Talk:Janardana

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hinduism Low‑importance

	Hinduism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mythology Low‑importance

	Mythology portal This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merger proposal

Since this page looks like it describes the title of another deity, maybe it would be best to merge this information to the deity in question and switch this to a redirect. It doesn't look like there is much scope for expansion here. Simon Burchell (talk) 12:00, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose -- It is not only the name of Vishnu but also a popular name of Krishna. So merging in Vishnu will loose the content relating to Krishna. Wikid ^as© 12:14, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose-- Since Janardana is the title of two different deities it would be inappropriate to merge the article to a single deity.Skr15081997 (talk) 10:23, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]