Template talk:Ship classes of the Chinese Navy

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

China Mid‑importance

	China portal This template is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Mid	This template has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Maritime / Asian / Chinese

This template is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Asian military history task force
	Chinese military history task force

Semi-protected edit request on 29 April 2018

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Request to edit Template talk:Ship classes of the Chinese Navy by change training ship from Qi Jiguang-class training ship to Type 680 training ship to comply with wikipedia convention of listing ship by type when type number is available XdeLaTorre (talk) 02:00, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done L293D (☎ • ✎) 19:24, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Moving the NATO report name into parentheses

Currently, the template listed the NATO report name along side with the Chinese designation. As a result, those without a NATO report name have a redundant "class" behind (Type 095 class, Type 003 class, Type 002 class, Type 001A class). Per the example of the Royal Navy, I will move the NATO report name into parentheses and remove the redundant "class". -Mys_721tx (talk) 22:39, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 3 June 2019

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

This template should not be a duplicate of the same thing. because there is already an artile List of active People's Liberation Army Navy ships, instead, the original template that includes all ship classes of the Chinese navy is appropriate because it included all ship classes, including those retired. 172.91.159.57 (talk) 02:37, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Extended content

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Consider reviewing WP:CLN, which indicates that readers and editors may have multiple different ways to navigate. Izno (talk) 20:46, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Changes I want to make are:

(1) The name of the template is changed from Active Ships of the People's Liberation Army Navy to Ship classes of the Chinese Navy (2) Retired ship classes are added Reason for makeing these changes is because there is already an article List of active People's Liberation Army Navy ships, that provides the same info the current version of the template provides, and neither provides the list of retired ship classes of the Chinese navy. Changes I want to make is to provide info of retired ship classes of the Chinese navy. The current version of the template is same as List of active People's Liberation Army Navy ships, because both the article and the template have the same info only on active ships. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.91.159.57 (talk) 05:26, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]