Imme van Gorp's Reviews > A Study in Scarlet

A Study in Scarlet by Arthur Conan Doyle
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
101358081
|| 3.5 stars ||

This was very unlike what I expected it to be, or at least, parts of it were.
The book is divided into two parts, and the first part did fit exactly what I thought the whole book would be like. We see Dr. Watson and Mr. Holmes meet, we see Watson being in awe and wonder at Holmes’ peculiar and genius personality, we see Holmes get involved in a mysterious and strange murder-case, and finally we see him easily solve the case with his own brand of deduction skills.
Opposingly, the second part completely abandons these two characters and dives into the past to give a detailed, intricate and tense backstory of the murderer and why he has decided to commit his crimes.
It is only at the very end that everything is tied back together again and we find out the full story at the same time as Dr. Watson.

Personally, I thought the first part was a little simplistic and nowhere near as smart or distinctive as I thought it would be. I wished we could have seen more of Sherlock’s actual deduction work, but considering the story is narrated by Watson, and he only gets short and simplified summaries of Sherlock’s deductions after the fact it has already taken place, this wasn’t the case at all. It was still fun and easy to read, but not as special as I was hoping it to be.

When I got around to the second part of this book I was honestly quite mystified and confused. At first, I didn’t have a clue as to what was happening or what I was even reading. However, once I started to realise that I was reading the backstory to the crime of the first part, I became more interested and eventually found myself very intrigued. It was actually a really good story that tug on my heartstrings more than once.
I especially found myself feeling the highest respect for John Ferrier and his perseverance in wanting to protect his adoptive daughter against the horrors of Mormon culture and against having to become one of the many brides in a polygamous harem. He would rather die than have his little girl be tied to these monsters, and it was admirable to say the least. Jefferson Hope, of course, also acquired my respect for all that he did and I honestly couldn’t help but feel that the men who were murdered didn’t quite get enough compared to all that they were guilty of. I’d have wished to see them die more gruesomely if it were up to me.
All in all, it was actually quite a tragic story with no happy ending for any of the good people involved.

All this said, I do think it is important to note that I believe this is one of those very rare cases where the tv adaptation is far better than the original text. I mean, the BBC’s Sherlock is seriously one of my favourite tv series of all time, while this was certainly not one of the best books I’ve ever read. Sure, it was still really good, and all the credits for the premise of the story and the idea of the characters should go completely to this, so I am glad I have read it, but still, the BBC’s adaptation just does it so much better. Therefore, if you’re only interested in exploring one version of Sherlock’s adventures, I’d recommend watching that instead. For die-hard fans (like me), however, this felt like an extra little bonus to read!
77 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read A Study in Scarlet.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

June 4, 2024 – Shelved
July 4, 2024 – Started Reading
July 4, 2024 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-28 of 28 (28 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Krystal (new)

Krystal I have this series on my shelf and I need to get to it. Great review! 🩷


message 2: by SK (new)

SK Fantastic and detailed review babe 🥹🥹


message 3: by allison ☆ (new)

allison ☆ I always thought about getting into Sherlock Holmes but I might just watch the show. Sorry, this was disappointing and didn't go into detail. It is good that you still found it interesting and could like it🫶.


Imme van Gorp @Krystal — This was honestly such a quick and easy read; it’s totally worth reading in a few hours <3


Imme van Gorp @SK — Aww thankyouu, sweetheart🤎


Imme van Gorp @allison — Yea, it was a good book but I’d totally recommend the tv show more!!!💘


message 7: by aashilyyyy (new)

aashilyyyy now my tbr is longer ✋🥲


Imme van Gorp @aashilyyyy — hahaha i know the struggle😓💕


message 9: by Marquise (new)

Marquise Nice review, Imme! This one gets diverging ratings from my friends. :)


message 10: by Imme (new) - rated it 4 stars

Imme van Gorp @Marquise — All my friends seem to have liked it, but I totally get why this wouldn’t work for some people. I do see its flaws as well!


Drache.... (Angelika) Awesome review, Imme. I have to admit I neither read nor watched any Sherlock Holmes book/series.
*goes into hiding*


message 12: by Imme (new) - rated it 4 stars

Imme van Gorp @Angelika — Oh my god😱 Girl, I swear, you GOTTA watch the show!! it’s so insanely good!!😁


Sana⁷ This book took me by surprise, I didn't expect to like it as much as I did! The only Sherlock Holmes I had any contact with were the RDJ version and all the mentions of him in the "Detective Conan" anime. I agree with you, the book version is the best version! ☺️


message 14: by Imme (new) - rated it 4 stars

Imme van Gorp @Sana — well, for me, the best version is the BBC tv series with Benedict Cumberbatch and Martin Freeman, but I watched the movies with RDJ a long time ago, so I can’t remember whether I preferred that one over the book or not😉 I love that this book was such a pleasant surprise for you🤍


message 15: by Rain (new)

Rain A fair review. I agree that the tv adaptations are much better.


message 16: by Imme (new) - rated it 4 stars

Imme van Gorp @Rain — Happy to see it’s not just me hahha ;))


message 17: by Jonathan (new)

Jonathan K (Max Outlier) Elementary Watson..elementary!


message 18: by Imme (new) - rated it 4 stars

Imme van Gorp @Jonathan — 😂😂


Dann [Hiatus] I have never seen the BBC show, but I'm sure I'll love it when I do.
I'm reading this book soon, though, and I'm kinda nervous. It's weird that it describes why the murdered did what he did. That's such a strange concept. I was hoping this would remind me of Agatha Christie's books, but I now think it'll be quite different.


message 20: by Imme (new) - rated it 4 stars

Imme van Gorp @Dann — I’ve only read two Agatha Christie’s, so I’m not super familiar with her works, but what I’ve seen of her books so far, it was definitely quite different from this!
I honestly did kind of like the backstory in part 2, even if it was unconventional, but that’s one thing that’s not part of the BBC series. The tv series only shows the deduction process and capturing of the criminal, and never shows anything from the perspective of the murderer


message 21: by Mai (new)

Mai I love the BBC show


message 22: by Imme (new) - rated it 4 stars

Imme van Gorp @Mai — it’s the absolute BEST🫶🏻🫶🏻


message 23: by Charles (new)

Charles I remember having the same reaction as you the first time I read this, I loved the BBC series also. Absolutely wonder review Imme💙


message 24: by Imme (new) - rated it 4 stars

Imme van Gorp @Charles — Thankyou!💘 The BBC series really is so perfect that I wasn’t entirely surprised that the book couldn’t compare, and I was honestly really happy with how much I still enjoyed it!🖤 I think it might have also helped that the second part was soo different that I almost stopped comparing it to the greatness of the tv show hahah😉


message 25: by A (new)

A Mac I've read a decent amount of Sherlock Holmes, but I guess not this one because I didn't realize it was divided into half like that. I'm glad to see that the second half became more interesting for you (even if the TV show was better!). Great review, Imme!


message 26: by Imme (new) - rated it 4 stars

Imme van Gorp @Mac — From what I’ve found online, it seems his books dedicated to one case all have this kind of format, whereas his books with multiple cases only follow the crime-solving bits for each one. Not sure if that’s true, but it’s what I read online LOL


message 27: by Nazanin (new)

Nazanin Glad you still enjoyed it, hon! 💕


message 28: by Imme (new) - rated it 4 stars

Imme van Gorp @Nazanin — thankss😘


back to top