Leaders

America’s trustbusters plan to curtail the use of non-compete clauses. Good

The clue is in the name

Image: Sébastien Thibault

Three-quarters of Americans who work, do so for a firm. They have contracts setting out their pay, holiday, benefits and sometimes the appropriate way to dress (although not in journalism). A lot of contracts also say whether employees may work for a competitor if they leave the company. It is hard to know what share of American workers are restricted by these non-compete clauses, but the available evidence suggests it may be as high as one in five. More worrying, these clauses are as likely to apply to workers operating deep-fat fryers in fast-food kitchens as they are to workers operating in the conference rooms of white-shoe law firms. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has these clauses in its sights, on the grounds that they are anticompetitive and suppress wages.

This article appeared in the Leaders section of the print edition under the headline “The clue is in the name”

Zero-sum

From the January 14th 2023 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from Leaders

Mario Draghi’s best ideas are those Europe finds least comfortable

The danger is that it picks the easy ones

The Labour government’s worrying lack of ambition in Europe

Sir Keir Starmer is trapped by the mindset of the post-Brexit years


A make-or-break moment for Mexico

In America’s biggest trading partner the rule of law and democracy are under attack


The real problem with China’s economy

The country risks making some of the mistakes the Soviet Union did

What to do about America’s killer cars

The country’s roads are nearly twice as dangerous as the rich-world average. It doesn’t have to be that way

How to deal with the hard-right threat in Germany

As extremists win more votes across Europe, forming moderate and effective governments is getting harder