Will Byrnes's Reviews > Fear: Trump in the White House

Fear by Bob Woodward
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
1526851
's review

really liked it
bookshelves: american-history, books_of_the_year-2018, economics, history, nonfiction, politics, trump

…the only thing we have to fear is fear itself - Franklin Delano Roosevelt Inaugural address – March 4, 1933
Real power is—I don’t even want to use the word—fear. - Presidential candidate Donald J. Trump in an interview with Bob Woodward and Robert Costa on March 31, 2016
FDR was correct. The fear that gripped the nation in the Great Depression may have had a basis in reality, but acceding to that fear could have hindered any attempts to make the dire economic situation better. Would Roosevelt feel the same way today? Do we have nothing to fear but fear itself? Well, we do have a very concrete problem that generates a fair bit of concern, anxiety, nervousness, and yes, fear. The guy in the White House. The fear that Roosevelt addressed was a concern that the nation, under the weight of the latest in a series of economic collapses, might not be able to recover from it soon enough to matter, leaving the nation impoverished, riven with internal strife, and in danger from external enemies. The fears we contend with today include a widespread concern about a declining standard of living, a whipped-up concern about minorities, both foreign and domestic, distrust of those who worship differently, or not at all, confusion about increasing gender fluidity, and diversity. But there are specific fears that center on the guy in the Oval Office, both of the incoming and outgoing sorts.

description
Bob Woodward - image from the Washington Post

As illustrated in the opening quote above, (which is the opening of the book as well, the Trump quote, that is) Donald Trump believes the application of fear in dealing with people and nations is the proper course. Threats, bullying, and intimidation are the favorite irons in his bag. In the application of this approach, it is distinctly possible that he might miscalculate to the point of sparking economic mayhem, or even war. But the other element of fear that should terrify us all is his fear for himself.

Donald Trump has paid vast sums of money to see that his under-the-covers philanderings remain under cover. (“You’ve got to deny, deny, deny and push back on these women,” he said. “If you admit to anything and any culpability, then you’re dead.”) He is terrified that the world might see what an empty vessel he truly is. You may recall his conversation with the Mexican president in which Trump pleaded with El Presidente to give him some political cover so he would not have to face his supporters with the news that building the wall was really only a campaign scam. He is afraid that he will be shown to be a mobbed-up front-man, a tool for the Russian mafia, living large by laundering their ill-gotten rubles. He is terrified that he will be exposed as an asset of the Russian government, impacting American foreign and domestic policy in ways that advantage his Russian handler. Where those fears become kinetic is in how he attempts to protect himself. He has done his best to shred the two American institutions that might hold him accountable, the justice system and the fourth estate, waging war on truth itself.

Trump has been griping about the media, well the media that is not Fox, Infowars, Clear Channel, Rush Limbaugh, or any of the far right-wing outlets that serve as a public relations propaganda support system for him, at least since his campaign. It has always seemed clear that the intent here is to erode the standing of news organizations that were likely to expose his many misdeeds. His attacks on judges handling suits against him, on the FBI, which was investigating his campaign’s potential ties to Russia, and on the Justice Department, which controls the FBI, and under which the Special Counsel was appointed, are all attempts to undermine the authority of agencies that are likely to bring his crimes to light and him to justice. If he can persuade the American people that the cops and judges are all corrupt he might get away with his particular responsibility for decades of money-laundering, at the very least, and quite likely a traitorous alliance with Putin, whether entered into willingly or via blackmail. Fending off investigators, public and journalistic, is an existential challenge for him, driven by his fear of exposure.

The focus of Woodward’s book is on one particular form of fear, the concern the people who work for Donald Trump have that he might do serious damage to the United States, and even to the world, either in his handling of potentially fraught negotiations, domestic or international, (there is particular attention paid to dealings with South and North Korea that illustrates this very well) or in his need to preserve his freedom, and privilege, by destroying respected norms and institutions. He is Godzilla, and we are all Tokyo.

description

Another substantial element is the chaos that is the White House, where established lines of communication and authority are regularly crossed, where the staff are constantly on the edge, wondering when the next absurd and/or dangerous presidential action may require their intervention, to try talking him out of it, slow him down, or make the requisite paperwork vanish.

A third theme that permeates is Trump’s flaws as a leader, his lack of intellectual curiosity, his adherence to preconceived notions regardless of research and advice that would lead a flexible human to a more informed opinion, (for example, accusing Iran of violating the treaty despite his own people telling him that they had not) his inability or unwillingness to take in more than a minimum amount of information on pretty much any subject, suggesting an attention deficit disorder.

You have probably heard quite a few quotes from this book, as coverage of its contents has been widespread. Perhaps the most significant are in the prologue
It was no less than an administrative coup d’état, an undermining of the will of the president of the United States and his constitutional authority.
In addition to coordinating policy decisions and schedules and running the paperwork for the president, Porter told an associate, “A third of my job was trying to react to some of the really dangerous ideas that he had and try to give him reasons to believe that maybe they weren’t such good ideas.”
Another strategy was to delay, procrastinate, cite legal restrictions, Lawyer Porter said, “But slow-walking things or not taking things up to him, or telling him—rightly, not just as an excuse—but this needs to be vetted, or we need to do more process on this, or we don’t have legal counsel clearance—that happened 10 times more frequently than taking papers from his desk. It felt like we were walking along the edge of the cliff perpetually.
…the United States in 2017 was tethered to the words and actions of an emotionally overwrought, mercurial and unpredictable leader. Members of his staff had joined to purposefully block some of what they believed were the president’s most dangerous impulses. It was a nervous breakdown of the executive power of the most powerful country in the world.
As with Michael Wolff’s Fire and Fury, Steve Bannon has clearly offered the author considerable information on the goings on inside the White House. It is also clear that there are many other insiders who have talked to Woodward. One must always wonder, of course, where reporting events accurately leaves off for these sources, and where reputation embellishment begins. Thankfully, Woodward has gone to great lengths to corroborate diverse accounts to arrive at an accurate picture. I would be inclined to take what is reported in this book as the best obtainable version of the truth.

Here are some other details that are worth remembering.
-----Reince Preibus, as head of the GOP, had invested heavily in analytics and big data, over $175 million, and was very effective in using the drill-down intel to target neighborhoods with battalions of volunteers in the 2016 election. The intel even allowed targeting of individuals.
-----It was in 2015 that the NSA first found that Russia was looking at US voter rolls.
-----After pussygate, while almost all of his advisors urged Trump to drop out of the presidential race, there were two who urged him to stay in, Bannon, which is no shock, and Melania, which is, given the general view that she wanted no part of a presidential run.
-----Woodward also reports that, while Trump and Melania operate in pretty much separate spheres, there is genuine affection between the two. Color me skeptical.
----- It was interesting to learn how much influence and access Lindsay Graham had at the White House, which goes a long way to explaining how Graham could have pulled such a 180 on Trump. Graham had called Trump a “race-bating xenophobic bigot” in 2015, but in 2018, Graham said “He’s not, in my view, a racist by any stretch of the imagination.” It’s enough to give a guy whiplash.
-----Fascinating to read about Trump’s lawyer John Dowd and his dealings with Trump and Robert Mueller.
-----It was somewhat alarming learning of the sundry notions that were floated by presidential advisors re how to deal with North Korea’s acquisition of ICBM capability.
-----And also alarming, although not at all surprising, to read of John Kelly’s avid hostility toward Dreamers.
----- His people manage Trump’s time so he gets home after the weekend news on CNN and MSNBC goes into softer mode at 9pm.

Much of the book goes into specifics on the hirings and firings that keep the doors of the White House in need of constant oiling. Sometimes the idiocy is mind-boggling. Trump, early on, passed over John Bolton for a significant position because he did not like his moustache. Not that I have any particular fondness for Bolton, myself, but you do not base such decisions on the quality of someone’s facial hair. I mean he hired Ty Cobb, for god’s sake, or had him kidnapped from another century.

Gripes – Woodward sticks by his public position that the Steele dossier was a “garbage document” and that Comey should not have presented any of it to the president. It is unclear on what Woodward bases this position, given the solidity of the investigator, and the ongoing verification of information reported in that document.

You have probably heard/read this, but here are some of the lovely things said about Trump by his own appointees
-----Cohn had witnessed this for over a year—denial when needed or useful or more convenient. He’s a “professional liar,” Cohn told an associate.
-----He’s a fucking moron,” Tillerson said so everyone heard.
----- Trump had failed the President Lincoln test. He had not put a team of political rivals or competitors at the table, Priebus concluded. “He puts natural predators at the table,” Priebus said later. “Not just rivals—predators.
-----The president’s unhinged,” Kelly said
-----Trump normally wouldn’t listen long or very carefully to his national security adviser but it had gotten much worse, McMaster told Porter. “It’s like I can’t even get his attention.”
-----Cohn realized that Trump had gone bankrupt six times and seemed not to mind. Bankruptcy was just another business strategy. Walk away, threaten to blow up the deal. Real power is fear… Applying this mind-set from his real estate days to governing and deciding to risk bankrupting the United States would be a different matter entirely.
----- In a small group meeting in his office one day, Kelly said of the president, “He’s an idiot. It’s pointless to try to convince him of anything. He’s gone off the rails. We’re in crazytown.
“I don’t even know why any of us are here. This is the worst job I’ve ever had.
-----McMaster said that he believed Mattis and Tillerson had concluded that the president and the White House were crazy. As a result, they sought to implement and even formulate policy on their own without interference or involvement from McMaster, let alone the president.
----- In the political back-and-forth, the evasions, the denials, the tweeting, the obscuring, crying “Fake News,” the indignation, Trump had one overriding problem that Dowd knew but could not bring himself to say to the president: “You’re a fucking liar.”

The man really commands loyalty in his people. And then there are the insults, the abuse to which he subjected that staff, regardless of their level of loyalty to him. It is amazing anyone will even speak to the man. I will spare you those.

It is obvious that there is a clear and present danger to all Americans from the man currently resident in the White House, a man who is not only unfit to hold this highest position in the nation, but a man whose dull intellect, exuberant venality, core-deep corruption, contempt for American values and laws, authoritarian inclinations, and unsurpassed greed have made him the worst president in the history of the nation. His rigidity and ignorance have caused even people who share the political values he espouses to engage in activities that are probably criminal in order to spare the nation the downsides of his ill-informed, and often darkly-intentioned decisions. Fear is not the only thing we have to fear. We have just cause to fear what Donald Trump might do with the gigantic instrument he has been charged with operating. While busying himself looting the national treasure for himself and his pals, while paring back sane restrictions on polluting industries, while dismantling much of the mechanism of government that produces and distributes factual information for the nation, while engaging in border practices that make us remember the 1930s and 1940s, he is also busy tearing down respected institutions, shredding political and moral norms, and making the USA the laughingstock of the world.

So, President Roosevelt, it is most certainly NOT THE CASE that the only thing we have to fear is fear itself. There are plenty of fear-generating people, nations and events on our planet that can justify our fears. But the one that supersedes all, for the moment, is Donald J. Trump. He is a danger to us all, and, as the investigations into his dark deeds progresses, he is only getting more paranoid and desperate. Be afraid. Be very afraid.
We must especially beware of that small group of selfish men who would clip the wings of the American Eagle in order to feather their own nests.
FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT, State of the Union Address, Jan. 9, 1941

Review first posted – 9/21/18

Publication date – 9/11/18

=============================EXTRA STUFF

Links to the author’s personal, Twitter and FB pages

September 5, 2018 - I Am Part of the Resistance Inside the Trump Administration - by Anonymous

Interviews
-----September 15, 2018 - New York Magazine - Bob Woodward on the ‘Best Obtainable Version of the Truth’ About Trump - by Olivia Nuzzi
-----September 5, 2018 – CNN - 13 totally bananas moments from Donald Trump's phone call with Bob Woodward - by Chris Cillizza. – a fun piece
----- September 14, 2018 - The Guardian - Bob Woodward: 'Too many people are emotionally unhinged about Trump'
- by David Smith
----- September 14, 2018 - KQED.org – Washington Week Washington Week episode: ‘Fear’ inside the Trump White House - with Robert Costa – Woodward’s final line in the interview - “He’s really disabled. He can’t tell the truth.”

Items of Interest
-----October 15, 2018 - A nice short video that puts the current danger into historical context - If You’re Not Scared About Fascism in the U.S., You Should Be
-----February 22, 2019 - Atlantic Magazine - The Alarming Scope of the President's Emergency Powers - by Elizabeth Goitein - When push comes to prosecute or impeach, do you really expect Trump to accede to the rule of law? This alarming article points out the many tools available to Swamp Thing that might be misused to keep his crooked ass out of jail. Be afraid. Be very afraid.
-----March 7, 2019 - NY Times - Nicholas Kristof offers an optimistic perspective on the unlikelihood of a Trump Reich - We Will Survive. Probably.
-----March 14, 2019 - NY Times - Donald Trump’s Bikers Want to Kick Protester Ass - building a brownshirt militia - this is really bad
-----But Lawrence O'Brien Lawrence O'Brien thinks it's just gas. Sure hope he's right.
374 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Fear.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

September 12, 2018 – Started Reading
September 18, 2018 – Shelved
September 18, 2018 – Shelved as: american-history
September 18, 2018 – Shelved as: books_of_the_year-2018
September 18, 2018 – Shelved as: economics
September 18, 2018 – Shelved as: history
September 18, 2018 – Shelved as: nonfiction
September 18, 2018 – Shelved as: politics
September 18, 2018 – Shelved as: trump
September 18, 2018 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-50 of 104 (104 new)


message 1: by Kathleen (new)

Kathleen Excellent review!👍


Victoria Such a fantastic review. I finished this this week as well. Overall, I was a little disappointed in the book. I’m not sure I understand it’s purpose beyond fleshing out more details of what we already seemed to know about Trump. It was interesting, but I don’t feel any smarter about things.


message 3: by Bookfan (new)

Bookfan With the extensive reporting both preceding and following its publication, in addition to reviews like yours and others, would you say that it's still worth reading? Thanks for the thorough review.


message 4: by Theresa (new)

Theresa Alan Great (depressing) review!


message 5: by Paula (new)

Paula K A brilliant review, Will. Spot on. One of the finest reviews I have ever read!


Will Byrnes Bookfan wrote: "With the extensive reporting both preceding and following its publication, in addition to reviews like yours and others, would you say that it's still worth reading? Thanks for the thorough review."
Definitely worth checking out, IMHO


Will Byrnes Theresa wrote: "Great (depressing) review!"
Thanks, Theresa. Depressing indeed.


Will Byrnes Paula wrote: "A brilliant review, Will. Spot on. One of the finest reviews I have ever read!"
Thanks, Paula.


message 9: by Cheri (new)

Cheri I saw him on Stephen Colbert the other night and between your review and hearing them discuss this book, I think I need to add this. Thanks for another excellent review, Will!


message 10: by Joan (new) - rated it 4 stars

Joan Will, thank you for your review!


message 11: by Will (new) - rated it 4 stars

Will Byrnes Thanks, Cheri. Particularly germane given the impending sacking of the deputy AG.


message 12: by Will (last edited Sep 25, 2018 03:49AM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Will Byrnes Joan wrote: "Will, thank you for your review!"

Thank you, Joan


message 13: by Jan (new)

Jan Rice Your review will be my resource on this one, Will. Thanks.
My impression is that Woodward is on a different level than Michael Wolff. Having read them, is that your conclusion?


message 14: by Will (new) - rated it 4 stars

Will Byrnes Apples and oranges, in a way. Different approaches despite many of the same sources. Both are worthwhile.


message 15: by Jan (new)

Jan Rice Thanks, Will.


message 16: by Christine (new) - added it

Christine Brilliant, Will! I have not yet read the book, but fully agree with the parts of your analysis with which I'm familiar. I have been following politics closely these past two years. Trump is a danger to us all, a danger to our nation, and by extension, a danger to our allies. How do we mitigate the ongoing damage?!

I've recently started reading The Shadow President: The Truth About Mike Pence, by Michael D'Antonio and Peter Eisner. This wolf-in-sheep's-clothing also scares me deeply. I have not gotten far into the book (I become so infuriated after every few pages that I must put it down), but it's clearly well-researched. He believes it's his God-ordained destiny to take over the Oval Office. Many of his stated goals terrify me, and if Trump *were* impeached, I actually think Pence could be worse (because he actually possesses a working brain). What do you think?


message 17: by Will (new) - rated it 4 stars

Will Byrnes First, thanks so much for the kind words.

Second, I have read at least one piece that suggests Pence is a major league fraud and that his whole religious thing is a tilt to evangelical voters pure and simple. On the other hand we do not need some lunatic in the White House who wants to turn the nation into a theocracy with himself as Theo. Blind faith is how terrorist sorts justify their maniacal actions. The same mentality in a US president could be catastrophic for the planet.

Third, he was involved in the campaign from at least the moment he was selected, so is up to his eyeballs in knowledge of Russian influence in the campaign and whatever other dirty tricks were afoot. He is or should be impeachable for that. We may need another Mueller investigation to nail down those details.

Things should get lively pretty soon. When Mueller presents his findings, impeachment proceedings are likely to follow, well, as soon as we get a Congress willing to do their jobs, so January 2019. At that point, Trump will have his greatest existential crisis and may seek to keep himself and his family out of jail by instituting martial law, or in some other manner suspending the rule of law. His mindless adherents, both in Congress and the general public, will line up like the lemmings they are and we will be faced with a choice, fight for our democracy or allow it to become a dictatorship. Of course I could be wrong. Even if the House impeaches him, the Senate is unlikely to come up with the 67 votes needed to convict and oust him. We've already seen what spineless toads the Republicans have become under Trump. Would 16 of them really vote to convict Trump? I doubt it. It is tough enough to get one of them to stand up to the serial lies of Brett Kavanaugh.

He has signaled already his excuse for ignoring the results of the mid-term elections by claiming that China was interfering in our electoral processes. It will be interesting times, seeing if Trump will tolerate the existence of a Democratic House.

This is an administration of monsters. We cannot drive them out of DC soon enough. Trump has already done what may be irreparable damage to our nation. At this point what foreign nation will ever again trust the USA as a partner in trade or defense if a single election could undermine so much of our global connections? Treaties become meaningless. Defense agreements become worthless. Trump has turned our nation into an international laughing stock and the yahoos who put him in office could not care less.


message 18: by Christine (new) - added it

Christine Absolutely, Will! Your reviews are always detailed, thought-provoking, and beyond-well-thought-out: eloquent in a very practical and accessible way. I look forward to reading them.

THIS one, though, this one scares me to my marrow, because you express very clearly the ongoing dangers of this administration. I fear that so much of our citizenry still has blinders on: whether worshiping Trump as some sort of reality-tv-star-deity-president, based only on his outrageousness and entertainment value; whether as one-train-of-thought-only Evangelical uber-righters, thinking we'll deal with disgusting Trump because 'God put him there to get us into the White House'; or whether as jaded Democrats, sick of the media circus and politics in general, and no longer paying close enough attention.

But yes, as you say, "This is an administration of monsters." The Republicans have sold out utterly, and I believe are now completely irredeemable, to any voter with a working brain. We can pray that the Blue Wave washes many of them away in November (and work actively to make that happen!).

However, as you also point out, Trump is telegraphing his intentions not to accept the Nov election results, and as terrifying as it is to envision, I do believe he's mentally-ill enough (narcissistic personality disorder, chronic liar, egomaniacal behavior, ad nauseum) to attempt martial law.

As for Pence- yes- your comments align with what I have been reading. He is definitely a fraud- but is sneaky and careful, and I worry that an investigation will not be able to pin anything on him. I worry that he'll slide through their hands. All my hope lies with Mueller: may he also have plenty of evidence about Pence, too.

: ) Your best line to date: "... we do not need some lunatic in the White House who wants to turn the nation into a theocracy with himself as Theo." Thanks for making me laugh, in the midst of these awful political contemplations!

I agree that irreparable damage has been done in some areas, especially the EPA and climate change data/protection, as well as the US' relationships with allies and other foreign nations. And so many other areas! I also sense that unhealable, generational harm is being done to communities and families, lasting harm from all of the divisiveness that Trump's insane blathering causes. It reminds me of the Civil War: decades of rifts between people over enormous differences of belief... but in our current case, I feel that there is clearly a "wrong" side. Trump's side, Pence's side, Kavanaugh's side, where blatant lies and greed and power-mongering have taken the place of ANY kind of intelligent attention to America's actual needs.


message 19: by Christine (new) - added it

Christine (Allow me to just add a "PS" about my Civil War comment, lest anyone misunderstand:
I do believe there was a clear "wrong" side to the Civil War. Slavery is evil, and should NEVER have been allowed to become a part of our early nation's economy and culture. I stand with Pres Lincoln, and the North, and my abolitionist ancestors, especially in Pennsylvania where my great-great-great grandmother had an Underground Railroad stop under her root cellar.)

My comment above regarding the Civil War was in no way meant to suggest that there was no clear "wrong" side then.

I was trying to draw a comparison, however inadequately, between the family rifts then and now. It is a horrible shame that there are those who listen to Trump (or Pence, or Kavanaugh, or any of Trump's monsters), and think that they are actually hearing truth.


message 20: by Will (last edited Oct 03, 2018 09:25PM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Will Byrnes I got that. Dark times indeed.


Cecily Gosh, this is impressively (and typically) comprehensive. Possibly a better use of time for many than reading the book in its entirety, which I found lacking anything new, and lacking analysis. But it will be important one day.


message 22: by Will (new) - rated it 4 stars

Will Byrnes Thanks, Cecily. Woodward does not do analysis. That said, when he was making the talk-show rounds he made it pretty clear that the person in the Oval presents an existential threat to us all, and offered more info than we already had re just how dysfunctional this White House is.


Cecily I get that not doing analysis was a deliberate choice (I've not read anything else by him). It certainly help give an air of objectivity. Nevertheless, I think it might have been better with a little.


message 24: by Hanneke (last edited Oct 20, 2018 01:55AM) (new)

Hanneke Gosh, Will, a brilliant review! Thanks for your indepth analysis. Not only you in the U.S., but the whole world is dealing with a really scary situation. May all the gods of Olympus help you to gain a Democrats majority in Congress in November, although you seem to suggest that Swampo would choose to ignore such an outcome and even suspend the rule of law. You don't even want to consider what that would mean.


message 25: by Will (new) - rated it 4 stars

Will Byrnes Hanneke wrote: "Gosh, Will, a brilliant review! Thanks for your indepth analysis. Not only you in the U.S., but the whole world is dealing with a really scary situation. May all the gods of Olympus help you to gai..."
Thanks, Hanneke. I would be more worried for the 2020 election, when there is a chance to vote Trump out of office. Remaining in office is an existential situation for him. Once out of office, he can be freely prosecuted for his crimes, so it is in his interest to remain in the Oval Office as long as possible, by any means possible, legal or not.


message 26: by Will (last edited Oct 20, 2018 09:08PM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Will Byrnes Cecily wrote: "I get that not doing analysis was a deliberate choice (I've not read anything else by him). It certainly help give an air of objectivity. Nevertheless, I think it might have been better with a little."
It certainly might have.


Lorna Will, a great review. I’m reading this now and even when you think you have heard it all before, there is something about the aggregate of all of this damning and frightening information, that is chilling. On the eve of a groundbreaking election, my fingers are crossed.


message 28: by Barbara (new)

Barbara I loved your review. Writing this on election day I am nervous and fearful about the outcomes. I was in a dazed depression for many days after 2016.


message 29: by Will (last edited Nov 07, 2018 10:52PM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Will Byrnes Lorna wrote: "Will, a great review. I’m reading this now and even when you think you have heard it all before, there is something about the aggregate of all of this damning and frightening information, that is c..."
Thanks, Lorna and Barbara. The national results were encouraging, even if we did not get all we had hoped for. Having the House under Democratic control is major, as is turning several state governor-ships. It may be that games were played in Florida, arguably the most corrupt state in the nation, which bears some investigating. How could it be that voters approved a liberal referendum, with approval exceeding 60%, yet the Senate race was a photo finish? Something smells off about this.


message 30: by Barbara (new)

Barbara I am encouraged by the election result but being an optimist I hoped for more. Florida still looks fishy.


message 31: by Will (last edited Nov 09, 2018 09:10PM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Will Byrnes Yep, like a can of sardines.


message 32: by Asif (last edited Dec 07, 2018 03:44AM) (new)

Asif Excellent review, I liked it though eye opening. I would only say one thing that while Trump did not make a team of rivals, like Lincoln: seems an ordinary statement is a deep one. I am a great admirer of great honest Abe, but sincerely speaking he was truly a remarkable person on whom not only Americans but humanity as a whole should be proud of. Trump is entirely a different creature he can not be compared to Lincoln, that will be like comparing gold to the silicon. He is not only incapable of forming such a brilliant team but he cant work with his own hand picked guys, that is tragedy.


message 33: by Will (last edited Dec 07, 2018 09:03PM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Will Byrnes Thanks, Asif. Trump can most appropriately be compared to a mob boss, but not a very good one.


message 34: by Asif (new)

Asif Yes insane one indeed.


message 35: by Lilo (new) - added it

Lilo Excellent review, as always, Will!

Please continue speaking up against the unethical, immoral, money-greedy, and first and foremost dangerous imbecile in the White House. So will I (at least until he will start arresting dissidents or building concentration camps).


message 36: by Will (new) - rated it 4 stars

Will Byrnes Thanks, Lilo. Will do.


message 37: by Lilo (new) - added it

Lilo REAL donald J Trump wrote: "hey fuck you"

Oh, my! You imposter of the #1 deplorable around again. Why don't you get lost and join the other deplorables?


message 38: by Will (last edited Dec 10, 2018 09:04PM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Will Byrnes Just a child looking for attention


message 39: by Lilo (new) - added it

Lilo Will wrote: "Just a child looking for attention"

Deplorable nevertheless! Children should have better manners.


message 40: by Will (last edited Dec 11, 2018 09:06PM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Will Byrnes Yes


message 41: by Asif (new)

Asif Lilo wrote: "Will wrote: "Just a child looking for attention"

Deplorable nevertheless! Children should have better manners."

I agree with you Lilo, uttering these words to someone respectable is beyond sarcasm and parody. That was unpleasant word I also respect still more Will Byrnes who consider this fake person a child that shows he is thorough gentleman.


message 42: by Lilo (last edited Dec 10, 2018 11:06PM) (new) - added it

Lilo Asif wrote: "Lilo wrote: "Will wrote: "Just a child looking for attention"

Deplorable nevertheless! Children should have better manners."
I agree with you Lilo, uttering these words to someone respectable is b..."


I also agree with every word of your comment. And I, quite often, wonder what people of countries (such as Pakistan) where young people still treat their elders respectfully must think of young people of Western countries (especially America) who show so little respect for their elders.


message 43: by Asif (new)

Asif Lilo wrote: "Asif wrote: "Lilo wrote: "Will wrote: "Just a child looking for attention"

Deplorable nevertheless! Children should have better manners."
I agree with you Lilo, uttering these words to someone res..."

Lilo that is your greatness, In fact good people are all around so are bad people, In west most people are well behaved and gentle, it occurs that some people, out of their psychological problems become irreverent, anyway thanks for this compliment. 🙂


message 44: by Lilo (new) - added it

Lilo Asif wrote: "Lilo wrote: "Asif wrote: "Lilo wrote: "Will wrote: "Just a child looking for attention"

Deplorable nevertheless! Children should have better manners."
I agree with you Lilo, uttering these words t..."


Thank you for your kind words, Asif. You are right. There are good and bad people in each and every country. And it would be so important to have a good leader who will inspire the good instincts in people and not a bad leader who does the opposite.

Good night, Asif! I am off to bed. It is past midnight here in Utah.


message 45: by Asif (new)

Asif Lilo wrote: "Asif wrote: "Lilo wrote: "Asif wrote: "Lilo wrote: "Will wrote: "Just a child looking for attention"

Deplorable nevertheless! Children should have better manners."
I agree with you Lilo, uttering ..."

Good Night Lilo Best wishes for you and your country.


message 46: by Idyll (new) - rated it 1 star

Idyll I'm trying to decide between Fear and Fire and Fury. I noticed that you gave the latter 5 stars. Which one would you recommend if you had to pick one?


message 47: by Will (last edited Jan 08, 2019 09:20PM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Will Byrnes A bit of apples and oranges. I would read both.


message 48: by Kara (new) - rated it 4 stars

Kara Koppanyi Wonderful review! Yes, I am afraid.


message 49: by Will (last edited Feb 26, 2019 09:08PM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Will Byrnes Thanks, Kara


Jamie rothenberger Great book. try reading Calvin and H
Hobbes


« previous 1 3
back to top