Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive/2024/07

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Report concerning User:Robgons

Robgons (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: Vandalism only account. --Ovruni (talk) 04:26, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Blocked indef. –FlyingAce✈hello 06:04, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Protection request for Q38611

Please semi-protect Q38611. Reason: Excessive vandalism XReport ----Wüstenspringmaus talk 11:31, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done: Protected for 3 months.--S8321414 (talk) 11:52, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Protection request for Q119401625

Reason: Edit warring by IP --Trade (talk) 12:28, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Deleted instead by Minorax. --Lymantria (talk) 13:22, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Revision deletion request

Personal information--Trade (talk) 13:30, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done
This section was archived on a request by: —Justin (koavf)TCM 13:41, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Vandal IP

No edits have been made from that IP since January. --Esteban16 (talk) 18:28, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
 Not done No recent vandalism. --Lymantria (talk) 05:22, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning User:Trumpthegoat123456789

Trumpthegoat123456789 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: VOA XReportLeonidlednev (talk) 05:20, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Blocked indef: per request Estopedist1 (talk) 06:13, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning User:37.222.77.20

37.222.77.20 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: Vandalism after final warning on Q10280322. Probably a sock of LiliaMiller2002 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)), same type of edits and same ISP. ―Sjö (talk) 10:17, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked 6 months. --Lymantria (talk) 11:06, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning User:2.139.228.141

2.139.228.141 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: Ediciones disruptivas ―Nicolas1231 (talk) 14:02, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked 1 month. –FlyingAce✈hello 16:19, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning User:Farstniffer

Farstniffer (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: Vandalised my user talk page with a pornographic image. This is a cross-wiki vandal who was previously blocked on Wikimedia Commons for doing the same thing there. ―AP 499D25 (talk) 03:26, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Global locked, no action required here.--S8321414 (talk) 03:34, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Protection request for Q24937332

Please semi-protect Q24937332. Reason: Vandalism, see filter log XReport --Leonidlednev (talk) 23:29, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done: Semi-protected for 1 month.--S8321414 (talk) 23:52, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning User:132.251.65.7

132.251.65.7 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: Vandalism XReport ―--Wüstenspringmaus talk 04:39, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done: Blocked for 3 days.--S8321414 (talk) 04:46, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

Deletion request

Please delete Translations:Wikidata:Introduction/Page display title/gsw. Invalid translation/vandalism. Thanks --Wüstenspringmaus talk 06:18, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Deleted--S8321414 (talk) 06:23, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
@S8321414 Perhaps it would be better to simply delete Wikidata:Introduction/gsw, as it has no meaningful content apart from the now deleted vandalism. --Wüstenspringmaus talk 06:31, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Also ✓ Deleted, thank you.--S8321414 (talk) 07:28, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

Please protect Anthony Taylor (Q4453759) temporarily due to excessive vandalism after the football match. Morneo06 (talk) 19:12, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done, for a week. Ymblanter (talk) 19:38, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning User:Onurnergiz

Onurnergiz (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: Vandalism-only account XReport ―--Wüstenspringmaus talk 09:12, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Account and Proxy are blocked WikiBayer (talk) 09:55, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning User:Nothing can no it all the was

Nothing can no it all the was (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: Disruptive editing. Misuse of operator (P137) with nonsense values. Every single edit matches this pattern. No constructive edits whatsoever. (Please mass-revert all contributions after blocking.) ―Elizium23 (talk) 05:57, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Blocked indef. All edits reverted Estopedist1 (talk) 06:10, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

Vandalism

190.150.139.108 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))

IP replacing one person with another, intentionally because it's reincident. It happened with other items/elements. Web-julio (talk) 08:12, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Blocked for three months Estopedist1 (talk) 16:57, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

Protection request

Please start protect song items I’m sick of seeing the, vanderlise everyday you have to start protecting 101.162.80.156 09:04, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

please give concrete items which are vandalized Estopedist1 (talk) 16:54, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Three days passed. No external info given. Spammy-like request by IP Estopedist1 (talk) 06:03, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Please protect item (Q3944735)

Mass vandalism 101.162.80.156 09:12, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Protected for six months Estopedist1 (talk) 16:55, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

Please undelete. I was about to match it with mixnmatch:6353. Regards Matthias M. (talk) 20:07, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

courtesy ping to the deleter: @MisterSynergy Estopedist1 (talk) 06:56, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
restored —MisterSynergy (talk) 06:58, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning User:12.75.11.65

12.75.11.65 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: Mass-vandal XReport ―--Wüstenspringmaus talk 08:58, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done: Blocked for 3 days.--S8321414 (talk) 13:32, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

Please semi-protect Wikidata:Requests for checkuser/Case/Mein Kampf ist der best. Reason: Target of persistent LTA-vandals XReport ----Wüstenspringmaus talk 09:10, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done: Semi-protected for 5 years by MisterSynergy.--S8321414 (talk) 13:35, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

Wikidata:WikiProject Video games was not involved in the discussion to delete these. A look at our backups revealed that these are released games properly mentioned in video game databases. Please restore. Matthias M. (talk) 10:33, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

@The Squirrel Conspiracy: FYI --Ameisenigel (talk) 18:47, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
I don't have an opinion one way or another. They certainly didn't fulfill criteria 1 and I didn't think they fulfilled criteria 2, but if there's an active Wikiproject that maintains the area and they seem to think it's fine, I'm not opposed to a more experienced admin restoring the items. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:56, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
✓ Done Undeleted. --Lymantria (talk) 05:57, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Björn Höcke (Q18176756): Persistent disruptive editing/edit warring, mostly regarding the de and en description. Morneo06 (talk) 17:14, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

5 years semi protected; topic not suitable for anonymous editing —MisterSynergy (talk) 18:40, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

Protection request for Talk:Q30680650

Please semi-protect Talk:Q30680650. Reason: Excessive vandalism XReport ----Wüstenspringmaus talk 16:54, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done --Ameisenigel (talk) 17:15, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning User:Silesianus

Silesianus (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) vandalizes and participates in edit wars, removing correct statements for Ukrainian surnames, especially Alioshkina (Q126726300) 159.205.181.252 07:48, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

 Comment Both alphabet and script is permitted for writing system (P282) but for names it seems to be customary to specify the script. I am guessing this is because names tend to be used in many countries that share the same script. See for instance Hansen (Q2712367) and Mariya (Q39897333). It is also a lot harder to prove that a name is unique to one country than the opposite, so it seems more pragmatic this way. Infrastruktur (talk) 16:44, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Q114337191

Can we protect Oscar-Danilo Ortega-Hernandez (Q114337191) from IP edits? Continuing vandalism and block the IP, and monitor for further vandalism. RAN (talk) 20:12, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done Item semiprotected for 6 months, IP blocked for a week. --Lymantria (talk) 20:31, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning User:Mmdumullana0

Mmdumullana0 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: Spam ―MathXplore (talk) 06:57, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Blocked indefinitely. --Saroj (talk) 07:23, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning User:Aoepro6969

Aoepro6969 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: Vandalism-only account XReport ―--Wüstenspringmaus talk 16:42, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Left a note, more likely test edits / good faith edits than vandalism imo. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 20:36, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
@Ajraddatz: No, these edits are pure nonsense. ("Hier steht alles über den Mao" = "Here is everything about the Mao" is imo a clear case of vandalism). And so are the other edits, too. Regards --Wüstenspringmaus talk 06:46, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Yes, I translated them when I was first looking. It still looks like test editing to me (certainly not productive), and hopefully will be addressed by a warning. Other admins are free to block if they want, and I will block if it continues. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 20:56, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
He stopped editing when he was warned. Let's keep eye on him Estopedist1 (talk) 06:04, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Thanks, no objections to that. --Wüstenspringmaus talk 06:07, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning User:83.30.185.113

83.30.185.113 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: LTA/Harassment XReport ―--Wüstenspringmaus talk 08:40, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done -- Ajraddatz (talk) 05:20, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: -- Ajraddatz (talk) 05:20, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning User:Saadfghjkl9988776655

Saadfghjkl9988776655 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: VOA + x-wiki abuse (please delete all their pages). XReportSHB2000 (talk) 02:36, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done: Global locked and all created pages deleted.--S8321414 (talk) 02:43, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning User:Areacv

Areacv (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: Spam-only account, no need for a second edit imo XReport ―--Wüstenspringmaus talk 06:23, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done --Lymantria (talk) 06:56, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Wikimail limit

Hi, since yesterday I am notifying the winners of the Wikidata competition Coordinate Me. I did so on their talk pages and I am trying to contact them through Wikimail, to talk about how they can receive their prizes. There are 30 winners. 21 of them I could send an email with "Email this user" yesterday but then this tool got blocked for me (to avoid spamming). The block is active for more than 12 hours now. Can someone help - either by lifting this ban or by allowing me to send more Wikimails? Thank you --Manfred Werner (WMAT) (talk) 09:50, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

Hi. If the block is imposed by the software then administrators can't do anything about it. Have you considered telling the users on their talk pages to email you instead? A block shouldn't trigger if you don't use the Special-page for emails. Infrastruktur (talk) 17:31, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
I see. On de.wikipedia the limit was lifted for my account a while ago - must have been done by a bureaucrat or similar. Anyway, after 24 hours the ban was over and I could send the rest of the Wikimails in late evening (CET). Using the wiki email function is really helpful in cases like this. If I ask for an email on a public talk page potentially anybody can send me an address and ask for the prize. --Manfred Werner (WMAT) (talk) 17:59, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
I just checked the user groups, I do not see anything about the limit of e-mails sent. I also do not see any active blocks on your account. As an interim solution, you can of course use your account on Meta or on any other project, but I understand this is not the best option. Ymblanter (talk) 19:37, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
accountcreator includes noratelimit and would resolve the problem. --Ameisenigel (talk) 18:47, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

Restore this item and change plwikisource link to M. Arcta Słownik ilustrowany języka polskiego/Rektanguł . Admins should take care for this. 77.255.4.137 17:06, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

courtesy ping to the deleter: @MisterSynergy Estopedist1 (talk) 06:27, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Yeah sure please undelete ---MisterSynergy (talk) 21:06, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
✓ Undeleted Estopedist1 (talk) 06:22, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

Possible sock of Matlin. GZWDer (talk) 17:28, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

just for the record: this user has done 111889 edits (account created on 1 June 2024). Estopedist1 (talk) 06:31, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
✓ Done MO likely Matlin, blocked, CU requested. --Lymantria (talk) 07:08, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning 161.132.174.18

161.132.174.18 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: Vandalism. --Ovruni (talk) 17:45, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done Ymblanter (talk) 19:36, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning User:95.116.59.146

95.116.59.146 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: vandalism only ―Stepro (talk) 21:17, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done: Blocked for 3 days.--S8321414 (talk) 23:59, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Protection request for Q6600039

Please semi-protect Q6600039. Reason: Excessive vandalism XReport ----Wüstenspringmaus talk 06:01, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done: Protected for 1 week.--S8321414 (talk) 06:05, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning User:Djdjdjdjrjrjrjrjdhxhxuxyxyxyxyx

Djdjdjdjrjrjrjrjdhxhxuxyxyxyxyx (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))

LTA. I've also just requested a global lock, but in the meanwhile... Horcrux (talk) 08:23, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Global locked.--S8321414 (talk) 08:31, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
Blocked as well. --Lymantria (talk) 12:25, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Q126478914

Can we protect Q126478914. The subject keeps editing, claiming to be royalty and removing references that they are a pretender. RAN (talk) 02:54, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Protected for six months Estopedist1 (talk) 06:11, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning User:83.26.199.75

83.26.199.75 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: Harassment XReport ―--Wüstenspringmaus talk 09:27, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done: Blocked for 1 week.--S8321414 (talk) 12:02, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning User:161.0.63.21 / RSR2003

161.0.63.21 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))

RSR2003 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))

Possible vandalism (multiple statements removed) and edit warring by the apparent same editor, 161.0.63.21 / RSR2003, on Chalatenango Department (Q522221) (33 claims removed), Cuscatlán Department (Q1130677) (16 claims removed), and possible other items. -- DCflyer* (talk) 06:46, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

IIRC, there has been a recent change in the administrative division of El Salvador. Perhaps the statements should be deprecated rather than removed, but the changes seem to be in good faith. I'll do some more research once I'm at a computer. –FlyingAce✈hello 12:39, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Yes, @FlyingAce, there has been a relatively recent change in the administrative division of El Salvador. Thank you for confirming this. I will search for reference(s) to add to the statements.
However, the fact that a statement is no longer true is not a justification for its removal. The qualifiers start time and end time, along with preferred rank, are used to state the currently valid or most recent value(s). A deprecated rank indicates that a claim was always erroneous or never known to be true, and that may or may not be applicable to these items.
Also, most or all of the values of contains the administrative territorial entity (P150) (the statements which the editor(s) removed and then repeatedly reverted without explanation, apparently both logged in and anonymously) contain the inverse value of located in the administrative territorial entity (P131), so these items would need to be updated, as well. Additionally, unrelated statements were removed multiple times. For example, the value for elevation above sea level (P2044), was removed on 19 April 2023 and 8 July 2024, by the editor. -- DCflyer* (talk) 19:38, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning User:FelixBot

FelixBot (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: Please block temporary, see [1] XReport ―--Wüstenspringmaus talk 09:54, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done temporary for one week. Can be unblocked if the bot is stopped. --Ameisenigel (talk) 10:22, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

Check Croatian descriptions

Dear colleagues, could someone understanding a bit of Croatian check Special:Contributions/Milafkgkrifkfkfkpfm? They seem vandalisms, but I can say it only on the basis of Google Translate and I would like a double check. Thanks! --Epìdosis 11:22, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

I'm not understanding Croatian but edits like this and that edit + vandalism on other projects let me strongly believe that these edits are vandalism. If a native Croatian speaker thinks that some of the changes are still useful, they can feel free to restore this user's versions. The account is now also globally locked. --Wüstenspringmaus talk 12:01, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

Process Question: Proposals to Make Changes to Existing Properties

I understand that there is a process in place for proposing new properties in Wikidata. If a user wants to propose changes to existing properties, such as adjustments to allowed values, additions of property constraints, or changes to data types, is there a process in place for this as well? I was planning to do this by putting a detailed proposal (as well as an implementation and data cleanup plan) in the Project Chat, waiting for a period of time (would a week be sufficient?), and then going ahead with the changes if/when something close to consensus is reached. I am not a property creator, however, and wanted to check in to make sure I wasn't going to be going against Wikidata established practices beforehand. Please let me know whether there are best practices I should be following. Thank you, --Crystal Yragui, University of Washington Libraries (talk) 18:28, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

Yes, this is indeed one of the possible processes, pls go ahead. Ymblanter (talk) 18:38, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Will do, thank you! Is there an amount of time that is acceptable to wait before I go ahead and make the proposed changes? What if nobody comments? --Crystal Yragui, University of Washington Libraries (talk) 23:03, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
@Clements.UWLib: a couple of additional steps I'd recommend:
(1) Also start a discussion - at least link to the project chat proposal - on the property talk page
(2) ping people who have been involved - those who have edited the property, and those who discussed its creation on its property proposal page.
Thanks! ArthurPSmith (talk) 18:43, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Thank you! There has been consensus on the property talk page, so I will link to the project chat discussion from there and ping those who have been involved. Is there a way to ping everyone who has edited a property at once if it is a property that has been edited by many different users? Or, would I need to go through and mention many many people individually? Crystal Yragui, University of Washington Libraries (talk) 23:02, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

Protection request for Q24060074

Please semi-protect Q24060074. Reason: Excessive vandalism XReport ----Wüstenspringmaus talk 08:23, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Protected for six months Estopedist1 (talk) 12:40, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

Giuseppe Verdi

I want add the wikiquote of Giuseppe Verdi in the ID Q7317. Thanks 2806:107E:22:6F3E:C93:2E4A:FB8E:9527 04:43, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

which language Wikiquote are we talking about? And please use {{Edit request}} at item's talk page, so everyone can see it in Category:Wikidata protected edit requests Estopedist1 (talk) 06:28, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

They meant the Spanish Wikiquote article. Added. --Wolverène (talk) 07:10, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning User:1.46.141.38

1.46.141.38 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: nonsense desc. mass experiments ―Mykhal (talk) 06:08, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Blocked for three months Estopedist1 (talk) 06:29, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning User:To the fmnfnfnc

To the fmnfnfnc (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))

Vandalised over 100 times Midleading (talk) 05:46, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Blocked indef by Lymantria. All edits are patrolled Estopedist1 (talk) 06:20, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

Spam on Q127401500

Hey there! Please protect this item; several IP addresses have been changing the website link to promotional targets recently. Let me know if you have any questions! TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 09:41, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done for one month --Ameisenigel (talk) 10:59, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

Disruption: non-standard additions

Greetings,

Currently I'm tracking some disruption of limited scope. There is a new editor who's adding non-standard aliases, names, descriptions to certain obscure items.

The subject matter appears to be Polish-American Catholic clerics. I'm unsure why the geolocation is going all over the place; perhaps this user has resorted to proxies. No communication was established with the user account, but today they have been apparently editing while logged out.

Admins, could we protect these items, and issue another warning to this user? This is not vandalism nor malicious; it's simple ignorance of our policies and standards. The material being added would be fine if it were relegated to the proper place. Elizium23 (talk) 18:47, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Shall we add 152.166.51.188 (talkcontribslogs) to the list of today's disruptive IPv4 addresses?
Also, this may be a random coincidence, but I feel that it may be worth mentioning here and now: the Wikipedia interface (Wikidata, in particular) has just notified me that someone has unsuccessfully attempted to log in to my account, multiple times, just at exactly the same time my edits were reverted by the above IP editor.
I have no proof that this IP was attempting to access my Wikidata account, and I'm not too concerned about its ultimate security, but it does seem a rather antisocial thing for someone to do, perhaps in retaliation for such a minor dispute here. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 19:37, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
109.241.182.168 (talkcontribslogs) from Poland, is now accusing me of "being drunk".
I am unsure whether this is a separate case from the other Polish crap being spewed, but the personal attacks are rather over-the-top and I'd appreciate not being harrassed here, especially if someone is actually trying to sign in to my account. Elizium23 (talk) 20:27, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
@Estopedist1, @Lymantria, please take action. It is unambiguous now that one of these users is attempting to access my Wikidata editor account.
  • 181.47.220.80 (talkcontribslogs) said "still drunk" and at the same time as his edit, I received a notification that there were multiple failed access attempts.
Elizium23 (talk) 14:49, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
@Elizium23: nowadays it is very easy to change IPs and hence to harrass any user. Nothing I can do here. Just keep his reverting and be calm. Once I also had same situation when a vandal tried to access to my Wikidata editor account. I hope your password is good and not easily to be unlocked Estopedist1 (talk) 14:59, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
I blocked indef user:Zygmunt Gorazdowski. I don't see range-block possibility for IPs Estopedist1 (talk) 15:02, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
There are only a few affected items; would you consider semi-protecting them please? Particularly Carlo Acutis (Q2939142) who is in the news as canonisation approaches. Elizium23 (talk) 15:04, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Tried some IP blocks and semiprotections as well. --Lymantria (talk) 15:12, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Thank you kindly; would you consider also semi-protecting the corresponding talk page? IPv4 disruption continues there, with edit-summary insults upon my person, and yet more attempts to compromise my very editor's account. Elizium23 (talk) 18:33, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
This is a WMF-banned user who uses a VPN. When frustrated he starts trying to hack your account. I strongly suggest protecting anything he touches, because he'll just keep reverting to his preferred version (and his "edits" invariably contain some kind of original research or other nonsense, including spam and delusional claims about his own expertise or something). Antandrus (talk) 21:40, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
✓ Done by a mix of myself, other local admins, and stewards. —Justin (koavf)TCM 03:46, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

Undelete this. There were sources. Additional: https://aktualnosci.aksim.edu.pl/pamietamy/odszedl-do-pana-brat-ojca-dyrektora/ https://ddtorun.pl/pl/722_wspomnienia/51440_radio-maryja-tv-trwam-i-aksim-w-zalobie-nie-zyje-miroslaw-rydzyk.html https://polityka.se.pl/wiadomosci/rydzyk-przekazal-tragiczna-wiadomosc-nie-zyje-jego-brat-z-zakonu-aa-mwxe-AcGH-Gcg9.html https://www.se.pl/torun/grob-rodziny-rydzyka-utonal-w-kwiatach-poruszajace-pozegnanie-kochanemu-tacie-aa-Pcvj-zFjZ-DG6P.html https://ototorun.pl/artykul/torunski-duchowny-w/1518737 https://goniec.pl/najpierw-klopoty-finansowe-a-teraz-to-tadeusz-rydzyk-stracil-bliska-osobe-ar-wbc-250124 77.255.4.137 17:09, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

courtesy ping to the deleter: @The Squirrel Conspiracy Estopedist1 (talk) 06:29, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning 138.246.3.45

138.246.3.45 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) Can I have a second pair of eyes looking into the many item creations by this IP, all seem to be unsourced if not empty, but not utter nonsense. Nuke or not? --Lymantria (talk) 07:02, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

This IP created many unsourced and without sitelink items, just delete them I think.--S8321414 (talk) 08:50, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
✓ Done @S8321414:: thank you for the second opinion. --Lymantria (talk) 09:42, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning User:178.139.232.172

178.139.232.172 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: Mass addition of fake information, such as: [2], [3]Nicoljaus (talk) 09:19, 16 July 2024 (UTC) And such as: [4], [5] --Nicoljaus (talk) 09:43, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done Long-term abuse (LiliaMiller2002), blocked for a week (as mobile IP), edits patrolled. Thanks for reporting. --Lymantria (talk) 09:58, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

protection request for Q10314243

I see a lot of vandalism on (Q10314243), he is the founder of Instagram and target for many vandals to make themselves (founder of Instagram). Ibrahim.ID (talk) 16:32, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done --Lymantria (talk) 16:50, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protection for Q85867923

Unfortunately nothing has changed (still not reverted) since last time, the anonyms continue their disruptive practices. Regards Kirilloparma (talk) 00:13, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Protected for one year (2nd protection). I reverted 55 edits to reach to stable version. Hopefully it is acceptable, pinging to @Kirilloparma Estopedist1 (talk) 06:24, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning 2803:C600:6103:808D:FDAF:BB4A:F234:4F5A

2803:C600:6103:808D:FDAF:BB4A:F234:4F5A (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: Vandalism only. (see 1, 2. 3, 4. Please revert all edits ) Ovruni (talk) 03:15, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Edits are reverted and IP is blocked by an abuse filter for one day. --Wüstenspringmaus talk 06:09, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
range-blocked (2803:C600:6103:808D::/64). All edits are not patrolled Estopedist1 (talk) 06:25, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning User:217.156.4.85

217.156.4.85 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: Spam--Trade (talk) 21:24, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done deleted and blocked. --KonstantinaG07 (talk) 21:48, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 03:12, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning User:زيد بن عبدالله

زيد بن عبدالله (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: Vandalism only account ―Asorev (talk) 22:15, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done: Blocked indef.--S8321414 (talk) 23:35, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 03:13, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Request page protection

France 4 (Q575876), request semi protection due to persistent vandalism. Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 03:03, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done: Protected for 1 year.--S8321414 (talk) 03:09, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 03:13, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Request page protection Q1440772

France 5 (Q1440772), request semi protection due to persistent vandalism. Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 03:11, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done: Protected for 3 months.--S8321414 (talk) 03:15, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 03:39, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning User:2A01:E0A:A55:F910:0:0:0:0/64

2A01:E0A:A55:F910:0:0:0:0/64 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: Vandalism ―S8321414 (talk) 03:25, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done 1 week. --Lymantria (talk) 05:50, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning User:Zoyakhan872829

Zoyakhan872829 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: Spam ―MathXplore (talk) 07:58, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Global locked.--S8321414 (talk) 08:13, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning User:Rizwanahmad0179

Rizwanahmad0179 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: Spam ―MathXplore (talk) 08:03, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Global locked.--S8321414 (talk) 08:15, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning User:Lovely boy8979

Lovely boy8979 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: Vandalism only account ―Jan Kameníček (talk) 20:29, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked. --Lymantria (talk) 20:39, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Second opinion re: revoking Soufiyouns's email access

Hello! I just received an email from user:Soufiyouns asking me to undo a block (user:باسم was the blocking admin). I revoked their email access for the duration of the block, explained that email unblock requests were inappropriate, and pointed them towards the unblock template via a talk page message. Was that the correct course of action? The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:58, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

I received the same email. --Crystal Yragui, University of Washington Libraries (talk) 17:38, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
I wouldn't have necessarily removed their ability to send emails, but correct to direct them to the unblock template as the preferred method of appeals I think. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 18:25, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
I also received this e-mail, for the record. Ymblanter (talk) 19:22, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
There are a few aspects that concern me here. @باسم has been actively editing but hasn't weighed in here, as the original blocker. @Soufiyouns appears to have sent email to at least one editor who's not an administrator, and can't, therefore, unblock anyone. Soufiyouns hasn't responded on their User talk page, either, despite retaining access to write there. @The Squirrel Conspiracy has received no support for the action in question, but hasn't modified the block to restore email access to this user. I suppose it's a moot point, as the block expires in a few hours, but in principle, I see no reason that email access should've been revoked. While it's "preferred" to request unblocks out in the open, it's not mandatory anywhere that I've seen, and Wikidata has no policy about this, so hopefully, admins can WD:AGF here. Because it seems to me that, before and during this block, Soufiyouns has been making use of the User talk page to calmly and rationally discuss the issues with the blocking admin. Elizium23 (talk) 19:26, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning User:Hamka Azizan

Pramesta Cahyani (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))

Zildzi (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))

Hamka Azizan (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: Sockpuppet, already blocked indefinitely in idwiki as of duck test. It is the same LTA that operates the Pramesta Cahyani and Zildzi. Nyilvoskt (talk) 16:37, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

@Nyilvoskt: all accounts blocked indef. Should we revert all actions done by user:Hamka Azizan? Estopedist1 (talk) 06:28, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
The first and third accounts are Likely the same, technically. Please report further instances to WD:RFCU as LTA cases often involve sleepers.--Jasper Deng (talk) 06:33, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning User:77.255.4.137

77.255.4.137 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))
159.205.181.252 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))

As per [6] i want to bring to attention of administrators, that IP 159.205.181.252 is continuing in edit warring at Alioshkina (Q126726300) with a new IP 77.255.4.137. The last edit of 159.205.181.252 was at 3. 7. 2024, 07:48, the 77.255.4.137 first edit was on 3. 7. 2024, 08:09. The IP actions were discussed here. Silesianus (talk) 11:00, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

Alioshkina (Q126726300) is semi-protected for six months Estopedist1 (talk) 06:16, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

I want to report that this IP is lock evasion of Special:CentralAuth/Dataminerfr, Special:CentralAuth/Sascestvrai, Special:CentralAuth/Saonnotice, etc. Please check their deleted contributions here. Please also see w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Stluciainformation/Archive for their other accounts. Thank you for your attention. MathXplore (talk) 13:38, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Fixed links. MathXplore (talk) 13:39, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Global blocked for 1 week.--S8321414 (talk) 13:47, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

ZI Jony

ZI Jony (talkcontribsnew itemsnew lexemesSULBlock logUser rights logUser rightsxtools)

I would like to request the Rollback rights again to work more actively against vandalism. please note that my rights were revoked earlier (April 2020), I believe that I know the process of use of rollback also I've good experience in the same. @DannyS712, Jasper Deng, Liuxinyu970226, GZWDer, Camouflaged Mirage, KonstantinaG07: @Ymblanter: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 04:21, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

I would like to mention Zi Jony have been an unsung hero with creating properties, approximately 300 of them in 2024. This is amazing! Thank you. Infrastruktur (talk) 06:54, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
We have Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Other rights. --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 08:33, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
@Matěj Suchánek, DannyS712 mentioned in the closing summary that when I'll request the Rollback rights again, should request here, and ping all of those users who was involved in that discussion. Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 10:11, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
 Support Give it a try after four years --Ameisenigel (talk) 09:21, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
 Support (as non-admin) per Ameisenigel. --Wüstenspringmaus talk 15:16, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
✓ Done Flag granted. --Lymantria (talk) 07:31, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Please protect Q2439541

Ali B (Q2439541) has not been fully convicted yet as there is still an appeal going on, but users keep adding descriptions that violate WD:BLP. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 17:26, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done Infrastruktur (talk) 19:16, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
Why havent the descriptions been deleted if they violate BLP? Trade (talk) 21:23, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
Laziness. The guy had a previous conviction so I didn't think it was important in this case, as most non-wikipedians rarely look in the logs. I have deleted the revisions now however. Infrastruktur (talk) 21:56, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

Pages protection request

Please protect Q2061833 Q122979577 Q18559542 mass vandalism Mass sock puppetry protect this pages for a while please 101.162.80.156 08:54, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Protected for six months Estopedist1 (talk) 09:24, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Maybe we should open a Wikidata:Requests for checkuser?--Estopedist1 (talk) 09:25, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Yes 101.162.80.156 09:44, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
@Estopedist1: FYI: m:User:Leonidlednev/LTAs/ACV. --Lymantria (talk) 11:00, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
See also Wikidata:Requests for checkuser/Case/LTA vandals. --Wüstenspringmaus talk 11:35, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Re: Report concerning User:161.0.63.21 / RSR2003

161.0.63.21 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))

Re: Report concerning User:161.0.63.21 / RSR2003

Anonymous editor 161.0.63.21 persists in edit warring on Cuscatlán Department (Q1130677), including the removal of a sourced statement on 16 July 2024, with the same claim having been removed by the same editor on 8 July 2024 and 19 April 2023. -- DCflyer* (talk) 20:57, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

I've checked CA of RSR2003 and noticed that this was also abusing multiple accounts on Wikidata with edit-warring and removal statements, see their CU-results. So I support blocking this user / the IP (regardless of whether it is the same person as the user). --Wüstenspringmaus talk 06:33, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
✓ Done Socks indeffed, global locks requested, IP blocked for 1 month, item semiprotected for 1 month. --Lymantria (talk) 07:22, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Frequently vandalized by IP editor. William Graham (talk) 00:41, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Protected for six months Estopedist1 (talk) 06:22, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning User:Annoconnell

Annoconnell (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: Spam-only account, imo no need to wait for a second edit XReport ―--Wüstenspringmaus talk 05:53, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Blocked indef by Lymantria Estopedist1 (talk) 06:23, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning User:Keynateweb

Keynateweb (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: Promotion-only account ―S8321414 (talk) 06:25, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done User warned, item deleted. --Lymantria (talk) 07:29, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Protection request per persistent vandalism

From some time ago, several IPs are vandalizing an amount of entries about royals, changing deliberately the labels and descriptions in English and some other languages (1, 2, 3, 4 and 5) without obtaining any consensus for doing that, and removing deliberately statements (6, 7 or 8), and other major modifications. This is not the first time they do this class of long-term editions. See User talk:Epìdosis/Archive/2024#Protection requests per vandalism for a similar previous case (@Epìdosis, @Hjart).

I restored the entries to their stable versions, but it is known that some of those IPs come back for restore their versions (more information at the previous discussion at Epìdosis talk page). For that, please consider protect all this entries and restoring them to stable versions if the IPs change them again before protection is applied. FYI, the entries affected are listed above:

Thank you in advance. Yours sincerely. 81.41.177.91 22:09, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done 3 months semi, except for Q76343, for which the edit history does not justify protection. --Lymantria (talk) 05:55, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
Q1765834 wasn't protected. Now ✓ protected. Reverting to stable version is not trivial and still not done Estopedist1 (talk) 06:18, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Protection request

Please protect Q605628 Q1569320 Q928089 mass vandalism 2001:8004:1DD5:EB23:80A1:EB90:445E:C54 10:20, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

--Estopedist1 (talk) 15:09, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done, for 1 month Ymblanter (talk) 19:33, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Protection request

Hi! This item is vandalized on a regular basis by some IP's.

Soylacarli (talk) 15:07, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done 3 months. --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 18:55, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

New spam entry

Q127600387 Vicarage (talk) 17:23, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

item is deleted Estopedist1 (talk) 06:16, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

Please semiprotect Micaela Bastidas (Q3826495) since there are constant vandalism edits by IP users. Thanks. --Ovruni (talk) 20:05, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done Another year. --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 20:35, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning User:Keyboard fmndmdnf here

Keyboard fmndmdnf here (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: Vandalism. Long-term abuse (ACV). See also today's other accounts: "Up all the way joe go me go u" and "Its all the unproffedional things". ―ClumsyOwlet (talk) 02:10, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

All global locked.--S8321414 (talk) 02:33, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

Protection request

Please protect this items

Q2219037 Q1526414 Q3977987

mass vandalism 2001:8004:1DD5:EB23:B91F:A924:1A0D:C3FD 08:51, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done 1 month. --Lymantria (talk) 12:31, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning User:178.139.236.255

178.139.236.255 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: Vandalism XReport ―--Wüstenspringmaus talk 10:45, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done 3 days (mobile IP), although likely LiliaMiller2002. --Lymantria (talk) 12:26, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

Protection request

Hi, please protect Q126599156 (or just delete it). LTA Stluciainformation has repeatedly used this redirect for self-promotion, because the main item Q126478914 has been protected due to his excessive self-promotion attempts. Thanks! Johannnes89 (talk) 15:08, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done Independently. --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 15:10, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Thanks --Johannnes89 (talk) 15:28, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

Pages protection request

Protect my email and account 112.210.230.6 12:59, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

 Not done, we cannot assist with issues outside Wikidata. Also, please stop modifying translations randomly. –FlyingAce✈hello 14:37, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning User:JimmyProcházka

JimmyProcházka (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: These edits look like vandalism to me, but I would ask a Czech native speaker before reverting all edits/blocking this user. @Matěj Suchánek, Martin Urbanec: What do you think? --Wüstenspringmaus talk 11:14, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

I undid blatant nonsense, and sent a warning. What's left is more less okay. --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 13:11, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
✓ Done Since the vandalism continued, I blocked him. Other admins are free to change the block settings if they wish. --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 15:28, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning User:YSR UNIQUE bw

YSR UNIQUE bw (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: Spam ―MathXplore (talk) 14:21, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

 Not done only one edit in Wikidata Estopedist1 (talk) 06:13, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Now globally locked. –FlyingAce✈hello 13:59, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

Vandalism of UTC

The item Q1536 is being vandalized by User:2A01:9700:1AFF:8900:939:2746:BA9C:17B1. The change include removal of aliases and descriptions, and replacing the English name Coordinated Universal Time with موسكو

Jc3s5h (talk) 21:19, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

Similar behavior on Q6313217 with another IP address, 37.202.73.29. Jc3s5h (talk) 21:28, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Q1536 is protected for six months. IPs are (range-)blocked Estopedist1 (talk) 06:16, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 02:59, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

Hades1024

diff : vandalism, insult (French law). LD (talk) 08:53, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done Revdelled. User is warned already. --Lymantria (talk) 14:37, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning User:Hades1024

Hades1024 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: [7]Lewisiscrazy (talk) 09:03, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done Revdelled. User is warned already (see above). --Lymantria (talk) 14:39, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

Protect Bosnia, User:178.201.237.97 / User:5.43.76.74

Users 178.201.237.97 and 5.43.76.74 vandalizing item Q188736. LydiaPintscher and I keep undoing it, but they are persistent.--178.201.237.97 09:25, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done Semiprotected by Madamebiblio. --Lymantria (talk) 14:41, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

Request page protection Q706667

Nicky Wu (Q706667), request semi protection due to persistent vandalism. Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 21:38, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done: Protected for 2 weeks.--S8321414 (talk) 23:18, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 02:59, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning User:178.139.230.82

178.139.230.82 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: Adding absurd 'data' to a series of profiles – 'dead of man-pregnancy', 'occupation stripper', etc., etc. All its interventions are vandalism. --Mrs Robinson (talk) 21:51, 21 July 2024 (UTC) ―Mrs Robinson (talk) 21:51, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked 1 month. --Lymantria (talk) 09:10, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning User:185.113.2.156

185.113.2.156 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: Revdelled. User is warned already. XReport ―Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 07:12, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done: Blocked for 3 months.--S8321414 (talk) 07:32, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 09:55, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

repurposing items

Hello, please protect items d:Q524656, d:Q21869232, d:Q83837230, as they have been repurposed from films, albums, ... to literary works, sitelinks have been removed, etc. Thanks a lot!M2k~dewiki (talk) 00:03, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Bash222 ( talk  · contribs  · logs )
Swunnam ( talk  · contribs  · logs )
I have identified a bunch of other items repurposed by Bash222. It also looks like this person's previous account was Swunnam and they changed for some reason. Both have created items for literary works that don't appear notable. A greater cleanup and possibly blocks are needed. William Graham (talk) 01:21, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Iddih0061 ( talk  · contribs  · logs )
Alhassan1234 ( talk  · contribs  · logs )
Yussifabdulfatawu ( talk  · contribs  · logs )
Ibrahim Zeinab ( talk  · contribs  · logs )
And also these accounts. William Graham (talk) 01:24, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
There is the possibility that there is some sort of new editor outreach group program running that has not identified or declared itself anywhere. William Graham (talk) 01:31, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
I came across at least these three who attempted to repurpose an item and seem to be related:
Contributions are clearly Ghana-oriented, so it should be possible to track them using a list like [8]. --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 07:32, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
... and now I found [9] which had been repurposed since 2022. I will fix this later. --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 07:37, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
I indeffed Bash222, as he was warned in July 2023 to not repurpose items, which he apparently ignored. --Lymantria (talk) 06:53, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
It did not cease. Found a few more users:
Unfortunately, some of them are becoming auto-confirmed, and it will be more difficult to track. Should we start with issuing blocks? --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 19:30, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
I do think so. --Lymantria (talk) 06:19, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Request page protection Q18458592

Vietnam Women's Academy (Q18458592), request semi protection due to persistent vandalism. Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 16:50, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done 1 week semi. --Lymantria (talk) 20:48, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

Block request

Same user for Nama24Pok, please see [10] and [11].--MCC214 (talk) 12:33, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

 Comment: Most of them don't edit recently except User:Courageous.Contributor.--S8321414 (talk) 14:26, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
S8321414, all in list confirmed in zh.wiki (duck or CU), this user used other wiki illegit and abuse restart.--MCC214 (talk) 08:50, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
Some of them are global locked, remaining don't have any edits recently, I don't think we should do something locally for now.--S8321414 (talk) 23:49, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
S8321414, all in list is same user, SiuMai, also, some edit came from zh.wiki.--MCC214 (talk) 05:38, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
I still think you should report them to m:SRG to request global lock.--S8321414 (talk) 06:16, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Editors violating OR policy and ignoring discussion at Q6495391

There are several editors who appear to be both gatekeeping me from removing incorrect linking to Q6495391 and ignoring attempts at discission.

People are effectively engaging in original research, which is clearly a violation of policy.

People need to step in and either acknowledge the problem, actively collaborate or stop refusing me to edit aspects of historiography that I have solid evidence of Wikimedia managing to fib by ignoring sources. Peter Isotalo (talk) 18:21, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

the item is fully-protected for one month due to edit-warring by established users. There is also pending deletion request. Estopedist1 (talk) 06:16, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Why on earth would you protect the item with the problematic content intact? The item is clearly violating basic policy by making demonstrably, easily verifiable errors.
Most of the items are either not using the same terminology "late modern" or aren't even referring to the same timespan (20th century until now rather than c. 1800 until now). Not a single established user has lifted a finger to actually help solve the conflict or even tried to reply to the factual issues involved.
The behavior here is ungenerous and in my view clearly obstructive. People are not taking the issue seriously and appear to favor simply grandfathering unsourced claims rather than allow for perfectly normal corrections, as is the normal standard for all Wikimedia projects. Peter Isotalo (talk) 11:42, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Please, restore my revision, proper revision. Unrelated-directly to this, also revert for Q551335 to Special:Diff/2206576640 and for Q20877009 to Special:Diff/2206578084. --5.43.65.30; 14:34, 23. july 2024. (UTC) [e]

 Not done You can request and discuss necessary changes at the item's talk pages, of course explaining on what source(s) changes are based. --Lymantria (talk) 15:06, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning User:Apex512

Apex512 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: Spam ―MathXplore (talk) 01:36, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Page deleted, blocked indef as it appears they tried to do the same in mediawiki (see Central Auth. –FlyingAce✈hello 02:43, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning User:Super Vidalista

Super Vidalista (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: Spam-only account XReport ―--Wüstenspringmaus talk 07:30, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done, account locked. --Hoo man (talk) 08:31, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning User:2803:C180:2102:85F8:0:0:0:0/64

2803:C180:2102:85F8:0:0:0:0/64 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: Vandalism XReport ―--Wüstenspringmaus talk 07:34, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Blocked for three months. And vandalized item is protected Estopedist1 (talk) 08:41, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 10:19, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning User:Rahu.sahu888

Rahu.sahu888 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: Spam-only account XReport ―--Wüstenspringmaus talk 07:40, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done, account locked. --Hoo man (talk) 08:31, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning User:2806:2F0:8021:F317:F087:E520:FB0D:ED02

2806:2F0:8021:F317:F087:E520:FB0D:ED02 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: Vandalism XReportLeonidlednev (talk) 02:25, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

Global range-blocked for 32 hours.--S8321414 (talk) 02:37, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

User:125.163.127.31

125.163.127.31 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) vandalism on Chromium. Valepert (talk) 07:25, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done: Blocked for 1 week.--S8321414 (talk) 07:58, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning User:Alexdivkovic75

Alexdivkovic75 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: Spam ―MathXplore (talk) 11:54, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

Globally locked. –FlyingAce✈hello 12:57, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

Protection request for Q181182

Please semi-protect Q181182. Reason: Excessive vandalism XReport ----Wüstenspringmaus talk 14:30, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done for 3 months --KonstantinaG07 (talk) 17:20, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 18:22, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

last appearance (P12878)

Could someone make it so this property shows up right below first appearance (P4584) on items? Trade (talk) 13:30, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

This could be done by editing MediaWiki:Wikibase-SortedProperties --Ameisenigel (talk) 09:57, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
@DannyS712:, could you please look into it? Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 02:56, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

NiferO

[12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] — this doesn't seem to be OK. 2A00:1370:8186:125E:356B:CE70:F19D:24A8 13:31, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

user is warned, but I think such kind of edits are actually good faith Estopedist1 (talk) 15:21, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Some of "good faith edits" lead to very bad results: particularly this edit [19], which went into infoboxes in many Wikipedia language editions, has eventually stated that bread was invented in Australia about 30,000 years ago (despite of lack of definitive evidence for it). No thanks, this is "almost disruptive" (IMHO). 2A00:1370:8186:125E:356B:CE70:F19D:24A8 16:21, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
I agree. Mass-reverting is possible outcome but maybe we will get some answers from user:NiferO Estopedist1 (talk) 16:59, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

It is a problematic case. Several his edits are not wrong but they can be called as "reduction to nonsense", e.g. Special:Diff/2204411587. If the user doesn't feel that his edits are nonsense, then it is probably best (for Wikidata) to block him.--Estopedist1 (talk) 06:19, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

I warned him twice. Possibly a student with little interest to read and follow Wikidata guidelines Estopedist1 (talk) 06:14, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Shock-blocked for two weeks. Rationale: see his talk page and blocking rationale Estopedist1 (talk) 06:11, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

Biography page on Wikiversity

Hi, It seems it is not possible to add User pages to links "On other projects. May I modify my page "User:Rbmn/Arthur_Constantin_KREBS_(1850-1935):_Military_engineer,_Automotive_industrialist,_Great_projects_manager" as not "User" page ?

Thanks Rbmn (talk) 16:12, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

Please move page to appropriate namespace on English Wikiversity, we can't help you moving them on Wikidata.--S8321414 (talk) 23:11, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning User:123.16.244.200

123.16.244.200 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: Mass-vandal XReport ―--Wüstenspringmaus talk 15:02, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Blocked for 3 days. --Esteban16 (talk) 20:31, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protection request for Q110109160

Please semi protect Q110109160 as IP users remove descriptions and links without any reasons. SCP-2000 (talk) 06:29, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Please also semi protect Q127602202 and block 2402:7500:4ce:de65:59d0:baf:2f66:cce4 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)). SCP-2000 (talk) 06:37, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ 1 week protection applied. Stang 06:51, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Stang 06:51, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning User:R.szUser

R.szUser (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: weird edits (vandalism), weird self talk ―Mykhal (talk) 08:43, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Done by Epic. --Wüstenspringmaus talk 11:38, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Wüstenspringmaus talk 11:39, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning User:137.101.52.37

137.101.52.37 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: Lots of offensive edits including [20] , [21] , and [22] . ―William Graham (talk) 19:38, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done. Madamebiblio (talk) 01:08, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

Q59657831

Hi! Can someone please check whether the research topics listed at Q59657831 are valid? There's not much material online and it seems like a novel research. --TadejM (talk) 18:40, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

Sorry if I'm misunderstand, but are you talking about the statements related to notable work (P800) claims? i.e. "has this person published about gasocrinology (Q127038678) as a notable work"? If that's where you're going here, yes, all of these "notable works" are not works at all and are just subtopics of research or topics of some kind. —Justin (koavf)TCM 18:56, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Yes, that's what I'm talking about. These seem like novel hypotheses that have not yet gained credibility in the scientific community (e.g. Q127603341 which is described as a "theoretical hypothesis by S. A."). If there are no secondary references to support them I consider it best to not have them as standalone items and propose that they are deleted. --TadejM (talk) 19:07, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
At a minimum, calling these "notable works" is inaccurate. Are you suggesting that the individual items like gasocrine signaling (Q127038535) should be deleted or are just crankery? As it stands now, I'm not seeing any of the claims at Savani Anbalagan (Q59657831) being actually problematic except for the official website, which I fixed with an undo because it seems like that was just a typo from the beginning. I'll defer to others who may be more knowledgeable about biology or who can suss out exactly what to do with these claims. —Justin (koavf)TCM 19:13, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
I am not in the position to reliably judge whether they are crankery or not. I wanted to point out that these concepts (unlike some others in this field) are new to me and on the first sight they seem like an eager scientist pushing hard for their hypotheses to gain ground. In my opinion we should only have items on scientific topics that have been discussed in reliable secondary sources independent from the researcher. There is no such source cited and I also haven't been able to find it online. --TadejM (talk) 19:22, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
@Bergenblues, Praveenarasurajan: You seem to be behind a lot of these edits. Can you please comment here? Have these topics been discussed in multiple sources? Can you at least cite one source for them? Thanks. —Justin (koavf)TCM 20:22, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

On a tangential note, @Bergenblues, Praveenarasurajan: have you seen Wikidata:Conflict_of_interest and the related sources there? We do not have a policy exactly equivalent to w:en:Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest, but there are still some possible concerns with sponsored editing or being particularly close to a topic. Do you have a relationship with this person? Have you engaged in any paid editing here on his behalf? —Justin (koavf)TCM 20:25, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning User:Azajkhan41

Azajkhan41 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: Falsifying my RFD (https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions&diff=prev&oldid=2213783418), probably did the same as 122.177.107.68 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) (https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Wikidata%3ARequests_for_deletions&diff=2213783793&oldid=2213783418). ―Dorades (talk) 10:25, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

+2 removed requests. Please block this user/IP and decline this request. --Wüstenspringmaus talk 11:18, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
✓ Done DR closed, user warned by Matěj Suchánek. --Lymantria (talk) 07:20, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning User:Dorades

Spam User making wrong removal requests @Dorades Azajkhan41 (talk) 10:35, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

 Not done @Azajkhan41: Blanking the RFD page and falsifiying the RFD request will not get you anywhere. If you believe that the item is notable and should not be deleted, please find verifiable sources to prove its notability. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 16:49, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning User:All the way to motown howdown

All the way to motown howdown (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: LTA XReportLeonidlednev (talk) 04:08, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

Blocked indef. –FlyingAce✈hello 04:20, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

Q122791572 and Q106103956

Pages mentioned in Q122791572 in enwiki and mrwiki should be in Q106103956. Can someone please fix them. The pages were moved from dab recently but somehow mover didn't fix it here. ShaanSenguptaTalk 04:22, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

Fixed now, thanks for bringing this up. --Wüstenspringmaus talk 13:40, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning User:217.156.4.37

Creating too many promo items Midleading (talk) 04:08, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Range-blocked for three months. All his creations nuked Estopedist1 (talk) 06:23, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

Please delete the items created by the following IP and block:

Midleading (talk) 16:36, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

@Estopedist1: Your rangeblock doesn't cover the latter IP. Consider expanding it to /24.--Jasper Deng (talk) 05:23, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
✓ Range-blocked to /24. Discovered creations nuked Estopedist1 (talk) 06:20, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

Прошу поставить защиту на правки от незарегистрированных на элемент Q2034898, ибо какие-то пользователи не один раз добавляли в Место рождения квалификатор "административная единица" и "государство", хотя в случае с городом Львовом это не нужно и даже лишнее. Artur Random (talk) 17:45, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

Почему не нужно? Ymblanter (talk) 19:07, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Они же автоматически в статье подгружаются. УССР и СССР. Artur Random (talk) 18:49, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

За последнее время не наблюдаю ни проблемных правок, ни вандализма. Включил в список наблюдения на полгода, если начнётся настойчивое внесение некорректных (или не совсем корректных) правок, установлю полузащиту. --Wolverène (talk) 10:22, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning User:Awinsongyababa

Awinsongyababa (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: Erroneously merging people with the Distributed Game. I left a message on their talk page but they are unlikely to see it if they are using an external tool. Please block to get their attention. ―William Graham (talk) 20:44, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

shock-blocked for one week Estopedist1 (talk) 21:19, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Due to massiveness, he is likely some LTA. Checkuser case for e.g. user:Matlin? Pinging user:Jasper Deng Estopedist1 (talk) 06:39, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
I finished proofing all the merges, took me a bunch of hours. Erred on the side of reverting when there wasn't enough information to compare biographies/publications. William Graham (talk) 14:57, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Thanks @William Graham:! Unfortunately there were 2 other users doing many such merges yesterday - Suglo20 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) and Deishini Mariam (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)). I can review the latter, but User:Suglo20 had hundreds of merges that might take many days to resolve. This is a "duplicate" of the problem we had last month with another new Wikidata user - Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive/2024/06#Please revert June 20 edits by User:Jephtah Ogyefo Acquah. The error rate there was close to 50%, so I think it would be easiest here if User:Suglo20's were just all reverted. Magnus claimed he had shut down this feature in his "game" but evidently it came back somehow. ArthurPSmith (talk) 16:02, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
I've taken care of the Deishini Mariam merges; reverted 5 for being wrong one way or another. ArthurPSmith (talk) 17:47, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
BTW I had a similar problem recently with Nkpelawuni (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)); the problem mainly involved the "Merge items" game; I blocked the account once for 1 day and checked all the merges (nearly all were wrong); then there were a bulk of new wrong merges, so I blocked the account for 1 week and chacked all the new merges (nearly all wrong as the previous time). I fear somehow all of these account could be connected; maybe the same person creating a new one after the previous is blocked; it could be useful a look by the checkusers IMHO. Epìdosis 18:06, 22 July 2024 (UTC) See also Topic:Y8vvrrfnnminerl2 (asking to deactivate the "Merge items" game) and Topic:Y71rogb5cqh25uiw (asking to deactivate the "Duplicate authors" game). --Epìdosis 18:07, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Hmm, I had been assuming this was somehow just new Wikidata users trying to be helpful. I've had interactions with some of those who've used the game in the past (via their talk pages or undo comments) and they don't seem to act like a LTA person, but I haven't had much interaction with those types so maybe I just don't know. In any case I think there's a fundamental problem here of calling merges in Wikidata a "game" - merges need to be thought through carefully, they have significant follow-on consequences (changing items that refer to them) that become very hard to reverse after a week or so. ArthurPSmith (talk) 18:12, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Also taken care of the Suglo20 merges; I reverted 54 out of 134 of them (40% error rate). So anyway hopefully we're done with this problem for good now. ArthurPSmith (talk) 20:57, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

@Estopedist1: There's strong technical evidence that this is an (unannounced) hackathon. Out of caution I will not make any blocks related to this without that clarification. Otherwise it is Likely that Awinsongyababa = Suglo20 and Possible that they are Deishini Marium. CheckUser isn't perfect.--Jasper Deng (talk) 22:49, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

@ArthurPSmith@Epìdosis@William Graham: only smart solution here is that new users (without autopatrolled status) are not permitted to merge items Estopedist1 (talk) 06:24, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
 Support is that something the interface allows setting? ArthurPSmith (talk) 13:47, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
Probably Estopedist1 intended merging items through the Wikidata game - which is now solved, cf. Topic:Y8vvrrfnnminerl2 and Topic:Y71rogb5cqh25uiw (all the merge games in the Wikidata Game have been canceled) -; disallowing doing it through Wikidata itself (using Special:MergeItems or the merge gadget) would probably be possible only through Special:AbuseFilter and would anyway require a wide discussion (probably a RfC). Epìdosis 21:15, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

vandal

https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/%D8%A7%D8%B6%D8%A7%D9%81 has vandalised 2 pages. I've reverted the changes to one. Vicarage (talk) 12:42, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

user is warned. No additional edits after warning Estopedist1 (talk) 20:05, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Probably they are just a newbie on Wikidata, the most recent edits are made in the sandbox pages. --Wolverène (talk) 07:54, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning User:IRFakeFreeAN

IRFakeFreeAN (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: A vandalism-only account, for several months it changes names of places to outdated ones. I suggest blocking. --Orijentolog (talk) 05:51, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: last edit was one month ago. Let us know, if he will continue, @Orijentolog Estopedist1 (talk) 06:08, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
@Estopedist1: OK, I will. Thanks. --Orijentolog (talk) 06:18, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 01:33, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

Restoration of Q127000000

Hello. It was me who created it (not connected), I wanted a page in my name (that I will complete) with an easy to remember number. Thank you. Gzen92 (talk) 20:41, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

Sorry, are you saying that you want a vanity Wikidata entry just because? —Justin (koavf)TCM 20:50, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
Are you notable? --Wolverène (talk) 23:51, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
As part of Gzen92's effort to snipe that QID, they (and their bot User:Gzen92Bot) created a bunch of additional items. For each failed attempt at a QID, they redirected them to Unterlinden monastery (Q15117344). I believe many other of the redirects were failed bot runs. Q15117344 has at least 400 redirects to it. If you look at their edit history, they attempted to capture Q128000000 today, and failed. I believe this kind of editing, creating mostly empty items for the purpose of sniping a QID and not managing their bot correctly, is a violation of Wikimedia policies and deserves some kind of sanction. William Graham (talk) 01:06, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
This is wildly unacceptable and best case scenario, this bot is malfunctioning, so I have blocked it. —Justin (koavf)TCM 03:17, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
It seems patently obvious that he's trying to game the system for some kind of vanity URIs or something ridiculous. I have locked that page and blocked the user for two weeks. That is ridiculous, disruptive, and obviously inappropriate. —Justin (koavf)TCM 03:19, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
 Not done Rightfully deleted, no reason to undelete. --Lymantria (talk) 10:57, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning User:2604:2D80:D005:7000:0:0:0:0/64

2604:2D80:D005:7000:0:0:0:0/64 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: LTA, please also revoke the talk page access XReport ―--Wüstenspringmaus talk 12:27, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done: Blocked by Lymantria for 3 months.--S8321414 (talk) 12:35, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 01:33, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning User:2800:e2:9c80:2cf:2ca2:a65:6f2:fc19

2800:e2:9c80:2cf:2ca2:a65:6f2:fc19 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: excessive vandalism on Hannah Arendt (Q60025). (Probably the item should be protected or the IP blocked) ―Killerkürbis (talk) 18:33, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done
This section was archived on a request by: —Justin (koavf)TCM 18:39, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

Vandalism and edit warring

POitor (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: adding disputed and false information into the items about towns Shusha[23][24] and Khankendi[25][26] even after his edits were reverted. Interfase (talk) 19:18, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

Editor, I understand your emotional struggle, but the information I added to the data (City in Nagorno-Karabakh, now occupied by Azerbaijan (in Armenian)) is the absolute truth and you are the one doing the vandalism now. Relax, shake off your nerves. Thank you, Stay well)) POitor (talk) 19:40, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
Let me add that you are using a supposed machine translation, are you making efforts to write in Armenian? the letter "u" is "Ու / ու". Take note.
Leave Armenian editing to those who know the language. POitor (talk) 19:46, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
Don't worry about my nerves. Your disputed edits will be reverted and if you will not stop adding disputed and wrong information into the items your access to Wikidata may be blocked. So, please stop make edits that were reverted. These cities are not under disputed territories, so in all languages including Armenian it should be noted that they are cities in Azerbaijan, not "in Nagorno-Karabakh". They are not "occupied by Azerbaijan". They are located within internationally recognised borders of Azerbaijan. And this fact should be in Wikidata in all languages. Interfase (talk) 20:04, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
He continues edit warring and returning false and disputed information[27][28][29][30] Interfase (talk) 20:09, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
I've protected the item to stop the edit-warring. Please discuss on the talk page. If you cannot figure out a consensus there, get a third party. Edit-warring is not productive. —Justin (koavf)TCM 20:22, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
Dear Koavf, of course, thank you for that step, but for the sake of fairness and neutrality, you also should not let Interfase's edit remain until the end of the discussion. So those rows may still be empty. POitor (talk) 20:33, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
I reverted the situation to the consensus stage before your disputed edits. They are not "my edits". That is consensuss version of the items. Do not mislead the administrator please Interfase (talk) 20:35, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
To be clear to anyone who hasn't looked at the history, Interfase has made hundreds of edits stretching back months, so I didn't undo all of those: I just went back to 2024-07-17, prior to this current round of back-and-forth. Again, please take this to the talk page and please consider giving it 24 hours before you get into it. There are unlikely to be any edits to this item in the meantime, so let's take a step back. —Justin (koavf)TCM 20:39, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
Interfase Worrying about nerves is a profession, that's how it works, besides, it's respect you don't show by getting into an editorial fight. I did what you did. You don't wait for the discussion to end, you quickly change edits. POitor (talk) 20:27, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
Did you start a discussion on the talk page after your edits were reverted? No. So, first initiate the discussion and explain why your edits are not the adding of false information. Interfase (talk) 20:30, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
Oh, only now did you remember that the issue can be resolved through discussion. You changed my edit at once, it is a clear proof that you are not constructive and the goal is to do what you want. POitor (talk) 20:40, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
I did not change your edit, I reverted them because was disagree with them. But I am agree with Justin. Let's keep it in version before edit warring and move to the talk page. Interfase (talk) 20:46, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
On first glance, I thought it was at the state it was before the edit-warring started, which is generally what I think is best. I have now restored the previous version.
As someone who does not know Armenian or Azeri or much about Caucasian history/ies and culture/s at all, from first glance, it seems like this is all just a matter of labels, and it's not obvious to me why you can't just have both labels that you prefer if both of them are actually used, but I'm also not the best person to get deep into this conflict. Just please know that this kind of reverting back and forth is just not productive. —Justin (koavf)TCM 20:36, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

I would like to think that protecting, reverting, and asking for cooler heads to prevail is enough and that blocking or getting into the weeds of the dispute are not necessary now. —Justin (koavf)TCM 20:39, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: —Justin (koavf)TCM 20:39, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

@Interfase, POitor: Please take 24 hours to cool off and stop responding here and instead discuss at the talk page. I don't want to get involved in stopping personal attacks or read discussions about bad faith or have an interminable section here. Please drop this for now and reconsider how you can collaborate. —Justin (koavf)TCM 20:44, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

Agree. Interfase (talk) 20:47, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
I didn't open the discussion, I edited it in wikidata and it's strictly the truth. It's just that this user makes changes as he wants, threatens to block, is that right? Reverses my edits several times, isn't it an edit war? POitor (talk) 20:50, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
Yes, hence I called it that. I'm asking you to again please drop the conversation here and go to talk after letting some time expire. I don't see value in continuing the conversation here. Please stop for now and discuss elsewhere. —Justin (koavf)TCM 20:57, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
You can also see here that this person did the same thing with the names of cities POitor (talk) 20:57, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
Stop. —Justin (koavf)TCM 20:59, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

Probably canvassing

Soufiyouns asking other users (Jsamwrites, Lionel Cristiano and Clemens Dulcis) to support property proposals! I found the following property proposal Pocket Oxford German Dictionary: English-German ID, Pocket Oxford German Dictionary: German-English ID, and Pocket Oxford-Hachette French Dictionary: English-French ID. Please see Soufiyouns's contributions, Topic:Y9059pujcdduhzcr, and my user talk page for reference. As Wikidata:Canvassing not implemented yet, I raised the issue here. Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 10:03, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

Hi @ZI Jony: I invited users involved in the creation and editing of lexemes and interested in French and German languages, and I considered this to be beneficial for Wikidata. I hope that notifying and informing users about the presence of proposed properties is not harmful but rather beneficial. I therefore invited several users to comment on my requests and creative proposals because they are already involved in the subject. I think that my requests were not aimed at my personal interest and that I did not request permissions or privileges, but these are subjects linked to bilingual dictionaries and contributions of an encyclopedic nature. Regards. Soufiyouns (talk) 10:27, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
@Soufiyouns, I saw messages on their talk page, it's not an invitation, it's canvassing! Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 10:36, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
 Comment There is no explicit rule against canvassing, but I believe it is followed de facto. I would say it's more serious if it happens in a request for permissions or a policy vote. The question is then if it becomes spammy and disruptive. I would say that asking unrelated users on their talk page to vote in support is not something we would want. It also calls into question the validity of the consensus, which arguably does harm to the process. But to be fair, a number of property proposals would fly under the radar these days if we didn't poke people somehow. I don't think anyone would mind if you used Template:Ping project or Wikidata:Project chat or any of its localized pages for this. You should also avoid language that could be interpreted as soliciting votes. Infrastruktur (talk) 22:54, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
@Infrastruktur: Thank you for these valuable details regarding the property proposals which would have gone unnoticed if we did not contact the potential users involved in their theme. I take for example the bilingual English-Italian proposal Pocket Oxford Italian Dictionary: Italian-English ID which was going to be archived without favorable approval because of the absence of a positive vote. I then contacted the user Luca.favorido who is active on lexemes in Italian, and he thanked me for notifying him about it and strongly supported this proposal which was then created (Italian-English Dictionary ID (P12885)) and will be very useful to him in his work. Regards. Soufiyouns (talk) 05:38, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
@Soufiyouns, the best way is to ask their opinion (not to support) by ping them in property proposal discussion, talk page of lexicographical data, or related project pages. You have done the same is wrong way! Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 05:54, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
@ZI Jony: I thank you for allowing the entire Wikidata community to open the discussion on this type of incident, and I will try to ask users' opinions on topics of general interest, and I will avoid using the crude word Support which can create ambiguity and nuance constructive debate. Regards. Soufiyouns (talk) 06:15, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
For transparency reasons, I have precised this in the support message. John Samuel (talk) 11:04, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
@Jsamwrites, I noticed your remarks, and I appreciated you for that. Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 05:57, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning User:2601:8C:4182:9AB0:0:0:0:0/64

2601:8C:4182:9AB0:0:0:0:0/64 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: Vandalizing, reorganizing and repurposing items related to daytime television and PBS. XReportWilliam Graham (talk) 21:50, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

This IP user that I believe has been blocked a bunch of times, previous usernames including User:WorthItFan93848393838 and probably User:IshaTaylor. William Graham (talk) 21:57, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
✓ Done Blocked 3 months. --Lymantria (talk) 05:41, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning User:Az összes nap, amikor ez meg fog történni, megtörtént velem

Az összes nap, amikor ez meg fog történni, megtörtént velem (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: LTA XReportLeonidlednev (talk) 02:53, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

I want add in Messi (Q81794) the link of [Akenatón (wikiquote español)] if it is posible, do you can give me please help? Lruizsaf7 (talk) 12:27, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

Done, thanks for this note. --Wüstenspringmaus talk 12:34, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Wüstenspringmaus talk 12:34, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

Protection request for Q100292691

Please semi-protect Q100292691. Reason: Persistent vandalism XReport ----Wüstenspringmaus talk 08:42, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Protected for six months Estopedist1 (talk) 06:19, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: –FlyingAce✈hello 14:21, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning User:Nakamoto2

Nakamoto2 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: most likely fake info additions, user page looks like joke. (last edit directed me to reverts elsewhere: 1, 2) ―Mykhal (talk) 13:37, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done Indeffed. --Lymantria (talk) 05:57, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

Protection request for Q1227076

Please semi-protect Q1227076. Reason: Vandalismo reiterado XReport --Nicolas1231 (talk) 14:04, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

✓ Protected for two years: 2nd protection Estopedist1 (talk) 06:29, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: –FlyingAce✈hello 14:20, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning User:Tm

Tm (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: user is vandalizing this page by repeatedly adding [31][32] a nonexistent X profile and an irrelevant porn link. Their talk page history shows that they've been warned multiple times about edit warring, adding unsupported data, and disruptive editing. Lapadite (talk) 01:08, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

And the above account has the bad habit of removing historical social media accounts that should be marked as obsolete instead of being removed, as i have done, removed several sourced statements, like political party, in particular removing them again 4 minutes, after i pointed several other sources in my talkpage like the source or others like ‘Parks and Recreation’ Cast Reunites for Wisconsin Democratic Party Fundraiser or Celebrities who support Joe Biden for president
For whatever reason, this same user keeps removing sourced statements, when it even has the text quoted, like "Plaza started out in entertainment as a “Saturday Night Live” set design intern and an NBC page." as not once, but twice.
His full actions of massive removal of sourced statements. Tm (talk) 01:19, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
But his actions of removing sourced statements extends to more items like Charlie Puth (Q19810390) or Amy Lee (Q172632) Tm (talk) 01:28, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
That isn't sourced content, and I know because I've been an active contributor to the WP article of the latter page you linked. But do try your hardest to attempt to distract from your disruptive bordering on vandal edits and your history of edit warring (for which you were warned by an admin). Lapadite (talk) 01:35, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
Curious decision to not link to that discussion in full in Wikidata:Administrators'_noticeboard/Archive/2021/11#Tm where on can see what was really happening for several months prior with the continuos actions of one user, despite several previous enlarged discussions, but good try. Tm (talk) 07:49, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
As the user has been told at least once before, a celebrity endorsing a presidential candidate does not translate to us determining that the celebrity is a member of the political party of that candidate. Wikipedia has a strict policy on BLPs (biographies of living persons), and not including original research or synthesizing content from sources ("Do not combine material from multiple sources to state or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any of the sources"). The actress does not state in the link that was present that she is a member of any party. Endorsing a political candidate does not automatically make someone a member of the candidate's party. Moreover, given TM's sidestepping here, I'd like to stress that this report isn't a content dispute, it is about the user repeatedly and knowingly re-adding a porn entry and a non-existent X profile. Lapadite (talk) 01:36, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
First thing, this is Wikidata, not the english Wikipedia, so what policies it might have, as no standing in here
Again, one does not remove an deactivated twitter profile or any other social media accounts that should be marked as obsolete instead of being removed. And that is exactly what i did and did not not removed it like you did.
And she was a history of endorsing different democratic party candidates in different USA like democratic party candidate Beto O'Rourke in the 2018 United States Senate election in Texas against the republican Ted Cruz or a Matt Meyer, democratic party candidate to the New Castle County Executive, Delaware. Tm (talk) 08:21, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
What Wikidata is not - "Wikidata is not a place to put original research". Lapadite (talk) 09:06, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
For the attention of any admins that read this: I'd removed the irrelevant porn link that Tm re-added to the page several times. I haven't removed it again, despite it being vandalism and a violation of WP's Biography of Living Persons policy and WD's Living People policy, because of Tm's edit warring, which I don't want to contribute to. I am awaiting admins' input on this vandalism, which would be immediately be removed on Wikipedia and the user who repeatedly reinstated it would be blocked. Lapadite (talk) 08:57, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
You conveniently "forget" to mention that
This person has a history of several endorsements of the USA Democratic Party, in federal and several states or participated in the 2020 Democratic National Committee's after-party.
The Wikidata:What Wikidata is not you linked clearly states that :"[Wikidata is not] Wikipedia, or an encyclopedia", yet that doesnt stop you from quoting policies from the english Wikipedia that have no bear in Wikidata
You conveniently "forget" to mention that because you removed i reverted all your removals of sourced statements because it is impossible not do it item by item, given how extensive your removals are, so nice try to smudge my actions and try to pass them as vandalism Tm (talk) 09:49, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
I addressed the issues with rest of your edits, such as the original research policy-violation that is categorizing the person as a member of a political party without any explicit statement from the person that they are. As well as categorizing unpaid internships before starting her acting career as her occupations. As well as linking to a non-existent X profile. And you've had seven opportunities so far in the seven edits you've made recently to not re-add or to remove the porn link. The nature of these edits, combined with your edit warring and then looking at your talk page history and links to warnings you've received in the past, your editing behavior shows a pattern of concern. Lapadite (talk) 11:10, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

Arthur Constantin KREBS

I want to link Arthur Constantin KREBS' Wikidata page to the Wikiversity page. Can you help me? Rbmn (talk) 13:16, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

You mean v:en:User:Rbmn/Arthur Constantin KREBS (1850-1935): Military engineer, Automotive industrialist, Great projects manager? Please request move this page to main namespace on English Wikiversity, or you can't link it on Wikidata according to Wikidata:Notability 1.1--S8321414 (talk) 13:45, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning User:Iamcarbon

Iamcarbon (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: mass removal of labels, often for languages where it is correct ―Mykhal (talk) 06:03, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Mykhal
Wikidata introduced the new "mul" language code today, which can be used to specify a default value for an item. This works nicely for proper names (people, trademarks, organizations, product names, etc), where the name is shared across multiple languages. By specifying the default, we no longer need to manually duplicate it across dozens (and in some cases, hundreds) of languages. Iamcarbon (talk) 06:14, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Interesting, I have missed it. It would be great if it could be mentioned in the summary for the these deletions. —Mykhal (talk) 06:25, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Totally agree. These deletions need summaries. I've paused deleting any additional labels until I can make sure they are included, and make sure the community is in support of consolidating duplicated labels where the native label is used across languages (Astroids, Humans, Trademarks, etc).
Going to continue to watch the mul discussions of the next week and hope to continue to get feedback on the batch of changes I've made today.
I've also noticed, that by simplifying the label sets -- it makes them super easy to review and spot errors / vandalism. I've caught a handful of errors / spam during this process.
It also looks like these simplifications may help the infrastructure team improve the scalability of the query service! Super excited to see this rollout. Iamcarbon (talk) 07:11, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
@Iamcarbon, Mykhal: the 'mul' code is not fully available yet. Please stop deleting labels until at least the week of August 12. See Help talk:Default values for labels and aliases#Default labels rolled out now? "It's rolled out for limited release (to those folks who put "mul" in their Babel boxes) starting today with a full release starting the week of August 12th. — Huntster (t @ c) 20:37, 29 July 2024 (UTC)" ArthurPSmith (talk) 14:11, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

Report concerning User:93.148.144.72

Hello, the Lake Como LTA is back again as 93.148.144.72, and it's adding a lot of wrong statements. Could someone stop it and rollback? Horcrux (talk) 16:54, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

He is blocked for six months. Just in case I am giving some days before nuking his mass-creations Estopedist1 (talk) 20:11, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
@Horcrux: all his creations is nuked, but because of massiveness, patrolling of all his edits would be a huge work Estopedist1 (talk) 06:07, 3 August 2024 (UTC)