User:LuK3/dashboard
CAVEAT: all the |show= parameters have been set to 7 days.
AB = Administrative Backlogs
[edit]Administrative backlog
[edit]AIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism
Reports
[edit]- DelmarvaScribe (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1319 (LTA 1319, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 18:49, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment - This appears to be a false positive, I think this filter needs some tweaking. Jdcomix (talk) 18:55, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
False positive. Edits are not vandalism. The filter is not intended for this kind of activity. -- Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:58, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- 2601:447:cf7f:a370:c892:9eeb:e9e5:e0e2 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 793 twice in the last 5 minutes (Common spam/scam phone numbers, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 20:50, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- 2a01:cb00:28:5a00:75cb:3d40:9515:1504 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 21:00, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- 78.163.96.34 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 23:37, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- 75.90.225.253 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 766 (Alt-right labeling, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 23:38, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- 2a02:8440:7132:8bf4:c20e:c5e0:3743:182 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 23:39, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- 2607:FEA8:E447:3500:44FD:D267:6D3:2AA8 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - Fat (disambiguation) was changed by 2607:FEA8:E447:3500:44FD:D267:6D3:2AA8 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.892059 on 2024-08-08T03:44:31+00:00 (Automated) ClueBot NG (talk) 03:44, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- 2603:8000:7000:a9:a5ea:a8f5:5796:c72b (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 03:54, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- 2600:1012:B20E:21FE:99D8:7456:B03B:B777 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Pauly Shore (diff): vandalism after final warning. Geraldo Perez (talk) 01:43, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- Continued as User talk:2600:1012:B20E:21FE:5434:E1BA:A424:BE6C on same /64 range Geraldo Perez (talk) 05:12, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- BLP violations. Edits are adding unsourced height info to bio article infoboxes. Geraldo Perez (talk) 05:41, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- Continued as User talk:2600:1012:B20E:21FE:5434:E1BA:A424:BE6C on same /64 range Geraldo Perez (talk) 05:12, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions
| Candidates for speedy deletion | Entries |
|---|---|
| User requested | 0 |
| Empty articles | 0 |
| Nonsense pages | 0 |
| Spam pages | 0 |
| Importance or significance not asserted | 0 |
| Other candidates | 3 |
The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
( source / chronological order / expired )
{{CSD backlogs}} 7 backlognav + 2 + 5 single cat
| BLP articles proposed for deletion by days left – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Proposed deletion – No backlog currently |
|---|
Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 32 items
Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old – 1 item
Requested RD1 redactions – 3 items
Expired proposed deletions of unsourced BLPs – No backlog currently
UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection
- Testes12 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "testicles" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 19:40, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- ChickenSandwich0183619272 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Poopoopooggd (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "poo[- ]?poo" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 05:50, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- Poop McCanadian (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "Poop" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 07:00, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- PersonaofRevenge (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
[edit] | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Weeks of edit warring, plus sock puppet and vandalism accusations. No attempt to discuss on talk page by any involved. Escape Orbit (Talk) 09:31, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – ARBPIA. Jdcomix (talk) 15:37, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism in a BLP by an unregistered user seemingly using different IPs Leafy46 (talk) 15:44, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:43, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Observed numerous amounts of vandalism mostly from IP accounts, mainly revolving around the film's box office and critical response. Dusty Kelpie (talk) 16:18, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:51, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – There's been a surge in disruptive IPs since late July. TheWikiToby (talk) 18:09, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- Arjuna (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Sahadeva (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: constant persistent vandalism by User talk:DraupadiPandavas (latest sock account of User: Kairakairav). Warnings given, no response, others pages like Kunti, Pandu, Madri were earlier requested as well. Banning the user doesnt help as sockmaster make similar disruptive edits using diff alt accounts and IPs..245CMR.•👥📜 19:45, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – just to slow things down for a while. — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 20:55, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent content dispute (mediation attempted, see personal talk page and WP:HOCKEY). The IP has been told to stop and insists on deviance from project standard (consensus). mftp dan oops 22:12, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ip's and new users. BLP violations. Knitsey (talk) 22:32, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: This is due to a news story about the subject of the article hiring consultants for paid editing on his Wikipedia page. The article contains a direct link to Wikipedia, so vandalism is very likely to continue for a couple days until the story dies down. Jamedeus (talk) 02:16, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – User is being harassed by ip. They are asking for tp protection. Knitsey (talk) 23:02, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I also have revision deleted 2 edits by the IP; if they vandalise again, please report to WP:AIV...more effective to block than to protect. Lectonar (talk) 08:48, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
Reason: IP edit warring against consensus GoodDay (talk) 23:34, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Reason: IP edit warring against consensus GoodDay (talk) 23:34, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Reason: IP edit warring against consensus GoodDay (talk) 23:35, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed protection: Consistent disruptive editing by IP users and DraupadiPandavas (talk · contribs) after previous protection gor over including removal of several key characters played by less recognised actors and cameo characters played by recognised actors and addition of fake information for several characters by removal of actual information. Please protect this page from this particular User DraupadiPandavas (talk · contribs) too as she is also constantly doing same disruptive editing like IP users. Pri2000 (talk), 23:58, 07 August 2024 (UTC)
- Commemt: User: DraupadiPandavas(talk) is a sockpuppet of consistent sockpuppet user from around years Kairakairav. So consistent disruptive edits are done by this sockpuppet and other IP users.
Pri2000 (talk) 01:46, 08 August 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple IP addresses are attempting to add unreliable sources implying that subject died from Covid vaccine - see this example edit. MiasmaEternal☎ 00:21, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editor keeps on pushing their disruptive edits on the page, which remove large amounts of content to push caste-based POV views: [1], [2]. MaplesyrupSushi (talk) 01:12, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
Reason: On 6 January 2023 at 20:14, a user with IP address 50.100.114.7 (no username) snuck in a false nickname for the town of Hawkesbury, "Birthplace of Andrew Alberts-Scherer". This went unnoticed until July 13 2024 when I randomly decided to look up this Andrew person, and discovered they are not a person who is significant to Hawkesbury's history or culture. The official Town of Hawkesbury website also has no reference to this person. I removed the false nickname; but as of today, the false nickname has been added back SIX times, by username Oliverfoster27 as well as another user 209.171.85.162. Someone is doing this on purpose intentionally, and I don't know why or what their intention is. I am asking for your help to protect this Wikipedia page and stop this repeated vandalism I have had to continuously undo. I am not sure how else to stop this. Thank you. Justanothereditor22 (talk) 01:13, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
Reason: IP beginning another edit war GoodDay (talk) 02:27, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of vandalism from IP addresses. 18fructidor (talk) 02:45, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection. Lots of IP editing. Leaving the content issues aside, IPs aren't eligible to edit that page (I/P area.)Dan Murphy (talk) 03:35, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
Automated comment: @Dan Murphy: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:48, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- Please enforce WP:CT/EE. IanDBeacon (talk) 04:10, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: IP-hopping vandal keeps vandalizing the budget of this film, as well as others, despite several blocks already being put in place. NJZombie (talk) 07:13, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent unreferenced edits from IP users. Hotwiki (talk) 07:17, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – information about this article is rapidly changing. Arijit Kisku (talk) 08:25, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Unprotection: Remove the 2011 pagemove protection. Page may need to be moved back to lowercase "i" following the consensus at Talk:Genocide of indigenous peoples#Requested move 25 May 2024. — kashmīrī TALK 12:04, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to have already been unprotected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:10, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because it is in the interests of the public that fascists are not able to present Tommy Robinson, a Nazi, as an activist and then protect the page so misleading information cannot be edited. Chicle chica (talk) 22:09, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Chicle chica: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:15, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Protected over 10 years ago by now deceased admin 2601:282:4700:272:18EA:F6D7:22BD:585 (talk) 03:59, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- Not unprotected – Vandals are still around, and this article tends to attract them. Interestingly, your IP range recently served a one-month block for vandalism. Favonian (talk) 05:55, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Handled requests
[edit]
| 5 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 04:13, 8 August 2024 (UTC) |
| 24 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 06:39, 8 August 2024 (UTC) |
RFA= Requests for adminship
RFP= Requests for permissions
Autopatrolled
[edit]- PARAKANYAA (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Has created roughly 30 articles by my count; only one stub, my spotchecks found nothing concerning. Diverging Diamond (is Queen of Hearts's alt; talk) 19:10, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Is there any indication that the user wants autopatrolled? I don't want to throw rights at someone who would prefer that their creations be reviewed by NPP/AfC. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 10:42, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Red-tailed hawk: Unlike other PERMs, third party nominations for autopatrolled are welcome (preferred even), because it's primarily a tool used by NPP to manage its workload rather than a tool used by the holder to edit. If someone really doesn't want it for some reason, they can of course ask for it to be removed. – Joe (talk) 11:59, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Red-tailed hawk I would be open to having it. Hypothetically I like the idea of someone else checking my articles or critiquing them, but no one who has patrolled my articles has ever really made a significant change or tagged anything, so it hasn't really helped there lol, so if it reduces the NPP workload and gets the page indexed faster I don't see why not. PARAKANYAA (talk) 13:04, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- In that case, I have no objection to granting the right. — Red-tailed sock (Red-tailed hawk's nest) 13:08, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Done Elli (talk | contribs) 00:57, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
Automated comment This user does not appear to have the permission autopatrolled. — MusikBot talk 01:00, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- Overriding the bot... Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:03, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- Losipov (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
For a third time, I'm applying for autopatrolled rights; my first request was denied in April 2023, and my second request was denied in June 2024. The reason for the first decline was that my previous articles were tagged for "notability." After that decline, I worked on bringing articles over from the Russian Wikipedia and had relatively few problems when other editors were reviewing them (I don't bring over everything from those respective pages, so I added a tag for expanding from Russian to let others know that information is still there). The reason for the second decline was that I moved one of my BLP articles back into the mainspace without changing the sourcing, and it was eventually deleted (that was a mistake on my part). Now, roughly two months later, I have had little to no problems with the other articles I have brought over. I respectfully request that I be granted the autopatrolled permission this time around, as I believe it will help lighten the NPP workload to some extent. Thanks in advance for your consideration. Losipov (talk) 20:10, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Page mover
[edit]
- KingSkyLord (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have been editing for over 7 years and I plan on using this permission in order to help with discussions on WP:RM and deal with cross-redirects for articles that should have more disambiguated titles. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 12:46, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- ToadetteEdit (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Reason for requesting page mover rights: I want to have my page mover rights extended, as I contribute to RM/TR. Was given 3mo trial and it will end on August 20. ToadetteEdit! 08:30, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user was granted temporary page mover rights by Robertsky (expires 00:00, 20 August 2024 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 08:40, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- PadFoot2008 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I was granted pagemover rights nearly a month back, but due to mistakes on my part, the rights have been now revoked. So, I am requesting the rights again on Primefac's advice, explaining why I made the mistakes and how I shall avoid those mistakes going forward.
- On 5 July, Liz told me at my talk page about the terrible quality of my page swap on Polish–Russian War (1609–1618) which I had moved after closing an an RM discussion in the talk page, and that I had left a dozen broken redirects that she had to clean up. This mistake was due to my inexperience, as it was my first page swap. Following that, SilverLocust recommended me User:Ahecht/Scripts/pageswap to prevent such issues, which I have been using ever since, and there have not been any more such errors.
- On 8 July, SilverLocust informed me about MOS:DUALNATIONALITIES after I moved Polish–Russian War of 1792 to Polish-Russian War of 1792. I was not aware of MOS:DUALNATIONALITIES at that time, and since then I've taken up the task to fix other article titles violating it as well. I had been aware of and had read the WP:Article title policy, but I had not completely read through the WP:MOS at that time. I've completely familiarised myself with the guideline now and hence hope to minimise mistakes I might make relating to that.
- On 30 July, I moved British Indian Army to Indian Army (1895–1947) after which Celia Homeford informed me that the move had been unilateral, following which I immediately proceeded to check the talk page of the article for previous RMs, which I did find and had resulted in the move of Indian Army (1895–1947) to British Indian Army. I hadn't checked the talk page before swapping the page and thus had not been aware of this RM when I had swapped — a mistake on my part. I had checked the WP:COMMONNAME of the article and sought to make the article title WP:Consistent with other historical army related articles like German Army (1935–1945) for instance. I should've checked the talk page and it's archives for any previous RMs and discussions before making the swap. That is what I usually do before making a move or a swap, but this step had slipped my mind in this case. In future, I shall make sure to always check the talk page and the archives for RMs and discussions regarding the article title without fail before making a move or a swap.
I've learnt from my mistakes and hope not to repeat them. I also aim to minimise any chance of any other mistakes on my part. PadFoot (talk) 17:56, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had this permission revoked in the past 180 days ([4]). — MusikBot talk 18:00, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Not done. I'm surprised this wasn't instantly declined... Your rights were removed, give it more time to show that you've learned instead of immediately re-applying for the perm. For the time being, utilize WP:PM/TR. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:39, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer
[edit]- AlexBobCharles (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have been monitoring recent changes on pages for a while now AlexBobCharles (talk) 08:36, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Adriazeri (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I’ve been editing for a little while now, I’ve requested page protection and reverted edits which are not appropriate on various pages. I am pretty devoted to editing on Wikipedia and I have an extensive Watchlist so I think this permission would be useful. Adriazeri (talk) 22:55, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
Rollback
[edit]- Lordseriouspig (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I've been patrolling recent changes for a while now, using Twinkle to warn members. I have over 200 mainspace edits, and I'm extended confirmed with over 700 edits total. I've also been doing NPP for a little too. I'd like to use rollback for more advanced tools such as Huggle and AntiVandal. Thanks, Lordseriouspig 06:14, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- I see that you are failing to consistently warn editors when you revert their edits. Why? It's important to leave a notification for every revert you make. Are you aware that we have tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet that make this extremely easy? -Fastily 10:34, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- I don’t believe I'm not, @Fastily:, I warn people using twinkle, here is my warn logs: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3AContributions&target=Lordseriouspig&namespace=3&tagfilter=twinkle&start=&end=&limit=50. Lordseriouspig 20:31, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- I reviewed your contributions from last month and found these within seconds: 1, 2, 3. I'll repeat what I said above: it's important to leave a notification for every revert you make. Are you aware that we have tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet that make this extremely easy? -Fastily 08:03, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- I’m unsure why I forgot to add a warning for those, @Fastily, considering Twinkle automatically opens the talk page, but I usually warn members, and tools like Anti-vandal or Huggle would probable negate me forgetting warns. Thanks, Lordseriouspig 10:00, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- No worries, thanks for your honesty. Please ensure that you are always leaving warnings. I can't stress enough the importance of not biting the newcomers; if you find yourself reverting good faith edits, then it's especially important to notify the editor. If you don't want to leave a template warning, that's completely fine, but you do need to leave a talk page message explaining why you reverted the edit. Moving forward, could you please make a promise to leave warnings/notifications for every revert? -Fastily 23:02, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- I’m unsure why I forgot to add a warning for those, @Fastily, considering Twinkle automatically opens the talk page, but I usually warn members, and tools like Anti-vandal or Huggle would probable negate me forgetting warns. Thanks, Lordseriouspig 10:00, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- I reviewed your contributions from last month and found these within seconds: 1, 2, 3. I'll repeat what I said above: it's important to leave a notification for every revert you make. Are you aware that we have tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet that make this extremely easy? -Fastily 08:03, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- I don’t believe I'm not, @Fastily:, I warn people using twinkle, here is my warn logs: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3AContributions&target=Lordseriouspig&namespace=3&tagfilter=twinkle&start=&end=&limit=50. Lordseriouspig 20:31, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user does not appear to have the permission rollback. — MusikBot talk 11:10, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
- LR.127 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I've been viewing recent changes for a while with Twinkle, and would like to keep using the Android app to prevent vandalism, which requires rollback permissions.
I am aware, after reading others' requests, that warning users after edits must be done every single time. While there are moments in which I have forgot to do this in the past, I will ensure to make it a consistency going forward. LR.127 (talk) 00:54, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
- Great, thanks for confirming. Could you please now go do some RC patrol in which you demonstrate how you will be notifying all users? -Fastily 11:10, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
- Win8x (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have been monitoring Recent Changes for around a month now and would like to use Huggle to help me do it, but this requires rollback. I just want to admit it here: at the start I did not always warn users but I do warn all the time now. Either way, thank you! win8x (talking | spying) 01:23, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- Great, thanks for confirming. Could you please now go do some RC patrol in which you demonstrate how you will be notifying all users? -Fastily 03:37, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oh, but that's what I was already doing. My last like... 200/300 edits are all warned. But sure, I will continue to do so. Thanks! win8x (talking | spying) 04:12, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- I see reverts from just a few days ago in which you failed to notify the editor (e.g. 1, 2, 3). Like I said, please now go do some RC patrol in which you demonstrate how you will be notifying all users. A few dozen reverts would be ideal. Confirm below once you've done this and I will re-review. Thanks, Fastily 04:54, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- Done! Just to clarify, is a welcome message such as Template:Welcome-delete an acceptable alternative to Template:Uw-delete1, for example (if it's a new user)? Thanks. win8x (talking | spying) 23:05, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- Yes that's fine. I did see you failed to notify an editor after making this revert today. Why? -Fastily 00:04, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- Done! Just to clarify, is a welcome message such as Template:Welcome-delete an acceptable alternative to Template:Uw-delete1, for example (if it's a new user)? Thanks. win8x (talking | spying) 23:05, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- I see reverts from just a few days ago in which you failed to notify the editor (e.g. 1, 2, 3). Like I said, please now go do some RC patrol in which you demonstrate how you will be notifying all users. A few dozen reverts would be ideal. Confirm below once you've done this and I will re-review. Thanks, Fastily 04:54, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oh, but that's what I was already doing. My last like... 200/300 edits are all warned. But sure, I will continue to do so. Thanks! win8x (talking | spying) 04:12, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- Wburrow (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have been patrolling recent changes since late June and believe access to more advanced tools like Huggle would enhance my anti-vandalism work. I understand the importance of warning users after every revert and believe I have been consistent in doing so. Thanks for your consideration. Wburrow (talk) 17:51, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- I see that you are failing to consistently warn editors when you revert their edits (e.g. 1, 2, 3). Why? It's important to leave a notification for every revert you make, particularly if the edit was made in good faith. Are you aware that we have tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet that make this extremely easy? -Fastily 22:24, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- For the edits you picked, I explained the reasoning for the revert in my edit summary instead of using a warning template on their Talk page because I felt that approach would come across as friendlier/less hostile. My understanding was that reverting required either a talk page warning or an explanatory edit summary, but it seems that understanding was mistaken, and I can commit to leaving a talk page notification for all future reverts. Wburrow (talk) 04:25, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
- Please ensure that you are always leaving warnings. I can't stress enough the importance of not biting the newcomers; if you find yourself reverting good faith edits, then it's especially important to notify the editor. If you don't want to leave a template warning, that's completely fine, but you do need to leave a talk page message explaining why you reverted the edit. Moving forward, could you please make a promise to leave warnings/notifications for every revert? -Fastily 00:04, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- For the edits you picked, I explained the reasoning for the revert in my edit summary instead of using a warning template on their Talk page because I felt that approach would come across as friendlier/less hostile. My understanding was that reverting required either a talk page warning or an explanatory edit summary, but it seems that understanding was mistaken, and I can commit to leaving a talk page notification for all future reverts. Wburrow (talk) 04:25, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
Footer
[edit]Policies and links