Will Byrnes's Reviews > You Are Not a Gadget

You Are Not a Gadget by Jaron Lanier
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
1526851
's review

really liked it
bookshelves: nonfiction, economics, brain-candy

There are many ideas floating about in the mind of Jaron Lanier, the guy who popularized the term virtual reality, was with Atari in the beginning and has, for decades, been involved with VR as a teacher, consultant and architect. One of his notions, the core argument of this book, is that much of current internet interface design, so-called Web 2.0, is hazardous to users.
certain specific, popular internet designs of the moment—not the internet as a whole—tend to pull us into life patterns that gradually degrade the ways in which each of us exists as individuals. These unfortunate designs are more oriented toward treating people as relays in a global brain.
description
Jaron Lanier- image from Smithsonian Magazine

He takes issue as well with the idea that content should not have to be paid for.
the idea that information should be “free” sounds good at first. But the unintended result is that all the clout and money generated online has begun to accumulate around people close to only certain highly secretive computers, many of which are essentially spying operations designed to sell advertising and access or to pull money out of a marketplace as if by black magic. The motives of the people who comprise the online elites aren’t necessarily bad…but nevertheless the structure of the online economy as it has developed is hurting the middle class, and the viability of capitalism for everyone in the long term.
He points out that those who make their living from creativity, writers, artists, photographers, designers, are under an all out assault by on-line providers eager to deliver art only as a means of generating ad revenue, to themselves, not the creatives who actually produce content. Lanier sees the rise of what he calls “digital serfdom,” yet another attack on the middle class. With the bi-polar tax code in the US that punishes actual work, the demise of support for working people by a viable, liberal Democratic Party, and the off-shoring of as much work as possible by capital that encounters fewer and fewer limitations on trans-national transit, the middle class does not need yet another drain on our resources and ability to earn a living, yet here it is. Lanier makes a compelling case that value, in the form of dollars, accumulates increasingly in the pockets of internet giants like Google and Amazon, and the ability for individual content-producers to make a living from their creative product is declining. And further that any economic gains we might see from technological advances will be swallowed up by the really big fish, leaving us, ultimately, worse off.
the notion that cheaper computers, smartphones, etc., will compensate for the growing economic gap is just not true. Ultimately mounting poverty will outpace cost savings and everyone will suffer. We can’t count on anything but a strong middle class to maintain many things dear to us: widespread self-determination and liberty, a dynamic commercial market filled with surprises, and a democracy that can’t be bought because ordinary people have enough clout to stand up for themselves. Some of the current popular online designs , as appealing as they might seem at first, are leading us away from these wonderful things.
The rest is details. But the details are pretty interesting. Lanier goes into specifics re how users are being sliced, diced and re-sold like toxic assets, as the extant interfaces rely increasingly on our giving up more and more of ourselves.

There are loftier concepts in the air as well in the book. Lanier looks at what he calls the “hive mind” and examines assumptions regarding the likelihood of artificial consciousness arising from increasingly vast connected cloud computer resources.

He examines why it is that software advances cannot match Moore’s Law, namely that hardware efficiency doubles every 18 months. Current software at any time is, of necessity, the tip we see of a very large iceberg.

Lanier dabbles into the implication of things like NCLB
what computerized analysis of all the country’s school tests has done to education is exactly what Facebook has done to friendships. In both cases, life is turned into a database
Lanier offers a wealth of intriguing ideas in this relatively small volume. I was most fascinated with what he had to say about cephalopods and a possible source for our species’ appreciation of metaphor.

I enjoyed the book and it made me think, but I also must confess that I drifted a bit while reading some of the latter chapters. Sometimes he wanders afield. Otherwise You are Not a Gadget made me hopeful that at least some people are aware of the darker implications of current trends, and are thinking about not only how we got here, but some ways in which we might avoid some of the problems that are beginning to emerge.

============================EXTRA STUFF

Lanier's personal site. He does not maintain Twitter, FB, or Reddit accounts

Items of Interest
-----January 5, 2013 - I came across this fascinating interview with the author in Smithsonian magazine
-----August 24, 2020 - GQ - The Conscience of Silicon Valley By Zach Baron - on the fulfillment of Lanier's predictions and possible correctives looking forward
113 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read You Are Not a Gadget.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

June 30, 2011 – Started Reading
June 30, 2011 – Shelved
June 30, 2011 – Shelved as: nonfiction
June 30, 2011 – Shelved as: economics
July 1, 2011 – Finished Reading
November 2, 2012 – Shelved as: brain-candy

Comments Showing 1-17 of 17 (17 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Emilie (new)

Emilie what are some of the specific designs he is talking about, will?


Will Byrnes He rarely gets very specific, but says "web 2.0 designs strongly favor flatness in cultural expression. But I believe that flatness, as applied to human affairs, leads to blandness and meaninglessness." So wiki, YouTube, Digg, social networking by implication. "A movie like Blade Runner is first-order expression, as was the novel that inspired it, but a mashup in which a scene from a movie is accompanied by the anonymous masher's favorite song is not in the same league. I don't claim that I can build a meter to detect precisely where the boundary between the first and second-order expression lies. I am claiming, however,that the web 2.0 designs spin out gobs of the latter and choke off the former."

And Brian, I hoope to post this week on the latest Chris Hedges. Talk about depressing.


Will Byrnes No doubt. But, interpreting Harding, I expect his take is that it is all derivative of the actual creators of the original work(s), and that both artists and their reinterpreters are all ultimately working for the bundlers of their and our work, for their economic benefit, and not ours.


message 4: by Emilie (new)

Emilie thanks for explaining.


message 5: by Caroline (last edited Jan 05, 2013 11:41PM) (new)

Caroline Fascinating, as was the Smithsonian interview. I hope this work generates more books and articles on the subject. His book is a bit out of my league (I read a lot of the quotes too...), but I hope to read more about his ideas a bit further down the line, when perhaps they are more accessible. Very interesting.


Will Byrnes He has a new book coming out, thus the interview. Yeah, he is one of those folks who make regular smart people feel dull.


message 7: by Cathy (new)

Cathy DuPont Will:

I cannot profess to understand all of this but what I could wrap around my brain around is really scary.

And the Smithsonian interview of Lanier, really, really scary. I found Lanier's words about posting anonymously particularly unsettling. The "mob mentality" is in my opinion, very real.

Thanks for reading/reviewing this important book and directing me to it.


Will Byrnes Rand wrote: "Here's a positive spin."
Sounds interesting. Thanks for the rec


message 10: by Jan (new)

Jan Rice The analogy to the "hive mind," by which it sounds like Lanier means something unsettling (Childhood's End-like?) reminded me of something in my current project, Muller's The Mind and the Market: at the dawn of the Enlightenment in the early 1700s, it was thought the newly acceptable drives of ambition and motivation would lead from "The Grumbling Hive" to the happy hive, in which, by the creation of what we now call the middle class, "the very Poor" would live "better than the Rich before."

So then humanity was looking forward to a middle class, and now we're afraid it's slipping away!


message 11: by Will (new) - rated it 4 stars

Will Byrnes Or being kicked down the stairs


message 12: by Michael (new)

Michael Great food for thought. Am glad someone is thinking creatively about this "digital serfdom" and life being turned into a database. But I am not hearing of any solutions. There was such an exciting decade of innovation in a wide-open frontier, so it is sad to see such a concentration and control be a few companies now. I hear from other thinkers that the arrival of the limit of Moore's Law will cause a lot of problems with business cycles (Kaku's book on the future). Maybe that will give software innovation to really catch up. Still the message of history is surprises always change the game. With evolved Google Glasses or video in contact lenses, watch PCs, and great voice controlled interfaces we will be perpetual net citizens.


message 13: by Rand (new) - added it

Rand Here's another, more positive, book on this subject. Hacking Happiness: Why Your Personal Data Counts and How Tracking it Can Change the World.

(note that there is currently a promotion for that title, so if you interested, click away!!! it really matters <3


message 14: by Will (new) - rated it 4 stars

Will Byrnes Thanks, Rand. It looks interesting


message 15: by Stephanie (new)

Stephanie Sun Great review Will.


message 16: by angela tsui (new) - added it

angela tsui Atari is the outer space jam that my entire family grew up with so fondly of.


message 17: by Will (new) - rated it 4 stars

Will Byrnes Cool


back to top