoid this one for now."

Thanks for your kind comment about the review. Hope you have a great day, Melike! Best wishes.


Sarah Foulc I understand what you mean. I loved loved loved this book and I'm a big fan of Mandel and maybe I loved this book more for its themes and the beautiful, unique writing style of Mandel that is just very clear and lucid - but it did feel like a draft of something that could be much bigger and bolder and layered. I found the ending a bit rushed. I still loved it. But in comparison to her two previous novels, I definitely get what you mean.


message 28: by John (new) - rated it 2 stars

John Mauro Sarah wrote: "I understand what you mean. I loved loved loved this book and I'm a big fan of Mandel and maybe I loved this book more for its themes and the beautiful, unique writing style of Mandel that is just ..."

Thanks for your sharing your thoughtful comment, Sarah. I'm glad that you enjoyed this book despite its shortcomings compared to her previous work. I completely agree about the beautiful writing style. I had loved all of her previous books that I had read and was prepared to love this one as well, but it just fell short for me. Thanks again for your kind comment, and happy reading! Best wishes.


message 29: by Mary (new) - rated it 4 stars

Mary Terrific review. I enjoyed this novel but also recognized the structure that David Mitchell uses.


message 30: by John (new) - rated it 2 stars

John Mauro Mary wrote: "Terrific review. I enjoyed this novel but also recognized the structure that David Mitchell uses."

Thanks for your kind comment, Mary! I'm glad you enjoyed this book. Hope you have a great day!


message 31: by Sofia (new)

Sofia I have a soft spot for interconnected universes. There's something so special about seeing someone you know from another book, that a-ha moment when you make a connection and feel highly intelligent. But they have to be original!


message 32: by John (new) - rated it 2 stars

John Mauro Sofia wrote: "I have a soft spot for interconnected universes. There's something so special about seeing someone you know from another book, that a-ha moment when you make a connection and feel highly intelligen..."

Me too, but it also can't spoil the plot of the other books. I'm glad that I had already read The Glass Hotel before reading Sea of Tranquility. Otherwise, most of the key plot elements would have been spoiled. Thanks for your comment, Sofia!


message 33: by JoySheridan (new) - added it

JoySheridan I have not read Cloud Atlas and probably need to per comments. I loved Cloud Cuckoo Land.


message 34: by John (new) - rated it 2 stars

John Mauro JoySheridan wrote: "I have not read Cloud Atlas and probably need to per comments. I loved Cloud Cuckoo Land."

I hope to get to Cloud Cuckoo Land in the coming weeks. Thanks for your comment, Joy! Best wishes.


Dotty I agree with your review. I don’t recommend this book at all.


message 36: by John (new) - rated it 2 stars

John Mauro Thanks for your comment, Dotty! I'm glad we share the same opinion. Have a great day!


message 37: by Paul (new)

Paul Weiss Just curious. Would your rating have been more favourable if you HADN'T read CLOUD ATLAS?


message 38: by John (new) - rated it 2 stars

John Mauro Paul wrote: "Just curious. Would your rating have been more favourable if you HADN'T read CLOUD ATLAS?"

Hi Paul, great question! I can't answer that with certainty, since I can't unread Cloud Atlas. But if I had no knowledge of Cloud Atlas, I imagine that I would like Sea of Tranquility quite a bit more. Probably four stars in that case. If one doesn't already know about Cloud Atlas, I think Sea of Tranquility would seem quite original in its layered structure across disparate timeframes, with a common thread running through all of the layers. However, objectively speaking, the question of originality has to consider that Cloud Atlas was published first and was a massively popular and well-known book for David Mitchell. I hope that at least partially answers your question, Paul. Hope you have a great day!


Camille I find it funny that you call it a rip-off of Cloud Atlas and then just highlight the differences. I liked that there wasn't any difference in style between 20/21/23rd century, it felt like humans just stay the same no matter the time. If you look at letters from soldiers in WWI, they actually wrote just like you and me writing to loved ones. It's an interesting comparison though, not one I'd have thought even if I love David Mitchell. Sea of T felt a lot more like sci-fi, with careful time travel logic, whereas Cloud Atlas deals with the Soul


message 40: by John (new) - rated it 2 stars

John Mauro Camille wrote: "I find it funny that you call it a rip-off of Cloud Atlas and then just highlight the differences. I liked that there wasn't any difference in style between 20/21/23rd century, it felt like humans ..."

Hi Camille, I spend the entire first half of the review detailing the striking similarities between Sea of Tranquility and Cloud Atlas. The difference that I pointed out is that David Mitchell adjusts his writing style for different time periods, whereas Emily St. John Mandel uses exactly the same writing style over a 500-year spand of time. The latter case is simply not realistic. People in Shakespearean times spoke and wrote very differently from people today. Likewise, the language in 2401 will have evolved quite a bit from the language we use today. I think David Mitchell did an excellent job capturing these differences, whereas Emily St. John Mandel didn't even make an attempt.


Closet Rebel I am reading both Cloud Atlas and Sea of Tranquility right now. So far, Sea of Tranquility is way better than Cloud Atlas.

Sea of Tranquility is trending at 4 or 5 stars while Cloud at less is trending at 2 or 3 stars. Cloud Atlas is a slog and Sea of Tranquility is smooth like butter.

This is not surprising because Madel is the better writer and is able to coherently pull off a story about interconnections across time and space.

Don't give up on reading this book just because someone you follow did not like it because you will be missing out.


message 42: by John (new) - rated it 2 stars

John Mauro Closet Rebel wrote: "I am reading both Cloud Atlas and Sea of Tranquility right now. So far, Sea of Tranquility is way better than Cloud Atlas.

Sea of Tranquility is trending at 4 or 5 stars while Cloud at less is tr..."


Sea of Tranquility is certainly a much shorter, easier read compared to Cloud Atlas. But Cloud Atlas is highly original and Sea of Tranquility is copying its structure. I'm glad you are enjoying Sea of Tranquility and don't want to take away that enjoyment. (For me, a large part of the enjoyment comes from originality.) Thanks for sharing your opinion. Happy reading.


Vincent Raimondi @closet rebel no!!!!! cloud atlas the movie was so good


message 44: by John (new) - rated it 2 stars

John Mauro Vincent wrote: "@closet rebel no!!!!! cloud atlas the movie was so good"

Agreed! The Cloud Atlas movie was excellent.


message 45: by lem◍nade (new)

lem◍nade Too bad it disappointed you, I thought it sounded so clever and creative from the summary. I didn't read Cloud Atlas, though.
Great review! :)


message 46: by John (new) - rated it 2 stars

John Mauro Lem◍nade wrote: "Too bad it disappointed you, I thought it sounded so clever and creative from the summary. I didn't read Cloud Atlas, though.
Great review! :)"


Thanks for your kind comment, Lem◍nade! Fortunately I've found plenty of other great books this year, so overall 2022 has been an excellent reading year thus far. I hope you are enjoying your current read. Best wishes!


message 47: by lem◍nade (new)

lem◍nade Thanks! I hope your reading year stays great 😀


Trudie I had exactly the same thought re CloudAtlas ( which is one of my favourites) and then found your review, pleased I am not the only one to see this as a wan imitation


message 49: by John (new) - rated it 2 stars

John Mauro Thanks for your comment, Trudie! I'm glad you also had the same opinion. Hope your next read will be better! Best wishes.


Krista I read and loved both Cloud Atlas and Sea of Tranquility. While I acknowledge that the two books share certain structural and narrative elements, the differences are huge and include, characters, settings, themes, vision of the future, writing style, preoccupations, narrative voice and much more. Writers learn from and bounce off each other, it doesn't mean they are ripping each other off. Tolkien and CS Lewis disagreed about how to write an allegory of Christ and through this disagreement came up with The Chronicals of Narnia and Lord of the Rings which are as similar as they are different. You could argue that any book concerned with time travel is a rip off of cloud atlas, but please don't.


« previous 1 3
back to top