Gumble's Yard - Golden Reviewer > Books: 2018-women-longlist (16)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
my rating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1910702692
| 9781910702697
| 1910702692
| 3.66
| 87,514
| Mar 14, 2017
| Jun 01, 2017
|
it was amazing
| [Svetelena said] I lived by aesthetic principles, whereas she, who had been raised on Western philosophy, was doomed to live boringly be ethical pr [Svetelena said] I lived by aesthetic principles, whereas she, who had been raised on Western philosophy, was doomed to live boringly be ethical principles. It had never occurred to me to think of aesthetics and ethics as opposites. I thought ethics were aesthetic. “Ethics” meant the golden rule, which was basically an aesthetic rule. That’s why it was called “golden” like the golden ratio. “Isn’t that why you don’t cheat or steal – because it’s ugly” I said I read this novel due to its longlisting for the 2018 Women’s Prize for fiction - and am delighted it has now been shortlisted. The book is told in the first person by Selin, a Turkish-descended American starting as a freshman at Harvard in the mid 1990s and tracing her first year and first summer vacation there, particularly her unrequited relationship with Ivan (a graduating Hungarian mathematician). This is a coming of age story – capturing almost perfectly the transition from home and school to University, including at a world leading University like Harvard suddenly realising that your hitherto outstanding achievements are now par for the course (Selin for example shocked when she does not make the college orchestra). Selim is hopelessly naïve – both about the way Ivan is playing with her affections and around the conventions of student life which she initially struggles to recognise and then struggles to comprehend when she does recognise them – be that drinking alcohol, going to a coffee shop, buying clichéd posters of Einstein for her shared room, or for example when dancing in a group at a disco [it] reminded me of pre-school where you also had to stand in a circle and clap your hands. I began to intuit dimly why people drank when they went dancing and it occurred to me that maybe the reason preschool had felt the way it had was that one had to go through the whole think sober” This revealing interview with the author captures I think perfectly what she was aiming for in the book – a book about awkward, embarrassing experiences which is a picture of a really young person who is well-equipped in certain ways and not well-equipped in other way http://www.vulture.com/2017/03/elif-b... Ivan and Selin meet in a Russian class – and language is another key theme of the novel. Selin is fascinated by the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis which states that the structure of a language determines a native speaker's perception and categorization of experience (or as Selin puts it the language you spoke affected how you processed reality). She spends much of the book either learning another language (Russian in the first part, Hungarian in the second part) or teaching English as a second language (initially as a volunteer activity in a housing project and in the second half of the novel over the Summer in a Hungarian village). The similarities and differences between, and the linguistic quirks of Turkish, Hungarian and Russian (as well as Serbo-Croat which is spoken by another member of the Russian class – Svetlana) are examined throughout the book – including for example the influence or Turkish on Hungarian and Serbo-Croat dating from the Ottoman occupation of the countries. Selin is also a literature buff – and always seems to be trying to relate her experiences to literature. Mathematics also makes an appearance – as Selin frustrated with her ESL attempts at Harvard teaches mathematics in the project instead. If any of the the above makes the book sound heavyweight it is anything but, the writing is playful and humorous. There is a wonderful moment when walking to the gym, Selin is greeted by a throwaway How’s it going from a casual acquaintance and makes to answer, causing the guy, Selin and Svetlana to wait for what felt like hours before Selin simply walks off without a word – basically all because Selin cannot think of a non-conventional way to answer the question – a perfect example of what the author describes in the interview as Selin’s dilemma whether you can be sincere without being pretentious. It’s something Selin thinks about a lot. It’s like there are two poles: one is being totally lucid but not conveying anything, just stating completely obvious things, and the other is being completely impenetrable. Sometimes you have to risk going one way or the other. Selin decides she would rather risk being impenetrable than being obvious and lame. Selim, via Batuman, has a lovely ear for a phrase or description: patches of overgrown grass [in a run-down housing project] resembled a comb-over on the head of a bald person who didn’t want to see reality; an angel cake she is cooking fell down in the middle like a collapsing civilisation” and becomes a fallen-angel cake. She over-analyses everything, and spends time inappropriately parsing things around her – for example when watching The Sound of Music with her mother: I was interested when the nuns sang about solving a problem like Maria. It seemed that “Maria” was actually a problem they had – that it was a code word for something Often to the detriment of the subjects she is meant to be studying (for example when suffering with a cold in an academic interview): “Right” I said, nodding energetically and trying to determine whether any of the rectangles in my peripheral vision was a box of tissues. Unfortunately, they were all books. The professor was talking about the differences between creative and academic writing. I kept nodding. I was thinking about the structural equivalence between a tissue box: both consisted of slips of white paper in cardboard case; yet – and this was ironic – was there was very little functional equivalence, especially if the book wasn’t yours. Those were the kinds of things I thought about all the time, even though they were neither pleasant or useful. I had no idea what you were supposed to be thinking about. The Russian language is taught via a serialised story “Nina in Siberia” – a stitled and rather preposterous story (at least to this reader) which at each chapter only uses the grammar taught in the class to date, resulting in some tortuous terminology, but one which Selin invests in hugely “while you were reading it you felt totally inside its world, a world where reality mirrored the grammar constraints, and what Slavic 101 couldn’t name didn’t exist” (clearly her applying the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis). Much of the story (reproduced through the first part of the book) is around Nina’s thwarted relationship with an Ivan – and it is hard not to see that Nina’s interest in the story is mirrored by her interest in the real-life Ivan (or possibly vice-versa) leading to a great line when the story ends happily (albeit with each of Ivan and Nina finding happiness elsewhere). Why did every story have to end with marriage? You expected that from Bleak House or Crime and Punishment. But “Nina in Siberia” had seemed different. Of everything I had read that semester, it alone had seemed to speak to me directly, to promise to reveal something about the relationship between language and the world A number of other aspects I enjoyed – many of which reminded me of University: Selin muses on a Nabakov quote that “mathematics transcended their initial condition and thinks how each of solid cone geometry, trigonometry, and Fibonacci sequences were set up as pure theoretical concepts but turned out, centuries later, to describe reality, respectively relating to planetary orbits, sound waves and seed spirals in a sunflower – leading her to speculate what if math turned out to explain how everything worked – not just physics but everything – something I can imagine discussing myself at University (other than adding back the s to change the American to the British abbreviation for the queen of sciences and purest form of art). Discussions of pre-destination against free-will –something I remember discussing in detail with my friends at University, albeit with more of a religious aspect than the scientific/philosophical discussion here. For example the way she feels “staring at the green cursor on the black screen, trying to compose an email to Ivan – I had nothing but free will. The thought that it might be limited in some way made me feel only relief”. After playing squash the blue rubber ball was so small, so fast, so crazy. To think that the world was too deterministic for some people A discussion about the inherent inconsistencies in the imaginary world created by Bram Stoker for Dracula, and her surprise in finding he studied pure mathematics and how weird it was that a mathematician had created such an internally inconsistent world A discussion about the contradiction between how US teachers claimed they wanted pupils to learn (and indeed how they tried to teach them) and how they subsequently examined them – I don’t want you memorize and regurgitate, I want you to understand the elegant logic of each mechanism”. Nonetheless on the test you had to draw the diagram of RNA transcription – which reminded me of the Professional Exams I took post University. Which in turn leads on to the assertion that in many subjects Reason only got you so far. Even if each step followed from the previous one, you still had to memorize the first step, and also the rule for how stops followed from each other – which reminded me of the surprising amount of revision and learning involved in studying Pure Mathematics at University. So overall I have to say that I enjoyed this book hugely. It reminded me of a female (both in author and first person narrator) version of The Nix – and this resemblance was magnified both due to the number of times I laughed out loud when reading it, and the copious number of post it notes I placed in the book for passages or quotes I wanted to use in my review. However I went into it with very low expectations as many of those I most respected on Goodreads really hated it (even some who loves The Nix) – and I can understand why this book may not appeal to others which leads to my last quote which may also serve as an apology if you have not enjoyed my review: It was decreasingly possible to imagine explaining it to anyone. Whoever it was would jump out of a window from boredom. And yet there I was watching the accumulation in real time, and not only was I not bored, but it was all I could think about...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Apr 18, 2018
|
Apr 20, 2018
|
Mar 20, 2018
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
1473652375
| 9781473652378
| 1473652375
| 3.39
| 1,487
| Feb 22, 2018
| Feb 22, 2018
|
it was amazing
|
Update. Nine months on from my original review my (not particularly hard to make) prediction of a Wellcome prize longlisting for this brilliant book h
Update. Nine months on from my original review my (not particularly hard to make) prediction of a Wellcome prize longlisting for this brilliant book has come true. I had no understanding of the drive to exhume that now turns my quiet moments into imperfect acts of reminiscence: how it is to feel that one must note each detail of one’s thoughts in case that thing should pass unseen which might otherwise provide the key, laying out the shadows of the bones which rib and arch and hold the whole together I read this book as part of its longlisting for the 2018 Women’s Prize, although I had been aware of the book from some early reviews and had expected it to make the longlist. I am not surprised to see it shortlisted. “Sight” is the author’s debut novel, after a critically acclaimed book of short stories. I can see and can understand that this book may not be to the taste of many readers – but I feel that what others do not like about the book is what I most enjoyed. A FT review by Sam Leith described it (rather condescendingly in my view) as a certain sort of literary novel in which not much happens and with musings … expressed in a mannered register with very little resemblance to the way the average 21st-century person talks. In contrast I do not expect literary fiction to be plot heavy, my fellow Goodreads reviewer Paul has often remarked of the “spoiler” tag on Goodreads; that by definition a book which has a plot which can be spoiled is already flawed. Further I do not read literature to reproduce “say, like how the average girl, kind of talks?” From unfavourable or neutral Goodreads reviewers, the book has drawn comparison both to Rachel Cusk and to W.G. Sebald: whereas I regarded these comparisons as something that attracted me to the book and in both cases can see the links: perhaps a double aspect to the link in both cases, of Cusk her book on motherhood and her annihilated perspective style, of Sebald his weaving of historical fact into fiction and in a reference to East Anglian beaches), albeit the novel has style of its own. The book’s premise is simple – our unnamed narrator, married to Johannes and with a young daughter is pregnant with their second child. She reflects on her relationships with her mother, grandmother and daughters (born and unborn), and on her past and future roles herself as daughter, granddaughter and mother and on the transition between these relationships as well as that from child to adolescence to adulthood. The narrator is a voracious reader, and after the death of her mother, before marrying, she spends time in the Wellcome library (as did the author herself writing the book), searching through the medicine books there in the hope she might find the fact which would make sense of my grown unhappiness, allowing me to peel back the obscurant layers of myself and lay bare at last the solid structure underneath, her quest described as I sought among so many books a way to understand myself by analogy, a pattern recognised in other lives which might be drawn across my own to give it shape and, given shape, to give it impetus, direction As an aside – the Wellcome Trust sponsors one of the most intriguing book prizes in the UK and this book must surely be a contender for the 2019 Prize. This search seems to give her book a shape and pattern – the book being effectively rearranged in three parts – each concentrating on a particular relationship (respectively her mother, her psychoanalyst grandmother and her unborn daughter) and on a scientific figure (Wilhelm Röntgen – who discovered x-rays, Sigmund Freud and his children, John Hunter – a pioneering surgeon and collector, who helped introduce science back to the practice of medicine, his brother William and the anatomical sketches they commissioned from Jan van Rymsdyk, including of the dissection of a heavily pregnant woman with a full-term fetus). Initially these sections can seem disjointed both within themselves (between the narrators reflections on her life and the scientific parts) and between the different sections – but gradually the reader uncovers the overlaps between these parts – the recurring themes of stripping apart, examination, of transitions, of boundaries, of the difference and interaction between the superficial and deep. At this point and to give a flavour for the book (and simply because I noted down so much of the book – the book being littered with post-it notes when I finished), a number of examples are useful: On something which the narrator obsesses about – that Röntgen handed in his first paper on X-rays on the same day the Lumière brothers first publically showed their collection of cinematography: Rontgen … had seen all that had been solid go towards transparency. Opaque materials, wood, stone, his own flesh – had been reduced for him to shadowed outline, leaving the image of a substrate world spread out across a photographic plate, a catalogue of metal and bone and all that would not rot to set against cinema’s preservation of surface – “ The initial excitement of the public at x-rays (and a link forward to Freud’s work) [hope that] knowing the constitution of their bodies they might be granted understanding of their minds Freud and the Vienna Psychoanalytic society – this earnest group of men saw themselves … as architects of a future in which clarity was assured and all the convoluted crenellations of the mind would be unfolded Her grandmother taking about analysis told her Without reflection, without the capacity to trace our lives backwards and pick the patterns out, we become liable to act as animals do, minus foresight and according to a set of governing laws, which we have never taken the trouble to explore. Without reflection, we do little more than drift upon the surface of things and self-determination is an illusion. And later When a person has gained the skills necessary to explore the territory for themselves, to unpack their own minds and begin to understand the contents, they might start the work necessary to make their experience, their behaviour meaningful: and then at last they might start to become transparent to themselves Comparing her pregnant self to Susini’s Anatomical Venus (a clear link to the sketches of van Rymsdyk) I imagine how I would look laid out like this, formed into layers, each one a shell, demountable, and at the centre of it the indivisible nut my child makes, and how then all of it might be removed, stacked carefully up beside my open, undecaying carcass On her daughter growing up: Now she stands apart and I must reach for her, on each occasion a little further until it seems her progress towards adulthood is a kind of disappearance and that I know her less and less the more she becomes herself Her mother’s illness (shortly after twenty one) – her need for me forcing into reverse that inevitable process of separation which was the work of adolescence Sorting through her mother’s possessions: To pick through dusty boxes, to sift through memories which fray and tear like ageing paper in an effort to find out who we are, is to avoid the responsibility of choice, since when it comes to it we only have ourselves, now, and the ever narrowing cone of what we might enact When tending to her child I see the outline of my mother’s hands beneath the skin of mine . and I hear her voice in mine performing the liturgy of endearments, those sibilant invitations to returning sleep – and I wonder if these things are soothing in themselves or if it is rather that through generational repetition they have become that way, a memory taught and retaught, the epigenetics of comfort: …. I feel memory as enactment and my mother, my grandmother, in nay hands and my arms, a half-presence, no longer lost What I found particularly clever about this book was the way that its own subject matter becomes a meta-commentary on how the book itself is constructed, for example: the importance of the boundaries between the scientific historical sections and those sections with the narrators own musings; the way that layers are peeled back, examined and later reassembled – with the superficial in literary and anatomical terms contrasted with the deep; the importance of the “bare bones” of the novel’s structure overlaid with the interwoven complexity of the themes that run like blood vessels and nerves through it. Even the author’s idiosyncrasies of punctuation, with paragraphs and sentences ending with “ – “ (see the Röntgen example above) emphasises the idea of boundary and transition. I found the descriptions of the process of bereavement moving. For example, on realising she cannot bleed her mother’s radiators, reset her boiler, or replace the salt in her dishwater: This is where grief is found, in these suddenly unfilled cracks, these responsibilities – minute, habitual – which have lain elsewhere for years and which, having failed amongst grief’s greater broil to be reapportioned, are overlooked in favour of the more dramatic, until even the ordinary starts to crumble I also loved and particularly identified (albeit very imperfectly as the father some of the descriptions of pregnancy in the third part) On welcoming a second child, while making the first still feel full loved A reminder to our daughter that completion is elastic and she was enough even as we planned her augmentation Differences in her and Johannes view of pregnancy: What I felt as a set of prohibitions and a physical incapacity, a slow-fast remaking of my own biology, was for him hardly more than anticipation, like waiting for Christmas to come Then how she describes her feelings and experiences watching a foetal heart trace, her meetings with consultants (her pregnancy from the day the baby was found breech a series of waits on uncomfortable chairs clutching plastic cups from the water fountain in the corner of the waiting room), undergoing an ECV, the early stages of induction two days spent walking round and round the hospital car park in the hope labour might begin and their contrast with its violent ending, and birth as a ten hour lesson in topography . I also found the (inadvertent) links with other Women’s Prize books fascinating: Freud considering his youngest daughter and eventual collaborator and continuer of his work his Anna Antigone (linking to Home Fire); On Johannes before the birth He would not feel the child’s weight until he held it in his arms – linking to the most harrowing aspects of The Trick to Time) Overall I found this an outstanding book. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Apr 03, 2018
|
Apr 04, 2018
|
Mar 20, 2018
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
0802126456
| 9780802126450
| 0802126456
| 3.61
| 3,216
| May 02, 2017
| May 02, 2017
|
liked it
|
This book is a fictionalised retelling of a remarkable and true family history, which the author has told herself in a Literary Hub article which is i
This book is a fictionalised retelling of a remarkable and true family history, which the author has told herself in a Literary Hub article which is included at the back of my edition of the book, but the link for which I include below. https://lithub.com/my-mysterious-moth... The article itself effectively contains the whole plot of the book – so is best read alongside the book (for which it provides a useful summary) rather than before it; but the opening paragraphs sets the scene nicely: Known by her maiden name, Louisa Benson, my mother was not Burman, the majority race in Myanmar. Her father was Sephardic, and her mother was of the Karen ethnic nationality, one of Burma’s indigenous and chronically oppressed people. More detail on the life of Louisa Benson can be found below: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louisa_... The book opens with Louisa’s parents – the author’s maternal grandparents – Benny and Khin meeting for the first time on a pier in Burma just after the start of the World War (but at a time when Burma was still felt to be immune) and thereafter traces their lives and that of some key characters around them (particularly a lover of Benny’s and two lovers of Khin) and their children, alongside the tumultuous post-war history of Burma (particularly as experienced by the Karen people). The two threads – family memoir and national/tribal history – interweave naturally in a two way interaction: not only are the family profoundly and traumatically affected by that history, but they also play an important role in, it particularly in the Karen separatist movement. The other key family character is Craig’s mother Louisa – who twice wins the Miss Burma competition, and has later periods both as a movie star, as something of a tabloid victim (but both shot through with Burmese politics) and then as enforced-by-circumstance default leader of one of the key rebel movements. A key part of the book is the difficulty of communication across language, cultural and people barriers – Benny and Khin’s first conversation is facilitated by a translator and their early conversations (even Khin disclosing her pregnancy) in an almost pidgin language. Different experience – particularly traumatic experiences of war, detention, rape torture only serve to widen the difficulty of communication and Louisa’s difficult relationships with both her parents only adds additional lines of non-communication, and the dimension of generation. Key political themes of the book include: - The malign role of British colonialism in handicapping Burmese independence and poisoning race/people relations from the offset, particularly to be able to retreat from colonial responsibilities as soon as possible post War - The equally malign influence after that of American overseas policy, in a State department obsessed by the domino theory and a part CIA/part privateer group whose ultimate aim in their overt and covert interference in Burmese politics is unclear to anyone – the reader, the Burmese and one has to conclude even themselves - The validity or otherwise of violent resistance in the face of oppression - The tension in the separatist movements between arguing for independence or federalism (while effectively condoning and consolidating the poor relations between peoples) and instead aiming for a United democracy (but then trusting in the good faith of the majority Burman group, in the face of all evidence to the contrary) So overall a book with a fascinating and true back-story, with great political insight and a great take on a relatively unknown history and strong themes. However it was not a book that I felt was very well executed and the reason I think lies in the fact that the author, who is clearly a very talented writer, has overwritten the book. In particular I struggled with the overbearing voice of the traditional omniscient narrator, which seems to remove the agency from the characters and leaving interpretation space for the reader. I felt that too often I was being told what the characters were feeling more than being given space to understand what they were feeling. In fact more than that, typically I was told what one of the characters knew that the other character was feeling or indicating – in this book facial expressions, particularly eyes take over the communication that the characters find difficult. A typical example is: “Don’t you see” his searching glance seemed to tell her “All of that – that suffering you put yourself through – it came out of a need not to offend. And as long as you concern yourself with upsetting others, you’re in prison.” And “As I see it, you are your father’s daughter. He was a warrior, too, in his way. Trust him to endure this” And even the characters eventually seem to realise that this is the only method by which the author will allow them to communicate “Don’t speak” she said “Don’t immediately deny it. Just listen to me, and let me read your eyes” Finally, to end on a positive note, the book which took years in the writing (Craig’s first draft was based on her relationship with her mother) has become eeringly, if depressingly prescient given the recent persecution of the Rohingya Muslims in Myanmar. Even more fascinatingly, given the West’s current disillusion with the Nobel laureate and long-term political prisoner turned political leader Aung San Suu Kyi for her apparent acquiescence in these acts, her father Aung San, Japanese backing fighter turned national liberator turned British backed leader features in the book as someone distrusted by the Karen people: How very Western to trust the word of a man who speaks fluently, intelligently, even brilliantly. How very Western to trust that he has the same code of honour. How naive to think that because he makes one gesture towards Western democracy he couldn’t possibly at the same time be plotting a systematized form of inequality – a state in which one “dominant” race rules and is sanctioned to discriminate against others – against “minorities”....more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Apr 16, 2018
|
Apr 17, 2018
|
Mar 15, 2018
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
1786491281
| 9781786491282
| 1786491281
| 4.08
| 6,254
| May 04, 2017
| Mar 01, 2018
|
really liked it
| I am the woman who has tried to shield herself from the pain of the first person singular …. I am the woman who stands in place of the woman who lo I am the woman who has tried to shield herself from the pain of the first person singular …. I am the woman who stands in place of the woman who loathes to enter this story in any of its narrations … because that woman has struggled so hard and long to wriggle out of it – and now when asked to speak, she would much rather send a substitute. Sharing stories might be catharsis, but to her it is the second, more sophisticated punishment. I am the woman deputed on her behalf. Now shortlisted for the 2018 Women's Prize. A fierce and yet artistic account of domestic violence and marital rape – based very closely on the author’s own terrible experiences, although as the passage above makes clear one which is still a fictional account. The book simultaneously acts as a protest cry against the huge latent issue of marital abuse but also functions as a finely crafted into piece of literature – or to quote further from the passage above (the repetition within this passage of “I am the woman …” very representative of the various stylistic devices that the author applies in the book) I am the woman who tummy rubs every received taunt so that it can be cajoled into sentences Or as the author explains in this powerful piece https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/h... When I talk to people about writing my story, the first response is often: have you found the writing cathartic? Not at all. Catharsis is about purging emotions. That was never my aim. Instead, I wanted to take all that hurt and pain and shame and suffering, and distil it and transform it into something beautiful. The process of writing was a kind of alchemy-to take the horror of the violence, to dwell in it and shape that into an intense, moving sentence. I did that until every shard of my sadness caught the right amount of light, and every word shone on the page. I made an abusive marriage into an art object, and that is how I left it in the end I found this review by Preti Taneja(author of Preti Taneja We That Are Young– a book which uses King Lear to examine the role of women in Indian Society and vice versa) very helpful for understanding the cultural context of the book: https://www.theguardian.com/books/201... Politics also plays a key role – the abusive husband is a university lecturer on Marxism and ex-revolutionary guerilla and obscenely uses both his politics and his past to justify and obscure his abuse (I could not help reflecting on the accusations of misogyny and on-line abuse around Momentum activists). Overall this is a difficult, powerful and important novel. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Mar 27, 2018
|
Mar 27, 2018
|
Mar 08, 2018
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
0802126596
| 9780802126597
| 0802126596
| 3.19
| 15,341
| May 02, 2017
| Aug 01, 2017
|
it was ok
|
I read this book due to its longlisting for the 2018 Women’s Prize for literature. I have to confess that I until I started reading this book I had bee I read this book due to its longlisting for the 2018 Women’s Prize for literature. I have to confess that I until I started reading this book I had been entirely unaware of the infamous case of Lizzy Borden and her trial in 1892 for the alleged murder of her father Andrew and step-father Abby in August of that year, and which gave arise to what is a well known (if grisly) skipping song in America, from which this book takes its title: Lizzie Borden took an axe, And gave her mother forty whacks, When she saw what she had done, She gave her father forty-one. The book presents a basic timeline of the case as an appendix, but I think is better read with some additional knowledge – if only to be able to fully appreciate which parts of the novel simply follow the historically documented “facts” and which are the author’s interpretation or additional inventions/suggestions. A good basic source is: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lizzie_... Although the author herself drew on the resources of the Lizzie Borden Society www.lizzieandrewborden.com The very existence of that organisation demonstrating the infamy of this case. Interestingly, and despite my own extremely limited research I did notice a couple of (I can only assume deliberate) anomalies in this book compared to what I believe to be the received “facts” of the case: firstly everyone in the book addresses the Irish family maid (a key witness to the murders) as Bridget, and yet Bridget’s own testimony to the court started In the household, I was sometimes called Maggie, by Miss Emma and Miss Lizzie (not a particularly unusual occurrence where families use the name of an old servant for those who replace her); secondly Andrew’s slaughter of Lizzie’s pigeons is moved to the day before his murder and linked very clearly to the murder (with it seems the same axe used and even the sounds of the attack as heard by Bridget being the same), yet, this time from Lizzie’s own testimony No, sir, he killed some pigeons in the barn last May or June ……. I thought he wrung their necks The story is told in four first person voice – Lizzie, her sister Emma, Bridget and a fourth voice Benjamin – almost all on the day before or after the murder, albeit with a Benjamin related closing chapter when he attempts to confront the sisters years later. Benjamin is Smith’s own addition to the tale, a ruffian hired by the girl’s Uncle John (a key figure in the events) to put the frighteners on their father (who is increasingly favoring his second wife over them including gifting parts of the girl’s future inheritance to her) but who instead ends up an unseen witness to the events around the murders, rather implausibly hiding in a double murder scene, being searched by police and who absconds with some evidence including the murder weapon (whose absence was in historical fact one of the elements which introduced enough doubt in the Jury’s mind for them to issue a non-guilty verdict). Schmidt’s own verdict on Lizzie seems a clear (but unspoken) guilty despite a number of other possible motives and complications introduced – John’s rather creepy relationship with his nieces, Emma and Lizzie’s love-hate relationship, Abby’s confiscation of the savings Bridget had intended to use to return to Ireland, possibly even Lesbian relationships between Lizzie and Abby. And where the book succeeds is in painting a memorable if disturbing picture of the Borden household – one where with the death of Andrew’s first wife (the girl’s mother and John’s sister) all love has disappeared and been replaced with hatred and resentment which festers in the Summer heat like the over-ripening peaches which almost all the characters obsess over, and the decaying mutton stew which seems to poison them all. The book I think is best described as His Bloody Project: Documents Relating to the Case of Roderick Macrae crossed with Eileen – both of which books were shortlisted for the Booker prize and neither of which I particularly enjoyed, but which I think will appeal strongly to those who enjoyed one (or both) of them. In my view however the book could be described as magnifying the flaws of both of them. A murder mystery where the possible suspects all speak to us, directly from their thoughts, in the first person is I think very artificial. And whereas I found the Eileen character distinctly unappealing with her psychopathic tendencies and obsession with bodily functions – here we have at least two psychopathic first person characters (Lizzie and Benjamin) and three, if not all four, obsessed with bodily functions, decay, secretions, fluids, smells and so on (just as one example Benjamin’s first paragraph involves John being sick on him, the vomit described as gravy thick, later when he has to crawl through his own cold vomit – he describes it as gravel thick – implying this uneducated has developed a finely tuned taxonomy of metaphors for sick). ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Mar 12, 2018
|
Mar 12, 2018
|
Mar 08, 2018
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
0008196915
| 9780008196912
| 0008196915
| 3.80
| 19,647
| Jan 11, 2018
| Jan 11, 2018
|
liked it
|
Longlisted for the 2018 Women's Prize for fiction. Joanna Cannon’s second book after her best-selling debut novel The Trouble with Goats and Sheep, whi Longlisted for the 2018 Women's Prize for fiction. Joanna Cannon’s second book after her best-selling debut novel The Trouble with Goats and Sheep, which I seem to have been almost alone in strongly disliking, according it one of my rare 1* ratings, a review which concluded with a list of what I saw as “The Trouble with The Trouble with Goats” https://www.goodreads.com/review/show... This is her follow up novel – a novel which, given my experience with her first novel, I would not have read other than for its longlisting for the Women’s Prize. Three Things About Three Things About Elsie - The first things is that alongside Eleanor Oliphant Is Completely Fine its one of the two example of the relatively recent literary genre called “up lit” on this year’s Women’s Prize shortlist. - The second thing is that it is a classic example of the genre - The third thing …. might take a bit more explaining “Up lit” books – typically concentrate on those marginalised by society due to age or eccentricity, and have plots driven by kindness and empathy. Joanna Cannon’s best seller debut was seen as playing a key role in the popularisation of this genre; another pioneering example would be Rachel Joyce’s The Unlikely Pilgrimage of Harold Fry. https://www.theguardian.com/books/201... I hugely welcome books which preach compassion and understanding - too many literary books seem to revel in its opposite – celebrating the darker side of the human character (the unpleasant 2015 Booker prize winner “Seven Killings” being just one example of this). I do tend to find though that this newly developing genre relies a little too much on co-incidence, and on late revelations which are largely down to unreliable narrators (often unreliable for the very part of their character which the book is sympathetically portraying). I prefer books like Exit West, Lincoln in the Bardo, Attrib. and other stories or Turning for Home which have much of the advantage of “Up lit” without its disadvantages. “Three Things About Elsie” however is a classic example of the “up lit” genre in all senses. The book’s insider cover blurb says that the book will teach many things, of which three examples are given, the second being “the fine threads of humanity will connect us all forever”: the novel, particularly close to its ends, weaves so many coincidental interconnections between the characters (with almost every element of their past that has been previously mentioned turning out to overlap) that these fine threads turn into an almost impenetrable web. The book also relies almost entirely on an unreliable narrator – in fact Florence’s attempts to piece together for herself her memories of the death of her best-friend Elsie’s sister and the role played in it by Ronnie Butler (now seemingly back from the dead and masquerading as Gabriel Price) and, with much more emotional impact, by Elsie and by Florence herself, is fundamental to the book. I was surprised though to see the book ultimately relying on effectively the same plot device/key final revelation as Gail Honeyman’s “Eleanor Oliphant is Completely Fine”. I was also slightly mystified to note that, three pages after the pivotal action in the book which is the disappearance of a character called Mrs Honeyman, we are told that the name of owner of the Whitby hotel where the characters are all staying is Gail. But to finish on a positive note there is much to admire in the writing of this book. Cannon’s use of language and ability to convey the nuances of ageing is excellent – I felt I could have highlighted any number of passages in the book. Just as a few examples: This passage which questions the real societal motivations behind managed care for the elderly It’s called sheltered accommodation, but I’d never quite been able to work out what it was we were being sheltered from. The world was still out there. It crept in through newspapers and the television. It slide between the cracks of other people’s conversation and sang out from their mobile telephones. We were the ones hidden away, collected up and ushered out of sight, and I often wondered if it was actually the world being sheltered from us Or this which shows how simply growing old (like being a child) suddenly gives others the right to interfere in your life – as Florence looks back on when she was first moved, despite her wishes, into sheltered accomodation: It didn’t take them long to undo my life, I had spent eight year building it, but within weeks, they made it small enough to fit into a manila envelope and take long to meetings …. They hurried it away from me when I least expected, when I thought I could coat myself in old age and be left to it Or this series of lovely sentences exploring a group of old friends, reminiscing on their past: We explored pockets of the past. Favorite stories were retold, to make sure they hadn’t been forgotten. Scenes were sandpapered down to make them easier to hold … There were people missing from our conversations, and others were coloured in and underlined...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Mar 19, 2018
|
Mar 20, 2018
|
Mar 08, 2018
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
024120710X
| 9780241207109
| 024120710X
| 3.92
| 2,175
| Mar 29, 2018
| Mar 29, 2018
|
really liked it
|
I read this book due to its longlisting for the 2018 Women’s Prize. The book is written from the third party viewpoint of Mona, starting just before he I read this book due to its longlisting for the 2018 Women’s Prize. The book is written from the third party viewpoint of Mona, starting just before her sixtieth birthday in an English seaside town where she runs a toy shop and an internet business selling hand-made dolls, crafter by a local carpenter (a loner with whom she has an ambiguous relationship) and then painted by her and beautifully dressed in clothes she makes from second hand clothes. At the book’s start she spots an elderly and seemingly elegant man in a flat opposite and the two start a slow-burning friendship, marked by the man Karl (a German, who over time reveals that his almost lifelong friend - a rich man - died recently) who is as dapper and refined as she first imagined him. Their relationship becomes more awkward as they explore it turning into more of a relationship (Mona’s ambiguous relationship with the carpenter seemingly being one of the blockers). Occasionally her shop is visited by women sent by a counsellor - reluctantly revealing a birth weight to her and giving her a precious keepsake. We quickly realise that Mona gets the carpenter to craft a doll in the weight of the women’s stillborn baby and uses the doll (which inevitably reminds them of holding their bay shortly after its death) to help them to therapeutically explore the life their child might have led. Mona looks back across her life: her mother dies when she was a child just before which her father urges her to make the most of her time with her mother and shares his trick of time (“You can make it expand or make it contract. Make it shorter or make it longer” - as Mona later adds “You can make the most of what you have”); later when she emigrates to Birmingham from Ireland in the 1970s, meeting and marrying William and becoming pregnant with his child (something William panics about - seemingly concerned he will be as bad a parent as his own largely absent and often mentally ill father). A key part of the book is Mona’s habit of invention and her clear affinity with those who will share that habit with her: of imagining with a quite joy the future (as she does with William when they are first married - walking past rich houses and imagining the life they would lead there); or exploring a possible alternative present (with Karl she visits an antiques fair and the two pretend to be living in a house containing the antiques); or most poignantly re-ineventing an alternative past (as she does with mother’s of still born babies and at the book’s end with her own child). The book is well if not brilliantly crafted, deeply affecting with some heart-wrenching scenes and some memorably sketched side characters (particularly Mona and William’s female relatives) and with a plot which just about manages to avoid crossing the boundary into melodrama, but which relies a little too much on a third party viewpoint withholding crucial information. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Mar 30, 2018
|
Apr 02, 2018
|
Mar 08, 2018
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
0307908836
| 9780307908834
| 0307908836
| 3.59
| 1,854
| May 30, 2017
| Aug 01, 2017
|
really liked it
|
I read this book due to its longlisting for the 2018 Women’s Prize. It had overlap with two books I have already this year, both non-fictional althoug
I read this book due to its longlisting for the 2018 Women’s Prize. It had overlap with two books I have already this year, both non-fictional although one written in close to a fictional style, and both motivated by family connections to some of the most terrible events of the twentieth century. Maybe Esther: A Family Story by Katja Petrowskaja; born in Ukraine to a Russian speaking Jewish-descended but now non-religious and Soviet family, as she picks her “way through the rubble of history” to research her family tree, including a great-grandmother (the maybe Esther of the book’s title) who was shot for speaking to a German officer as she struggled, despite her age and infirmities, to make her way to the Jewish round up in Kiev that would preceded the Babi Yar massacre My review https://www.goodreads.com/review/show... East West Street: On the Origins of "Genocide" and "Crimes Against Humanity" by Philippe Sands; a powerful account of the legal and personal background behind the Nurenberg trials, which links back to the post WWI history of the now Ukranian city of Lviv and forward to the International Criminal Court, and which is given added poignancy and relevance by the author’s family links to the first and legal links to the second. This book, also set in the Ukraine at the time of the German occupation and enforcement of the holocaust, is entirely non-fictional (albeit with clear factual inspiration) but is also motivated by family connections. The motivation behind the book is best explained in this excellent and moving Guardian article by the author. https://www.theguardian.com/books/201... Where she reveals that her own family connections are very different: My grandparents were Nazis. I can’t remember a time when I didn’t know this. Opa – my grandfather – was in the Brownshirts, and was later a doctor with the Waffen SS; Amfi, my grandmother, was an active party member. – something which has always lead her to consider what it is like to be on the wrong side of history. This book itself was inspired by the story of Willi Ahrem, who managed to avoid military action by transferring to the construction corps and being stationed behind the lines in Nemirow, a small town in newly occupied Ukraine, where he was to oversee the building of a road … He had done all he could to minimise his involvement in the war. Yet only weeks after his posting, he awoke to the sound of the Jews of Nemirow being rounded up Full details of the heroic way he dealt with this are at the below link: http://db.yadvashem.org/righteous/fam... The equivalent character in the novel is Otto (after Rachel’s grandfather) Pohl, with effectively the same back story, – and the book opens with him witnessing German soldiers rounding up Jews that have disobeyed a command to gather at the brickworks with some basic possessions as though for a short journey. The book is largely set over the next three days of November 1941 as that round-up plays out in way that is tragically inevitable to us, 75 years later, but which those caught up in those events (on all sides) fail (sometimes willfully) to recognise even as it is happening. Otto is one of a number of third person point of view characters, others include; a peasant girl Yasia and her fiancee Mykola, a Red Army deserter now serving as an auxillary policeman for the Germans; Ephraim, a Jewish man who co-operated with the request to report but is anxious about his headstrong son Yankel (and his younger brother Momik) who fled the previous night. Yankel is the “boy in winter” of the title but in an interesting stylistic choice is never the main character and we only see him and sense his feeling and characters through those that interact with him. The book has two memorable set pieces. In the first Pohl (who the author describes in her article as, compared to Willi Ahrem less a righteous German than a man who tries his best at the worst of all imaginable moments), desperate for workers to meet his demanding targets for completion of the road is ordered by the local SS commander to select workers from the gathered Jews. Pohl sense a trap for himself given the unsuitability of those his foreman starts suggesting, and seeing the brutality with which the Jews are treated refuses to co-operate with what he sees as a degrading process for them – the reader of course realises (as tragically too late does Pohl when the sounds of repeated gunshots rings out later) that the SS commander is offering him the chance to redeem a small number of the Jews. In the second, we witness the inevitable but terrible and chaotic massacre, but from the viewpoint, via Mykola, of those forced to take part in facilitating it, desensitised by alcohol. These both occur in the second third of the novel – and in my view the story rather loses its impact in its final third, which focuses on Yasia’s sheltering of the two young brothers and then escape with them to her marsh-dwelling relatives. Nevertheless a memorable story. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Mar 13, 2018
|
Mar 14, 2018
|
Mar 07, 2018
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
1911215728
| 9781911215721
| 1911215728
| 3.55
| 20,104
| Jan 25, 2018
| Jan 01, 2018
|
it was amazing
|
UPDATE: I said in my review that the book had a strong chance of success in the Women's Prize, it was subsequently longlisted and has now made the sho
UPDATE: I said in my review that the book had a strong chance of success in the Women's Prize, it was subsequently longlisted and has now made the shortlist I spent much of the second half of 2017 and early 2018 reading experimental fiction: the Goldsmith shortlist; various books I had anticipated making that list; each of the Republic of Consciousness Prize longlist at least twice; a number of other books submitted for that prize; other books from the wonderful small presses that I discovered through the prize. Fiction that was brilliant but still often demanding of the reader. It is therefore a great pleasure to find a book that, while still excellently written is instead generous to the reader, one that simply weaves a good, old-fashioned story around a great command of language and evocative period detail, one that seamlessly weaves bawdy descriptions and dialogue (particularly in the first part), alongside the harsh realities of prostitution (even if it is high class prostitution) and female servitude (particularly in the second part), with a deeply affecting and melancholic third part. This story set in London and its outskirts (particularly Deptford) in 1785, starts with a merchant, ship owner and childless widower John Hancock finding that one of his captains has sold one of his ships for the apparent dead body of a goblin-like mermaid. Initially convinced he faces ruin Hancock decides to exhibit it as a marvel in a local coffee house, to his surprise to great success and is then persuaded by a high class madam – Mrs Chappell - to allow her to exhibit the mermaid alongside her girls. At the first evening she asks one of her ex-girls, Angelica Neal, a courtesan whose Duke-lover recently died without remembering her in his will, to entertain Hancock, only for Hancock, despite being smitten with Angelica, to flee when he realises the explicit nature of the other entertainments laid on at the party. The second part of the book mainly traces the fortunes of Angelica and those around her, fortunes which turn rapidly against her and from which she is rescued by marriage to Mr Hancock (who responding to some teasing of hers, becomes obsessed with finding another mermaid for her). To his astonishment he succeeds but, the third part of the book, turns to fantasy as the mermaid turns out to be ephemeral if bewitching when viewed, but to be deeply affecting emotionally, infecting those around it with a deep lying sense of ennui and loss. Another strong part of the book is the number of very strong female side-characters it develops – Bel Fortescue (Angelica’s best friend who succeeds in marrying her own upper class lover), Hancock’s niece Sukie, Mrs Chappell herself, Polly a mulatto in Mrs Chappell’s group of girls, Mrs Frost (Neal’s housekeeper, seemingly full of disapproval of Angelica’s lifestyle but who is all the time learning and developing what it would take to set up her own house of girls) – interestingly many, particularly Bel and Polly drift away from the story (or more accurately the story drifts away from them) but stay in the readers mind as fully formed characters. I suspect that this strong group of characters give this book a good chance of success with the Women’s Prize for fiction and already it must be a strong contender for next year’s Costa First Novel Prize. Overall a really enjoyable read – just what I needed and has set me up nicely for a return to the more experimental end of literature. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Mar 02, 2018
|
Mar 02, 2018
|
Feb 05, 2018
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
1408891042
| 9781408891049
| 1408891042
| 4.01
| 138,895
| Sep 05, 2017
| Nov 02, 2017
|
really liked it
|
Now shortlisted for the 2018 Women's Prize (as predicted in my last comment). This book is Jesmyn Ward’s third novel, all of them set in the Fictional Now shortlisted for the 2018 Women's Prize (as predicted in my last comment). This book is Jesmyn Ward’s third novel, all of them set in the Fictional town of Bois Sauvage on Mississippi’s Gulf Coast – both of fictional version of her native town of DeLisle and a conscious tribute to William Faulkner’s setting of his novels and short stories in the fictional Yoknaptawpha County), This book (like her second novel – Salvage the Bones) is already a winner of the National Book Award. It is now also a finalist for the National Book Critics Circle Award. The book opens in the voice of thirteen year old Jojo – he lives with his mother Leonie (and initially chapters alternate between their first person accounts. His white father Michael is incarcerated in “Parchman Farm” (the real-life nickname for the Mississippi State Penitentiary), his 3 year old sister (named Michaela but his mother, but Kayla to Jojo) and his elderly grandparents – Pop (River) and Mama (Phillie). Pop was himself incarcerated in Parchman Farm as a fifteen-year-old, arrested alongside his older step brother after the latter stabbed a white man in a bar brawl. There, due to his natural affinity for animals, he was put in a position of responsibility in charge of the team of vicious dogs that hunted down escaped convicts. He appears haunted by the memory of the youngest inmate – the 12-year-old Richie – who he tried to protect from the brutality around him and tells Jojo stories about him (but not about what happened to him). Mama is a herbal healer – with a strong belief in voodoo, but is now dying from cancer. Leonie is simply not able to cope with parenting, as the dying Mama tells Jojo towards the end of the book She ain’t got the mothering instinct. I knew when you was little and we was out shopping, and she bought herself something to eat and ate it right in front of you, and you was sitting there crying hungry. I knew then. She knows she is a disappointment to her parents and Jojo, but seems unable to break out of her pattern of life and since Michael’s imprisonment has moved onto coke addiction. When she takes drugs she can see and interact with the ghost of her brother Given – killed (by Michael’s brother) in what was officially called a hunting accident. Michael’s parents refuse to acknowledge her or her children with Michael. The character of Given is partly autobiographical, Ward's own brother killed by a white drunk driver – which she examined in her non-fiction book Men We Reaped which looked at the untimely, violent deaths of five young people in her community. Jojo is a complex character – desperate to emulate Pop’s masculinity, hugely resentful and suspicious of his mother but at the same time fiercely protective of Kayla who treats him as her mother, and sensitive to the voices of others (believing he can discern what animals and Kayla are saying to him). Where “Salvage The Bones” examines the man made magnification of a natural disaster – Hurricane Katrina, this book also takes place in the aftermath of a man made disaster – Michael was a rig welder on Deepwater Horizon and the implication is that his incarceration was due to crystal meth manufacture and dealing that he took up after losing his job (and many of his colleagues). When Leonie is called by Michael to say he is being released, she takes Jojo and Kayla (and a work colleague) on a road trip to Parchman Farm – calling en route to pick up a consignment of crystal meth. At Parchman farm – the ghost of Richie, visible only to Jojo, joins them and thereafter becomes the third first party narrator in the book, determined to travel back with them to meet Pop and discover the story of his own death. The opening of the book is very powerful – partly due to the complexity of Jojo and Leonie and their relationship. The book also captures brilliantly much of what ails America -the opioid epidemic, fatherless black boys struggling for viable role models, rural poverty, deeply historically entrenched racism. The book also ends very powerfully – albeit with an increasing descent into the supernatural with Mama turning increasingly to her voodoo beliefs and with Given and Richie joined by a chorus of the ghosts of the violently murdered. The middle of the book drags somewhat though, dissipating the powerful start on an interminable road-trip which seems to consist mainly of Kayla vomiting on the way to the prison and Leonie vomiting on the way back (after having to swallow some drugs to avoid arrest) – while it could be said that the journey out captures well the nature of a long drive with children in the heat (service stations, increasing irritation and resentfulness between family members, sickness), a realistic portrayal of boredom is nevertheless boring. I also found the book too derivative of other books I have read recently or at the least not really adding to how I had already been powerfully affected by them. The use of Ghosts to portray the long lasting effects of racism and prejudice has already been done in (to name three books published in the previous 12 months) Lincoln in the Bardo (where it was much more convincing), The Underground Railroad (where I much preferred the use of a fantastical device) and less coherently in White Tears. The coverage of the brutality of an American penal system which effectively turned prison into plantations/ legalised slavery has similarly been covered in the last 12 months in Homegoing, The Underground Railroad and was the central theme of the overlooked, 2016 Booker nominated Work Like Any Other. Overall a worthwhile read and, given recent trends, one that may well feature on the longlist for some 2018 UK literary prizes, but overall my rating is a 3.5 * rounded up. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Jan 26, 2018
|
Jan 27, 2018
|
Jan 26, 2018
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
1476716730
| 9781476716732
| 1476716730
| 3.62
| 88,279
| Oct 03, 2017
| Oct 03, 2017
|
liked it
|
Now longlisted for the 2018 Women's Prize. The author’s follow up book to the brilliant A Visit from the Goon Squad. I could not help but admire the au Now longlisted for the 2018 Women's Prize. The author’s follow up book to the brilliant A Visit from the Goon Squad. I could not help but admire the author’s versatility and bravery in writing such a very different book. And despite its conventionality (in complete contrast to its predecessor) there is much to admire here: Egan’s strong writing wears the considerable research behind the book lightly - although the diving parts are detailed this do not seem out of keeping for Anna’s narration; the book captures brilliantly a different sense of New York as a sea-facing City; the book conveys the changing social attitudes of the time, the forced acceptance of woman and blacks in previously male dominated areas of society and industry (but still against a background of deep prejudice and with a sense that post War this may prove only a temporary opening); each of the main third party characters – Eddie, Anna and Styles are sketched as complex and nuanced characters, both in their inner thoughts and their interactions with others – Eddie and Anna’s mutual belief that they somehow let down, and were let down by, the other being an example. However where the novel is weakest is that it seems to be an amalgamation of a number of overly familiar and unoriginal tropes – particularly the gangster TV series/movie and the (in my view excessively long and close to completely redundant merchant navy convoy/u-boat induced shipwreck/fight for survival piece. Famously Egan was quoted extensively a number of years back as saying that “A Visit from the Goon Squad” was inspired by The Sopranos and by Marcel Proust's In Search of Lost Time – the Sopranos inspiration being its polyphonic cast structure (with secondary characters coming to the fore) and its lateral sense of plot development. Here unfortunately the Sopranos inspiration is rather more immediate and unsubtle. Overall an enjoyable read from a clearly talented author – a book with a cinematic feel though (and from me that is never a recommendation for a book). ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Jan 18, 2018
|
Jan 18, 2018
|
Dec 27, 2017
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
0008172110
| 9780008172114
| 0008172110
| 4.23
| 1,274,853
| May 09, 2017
| May 14, 2017
|
liked it
|
Now longlisted for the 2018 Women's Prize. My view of this novel is that it is fine (which just like in the title of the book needs to be read and unde Now longlisted for the 2018 Women's Prize. My view of this novel is that it is fine (which just like in the title of the book needs to be read and understood as a British person using that word). The novel is I think certain to feature in the Richard and Judy Book Club selection as soon as it is published in paperback, and will be a staple read for many book clubs in 2018. Its nomination for the best first novel for the Costa Prize – a prize which “recognises some of the most enjoyable books of the year” and (per Wikipedia) are given not just for literary merit but also for works “whose aim is to convey the enjoyment of reading to the widest possible audience” – is hugely appropriate. It has already been sold for large sums worldwide and already signed up by Reese Witherspoon for a film (one can only wince to think of how Hollywood could butcher this story) – again this is no surprise. The real strength of this novel is that it manages to at the same time confront a difficult topic (extreme loneliness) and some dark subject matter (the book is at its strongest when Eleanor lapses close to suicide), while giving an ultimately feel-good message. At heart (and this is a book with a huge heart) it has at least three important life lessons: that there are people around us and not just older people who in today’s atomised society are desperately lonely; that we should never jump to conclusions about why other’s act like they do but take time to understand them and their back stories; that small acts of kindness (kind words without any undercurrent, gentle and well-intentioned physical contact) can be transformative in the life of the marginalised. But this is not literature: the character and life of Eleanor is littered with contradictions and inconsistencies (it would be churlish to list them here) – and while a few could be generously said to explained by Eleanor’s own denial of her past and unreliability as a narrator, that cannot be said of most, unless we simply accept that the entire tale is imagined. I also think that the messages of the book would have been stronger (and more relatable to those around us) without the extremeness of Eleanor’s story. The end of the book delivered two disappointments to me: Firstly I had suddenly thought mid-story that I had misinterpreted what was going on and that the final reveal of the book would give it a new, and more complex and ambiguous turn - only for that “reveal” to be two things which were obvious from very early on in the book to any vaguely attentive reader; Secondly one area I struggled with was how the social services and authorities dealt with the young and teenage Eleanor, especially as simple maths meant this was happening around the turn of the century, not in a less enlightened age – the acknowledgements did nothing to dispel my suspicion that this was entirely unresearched. Overall this is a book I would recommend that you read at some point in 2018. But if you really want to take a hard look at the bleakness at the heart of our society then read a book which is meticulously researched and great literature Even the Dogs– it perhaps was to the disservice of this book that I picked up it only hours after finishing McGregor’s book and reflecting on that I have rounded up my 2.5 rating. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Dec 08, 2017
|
Dec 09, 2017
|
Nov 17, 2017
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
1785151142
| 9781785151149
| 1785151142
| 3.23
| 886
| Jul 20, 2017
| Jul 20, 2017
|
really liked it
|
The 2017 Goldsmith Prize winner - ahead of a strong shortlist and now longlisted for the 2018 Women's Prize. We [The Young] were given just enough cThe 2017 Goldsmith Prize winner - ahead of a strong shortlist and now longlisted for the 2018 Women's Prize. We [The Young] were given just enough choices to make us feel as though we were free, but not so many that our minds (our still-fragile intellects) became overloaded. Doubt ended. The information stream was purified ……….. We live Now. We live in Light. And when darkness threatens (darkness? Can there ever truly be darkness again?) they simply adjust the chemicals. Sometimes – while we sleep, as we gently dream – they remind us of how it used to be so that we appreciate how good things are now. Now that we are Free From Desire. And we are H(A)PPY to be reminded of this because it reinforces our sense of peacefulness, of calm, of conformity, of equilibrium. They tell us about the lies of The Past. Of how The Young were told that the needed to rebel against the norm in order to feel Whole. That creativity is dependent on struggle and suffering. H(A)PPY, in a way similar to Brave New World is set in what seems to its inhabitants a utopia but to us potentially a dystopia. The core inhabitants of this post-apocalypse world, The Young, live in a largely asexualized society which has rejected emotion (particularly an Excess of Emotion). Instead The Young strive to stay In Balance, both individually, as small communities and as a broader society, this Balance being measured on The Graph. Their thoughts and actions are recorded and visible to all on their Information Stream, with dangerous concepts highlighted in different colours and a pinkening of their graph. Any inadvertent deviation is controlled by chemicals or if required by recalibration of physical Oracular Devices. Their access to information (particularly information which may disturb The Balance) is controlled by the Sensor. In the past, The Old were completely awash with facts and non-facts. They asked a question and it was properly answered. A fountainhead of information was released. But was the water clear. Did it quench, revive or simply deluge?. Clearly some of this initial set up can be regarded as a satire of Generation-Snowflake, of safe-spaces, of the increasing self-censorship of the internet, and of the increasing trend for public figures to have to issue a public apology if they ever give rise to comments which reflect their unguarded thoughts and which deviate from now socially-established liberal values. In the hands of Dave Eggers his book would have remained there. The main plot development comes when the narrator Mira A, a musician, starts researching into a guitar player who she knows as 91.51.9.81.81.1.2, but who is the (real life) Paraguayan guitarist Agustin Barrios (whose works Barker recommends the reader to listen to while reading the novel). While viewing a picture she spots a small girl in the margins of the picture. Further information on Barrios, his music, his country and the language of that country (part Spanish, part Guarani) is dotted throughout the book. In the hands of Ali Smith– the book would then alternate between the narrative and reflections on the artist. However Barker is neither Eggers or Smith and instead of remaining where she is and following through on these early directions, the book very deliberately spirals off (and largely out of control) in two different ways. Firstly in its story. Shortly after the book starts she notes that the word Happy is coming out as H(A)PPY in her stream and tries to understand why the word is “Disambiguating, parenthesising” – something which seems to be linked to her enquiries into the past and which appears to threaten the entire edifice of the new order. From there we have a hardline faction within The Young, The Banal, a shadow twin Mira B (at times we are unclear which of the two is our narrator), a word or text Cathedral and much else even harder to explain. Secondly typographically – the book is already unusual in mimicing the colouring of the words monitored by the Information Stream but we start to have blank pages, pages of repeated coloured text, different typefaces (including mirror writing), symbols (including some which we are lead to believe are written directly into the stream and therefore onto the pages we read by Mira’s hands in a dream like state). Early on Mira A is examined by Kite, a Full Neuter who describes himself as a Mechanic to The System. He says to her Of course you will be familiar with the narrative form ….. those curious narrative structures employed so often and so successfully in the past. The narratives of family and romance and adventure, the masculine and the feminine narratives, the narratives of class, of nationalism, of capitalism, of socialism, of faith and myth and mystery, historical narratives, science fiction narratives, experimental narratives, horror narratives, literary narratives, ‘reality’ narratives, This passage seems to strike at Barker’s main motivation here (and in most of her writing), a rejection of conventional novels and stories. Instead in this book, she systematically seeks to undermine and deconstruct the very concept of narrative and story. Kite says just before this to Mira A I have inspected [your] narrative …. Its flow is, well its plodding – pedestrian – fluctuating - halting – occasional. It’s intermittent, at best. Narratives are not your speciality …… The real danger with your narrative … is that it is lazy. …. You are idly playing with random details. You are forcing things together. You are making strange connections. And you are struggling to make a kind of sense out of them Barker clearly herself does not even seek to specialise in narrative. Her work though is far from lazy or idle-play, and the opposite of plodding or pedestrian. Instead it sparkles with ideas and invention. However, at times she (or at least I as reader) did struggle to make sense out of what seemed random details and strange connections. Ultimately once something is undermined and deconstructed what is left lacks real form. Nevertheless this was a stimulating read and one which seems entirely designed to be shortlisted for the Goldsmith prize. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Sep 14, 2017
|
Sep 14, 2017
|
Sep 13, 2017
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
1408886774
| 9781408886779
| 1408886774
| 4.03
| 67,047
| Aug 15, 2017
| Aug 15, 2017
|
really liked it
|
Winner of the 2018 Women's Prize. And a book which seems uncanningly prescient given the recent change in Home Secretary. A book I originally read due Winner of the 2018 Women's Prize. And a book which seems uncanningly prescient given the recent change in Home Secretary. A book I originally read due to its longlisting for the 2017 Booker prize and by an author whose previous works I have not read. In the stories of wicked tyrants men and women are punished with exile, bodies are kept from their families –their heads impaled on spikes, their corpses thrown into unmarked graves. All these things happen according to the law, but not according to justice. I am here to ask for justice The book is a retelling of Antigone – a classical play with which I was unfamiliar, but which I read in preparation for reading this novel. The main characters of Home Fire and their Antigone equivalents are in two main families: Three siblings from an Anglo-Pakistani family – the studious and serious Isma (Isemene), her beautiful and more impetuous and younger-by-9-years sister Aneeka (Antigone), and Aneeka’s impressionable twin brother Parvaiz (Polyneices); A high profile Conservative politician Karamat Lone “Wolf” (Creon), his son Eamonn (Haimon) and his rich Irish interior designer wife Terri (effectively the prophet Tiresias). The book is told in 5 third party point of view sections told in turn from the viewpoint of Isma. Eamonn, Parvaiz, Aneeka and Karamat – four of these proceed in turn in chronological order but Parvaiz’s section jumps around in time including sections which predate all the other sections. The three siblings father was largely absent from their lives, instead fighting across the world as an Islamic freedom fighter in areas like Bosnia, then relabelled as an Islamic terrorist after 9-11 and his family eventually find out dying on his way to Guantánamo. When their mother died also, Isma at 21 has to give up her successful sociological studies to act as a full time carer for the twins. The siblings family hold a long term grudge against Karamat- as, when a young MP, he refused to help them find out about their father and retrieve his body. Over time Karamat has moved away from his Muslim background, after a scandal when he was seen entering a mosque believed to be terrorist-sponsoring, and now stands as a fully British anti-terrorist hardliner. The book is set when the twins are 19, Aneeka studying law. Isma now free from her responsibilities taking a research place in America with her previous academic supervisor and Parvaiz (radicalised by some family friends and IS recruiters who play on the tortures inflicted on the father he never knew) using the cover of a family trip to Pakistan to join the Caliphate in Raqqa where he becomes a member of the IS media unit. In America Isma meets Eamonn and despite recognising him strikes up a friendship with him, when Karamat is made Home Secretary they admit to each other about their fathers. On his return to the UK, Eamonn takes a package from Isma to her house and is immediately smitten with Aneeka – her initial reaction is hostile, but immediately after she pursues him and the two have an affair. I recently read the brilliant and Republic of Consciousness shortlisted We That Are Young - a modern day King Lear and a book disappointingly overlooked for the Women's Prize where it would have made a fascinating comparison to this book. Preti Taneja's approach to dealing with the "source text" was to follow not just the main plot, but often the dialogue of King Lear, and more specifically to choose to convey some of the more dramatic/odd parts of the original plot literally rather than in a figurative sense. That choice was fundamental to her very conception of that novel: her realisation that concepts and events which render King Lear strange to a modern Western reader can be understood in a modern context when transplanted across the world. Shamsie's approach has been a little more figurative - she has used much of the basic set up of Antigone (someone fighting against the state who is denied burial rights and effectively rendered stateless after their death) while not feeling the need to follow every last aspect of the original. She has brilliantly drawn out how the clear themes of Antigone (split loyalties to state/family, the rights and responsibilities of citizenship, the meaning of justice and the difference between state law and natural justice, female roles) are so relevant today. However there are clearly quite areas where the initial set up is different to Antigone. For example: no Eteocles; Aneeka/Isme's father's back story having limited parallel with Oedipus; Eamonn's initial relationship with Isma and Isma being the older sister (which both come from Jean Anouilh's version I think); Aneeka being the more beautiful daughter (Anouilh and the original have Isemene as more beautiful). I felt though that there were more direct links in the last section, but that these were subtle, for example: - Eamon's call with his father warning him "stopping a family from burying its own - that never looks good. That's what people are beginning to say around me. if your advisers won't tell you this, your son will" echoing Hameon telling Creon "under cover of darkness the city mourns for the girl" - Terri's warning to Karamat "And you've lost your son" echoing Tiresias prophecy that Creon's actions mean he will lose "a son of [his] own loins". - A blinding dust storm late in the book, which gives an echo of "the violent eddy lifted from the ground ... the vast atmosphere thickened to meet it" just before Antigone covers Polynices body for the second time I also loved the ending - and how the joint suicide of the classic version is played out instead. I did have some reservations about the writing. Like many others, I found the opening section very clunky and clichéd (for example a comment Isma makes about seeing her supervisor's hand being waved in welcome being like the outstretched arm of the Statue of Liberty). Had I have picked this book and browsed through it, without it being Booker longlisted, I may well have put it straight back down. Although the writing improves as the book progresses it remains uneven, a meditation on grief could have been written by Ali Smith, the section below (for which there simply is no excuse in a literary novel) from the pen of Clive Cussler. “His companion leant against the counter behind which the shopkeeper was standing, and flipped his phone from hand to hand while looking at the other customers. They filed out quickly in response, leaving the two men and the shopkeeper alone in the cavernous store. ‘Look at all this!’ the younger one said. ‘The Røde SVMX. The Sennheiser MKH8040. The Neumann U 87.’ ‘Uh huh. Just get what Abu Raees asked for, and let’s go. I’m starving.’ The shopkeeper reached beneath the counter and pulled out a box. ‘The Sound Devices 788T. Didn’t Abu Raees receive my message? I’ve had it for over two weeks.” One possible reason for this is that Shamsie is deliberately trying to write each section in the character of the point of view narrator. Overall I really liked this book – and was very disappointed to see it not making the Booker shortlist, so was delighted that the Women's Prize has given it the recognition it deserves. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Aug 14, 2017
|
Aug 15, 2017
|
Jul 26, 2017
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
1473660548
| 9781473660540
| 1473660548
| 3.78
| 14,630
| Aug 10, 2017
| Aug 10, 2017
|
really liked it
|
Now longlisted for the 2018 Women's Prize. Shortlisted for the 2017 Booker prize - which caused me to re-read the book (having originally read it immed Now longlisted for the 2018 Women's Prize. Shortlisted for the 2017 Booker prize - which caused me to re-read the book (having originally read it immediately after its longlisting and writing what I think was the first review of the book). A number of other reviewers have also criticised the narrative voice of Daniel as a sometimes uneasy mix of uneducated dialect and beautiful descriptions (a criticism I have raised of another Booker longlisted book Days Without End) - but on re-reading the book I am not sure I agree with the validity of these criticisms. The author herself I believe draws the contrast between Daniel's inner thoughts (particularly when relating to his family and to nature - areas where he feels confident and comfortable) and his written dialogue speaking to outsiders (when he lacks confidence). Overall I was pleased that this book made the shortlist. ORIGINAL REVIEW Just before his fourteenth birthday, Daniel/Danny about to turn fourteen and his sister Cathy, just turned fifteen, move with their father to a copse in a Yorkshire valley once part of the ancient kingdom of Elmet (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elmet) a land described in the Ted Hughes quote in the Epigraph as "Even into the seventeenth century this narrow cleft and its side-gunnells, under the glaciated moors were still a “badlands” a sanctuary for refugees from the law". This ancient kingdom includes the Cragg Vale (the setting for The Gallows Pole a book tipped unsuccessfully for the Booker longlist and which was set in the close of the seventeenth century featuring a group of coiners, just as the law started to invade their sanctuary). This is the debut novel of the author, a 28 year old studying for a PhD in the concept of decay in late-medieval towns and eco politics, a process she has described as complementary to writing this novel, a novel inspired by her researches. The novel’s creation came when she was travelling from her home town of York to London, observing the copses and outbuildings of the South Yorkshire landscape. Led by their father, the tight family unit build by hand and from the trees of the ancient wood a simple house in what we understand is the old location of their long absent mother's family home – a land which still retains much of its sense of ancient isolation and a land able to be glimpsed from the London to Edinburgh mainline. And if the hare was made of myths then so too was the land at which she scratched. Now pocked with clutches of trees, once the whole county had been woodland and the ghosts of the ancient forest could be marked when the wind blew. The soil was alive with ruptured stories that cascaded and rotted then found form once more and pushed up through the undergrowth and back into our lives. Tales of green men peering from thickets with foliate faces and legs of gnarled timber. The calls of half-starved hounds rushing and panting as they snatched at charging quarry. Robyn Hode and his pack of scrawny vagrants, whistling and wrestling and feasting as freely as the birds whose plumes they stole. An ancient forest ran in a grand strip from north to south. Boars and bears and wolves. Does, harts, stags. Miles of underground fungi. Snowdrops, bluebells, primroses. The trees had long since given way to crops and pasture and roads and houses and railway tracks and little copses, like ours, were all that was left. The story is narrated first person by Daniel looking back chronologically on the events that occurred after their move and breaking off to reflect in depth on earlier formative events in their family life. Within this detailed and simply but powerfully written account are interspersed brief present tense sections as Daniel searches for Cathy along the Edinburgh direction of the London train line which passed their copse. Their giant father is a legendary and undefeated bareknuckle prize fighter. He is fiercely independent and determined to breed in his children while he still can the same independence and reliance on nothing other than your wits, physical strength, the natural resources of the ancient woods, and old ties of loyalty. He arranges for Vivien an old friend of their mother's to give some more formal education to the children. He wanted to be an honest man who shared what he knew with his children, imparting details of his current and former lives, knowing that if any of the details were too much for us that was the very reason for imparting them. Everything he did now was to toughen us up against something unseen. He wanted to strengthen us against the dark things in the world. The more we knew of it, the better we would be prepared. And yet there was nothing of the world in our lives, only stories of it. We had been taken out of our school and our hometown to live with Daddy in a small copse. We had no friends and hardly any neighbours. We obtained a form of education from a woman who dropped books lazily into our laps from a library she had developed to suit only her tastes and her own way of thinking. She probably resented our presence. She probably thought we were filthy and stupid but gave us her time out of some obligation to Daddy. Daniel and Cathy are fiercely loyal to each other and their father but very different: "I had an inside sort of head. She had an outside sort of head.". Further unlike their father who seems unable to escape a traditional masculine role of fists and brawn, both confound gender expectations. Daniel, who others remark takes after his mother, effectively takes her role in their family unit, cleaning their house, cooking their meals, planting fruit trees and vegetables to supplement the meat their father poaches or trades in exchange for game or favours. He has long hair and nails and wears cropped t-shirts, styles he realises he has partly taken from his mother and partly from a lack of exposure to society’s conventions. You have to appreciate that I never thought of myself as a man. I did not even think of myself as a boy. Of course, if you had asked me I would certainly have replied that that was what I was. It is not as if I had ever actively rejected that designation. I just never thought about it. I had no reason to think about it. I lived with my sister and my father and they were my whole world. He also throws himself into the lessons with Vivien, becoming slightly obsessed with her and her life, perhaps as a way of trying to understand more of female life in the absence of a maternal figure. Cathy (who bunks off the lessons to roam in the woods) although appearing physically slight has learnt from her father how to defend herself and shares his belief that the world around them is not just and that the only thing someone can rely on to defend themselves against it are immediate family, old friends and loyalties and ultimately the ability to fight. She is also driven by an inner anger. ‘I think I were too angry to sleep,’ she said. Her statement shocked me. I asked her why she was angry. ‘I’m angry all time, Danny. Aren’t you?’ I told her that I was not. I told her that I was hardly ever angry and then she told me again that she felt angry all the time. She told me that sometimes she felt like she was breaking apart. She told me that sometimes it was as if she was standing with two feet on the ground but at the very same time part of her was running headlong into a roaring fire. For the first fourteen years of Daniel's life the family live in a small house on the North Sea coast, originally with their Granny Morley until her death. A key formative event from which in Daniel's view so much else stems occurs when he is six and the eight year old Cathy snaps under the persistent bullying and abuses of three boys and fights back only for her to be in trouble at school as the teacher and headmistress simply refuse to believe her story against that of the "nice boys". Daniel returns to the events many times I wondered if she thought about it too. Or if the boys did. Or if any of the other small people at the far reaches of my recollection spent the time that I had thinking about the bits in which they played a part. It seems to me that so much of everything came from this, and that if anyone thought about moments like this enough, the future would be done before it had even started, and I mean that in a good way. Events which seem to have triggered a complete change in Cathy's worldview As she cried she spoke: ‘I felt so helpless, Daddy. I felt as if there wandt owt I could do that would change them. Or hurt them. Not really hurt them like they were hurting me. I could hit them all I liked but it woundt change a thing. They were so nasty to me, Daddy. Not the pain, Daddy, I dindt mind that, but the way they made me feel inside. No matter what I do, I can never win.’ ‘You did though. You fought them and beat them. You protected your little brother. What more could you do?’ Daddy ran his hands through his hair and then his beard as if searching for an answer there. ‘I mean it doendt matter, does it? I mean that things will always be as they are now. I mean that there will always be more fights and it will just get harder and harder. I feel like I’ll never just be left alone.’ And confirmed to their father that they could not rely on any outside help or sense of justice Later, Daddy told us that after he had heard the teacher’s comments on the conduct of the boys he saw that there would be no real use in responding with his true thoughts. Mrs Randell’s assessment was simply the way people saw things, he told us. It was the way the world was and we just had to find methods of our own to work against it and to strengthen ourselves however we could. A key theme of the book is ancient concepts of property ownership and how they clash with modern capitalist concepts of landlords, an idea that would seem to be inspired by the author’s PhD research. In particular the family quickly clashes with the local landowner Mr Price. ‘I dindt buy land,’ answered Daddy. ‘I dindt win it in a fight neither. As far as Price is concerned we don’t own it, not in the way he sees ownership, at any rate.’ He shifted in his seat. ‘Your mother lived round here. When she fell on hard times, Price seized a lot of what she had. But when your Granny Morley died it seemed like the right place to come, to build a home, to live as a family. Because of your mother. And because I knew we would care for this land in a way Mr Price never could, and never would. Mr Price does nothing with these woods. He doendt work them. He doendt coppice them. He doendt know the trees. He doendt know the birds and animals that live here. Yet there is a piece of paper that says this land belongs to him.’ This clash widens when Danny’s father uses wider loyalties and an appeal to old working class solidarity (going back through the local mining unions to even earlier times) to turn it into a clash between the local workers and the farmers/landowners, a clash which over time culminates in violence and lead to Danny’s quest for his sister. One of the book’s strengths, and one which in my view raises it above The Gallows Pole, is the way in which Danny and others realise that the clash between old and new is not simply one between good and evil and also is appealing to a misplaced sense of history. I half listened to the plans that were being made now in this lounge between my father and these new friends. I could not help but feel that they too were dancing in the old style and appealing to a kind of morality that had not truly existed since those tall stone crosses were placed in the ground, and even then only in dreams, fables and sagas. Only then in the morality of verse. Overall I found this a powerful read, a strong piece of writing for the debut novel of a young writer and one which conveys the sense of a community left behind while (as noted above) examining contemporary questions of gender roles, property rights and inequality in a nuanced way. My main hesitation is around the narrative climax of the confrontation with Price which I did not find entirely believable. However Danny’s unresolved quest for Cathy added an extra layer of complexity to this part of the novel. Nevertheless this almost unknown book was for me a welcome edition to a Booker longlist dominated by prize winning and widely reviewed authors and works. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
2
|
Sep 30, 2017
Sep 30, 2017
|
Oct 02, 2017
Oct 2017
|
Jul 26, 2017
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
067008963X
| 9780670089635
| 067008963X
| 3.54
| 36,609
| Jun 2017
| Jun 06, 2017
|
it was ok
|
Now longlisted for the 2018 Women's Prize. Longlisted for the 2017 Booker Prize - and the only past winner to be longlisted. In my view however probabl Now longlisted for the 2018 Women's Prize. Longlisted for the 2017 Booker Prize - and the only past winner to be longlisted. In my view however probably the weakest book on the list. ORIGINAL REVIEW They drove over a … flyover as wide as a wheat field, with twenty lanes of cars whizzing over it and towers of steel and grass growing on either side of it. But when they took an exit road off it, they saw that the world underneath the flyover was an entirely different one – an unpaved, unlaned, unlit, unregulated, wild and dangerous one - , in which buses, trucks, bullocks, rickshaws, cycles, handcarts and pedestrians jostled for survival The first main character of the book is Anjum (a middle-aged transgender Hirja) now running a form of guest house/funeral parlour/commune in a graveyard in New Delhi. We trace her early life (including her mother’s discovery of her being a hermaphrodite) and then her move to a home for fellow Hirjas, and the eccentric group of people that lived there. There she adopts an abandoned child, but years later after being caught up and beaten (and her travel companion killed ) in post-Gujarat revenge riots she moves to the graveyard. Her second guest is an untouchable who names himself after Saddam Hussein and who has vowed revenge on a police officer whose actions lead to the death of his father at the hand of a higher caste mob. An intermediate section features another abandoned baby who appears in the middle of a protest gathering of various hunger strikers and ant-corruption campaigners, Anjum and Saddam decide to adopt her only to find she has been taken away – we find by a Syrian Christian Tilo. The book then switches across to Tilo and three acquaintances of hers who all met in a college play (which was abandoned after Indira Ghandi’s assassination and the resulting anti-Sikh massacres) – the three are Musa (a Kashmari militant), Naga (a campaigning corruption journalist who over time becomes an agent of the India security forces) and Biplap (an intelligence agent). Lengthy sections are told from first Biplap and then Tilo’s viewpoint and then tell something of Tilo and Musa’s back stories as well as the story of the baby's mother. The novel ranges across many aspects of Kashmiri separatism: army atrocities and tortures, the disappearance of young men to provide bodies to justofy army actions, the rivalries and fighting amongst the different resistance organisations, the punishments of informants. Roy also brings in many other areas about which she has been politically active as well as various historical incidents; neo-liberalism, the Bhopal disater, Hirja rights, the Naxalite movement, tribal land enclosures, Gujarat riots, Narenda Modi’s prime ministership and the “Saffron Parakeets” of Hindu activism associated with him, the mothers of the Disappeared, the Second Freedom Struggle and various anti-corruption activists, Caste conflict and Dalit rights, Indira Ghandi’s assassination, 9-11. Various other recurring ideas include conceptual art, junk texts, Indian bureaucracy, world events and particularly global terrorism. As well as conventional narrative which varies across tense and person, the story is also told by way of letters, diary musings, news clippings, an A-Z ‘Kashmiri-English Alphabet’. As all of the above should imply this can only be described as a sprawling book – Roy seems to want to cram in every aspect of Indian history since her only other novel 20 years previously, all of her political stances and campaigns in that period and every literary style and character she has conceived over that period. She also indulges in petty political point scoring via caricatures both of establishment politicians and activists, once allies who have ended up in other factions of the splintered opposition movement. The book is in the classic Indian literary style, part Magic realism, part Dickensian (both in the number of characters and in the social activism underlying the characters and plot) and part character-trait-as-national allegory (one of the Hirja’s remarks of their transgender nature “The riot is inside us. The war is inside us. Indo-Pak is inside us. It will never settle down. It can’t.”) which Roy herself helped popularise with her Booker winning novel. Its clear though that firstly Roy is returning to the novel form (and co-opting magic realism) to find a different way to bring her campaigning to a wider audience and in a different format. From what little he knew, Naga sensed there was a substantial piece of the puzzle that had gone missing in the newspaper stories – a sort of epic Macondo madness, the stuff of literature not madness. And also that the detail heavy, and violent aspects of the plot (almost every character seems to have had an acquaintance or relative victim of some form of violence) are deliberate. I would like to write one of those sophisticated stories in which even though nothing much happens, there’s lots to write about. That can’t be done in Kashmir. It’s not sophisticated what happens here. There’s too much blood for good literature. However despite these deliberate choices, I found this an unsatisfactory read. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Jul 02, 2017
|
Jul 04, 2017
|
Jun 22, 2017
|
Hardcover
|
Loading...
16 of 16 loaded