Gumble's Yard - Golden Reviewer > Books: 2020-booker-longlist (13)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
my rating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
024144151X
| 9780241441510
| 024144151X
| 3.26
| 23,488
| Aug 25, 2019
| Jul 30, 2020
|
really liked it
|
Now longlisted for the 2021 Women's Prize. I read the book following its earlier shortlisting for the 2020 Booker Prize and based on that did not feel Now longlisted for the 2021 Women's Prize. I read the book following its earlier shortlisting for the 2020 Booker Prize and based on that did not feel the book had the coherency to be a worthy Booker winner. Similarly I would not want to see it win the Women's Prize. The whites are still bright, some glaring and some almost blue, the white of widows, of mourners and renunciants, holy men and women, monks and nuns, the white of those who no longer belong in the world, who have already put one foot on another plane. The white of the guru and his followers. Maybe Ma saw this white cotton as the means to her truth, a blank slate where she could remake herself and find the path to freedom. For me it was something different, a shroud that covered us like the living dead, a white too stark ever to be acceptable in polite society. A white that marked us as outsiders. To my mother this was the colour of her community, but I knew better: the white clothes were the ones that separated us from our family, our friends and everyone else, that made my life in them a kind of prison. I read this book (which was originally published in India as “Girl in White Cotton” (*)) due to its longlisting for the 2020 Booker Prize: an intriguing longlist noticeable for (per the Booker website) featuring 9 US based authors, 9 female authors and 8 debutant novelists – with this book representing one of the 4 books at the intersection of that Venn diagram : albeit the US born author of this novel now lives in Dubai. (*) The author has said that her UK publisher "felt white cotton had different connotations outside of India, and readers wouldn’t immediately understand the connection to grief and asceticism The book is narrated in the first person by Antara, who lives in Pune, India with her US born husband but whose defining relationship is with her mother Tara. When Antara was young, Tara left her husband and for several years lived at an Ashram as the disciple and mistress of the legendary guru – becoming estranged as a result not just from her husband and parents but also from the young Antara, in a breech that never properly healed. Now years later, Tara, who lives alone, is starting to suffer the early signs of dementia and Antara forced into the role of a carer, a role made harder by her lifelong difficult relationship with her mother. Ironically just as her mother starts to lose her memory and grip on reality, Antara is forced to confront the reality of her own past behaviour and its implications for her marriage. This tension is exacerbated by two other generations: Tara’s own mother (still living independently and whose memory of history does not always align with the story that Antara has told herself) and Antara’s new born daughter (whose arrival simultaneously causes post-partum depression in Antara and further unsettles Tara, who believes the girl to be her own baby i.e. Antara). A key theme of the book (and one that makes it an interesting companion to the non-dystopian part of “The New Wilderness”) is its investigation of the relationship between mother and daughter and how it evolves for both parties from birth, through early attachment and nourishment to childhood independence, teenage rebellion, the daughter’s own motherhood and then to parental dependency. Antara (Un-Tara) is deliberately named to be unlike and separated from her mother (“designated as her undoing”), but in fact entwined for life (“I often wished she had never been born, knowing this would wipe me out as well – I understood how deeply connected we were, and how her destruction would irrevocably lead to my own”): something that then happens as her mother’s own decline seems to be accompanied by her own uncertainty, then pregnancy to try and save things, and then post-partum depression. Talking has never been easy. Neither has listening. There was a breakdown somewhere about what we were to one another, as though one of us were not holding up her part of the bargain, her side of the bridge. Maybe the problem is that we are standing on the same side, looking out into the emptiness. Maybe we were hungry for the same things, the sum of us only doubled that feeling. And maybe this is it, the hole in the heart of it, a deformity from which we can never recover. Another key character in the novel is Kali Mata (once Eve) and she acts as something of a surrogate maternal figure for the young Antara in the Ashram sections; her name symbolically drawing on both Jewish and Hindu icons of ambiguous motherhood. Other key ideas, very explicitly addressed in the book are: - Memories/forgetting: How memories are crafted and built; how as well as being personal they are effectively in common (if disputed) ownership between those who first experience them; what are the implication for this common ownership if one of the owners begins to surrender possession? He says my mother and I have always shared some version of our objective reality. Without me, her ties to that may have loosened, sad, but true – yet on the other hand, as a caregiver, the distance might be good for me. It is difficult when everything starts to vanish. He says memory is a work in progress. It’s always being reconstructed. Related to this is the concept of who gets to remember and tell a story - and as the book progresses we increasingly realise that Antara's narration is less than reliable and sense the cracks in the picture she presents of her mother and husband. - Belonging/exclusion. As the opening quote identifies the Ashram gave Tara a sense of community and Antara a sense of exclusion from her previously nascent roots. Antara’s husband as an NRI feels like he does not fully belongs in India (with his Western ideas, snobberies and rather simplistic morals). A photojournalist lover of Tara, fleeing the Mumbai riots, is taken in by a family who he then marries in to, only to find that others later question his motives and the work he produces from it. And Antara/Tara's complex relationship is all about the tension between belonging and exclusion. This contempt still draws up the moment I feel uncomfortable. I disown so I can never be disowned. - Obsession – Antara in particular relentlessly catalogues and collects: sleights when she is a child; objects as she grows up; facts as she tries to understand her mother’s condition and does her own research into the links with diabetes and gut bacteria (something which has darker implications later) - Art history/life. The author was an art critic and exhibition curator and ideas from art permeate both the book’s structure and its narrative. An art project that Antara has carried on for three years (see below) forms a key part of the tension in her relationships. Antara also uses art to try and come to terms with her research into dementia – sketching her research and ideas on papers. It is part of the meta-approach which permeates this novel that of course the author (whose grandmother’s own diagnosis with dementia part way through the writing of this novel gave it its final form) is using her own art form – novel writing – to capture her own research The other concept that came out strongly to me in my reading of the book was the idea of a palimpsest in its broadest sense – of art or ideas being written on previous attempts. We see it in the discussion of how memories are created and developed. There are references to the Brazilian 1920s avant-garde concept of “Anthropafagio” – the cannibalization of Western art. There is an exhibit based around artists re-interpreting “One Hundred Years of Solitude” (note this is I based I believe on an exhibit the author herself curated in Mumbai 2012: very much unlike her character “One Hundred Years of Solitude is not “a book I had never heard of, much less read” being in fact one of her favourite high school stories, and the idea of the insomnia plague that hits Macondo drove her initial idea of exploring the loss of memory and the idea of categorisation and labelling). At one stage Antara explores her Mother’s layers of clothes which set out the story of her life (wedding saris, bridal trousseau, Ashram robes). A key location is the Poona club – which the author represents as a key part of post-independence Indian society written over the legacy of colonialism. We see it in Antara’s crucial art project -a three year project to draw the same face each day, based only on copying the previous day’s painting. And again referring to the very meta nature of this book – what I find interesting is that the novel itself can be seen in these terms. It was written over seven years in around 8 drafts – with different persons (first/third), tenses, narrators, voices and settings. And the author has I understand taken the old manuscripts and formed them into an art project - wrapping them around her husband’s golf balls (his idea as something that needs redoing every day, building on past failures and successes). Overall I feel that this is one of the more ambiguous novels on the longlist. At times humorous at times intense and almost voyeuristically uncomfortable. On one level a relatively simple narrative, on the other one which weaves in a series of ideas and concepts - not just to that narrative but to the book's very conception. It is one with a touch of the Eileen Moshfegh and which shows the literary influence (acknowledged by the author) of Jenny Offill, Sheila Heti and Rachel Cusk. However the author I was most reminded of was Ariana Harwicz and her excellent “Involuntary” trilogy. Overall I found this a worthwhile and intriguing addition to the longlist. My thanks to Hamish Hamilton for an ARC via NetGalley. And even now, when I am without her, when I want to be without her, when I know her presence is the source of my unhappiness – that learned longing still rises, that craving for soft, white cotton that has frayed at the edge....more |
Notes are private!
|
2
|
Nov 2020
Aug 04, 2020
|
Nov 05, 2020
Aug 07, 2020
|
Jul 27, 2020
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
178607821X
| 9781786078216
| 178607821X
| 3.68
| 15,143
| Jul 11, 2020
| Aug 13, 2020
|
it was ok
|
Now shortlisted for the 2020 Booker shortlist - much the weakest on the list in my view (as it was weakest on the longlist also). I have now read her p Now shortlisted for the 2020 Booker shortlist - much the weakest on the list in my view (as it was weakest on the longlist also). I have now read her previous short story collection "Man Vs. Nature" referred to below - and in my review (https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...) I examine why that, in my view, was so much more successful as a short story collection than this was as a novel: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- . walking ahead of the Community, Agnes felt proud to be leading, just another kind of creature on a mass migration … finding water the way all creatures must. It wasn’t that she didn’t always feel this way each day they’d been out here. .... But there was something about the scope of what she could see now. . ….. Looking across the vast plain and seeing all the animals moving as one, in one direction, with the same needs, she felt a part of the place in a way she hadn’t before. She’d never realized she felt apart from it. But she guessed she had in some unknowable way. It was their reliance on the water spigots. On the maps. On the fact that they checked in with Rangers. They were never fully living on their own. Not like these animals were every day. Not until now. And she was leading. ….. When they left the City, her mother hadn’t called it a trip, or an adventure, or something temporary. She had said, “This is our new home.” … She felt like that small girl again, listless and coughing, turning a handkerchief red …. But that was no longer her. She was no longer that small girl, curiously watching from a distance, from behind her mother or behind Glen. …. She was a part of it all. It all depended on her. I read this book due its longlisting for the 2020 Man Booker prize – an intriguing longlist noticeable for featuring 9 US based authors, 9 female authors and 8 debutant novelists – with this book representing one of the 4 books at the intersection of that Venn diagram. The author has previously published a collection of short stories: “Man V. Nature”. In interviews about that collection said “that's how a lot of the stories in Man v. Nature came about … Through thinking, reading, watching nature documentaries, or just observing the natural world. I'm mostly interested in how humans are still animalistic and whether we once had a wilder existence than we do now.” and also how she often went away to the woods to write where “I’d witness wild tragedies, too: predation, death, abandonment, grief. I became curious about how a person might react to the kind of hardships that exist in the wild. It became one of the preoccupations of the book. I wondered under what circumstances those more primal instincts might rear up again in us. How many of our basic behaviors are really just small or large efforts to survive.” I believe that these ideas, in a far more detailed form than can be permitted in a short story, were much of the driving force behind this novel. The Guardian (who shortlisted that collection for their 2015 First Book award) described it as featuring “high-concept dystopias that belong in the realm of SF or fairytale or parable … [which] amplify the emotional states and subconscious forces that drive everyday life, such as grief, shame, desire and need”. If I had to describe this novel (with a conscious nod to the above) I would say it is: A high-concept dystopia, which leads to a small group of individuals being made the subjects of a cross between a nature documentary and a survival reality-show, which amplifies alpha male-female rivalries and allows the exploration of mother-daughter relationships. (Note that the title story of “Man V Nature” has the stranded characters reframing their predicament as a reality TV pitch). The dystopian set up features more as an important backdrop to the novel and like many dystopias is an extrapolation of current trends (at least pre-COVID trends). Implicitly a combination of climate change, over-population and capitalistic consumption have led to a USA (albeit the country is never stated) where many regions (The Heat Belt, the Fallow Lands, the New Coast) have been long since abandoned and the majority of the population live in the City, an overcrowded and increasingly violent urban landscape where pollution levels make childhood ill-health endemic and where over-population means life is cheap. The elite are rumoured to have fled to the fabled Private Lands. The City is supported by a group of productive areas – the Manufacturing Zone, the Mines, the Refineries “The cities of greenhouses, the rolling landfills, the sea of windmills, the Woodlots, the Server Farms”. One state has effectively been re-wilded as a refuge for wildlife: “The Wilderness State”. In a controlled experiment (whose purpose is not entirely clear) a group of twenty skilled volunteers (ideally “with knowledge of flora and fauna and biology and meteorology”) is picked to enter the state, subject to a series of rules (no domestication, no settlement, strict picking up of even micro-trash, restoration of the area after they leave) written down in the Manual and more or less vigorously policed by the Rangers, whose function seems to evolve over time alongside their uniforms, reflecting the differing aims of The Administration. The two main third party point of view characters are Agnes and her daughter Bea – Agnes’s husband (not Bea’s father) Glen was a University researcher in The City and when Bea’s health deteriorated rapidly, he pressed the Wilderness project and the three of them as founder participants. Something which, when Bea went through with it, lead to a breech with her own mother. The book starts some three years later, the twenty depleted by accident and ill-health, and with an impactful scene as Bea self-delivers her second daughter who is still born, before rejoining the group with little comment (note that the loss of a daughter and the ability of a mother to move on from it seems to me to fit the “Somebody’s Baby” story from ““Man V. Nature” – the baby in that story also a Beatrice). Thereafter the dynamics both in the nuclear family and in the remaining group change and tensions emerge. When Bea impulsively flees to the City for a period (after the death of her mother) Agnes’s already burgeoning independence grows even stronger – and her sense that she is at home in the Wilderness whereas Bea is still a visitor. And as Glen’s health fails, his influence and support of a consensus making approach to decision making fades and another male – Carl (originally Glen’s research student but unlike Glen who adapts practically to the hunting/nomadic lifestyle) – takes more of a leadership position, the dynamics developing further as Bea returns and as their group is re-expanded both by the Newcomers (who join The Originalists) before then encountering the Mavericks and the Trespassers. The group dynamics (the alpha leaders, the way in which sub-groups favour their own tribe for food distribution, the way in which the sick take themselves off to die, the way in which children are forced into independence) are strongly described and reminded me very much of reading the book “Dynasties” – which accompanied the recent BBC wildlife series of the same name. Another thing that is clear from the book (and confirmed in the acknowledgments) is that the author has heavily researched nomadic lifestyles and set alongside vivid descriptions of flora, fauna, landscape, I felt that the details of the group’s travels were very convincing – particularly when we enter into Agnes’s point of view and see through her how she uses her observations of animal behaviour and landscape to lead the group’s progress. But I also had some areas that I rated less highly. After the impactful opening scene, the book seems to drift, really for 200 or so pages and perhaps for me, never fully gets back on track until towards the end of the book as Agnes fully takes over the story arc (including a first party ending). I do not want literary novels to adopt Dan Brown style cliff-hangers at the end of each chapter, but I did feel that this book took things a little too far to the opposite extreme: if it were not for my desire to read the full Booker longlist I feel I easily could have abandoned this novel at various points. Further many of the dystopian/societal details I found inconsistent (just one example - quite a bit is made of how over time the community develops a hardened attitude to death due to all the death they see around them - and which surprises outsiders they come into contact with; but we are also told that in the City, due to overpopulation, emergencies are not treated by doctors as they are seen as fate). But perhaps the real strength of the book lies less in its dystopian considerations and more in its examination of mother-daughter relationships and how these evolve as each generation takes its turn on the other side of the dynamic (both influenced by and finally appreciating the behaviour of their own mothers). Overall I found this an interesting read but one that was too slowly paced and also one where I was not sure for much of the book where it was really trying to go, an impression which I did not entirely lose when I finished it. I can see this book’s appeal but it was not for me. My thanks to Oneworld for an ARC via NetGalley. When she becomes obstinate. When she becomes different from me. What will we share if we can’t share this? Will we be nothing but strangers? I want to grab her in these moments, squeeze her too hard, growl into her hair, never let her go. But she always wriggles free, unfazed, or maybe with a small eye roll. She knows she has everything I can give her. I think of my mother in these moments. She was someone who never did what I expected her to. When she looked at me, I didn’t understand what her look meant. She looked at me sharp-eyed, her mouth twisting and pained. As though looking at me hurt her sometimes. I didn’t understand it until I had the chance to care for this little Fern and I looked at her and saw all that came before and all that would come after and all its potential awfulness and certain beauty and it was too much for me to bear. I looked away, scared, disgusted, overcome with love, on the verge of crying and laughing, and finally, finally, finally I began to know my mother....more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Aug 02, 2020
|
Aug 04, 2020
|
Jul 27, 2020
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
0008374996
| 9780008374990
| 0008374996
| 4.03
| 4,099
| Sep 03, 2020
| Sep 03, 2020
|
really liked it
| It’s mad how you can live in a city and never see any of this. Or you just see faint smudges of it every now and again around the edges of your exi It’s mad how you can live in a city and never see any of this. Or you just see faint smudges of it every now and again around the edges of your existence but even then you don’t fully believe in it, because even though we live in the same city, where I’m from and where you’re from could be two totally separate worlds. Like say you hear about a shooting on a street you walk down every day on your way to work; it’s a shocking one-off occasion, a rarity, something to talk about, and every single violent incident that you hear of or read about becomes a one-off, or at least a surprise or a shock. But to others these incidents are just the punctuation of their reality. I read this book due to its longlisting for the 2020 Booker Prize – a varied, brave and innovative longlist, which in particular features a range of really diverse debuts. This is one of that group of debuts – written by Gabriel Krauze who has christened his writing as establishing a new "estate noir" genre. The Booker website sets out his biography: Gabriel Krauze came of age among the high rises and back streets of South Kilburn. He was not an observer on the periphery of violence. He was – personally - heavily involved in gangs, drugs, guns, stabbing and robbery - all while completing an English degree at Queen Mary’s University. And in the Author’s Note at the back the author tells us why this background is so relevant to the book – “Often the truth is disturbing and ugly everything in this book, in this story, was experienced in one way or another - otherwise I wouldn’t be able to tell it“ - because this book it seems is more fictionalized memoir than pure fiction, with a first party narrator, around 18-19 at the book’s opening around 2007 in South Kilburn; a narrator known to his friends as Snoopz but to his parents as Gabriel and to the probation service as Mr Krauze. It’s a story which describes London – the City where I work – but a very different London to the one that I or almost anyone I know would recognise, as the opening quote (and a number of other quotes in the book) acknowledges (see the end of my review also). The story opens with a burst of adrenaline – as Snoopz jumps out the whip, face covered in a bally to clamp a rich woman while Gotti does the eat, and tries to pop her Rolex (worth some serious p’s, likely even a number of bags), before they return to Big D who drives ahead in a posher car scoping the belly. We then return to his moving to South Kilburn at age 17 after finally leaving his Polish family (father, artistic mother and aspiring violinist twin brother) and moves in with the father of two boys he met at a grime Battle and from there we get the story of his increasingly deep involvement in drug taking, drug dealing, violence and theft (he goes much further than many of his peers in his willingness to take things to the next level without hesitation when either circumstances or pride requires it) and the penal system; while at the same time staying on the fringes of the postcode related gang culture (his Polish background and only temporary status in South Kilburn allowing him to stay one step removed) studying English literature at University and forging deep friendships and rather shallower sexual relationships. This lengthy quote I think gives a sense of the book much greater than I can otherwise convey. The next day is Monday so I have to go uni for a lecture and two seminars. Mazey and Gotti are still ko’d when I leave. When I get on campus, I buck Capo and we talk about how that Daniel yout got duppied and then later I’m in a seminar with people who know nothing about South Killy, nothing about their neighbours getting murdered and all that madness, and the class is talking about The Birth of Tragedy. Butterfly knife in my pocket. All I wanna talk about is how a man got slumped in the middle of a rave and how his killers are probably gonna get away with it, as if talking about it here, in uni, in the classroom, might make it normal, because since I touched uni, being around everyone catching jokes and studying and whatever has made me start to doubt that it’s normal. But in the end I don’t say anything because really and truly it feels abnormal that no one at uni talks about things like that when it’s going on in other blocks, in other ends like Pecknarm and Bricky and Hackney, and I barely take part in the seminar which is unusual for me, but all I wanna do is go back to SK and jam with the mandem. In the last ten minutes I snap back into the discussion – hand up – yes Gabriel? and I start breaking down the concept of the Dionysian and the Apolline, art as a beautiful end product that hides the dark and disturbing origins of its inspiration.Our seminar leader Dr Jerry Brotton says that’s good that’s good, says did everyone write down what Gabriel said? I say if anyone wants private tuition come holla at me. Everyone laughs and one girl says Sara would like some private tuition with you and the Iranian girl sitting next to her blushes deep pink burn and holds her book up in front of her face.. The book is scattered throughout with London road talk – a road mix of course of Jamacian Patios and US rap culture, with a strong London overlay, one which I found fairly easy to follow (with occasional use of Urban Dictionary) and one which I regretted thinking jarred with his white Polish background I’ve been getting this .. from white people for as long as I’ve been on the roads; I must be mixed race, I must be half black, feds saying are you half Jamaican? Mocking the way that I chat whenever I get arrested. All just a reflection of their instinctive prejudice towards anything in which they don’t recognise themselves, their way of doing, being, thinking. But it is also shot through with some memorable imagery – for example on being lockdown in prison: Always time to kill. Nothingness is long. Turns the day long. Makes it drip, but as it drips down, it doesn’t separate from its source, like honey or golden syrup, a long sticky string, and you’re waiting for the thinnest part of the drip to finally break and separate so the drop can hit the floor. But it doesn’t. The other thing that comes out very strongly in this book is authenticity. Every time a journey, an estate, an incident (a police raid, an accidental killing of a bystander) and so in is mentioned - you can check it on Google and see that it is real. But of course the greatest authenticity comes from Krauze's own experience. And I was impressed with the way that the book takes a different arc towards the end - forwarding further into Krauze's life as he starts to walk away from what his friends ultimately convince him is the ultimate destination he is facing. The author himself has talked about the transformative power of literature and how encapsulating this period of his life in the novel has finally allowed him to move on from it. An obvious (especially with the opening quote) but interesting comparison is with another Booker longlistee (from 2018) "In Our Mad and Furious City" - which was rather inexplicably not shortlisted but went on to gain lots of deserved recognition. That book had (I would say) greater artistry (the kaleidoscope of characters and voices, the compressed timescale, the strong narrative) but much lower authenticity (an anachronistic combination of football/music/politics, the misJudged character of Caroline, the movie style climax). If there was an issue with IoMaFC - it was the ability to dismiss it as fiction and so effectively walk away from its message - that option does not exist here. Ultimately it would be easy to dismiss this book as glamorising violence or romanticizing gang culture. I realised when reading this that, perhaps oddly, I find violence/sex in literature more acceptable when they are authentic/actually happened to the author as here, rather than when they are manufactured for literary purposes (in this case I would draw a contrast to "A Brief History of Seven Killings"). Nevertheless enjoying this book does bring a level of moral complexity/ambiguity. But in summary I found this very powerful and extremely memorable read. Ultimately literature is around experiencing different lives and worlds. And what this book shows is that one does not have to travel far (or read translated literature) to see a different world. For the main period of the book I was working less than 10 miles away and commonly travelling on similar tube routes) and about empathy. One question the book poses is whether empathy is possible across that 10 mile divide and in those tube carriages. I put the paper down and look around the carriage thinking how mad it is that although we’re all human beings sharing the same space, we know nothing about each other and we never will. We’re just bodies, just muscle and blood, same way the blocks are just concrete and windows, and yet what we can’t see is all the life, all the things that are going on, within. And when we look at another human whose life is unconnected to our own, we sense nothing of the soul inside them at all. Like these people sitting next to me; they’ll never know how I used to eat people, shank people, do all this craziness, how I love listening to trap music and Chopin piano waltzes and I shot coke and write love letters to this girl I met calling her my whirlwind. For a moment I catch myself wishing I could put on the bally and gloves and get the strap and go and do some eats and feel my heart between my teeth beating so hard that I have to bite into it so I can swallow. But there’s no one to do it with now and I force the feeling back down like when you’re on the verge of throwing up, but with all your body focused into the strain of the effort, you manage to force the vomit down, while no one notices. But I think this book goes some way towards bridging that gap. My thanks to 4th Estate and William Collins for an ARC via NetGalley. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Jul 29, 2020
|
Jul 30, 2020
|
Jul 27, 2020
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
B07XZN8PH8
| 3.34
| 4,583
| Aug 07, 2018
| Jan 14, 2020
|
really liked it
|
I had the pleasure to put some questions to the author on BBC Radio 4 Front Row in October. The recording covers my question on the first line of the
I had the pleasure to put some questions to the author on BBC Radio 4 Front Row in October. The recording covers my question on the first line of the novel (at 17:20-19:05). https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m000... Now shortlisted for the 2020 Booker Prize. It is the third part of a trilogy – after the much read and studied (but I must confess new to me) “Nervous Conditions” (considered something of a classic of African literature) and the far more unheralded “The Book of Not”. I read both books before I read this one and I am glad I did: the books function as direct sequels to each other (each taking up where the previous volume left off) and I really don’t think it is possible to appreciate the nuances of this book without having read the first two (see below). My two reviews are here https://www.goodreads.com/review/show... https://www.goodreads.com/review/show... The Book of Not finishes with Tambu having lost her job (quitting after having had her work appropriated by a white, male colleague) and facing the imminent loss of her hostel accommodation (as the Matron makes it clear it is time for her to move on and sets her up for an interview with an old acquaintance). Tambu’s closing words “So this evening I walked emptily to the room I would soon vacate, wondering what the future there was for me, a new Zimbabwean” This book answers that question and the answer, particularly initially, is a bleak one. Very much in contrast to the first 1.75 books (but foreshadowed by the final part of “The Book of Not”) Tambu (the same driven and achieving Tambu that planted her own field of maize as a young child to try and pay her own school fees; and who later won a scholarship to the school’s most prestigious school where she then proceeded to get the best O’Level results) is effectively now both despondent and under-achieving: haunted by her past failures, blaming herself both for her A level performance (which bought her academic aspirations to a crashing halt) and her impulsive decision to quit her job. When you were young and in fighting spirit, growing mealie cobs in the family field and selling them to raise money for your school fees, you were not this person that you have become. When and how did it happen? When you were amongst the brightest, in spite of running kilometres to school and studying beside a sooty candle? No, it couldn’t have been then either. Nor was it in the days that followed at middle school at your uncle’s mission, where you remained focused on a better life and so continued to excel. This leaves only your secondary school, the Young Ladies’ College of the Sacred Heart. It must have been there that your metamorphosis took place. Yet how awful it is to admit that closeness to white people at the convent had ruined your heart, had caused your womb, from which you reproduced yourself before you gave birth to anything else, to shrink between your hip bones. The title of the book is taken from a Teju Cole New Yorker essay “Unmournable Bodies” one prompted by the Western reaction to the Charlie Hebdo killings which (among other things) effectively asked why only certain violent deaths are considered worthy of reaction. The author of this novel has explained: I extrapolated that question to living bodies. Basically I asked the question whether, if we could mourn the circumstance of certain living bodies we might not create a better world. At the same time those living bodies also need to mourn themselves in order to begin to heal and move forward …my observation has been that women often find it difficult to mourn themselves and their circumstances. In Zimbabwe today a lot of women think they are born to put up with all sorts of abuse, beginning in the families they are born into and equally in the families they marry into. It is the idea that society foists on women that suffering is a woman’s lot. …. Such women do not know how to mourn their circumstances. It’s a question of being allowed to grieve for yourself. One has to see oneself as worthy to be able to grieve about the negative things that happen to one. Grieving and mourning are active. You feel and you wade through the feelings. With depression one does not wade through but more or less drowns. Grieving and mourning, because they are active, pull one through, in spite of being terribly difficult. This, I think, is true whether one is grieving or mourning for oneself, or for someone else. I think that many Zimbabweans have not begun to mourn their situation actively yet. They are still denying it so as not to feel the pain. And I think that quote explains much of the nature of this book. We (at least if we have read the first two books) know the real story behind both the A Levels and the advertising agency job – and can see that rather than grieving/mourning Tambu is effectively affected by depression. She does belatedly recognise the impact of racism and colonialism on her life (something her cousin Nyasha – like the second book, a much lesser presence her unfortunately than in the first book albeit with her backstory now even more clearly based on that of the author’s – Germany, filmmaker etc). At the same time a wider past and shame haunts her in different ways: the violent past that lead to her sister losing a leg (in the unforgettable image that started the second book) and her family patriarch Uncle being accidentally paralysed; the role of various of her family members (particularly Aunt Lucia) in the liberation struggle; the poverty of her mother (as well as more unspoken in this book her terrible act of family betrayal). All issues she largely tried to ignore in the second book other than if she felt they threatened her ambitions to succeed in a white school. All of this leads to a breakdown as she violently assaults a pupil in a teaching job she takes – not the first or last piece of behaviour by Tambu in this book which is at the same time harsh and exclusionary to others and self-destructive (another set piece sees her deliberately fail to come to the aid of a fellow hostel member being assaulted by a mob). Tambu we have to conclude is suffering from what Sartre wrote in his introduction to Frantz Fanon’s “Wretched of the Earth” is a “a nervous condition introduced and maintained by the settler among the colonized people with their consent.” – the quote which gave the title to the first book (in the second book we see her consenting to this process). The real narrative in the book only really starts when Tambu meets up with Tracey – her boss in her second job but also of course the person who inadvertently changes the course of Tambu’s life when she takes the honours for which Tambu has strived for such a period of time and on which she had based her entire future – and this leads to a series of scenes of an authentic holiday company which (slightly out of kilter with much of the book) verge on the satirical. Another notable feature of the book is how it is written in the second person. But this is very much second person narration used as a different and more distanced way of conveying a first person viewpoint (the author has said “Often when we talk we use “you” when we mean “I”. So that was the sense in which I used it.”) The author attributes the second person to her not being able to face what Tambu was going through via the first person and feeling that readers (presumably those who had followed her through the first two books) would feel the same. I wrote it in the second person because that was the only way I could access the subject matter in a way that I felt made sense. I just didn’t have the heart to use the first person. I needed distance and I imagined the reader would to. On the other hand, I didn’t want to jump into the third person when the other two books were in the first. I also thought that might be too much distance. So I tried it out in the second and I liked the effect. At the same time it means we have less of a distance to Tambu than in the first two books – as we sit alongside her observing her life and behaviour. You drop your gaze but do not walk off because on the one hand you are hemmed in by the crowd. On the other, if you return to solitude, you will fall back inside yourself where there is no place to hide. Further, when the second book keep circling around the Shona concept of Unhu and particularly the greeting (which more signifies an entire worldview) “Tiripo, kana makadini wo!” (“I am well, if you are well too.”) and Tambu's difficulty in seeing how the concept applies in the new world she is entering: then the move from an "I" to a "you" narration takes on an added significance. What happens when someone cannot even care for their own wellness – when the “you” is the “I”. At her lowest moment in the second book Tambu says the following (which seemed to me to foreshadow the change of person). Truly I could not imagine that I should have looked around me I another way, and analysed what was taking place from my own perspective. For do that one requires a point of view, but it is hard to stand upon the foundations you re born with in order to look forward, when that support is bombarded by all that is around until what remains firm and upright is hidden beneath rubble and ruins. The interaction of this book with the first two books is interesting. It is not as though the book does not fill in the backstory – almost all major developments in the first two book are set out here in outlines (probably more so than I would expect from the third part of a trilogy). But also surprised how misleading an impression that the "outlines" give (and I think evidenced by some comments I have seen on the third book from reviewers who have not read the first two). Tambu in the third book in particular is an unreliable narrator - particularly when describing her own life via the more distanced second person voice – all of course part of her struggle to properly mourn. I feel that trying to understand Tambu on this book only is similar to trying to understand present day Zimbabwe by reference to current events (and perhaps a Wiki outline of its history). The book is much more symbolic than the first two: a hyena reappears when Tambu’s grip on reality is least strong; a bag of mealie sent by her mother, one which she seems unable to either use of lose and one which gradually rots and decays both represents I think the burden of her shame at her village past (a shame which has almost physical impacts at times) and foreshadows the actions of her mother late in the book which end up forcing Tambu to repeat the actions of the second book and resign from a job. Overall I think this is a difficult book to read as a standalone one as evidenced by the reviews of many Goodreads whose reviews I closely follow: Tambu as a character in this book can be hard to understand or like; the book can feel very oblique at times; the choice of a second person voice is rarely optimal. However as the intense and difficult end to an important trilogy - and one which has reflected the difficult pre and post independence journey of her country via Tambu, I think it is a very worthwhile read. Thanks to Faber and Faber also for an ARC via NetGalley. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Aug 08, 2020
|
Aug 09, 2020
|
Jul 27, 2020
|
Kindle Edition
| |||||||||||||||||
178474347X
| 9781784743475
| 178474347X
| 3.61
| 46,690
| Apr 07, 2020
| Apr 09, 2020
|
liked it
| You have to wonder what goes through the mind of such a man. Such a narrow and limited man; so closed off. He has nothing to look forward to, nothi You have to wonder what goes through the mind of such a man. Such a narrow and limited man; so closed off. He has nothing to look forward to, nothing to daydream about. I read this book due to its longlisting for the 2020 Booker prize. That longlist has been remarkable for the number of debut novels (8 debuts, plus one book by a sophomore author whose previous book was ten years ago) alongside two follow ups to classic novels (“Wolf Hall”, “Nervous Conditions”); but as a result by the absence of a host of books by some established authors which have received critical and reader acclaim this year and were widely tipped to make the list (only “Apeirogon” appearing). The absence of Ali Smith, Maggie O’Farrell, Marilynne Robinson, Elizabeth Strout, Evie Wyld, Emily St John Mandel is odd when placed against the inclusion of this novel - a rather slight effort by a well- known author whose fans admit is far from her best and whose previous shortlisting was already, at least to me, something of an anomaly on literary merit (rather than enjoyment). I would summarise the plot of this book as follows: an unambitious, extreme ITFJ who grows up in a chaotic household, decides as he becomes an adult to order his life as far as he can to suit his tendencies while eliminating aspects of it where that does not prove possible. When his current girlfriend and the son of his first girlfriend have crises in their lives, the repercussions of the decisions he makes in keeping with his life mantra force him to his own moment of crisis. Some of the writing is excellent – there are lots of little moments of recognition and one particularly nice image. Sometimes when he was dealing with people, he felt like he was operating one of those claw machines on a boardwalk, those shovel things where you tried to scoop up a prize but the controls were too unwieldy and you worked at too great a remove. But these are slim pickings. For me a book like this needs to be more detailed and involving (as “A Spool of Blue Thread” was). I feel that Micah Mortimer would have worked much better as a side character in a sub-plot of a novel about his extended family . I also found the casting of Micah as an IT person rather clichéd. And the rather clunky metaphor which gives the book its title seems passed on a complete understanding by Tyler of how eyesight develops with age. And age is an issue more generally - I really could not work out when this book is meant to be set. The book makes for a pleasant couple of hours diversion but is out of place on a Booker longlist - particularly this one. You have to wonder what went through the mind of the judges. Such a narrow and limited novel; so closed off. It gave me nothing to look forward to, nothing to daydream about....more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Jul 30, 2020
|
Jul 30, 2020
|
Jul 27, 2020
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
3.80
| 34,528
| Feb 18, 2020
| Jul 30, 2020
|
really liked it
|
Re-read after its shortlisting for the 2020 Booker Prize. Given my observation below that I felt like large parts of the hastily written novel were ex
Re-read after its shortlisting for the 2020 Booker Prize. Given my observation below that I felt like large parts of the hastily written novel were existing works in progress (or at least fully formed concepts) included in the narrative I was intrigued to see the author's interview in the Guardian the week before the winner announcement where he says "I wanted to go back to writing about short stories, and the fastest way to make that happen seemed to be to take up parts of my life or things I'd always been thinking about and to set them down into fiction" Better to imagine his friends happy than to see their unhappiness up close. And unhappy they certainly would be – that has been the lesson this weekend, hasn’t it? The misery of other people, the persistence of unhappiness, is perhaps all that connects them. Only the prospect of greater unhappiness keeps them within the circumscribed world of graduate school. I read this book due to its longlisting for the 2020 Booker Prize – and it is probably the book on the longlist that has given me the most pause for reflection at this stage. Over 30 years ago I went to University – something that was completely new to me and to any of my working class family and friends. I stayed for a fourth year and was expected to stay for a PhD (if only to keep my brilliant brother company), but I simply could not understand academia (or the idea of being paid for research) and was very keen to get a job in what I thought of as real life. The college at which I studied (I did mathematics) was famous for its high level of science undergraduates – these NatScis (and if I am being honest the whole college including myself) being infamous for being wearing anoraks and being rather pale due to barely leaving their rooms (unless to go to the library). I found therefore this book simultaneously intriguing (as it circles around the wider theme of whether academia is real-life and even what real life means) and on one level alien, as (other than the far more introverted and slightly over-weight narrator) the college research scientists with which he mingles all seem to be tall, healthy, confident athletic types. And it is that split view that proceeds throughout the novel for me: the author’s writing at times is excellent (think Sally Rooney for the ability to capture the agony of young relationships and the way in which they seem so important while in them but superficial when views at a distance - but with much more flowing and captivating prose). At other times I felt whole chunks could and should have been excised (I really could have done with a lot less of the nematodes and together with the over long tennis game I was reminded of Ian McEwan at this most annoying – albeit the nematodes draw on more autobiographical experience than background research). The basis of the book is Wallace, having left his home Southern state (and a difficult upbringing) has taken a place as a graduate student at a mid Western University. Thinking that his homosexuality was effectively incompatible with where he grew up and sensing correctly it would be more acceptable at the college, he is rather blindsided by how little, as the first black student on his programme, he fits in or perhaps more to the point he is allowed to fit in. The book is simply brilliant at describing the covert racism that Wallace faces: a combination of an accumulation of micro-aggressions; condescension; unconscious bias, some “check your privilege” top trumps (in a memorable scene - which I think will be widely quoted - the flabbergasted Wallace finds himself accused of wallowing in his victim status as gay and black when in fact it is he who is a prejudiced misogynist), and perhaps most hurtfully a refusal, even by his closest friends, to really face what is happening to him – particularly when it might lead to conflict or simply to grant that perhaps he should be the one to say if something is racist. And there is the other thing – the shadow pain, he calls it, because he cannot say its real name. Because to say its real name would be to cause trouble, to make waves. To draw attention to it, as though it weren’t in everything already….. The most unfair part of it, Wallace thinks, is that when you tell white people that something is racist, they hold it up to the light and try to discern if you are telling the truth. As if they can tell by the grain if something is racist or not, and they always trust their own judgement. It’s unfair because white people have a vested interest in underestimating racism, its amount, its intensity, its shape, its effects. They are the fox in the henhouse. At one point (which I found particularly interesting given that Brit Bennett’s Vanishing Half was perhaps one of the 2 most surprising omissions from the longlist) Wallace I think draws on Bennett’s famous “Good White People” essay (and note that Brandon Taylor is way too well culturally/zeitgeist connected not to know what he is referencing here). There will always be this moment. There will always be good white people who love him and want the best for him but who are more afraid of other white people than of letting him down. It is easier for them to let it happen and to triage the wound later than to introduce an element of the unknown into the situation. No matter how good they are, no matter how loving, they will always be complicit, a danger, a wound waiting to happen. The action in the book takes place over a single weekend – the last weekend of Summer before Wallace and his friends fourth year of graduate school. Wallace, whose estranged father died a few weeks previously, is unsettled by the apparent sabotage of his experiment and speculates out loud to his friends about the possibility of leaving the program (something which the author actually did - leaving a science PhD to take up writing). Meanwhile the only real outsider in the group (who like me works in finance) raises again his view that the scientists are, in their refusal to leave the world of college, effectively taking refuge from real life. Both of these seem to perturb the fragile equilibrium of the group and a number of tensions come to the fore – including one strained relationship Wallace has with another, self-proclaimed straight, graduate Miller which (not entirely plausibly) turns into a rather violent affair. In the rather intense atmosphere the group of acquaintances: struggle to understand each other; get frustrated that they are not being understood; share in confidence, betray and then fail to react appropriately to secrets; get a glimpse of others unhappiness but only really through the lens of their own preoccupations. And Wallace’s quiet observations on this process are the novel’s real strengths: [this] is why he does not trust memory. Memory sifts. Memory lifts. Memory makes due with what it is given. Memory is not about facts. Memory is an inconsistent measurement of the pain in one’s life. The book was apparently written in 5 weeks – which I find: - remarkable for the control and insight shown in the writing; - fascinating for the contrast with much of the rest of the shortlist (books such as “Shuggie Bain”, "Burnt Sugar" and “Shadow King” took the best part of a decade to write); - a likely explanation for some of the more anomalous parts of the novel – I cannot help wonder if the tennis game, the copious description of the biological work (both of which are considerably too long for the brief metaphorical elements they bring to the novel), possibly the dinner party scene and particularly the flashback to Wallace’s childhood (poetically and memorably written but which implausibly is apparently told in a night time conversation) were all existing works in progress (or at least fully formed concepts) which were included in the novel. But nevertheless on balance this is a strong novel – and for a young, debut author shows a remarkable ability to convey the very realistic life issue of latent racism. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
2
|
Nov 05, 2020
Aug 2020
|
Nov 06, 2020
Aug 03, 2020
|
Jul 27, 2020
|
Kindle Edition
| ||||||||||||||||||
039308356X
| 9780393083569
| 039308356X
| 3.67
| 13,915
| Sep 24, 2019
| Sep 24, 2019
|
really liked it
|
Now shortlisted for the 2020 Booker Prize. “She does not want to remember but she is here and memory is gathering bones” I bought this book as I fe Now shortlisted for the 2020 Booker Prize. “She does not want to remember but she is here and memory is gathering bones” I bought this book as I felt (not least to the back cover blurb by Lemn Sissay) and had predicted that it had a very strong chance of making the 2020 Booker longlist. I started, but did not finish, the book before the publication of the longlist confirmed my hunch, and now (just over 2 weeks later) having read the rest of the longlist returned to it and completed it (and the longlist). The book is the author’s second after “Beneath The Lion’s Gaze” which tells the story of the 1974 revolution and overthow of the Emperor Haile Selassie – via the family of a Doctor (Dr Hailu). This book tells the tale of another convulsion in Ethiopia’s history – the 1935 invasion of Ethiopia by Mussolini – and both Haile Selassie (and less obviously) Dr Hailu play a crucial role: so that the book can be seen as something of a prequel in the story of both the characters and of the nation. And in turn the 1935 conflict has its own prequel – in the earlier 1895-96 Italian/Ethiopian war, which culminated in the Italian defeat at Adwa and which weighed heavily thereafter in the national memory of both countries (in Ethiopia as giving the nation secure independence and as a standard bearer of pan-Africanism; in Italy as a sign of humiliation for the only recently-unified state – one which it was inevitable a populist government would look to revenge). And this idea of history/prequel – and the shadow it casts over the present is a crucial one in the book. Every character dwells not just on the history of their country but also that of their family: to such an extent that these lost family members are effectively a shadow cast in the novel; more influential in many cases to the present day actions of the novel’s protagonists than the living around them. Hirut’s terrible relationship with Kidane (who claims to love her, but seems only to be able express this via rape) sits in the shadow of the sudden loss of both of her parents and her mother’s ambiguous relationship with Kidane’s father. She (like other characters) reminds herself and others of her lineage “daughter of Gettey and Fasil” as a sign of her continuing identity. And her father’s rifle – his Wujigra – takes on a totemic role during the whole novel (from the first 1935 chapter to the final paragraph in 1974). Kidane and Aster’s dead son – and their different attitudes to mourning him – effectively destroys their relationship but also propels Hirut’s refusal to take a traditional female role and to instead fight, with her women followers, as an independent equal in the conflict. The Cook plays a pivotal side role in the novel – first in Kidane’s household (and even earlier than the novel in the period before Aster married Kidane) and then in the Italian prisoner camp where much of the novel plays out. She, in deliberate contrast to other characters, refuses to discuss her name (let alone her lineage) as the only thing left that she has not had taken from her. The Emperor is haunted – quite literally by the book’s end - by the (real-life) death of his daughter Princess Zebenwork, and by the fear that he effectively abandoned her to a loveless marriage at a young age and to death away from home – the resulting breech with a rival branch of the royal dynasty (that he had effectively sacrificed her to try and heal) by the time of the book fatally wounds his own kingdom, with Zebenwork’s widower going over to the Italians. Later we view the emperor during his exile in Bath – reflecting on his memories of the kingdom. Hailu loses his brother in the very early stages of the war (I think his son – a key character in “Beneath the Lion’s Gaze” - is named after his dead brother). The loss of their sons in the early part of the conflict drives the members of Kidane’s army onwards – during their key attack some of them hold up pictures of their lost ones and shout their names in vengance. Fucelli (effectively representing the Italian regime) is haunted by a past attack that he survived and then by a humiliating attack perpetuated on him by one of the evening Ethiopian fathers (these I think effectively representing the Battle of Adwa) – and instead aims to humiliate and terrorise the Ethiopians. Ettore (Navarra) photograph’s the Italian invasion – initially through choice but later forced as part of his military duties to document the atrocities and humiliations that the military carry out on the Ethiopians; both for propaganda purposes in Italy and to terrorise the Ethiopians – but instead acting (as above) to fuel their vengeance. His time in Ethiopia is shadowed by both the fate and the lineage of his parent. The Jewish background of his father: condemns his parents to death in the growing Fascist regime back home; uncovers a hitherto unknown to Ettore truth about his father’s even earlier life and involvement in yet another piece of foreshadowing in the Odessa Pogroms; compromises Ettore’s own safety so that he has to comply with the requirement to document what he would rather turn his camera’s gaze from). Ettore’s photos and his secrets– buried by him (symbolically) underground, retrieved and unburied (literally and metaphorically) by Hirut, and viewed by her in a café in the very last days of the Emperor’s regime (in 1974) effectively act as the underpinning of the novel. As she flicks through the photos, they are described in words in the text, while the wider story behind the pictures forms the main skeleton of the novel’s narrative impetus (remember “memory is gathering bones”). And the book’s title is taken from Hirut’s recognition that the most lowly member of the army Minim ( whose name “nothing” captures his perceived value and self-worth) is effectively a double of the now exiled emperor and can be used to rally the demoralised Ethiopians. There are also more mythological and artistic echoes. The chorus chapters are of course a deliberate echoing of the Greek mythological retellings – and serve to represent the collective memory of the nation. Roman legend is seen in Simonides whose well-known memory technique is important to the Emperor’s reign (his ability to remember connections, family details and secrets about his most prominent followers is vital to the web of loyalty and patronage that holds his kingdom together). Crucially of course though Simonides technique was forged in tragedy and his ability to remember the placement of a group of the now dead prior to the disaster that killed them all. The opera Aida (an Ethiopian princess) forms the Emperor’s key listening during the early stages of the invasion – as he both seeks to understand how the Italian invaders might view Ethiopians and reflects on how its themes (and the role of Aida’s father – King Amonasro - mirror his own life and family history. And it is no surprise then that all of this comes together in the almost final scene of the novel – as Ettore and Hirut meet, a meeting entirely facilitated by Dr Hailu. They meet to discuss Ettore’s photos and for Ettore to try and retrieve the only letter he received from his father after war was declared. Their meeting is joined by the soon to be deposed Emperor, in disguise, unknowingly, as Minim – having been previously visited by the ghosts of Simonides, Amonasro and Zebenwork (remember again the idea “memory is gathering bones” ) And it climaxes in Hirut reciting the names of the now dead who fought for Ethiopia’s freedom 40 years earlier Interestingly though I have to say that this weighting down with history and shadow effects the reading experience of the novel. It feels like every scene is weighted down by portent and every paragraph shadowed by metaphor. And the memories and the cast of shadow characters can rather obscure the reader’s understanding of the novel’s present day, adding an additional layer of filters that can rather blur the transparency of the ostensible main narrative. But overall this is a fascinating novel and one which I think would repay a re-read. “Tell them Hirut, we were the Shadow King. We were those who stepped into a country left dark by an invading plague and gave new hope to Ethiopia’s people”...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Aug 10, 2020
|
Aug 13, 2020
|
Jul 27, 2020
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
3.59
| 5,805
| Feb 06, 2020
| Feb 14, 2020
|
it was amazing
|
I read this book solely due to its longlisting on the 2020 Booker Prize. I mention that because I think it showcases what (at least based on first imp I read this book solely due to its longlisting on the 2020 Booker Prize. I mention that because I think it showcases what (at least based on first impressions – I have finished 10 and started 2 of the 13 books at this stage) seems to be the most impressive element of this year’s longlist – the judges choice to pick a diverse set of both authors and writing styles, with a heavy focus on debut authors – in this case the TV and film actress Sophie Ward. A choice which I think might have come from them reading blind - PDFs without author bios, blurbs or plot summaries. Ward has a Open University Degree in Literature and Philosophy and a PhD in the use of narrative in philosophy of the mind. I mention the subject of her degree and PhD as they so closely fit the character and nature of this book and her University (where she now works) as it effectively excludes her from the Goldsmith Prize – which is where I otherwise may have naturally expected this intriguing novel to feature. The central conceit and structure of the novel is set up from the opening dialogue – between a couple: Rachel and Eliza(beth) where the two discuss thought experiments and Rachel demands to be in one. From there on we have a series of chapters each named after a famous thought experiment: examples include Pascale’s Wager on the existence of God, the Prisoner’s Dilemma, Thomas Nagel’s Bat, David Chalmers P-Zombies, Frank Jackson’s Super Scientist Mary, John Searle’s Chinese Room, Hilary Putnam’s Twin Earth, Plutarch’s Ship of Thesus, Descartes Demon, Gilbert Harman’s Brain in a Vat. You do not need to have known the thought experiment to follow the book – as each is concisely explained at the start of the chapter. And the ostensible main narrative tension is then introduced in the first chapter – Rachel becomes upset by some ants in their shared house and it becomes something of a test of her relationship with Eliza, one Eliza meets by buying Rachel a fertility kit - the two having long discussed having a surrogate baby with their gay friend Hal (his partner Greg is a space engineer). So far so reasonably conventional, but later Rachel asleep becomes convinced that an ant has entered her body via her eye – something the rational scientist Eliza of course refuses to believe and which, in the illogical way many decisions are made in real life to ease relationship tensions, leads Eliza to finally 100% commit to the baby idea. Evan after the birth of their baby Arthur, Eliza’s refusal to believe in the very small (but still finite) chance of Rachel’s account (mirroring in a way of course Pascale’s Wager) acts as a tension on their relationship, a tension which takes on an extra impetus when Rachel is diagnosed with incurable cancer And while at first you may read this first chapter as fairly conventional, with the ant simply an oddity, you would be mistaken – the ant (as well as the Pascal code which occasionally enters the flow), are far from oddities; in fact they are equally important to the narrative as Rachel and Eliza and vital to the fate of a far wider group. From there each chapter continues to be based around the thought experiment which opens it – albeit (like the opening chapter) in a not always linear way. The second Prisoner’s Dilemma chapter is far less about the mathematical/game theory logic of the dilemma itself, and far more about alternative pathways that stem from the co-operate/defect/defeat options, and the chapter explores three storylines about a Cypriot Turkish boy who decides to swim away from shore after his friend’s ball. And from then on, in line with the other experiments outlined, the book becomes far more non-conventional and an exploration of ideas such as human and non-human as well as individual and collective consciousness; alternative/parallel worlds; online versus offline worlds; artificial intelligence and the singularity; religious belief systems, scientific worldviews and artistic renderings - and so on. We have a range of narrators in two different senses: some are not human, others are the “same person” but in a different “realization”. We also have a range not only of times but of planets and even realities. And through all these the book asks: who are we; what does it mean to experience the world; how can we really know other people or even really know ourselves and our own reality. And yet at the same time all of this philosophical reflection and increasingly science-fiction writing is set against a really moving examination all the strands of a complex family unit – Rachel, Eliza, Hal, Greg, Arthur, Rachel’s mother Elizabeth. Perhaps the most fundamental questions of all that the book asks are what does it mean to love another person, what does it mean to grieve them. It is this narrative in parallel with the philosophy which I think really makes the book succeed as a rounded novel. It is a book which is both moving and stimulating. There is so much more I could say about this both innovative and very enjoyable book – and it is definitely one that will I think repay a re-read. A great edition to a fascinating longlist. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Jul 28, 2020
|
Jul 29, 2020
|
Jul 27, 2020
|
Hardcover
| ||||||||||||||||||
1529019273
| 9781529019278
| 1529019273
| 4.31
| 161,056
| Feb 11, 2020
| Aug 06, 2020
|
it was amazing
|
DESERVED BOOKER PRIZE 2020 WINNER - and thanks to the BBC for featuring my congratulatory tweet just ahead of Nicola Sturgeon's (20: 38 and 20:45) http DESERVED BOOKER PRIZE 2020 WINNER - and thanks to the BBC for featuring my congratulatory tweet just ahead of Nicola Sturgeon's (20: 38 and 20:45) https://www.bbc.co.uk/events/erx3v2/l... (also now winner of the Book of the Year as well as Best Debut Novel in the 2021 British Book Awards/"Nibbies") A desperately moving, heartbreaking book: one which places hope and despair, love and brokenness on the same page, treating them with equal weight and empathy. I first read this book ahead of the Booker longlist and felt sure (see below) it would make that list and could even be a potential winner - turns out I was right. Re-reading the book now 1 week ahead of the winner announcement I appreciated even more than the first time what a beautifully crafted book this is. Unfortunately though, from the rest of the shortlist (a good part of which I have re-read in the last weeks), one has to conclude that the judges are more interested in topicality and importance than they are in whether a book is actually well written and this feels a book more suited to a rather better Booker vintage. Her body hung off the side of the bed, and by the odd angle Shuggie could tell the drink had spun her all night like a Catherine wheel. He turned her head to the side to stop her choking on her rising boak. Then he placed the mop bucket near the bed and gently unzipped the back of her cream dress and loosened the clasp on her bra. He would have taken off her shoes, but she wasn’t wearing any, and her legs were white and stark-looking without the usual black stockings. There were new bruises on her pale thighs. Shuggie arranged three tea mugs: one with tap water to dry the cracks in her throat, one with milk to line her sour stomach, and the third with a mixture of the flat leftovers of Special Brew and stout that he had gathered from around the house and frothed together with a fork. He knew this was the one she would reach for first, the one that would stop the crying in her bones. This book is a remarkable well executed debut by a Glasgow born author, now living in New York where he works as a fashion designer. In a Lit Hub article (recommending other books set in Glasgow) he effectively sets the scene for this book: I grew up in a house without books, which was not unusual for the time or the place. The working men who surrounded me bent steel for a living, they built fine ships, or traveled miles into the earth to hack away at coalfaces. We sons took after our fathers. We kicked things—first it was footballs, then it was each other—and as we grew, we had little time for books. We sought apprenticeships or we learned trades. We were proud, we were useful. A theme also taken up in a recent New Yorker interview discussing a short story published there (as well as this book) The Glasgow I grew up in was rife with drink, drugs, and gang violence. Margaret Thatcher and her remote Tory government closed all the heavy industry in the city within a generation; ships, steel, coal—all gone. This had a terrible knock-on effect on all employment, and working families had nowhere to turn; fathers and sons were all put out of work, with no hope, and it ushered in some of the worst addiction and health crises in western Europe .. The book is effectively two intertwined stories – an autobiographically inspired story of the Bain family (particularly the mother Agnes and her youngest son – Hugh or Shuggie) over the period 1981-1992 (with Shuggie between 5 and 15); and a portrait of what was working class Glasgow in the early aftermath of what I can only really describe as the evils of Thatcherism – with (as the quotes above imply) its heavy industry male workforce becoming unemployed en masse (as collateral – possibly even deliberate - damage in Thatcher’s attempts to modernise Britain and break the power of the Unions) with poverty and addiction taking over. Agnes (as she confesses at the rare AA meetings she manages to attend) is an alcoholic – but also a strikingly beautiful woman and a proud one (both in her speech – when she is not slurring – and her appearance – when not dishevelled by drink). When her first two children Catherine and Leck were still toddlers, she left their father and her first husband – a solid Catholic – for a reprobate (an appropriate term for a non-believing Scottish Protestant), charming, womanising taxi-driver Douglas (Shug) Bain. For years they live with Agnes’s parents – until Shug (by now father to Shuggie) persuades Agnes they should move to a new development in the outskirts of the town – more it seems as a test of her loyalty as by now he claims to be tired of her drinking (or at least sufficiently bored with it to no longer even pretend to be conducting a serious affair with one of the dispatchers) – and he abandons her and the children there, to what turns out to be a devastated community, built near to a now almost closed mine. Agnes is both desperately dependent on others, but also fiercely independent and the resulting combination of neediness and aggression causes all those around her to plot to escape her – over time Shug, Catherine (who escapes first to marriage to a step-cousin and then to emigration), the one true boyfriend she has (her sex life otherwise being either assaults on her when she is under the influence, or quick fumbles exchanged for drink or money to buy drink) and Leckie (who retreats first into himself and his drawing and then to a job and flat as soon as he is of age). The only one who remains loyal to her – convinced, against not only all the odds but all the evidence, that there is some hope for her, is the growing Shuggie – who (as the opening quote shows) has to take on tasks and responsibilities well beyond his age. At the same time he is struggling with his own burgeoning sexual identity. The affected mannerisms and snobbery he adopts from his mother (and which are also mixed up with his almost superstitious as well as guilt-ridden beliefs about how he has to avoid any behaviour which might worsen her chances of recovery) – only make him stand out more from the determinedly masculine culture around him, and lead to bullying, ostracism from his peers and incidents of sexual exploitation from older boys and possibly adults (which Shuggie himself largely tries to suppress from himself and so from the reader). Shuggie’s main struggle though remains with his mother ”Ah just feel angry for the bad things they say about her. You should fight for her.” And weaved around the tale of the Bain’s (as I said above) is a remarkable portrait of Glasgow. One senses that Shuggie’s troubled but deep relationship with his mother is an echo of the author’s relationship with the City of his birth. As I remarked above this book is very impressive for a debut – showing huge writing maturity. The dialogue is often rendered in dialect – it would be imprecise to say the book is written in a Scottish dialect, instead it is in a variety of Scottish (mainly Glaswegian) dialects – and for a closely observing reader, the gradations of accent and dialect are key signifiers of class/status/religion and also, importantly, aspiration. The narrative though is not in dialogue (this is not say a James Kelman “How late it was, How Late” despite clear commonalities) albeit slang terms are scattered throughout it. For any British reader I would say the book was entirely comprehensible without any need to check terms – and for anyone of a British working class background of the right age, while much of the book may go way beyond poverty they experienced, there will I think be many familiar elements. The writing itself is on one level straightforward, this is no stream of consciousness or different style of writing (like say “Milkman” – another book with strong commonalities) or experimentation, but it is extremely well rendered, with deeply rounded characters, with a vivid use of language and many striking and original similes. One overwhelming impression I had of the book was of time and space: the time it must have taken to write and to craft, and the space it gives the reader to really get to know the characters and to experience the life they lead. This is a book where the length of the narrative and the apparent circularity of the action is crucial to conveying the character’s experiences. I would be disappointed if this does not make the Booker longlist and far from surprised if it progressed further. My thanks to Pan Macmillan for an ARC via NetGalley. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
2
|
Nov 10, 2020
Jul 14, 2020
|
Nov 10, 2020
Jul 18, 2020
|
Jun 30, 2020
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
0007480997
| 9780007480999
| 0007480997
| 4.39
| 40,612
| Mar 05, 2020
| Mar 05, 2020
|
it was amazing
|
Last night I had the pleasure to watch the stage version (having seen the first two plays some years back) - Mantel’s ability to adapt her work for th
Last night I had the pleasure to watch the stage version (having seen the first two plays some years back) - Mantel’s ability to adapt her work for the stage only adds to my appreciation of this brilliant final part of a triumphant trilogy. It also shows her ability to extract and condense the novel (which demands - possibly over demands - patience, knowledge and interest to extract its considerable rewards) for a different medium. ——————————————————————— Simply magnificent – in my view the strongest of a Trilogy whose first two volumes were among the most deserving winners in Booker history. A book which shines a light into history and in doing so holds up a mirror to our present day. Last Winter, a group of colleagues from around the world visited the UK for an internal conference in Windsor and in a break from the formal proceedings we took a trip to Windsor Castle. One of the many interesting parts of the Tour for me was St George’s Hall – and its ceiling studied with the coats of arms of every Knight of the Garter since its foundation in 1348. I say every Knight – but in fact some of the shields are numbered but blank – these I was told represent Knights expelled from the order (in the early days typically accompanied by execution), and I enjoyed conversing with one of the guides asking which Knight each shield represented and seeing if I could identify the reason for their expulsion. I particularly remember a conversation around the Earl of Monmouth and how his expulsion for trying to overthow a King who only a few years later was overthrown to popular acclaim, was itself a perfect example of revolution (in the true and original meaning of the word) and the wheel of fortune. One of the shields of course represents Thomas Cromwell (his election by the King into the order being one of the high points both of this book and Cromwell’s career; if in some ways designed to legitimized Cromwell’s being effectively made the King’s Uncle with the marriage of Gregory to Lady Ughtred (the Queen’s widowed Sister). And the idea of Cromwell as something of a blank canvas is one which partly lies at the heart of the conception of this fabulous trilogy – Mantel writing what must rank as one of the greatest character studies of all time, of a character who as his biographer Diarmaid MacCullough says is elusive even for a historian due to what he believes to be “deliberate destruction .. [when] Cromwell’s household heard of his arrest .. they began a systematic process of destroying the out-tray of his principle archive”. The result is that “amid the torrent of paperwork through which the conscientious biographer wades to recapture what is left of Thomas Cromwell, the man’s own voice is largely missing”. He then goes on to say “Hilary Mantel has sensitively captured this quality in Thomas Cromwell’s archive in her novels: her Cromwell is pre-eminently an observer, even of himself, not ‘I’ but ‘he’”. But in a different way Cromwell is not a blank canvas at all. Any historian writes with the background of previous biographers (as well as other historians who have included Cromwell – often far from sympathetically – in wider accounts of this pivotal period in not just English, but World history”. And any novelist writes similarly on top of previous fictional realisations of Cromwell – perhaps most notably the pro-More, anti-Cromwell account of “A Man of All Season”, an account which I can only comment seems to make as a hero a man who died in an attempt to ensure common Englishmen could not read the Gospel (and was canonised as a result). So this trilogy is not just a novel but a palimpsest – and in this last section of the trilogy Mantel brings the idea of history being re-written, re-evaluated but always in a way which can only imperfectly erase previous versions out explicitly. We have for example: - The frequent references to the devices of the fallen Queens and their intertwined initials with Henry’s, needing constant repainting; - Cromwell’s interrogation taking place in a room he decorated “for Anne Boleyn to lodge before her coronation. It was he who reglaxed them, and ordered the godesses on the walls; who had their eyes changed from brown to blue when Jane Seymour came in”; - As the book nears its end Cromwell first due to the strictures of fever and then his imminent death, revisits his life story - Mantel accompanies the reader on a revisit of the previous two volumes – in one bravura section of only 2-3 pages we have both the opening and closing sentences of “Wolf Hall” repeated; we also get the full story behind the opening and the young Cromwell’s escape abroad - And Cromwell is very conscious of it as he attempts to re-model England: “Can you make a new England? You can write a new story. You can write new texts and destroy the old ones, set the torn leaves of Duns Scotus sailing about the quadrangles, and place the gospels in every church. You can write on England, but what was written before keeps showing through…” - And finally this idea that history is written in layers, is the reason why this fabulous trilogy is so vital – and despite its historical fiction nature, of far greater relevance to today’s world than the supposedly more contemporary fiction that surrounds us. While reading the trilogy (a third re-read of the first volume, a second re-read of the second) I came across the following quote in the New Statesman taken from a letter written to Machiavelli (a contemporary of Cromwell and whose book increasingly features as the trilogy progresses) “I earnestly believe that only men's faces and the outwards aspect of things change, while the same things reoccur again and again. Thus we are witnessing events that happened earlier. But the alteration in names and outward aspects is such that only the most learned are able to recognise them. That is why history is a useful and profitable discipline, because it shows you and allows you to recognise what you've never seen and experienced" Since the trilogy started we have had the following: Brexit – and the divides both without and within Europe, Nick Timothy/Fiona Hill/Dominic Cummings, #metoo, Trump, Covid-19, Fake News, Austerity My view was that the main themes of this trilogy, are the following areas of the 16th Century: - Swings in Britain’s relationships with Europe, tension between the countries in Britain on that topic, shifting power blocs in Continental Europe itself - The North-South divide of the Pilgrimage of Grace - Advisors and councillors to leaders – their rise, fall and their emnities - Sexual harassment and belittling and subjugation of women - Braggart leaders with self esteem issues emerging in fiery denunciations of their critics - Plagues hitting London - Manipulation of news sources, propaganda and debates around what is true and what isn’t - Government spending cuts impacting on the poor and the tension with the well off as to whether they should support the less fortunate Just an example: Interesting for those of us in the UK in late May to reflect on what happens when an advisor (on whom a leader completely relies for political judgment and did his European policy) alienates large parts of the country including the people, powerful Bishops and other politicians - and then behaves in a way which both outraged them further and gives them an opening to being him down. No Rose Garden press conference here more an interrogation in the the Tower by the agents of the Tudor Rose. Interesting for those of us in the UK this weekend to reflect on what happens when an advisor (on whom a leader completely relies for political judgment and did his European policy) alienates large parts of the country including the people, powerful Bishops and other politicians - and then behaves in a way which both outraged them further and gives them an opening to being him down. No Rose Garden press conference here more an interrogation in the the Tower by the agents of the Tudor Rose. If only Cromwell had thought to explain his fondness for sourcing Lutheran texts as just to help with checking his eyesight. only Cromwell had thought to explain his fondness for sourcing Lutheran texts as just to help with checking his eyesight. ------------------------------------------ ORIGINAL NOTES I attended an event at the Royal Festival Hall tonight to launch the book. The evening started with two of the actors from the TV series reading first from Wolf Hall and then Bring Up The Bodies. Then Hilary Mantel read the opening part of The Mirror and The Light. She then had a long, detailed and very informative interview with the journalist Alex Clark and finished the evening by reading almost the end of the book (p866 if you have a written copy). A few points I found of interest and remembered (I did not take notes so I missed much more): On the length of the book: she emphasised that readers were not reviewers - they did not need to rush to finish the book in 48 hours so they could write a review. (Some on Goodreads may disagree!!). In particular the book is deliberately set out in five main parts (before the closing Mirror and Light chapters dealing respectively with Cromwell’s death and execution). Each of the parts is in three sections (mirroring the trilogy) and structured with an arc something like a novel. In other words she is encouraging people to read one section at a time. While writing the book she was in regular dialogue with Diarmaid MacCullouch and the biography he was writing. I read they biography earlier on the year and it sounds like it is an ideal companion as they used many of the same sources. Intriguingly she mentioned that all six wives feature in the book (I was unclear if book in this context meant The Mirror and The Light or the three volumes - she said elsewhere in the evening that she often talks about “the book” and even “Wolf Hall” meaning all three of the novels as separately published). In particular she said that the sixth wife (Catherine Parr) is in The Mirror and The Light and “not all readers will find her but you will be very pleased with yourself if you do”. So there is a challenge! UPDATE- a fairly easy one by most accounts. The writing of the plays had a big impact on her - in particular realising the importance of placement in a scene reflecting the power dynamics and of how and where dialogue is spoken changing its meaning. The influence of this involvement (which happened after the first two books were published) changed the way she wrote this third book. Often when starting a scene / idea she would imagine how she would write it if she had two actors on a stage and two pieces of dialogue and then expand it from there. She still regards her most impressive achievement as explaining the French East India Company scandal in “A Place of Greater Safety” and when faced with difficulties in this book with how to represent difficult ideas (which were more common here than in the first two volumes) she reminded herself that “you are the woman who ....) She regards her rewriting of the historical consensus verdict on Cromwell as a bad man, as a long overdue correction to an incorrect view perpetuated in secondary sources and which did not stand up when going back to primary sources. From writing the books she has gained a profound respect for those who fought for the reformation and the Gospel in England and has come on a journey much closer to a faith herself. The book is full of references back to images, ideas and scenes in the first two books. “Every character has its arc. Every pigeon comes home to roost”. The night before she finished the book she did not sleep as she felt all of the characters coming back to her demanding she accounted for completing their journey. The next morning went she went down her picture of Henry VIII had fallen from her wall, which have her the sense that The character of Cromwell had our survived even Henry and gave her the impetus to write the closing chapter (which was “more of an assembly job” as she had already written it in pieces). From the first conception of the book she had always imagined it bookended with the “So now get up”. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
May 10, 2020
|
May 17, 2020
|
Mar 06, 2020
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
1554689945
| 9781554689941
| 1554689945
| 4.25
| 23,163
| Sep 15, 2019
| Feb 25, 2020
|
it was amazing
|
Now shortlisted for the Orwell Prize for Political Fiction Re-read following its deserved (and predicted below) Booker longlisting. I loved this book a Now shortlisted for the Orwell Prize for Political Fiction Re-read following its deserved (and predicted below) Booker longlisting. I loved this book as much on a second read as a first - its omission from the Booker shortlist was simply to the detriment of the prize. Once upon a time …. Rami Elhanan, a Jew, a graphic artist … father too of the late Smadar, travelled on his motorbike from the suburbs of Jerusalem to the Cremesian monastry in the mainly Christian town of Beit Jala, near Bethlehem, to meet with Bassam Aramin, a Palestinian, a Muslim . father too of the late Abir, ten years old, shot dead by an unnamed Israeli border guard in East Jerusalem, almost a decade after Rami’s daughter Smadar, two weeks away from fourteen, was killed in the western part of the city by three Palestinian suicide bombers .. This brilliant book, surely a serious contender for the 2020 Booker Prize, is a “hybrid novel with invention at its core, a work of storytelling, which like all storytelling, weaves together elements of speculation, memory, fact and imagination”. At its heart is the true story of Rami (and Smadar) and Bassam (and Abir) http://withineyeofstorm.com/about-the... One Thousand and One Nights is an explicit inspiration not just for the storytelling of the book (and the way in which that storytelling in some ways keeps the girls alive - tragically here only in memory), but for its fascinating structure. It is told in 1001 number paragraphs – firstly counting up to 500 and then back down. The first half of the novel has as its narrative underpinning, the journey Rami takes on his motorbike to the meeting above, a meeting at which Rami and Bassam do what they do around the world – tell the stories of their daughter’s deaths, of their own mental journeys and of their plea for dialogue, understanding and peace. Memory. Trauma. The rhyme of history and oppression. The generational shifts, The lives poisoned with narrowness. What it might mean to understand the history of another. It struck him early on that people were afraid of the enemy because they were terrified that their lives might get diluted, that they might lose themselves in the tangle of knowing each other. The second half is underpinned by Bassam’s journey home after the meeting. The middle part is the two lengthy, and powerful accounts, that Rami and Bassam give at the meeting – accounts which we have already largely pieced together from the first part of the book, and which are then further explored on in the second half, but which are set out here in full detail. From the accounts and the book we get a strong sense of the kinship that Rami and Bassam have reached through their tragedies. Amicable numbers are two different numbers related in the sense that when you add all their proper divisors together – not including the original number itself – the sums of their divisors equal each other …. As if those different things of which they are compromised can somehow recognize each other. All of the above would make for a memorable and powerful piece of writing – however what also makes it exceptional literature is the way in which the 500 sections take elements of the stories of Rami and Bassam as a point to weave a web of connections, connections which then in turn give us a deeper understanding of their stories. These connections draw on modern and ancient history, geography, ornithology, mathematics, language, science, politics and so much more. Borges said to his listeners that One Thousand and One Nights could be compared to the creation of a cathedral or a beautiful mosque … Their stories had been gathered at different times, in myriad places …and from different sources …[they] existed on their own at first .. and were then joined together, strengthening one another, an endless cathedral, a widening mosque, a random everywhere It is really hard to do justice to the book and the way in which these connections are both scattered and then gathered together – sometimes via symbolism, sometimes bringing in the terrible reality of violence, and sometimes juxtaposing the two. But perhaps one example will give an idea. A terrible section tells of the work of Zaka Orthodox paramedics to gather up body parts after the suicide bombing which kills Smadar – the paramedics have to return to pick up an eyeball (of one of the bombers) spotted by an elderly man – Moti Richter. The eyeball has parts of the optic nerve attached and reminds Richter we are told of a “tiny old fashioned motorcycle lamp with wires dangling”. Via discussions of eye surgery, we go to the hospital where Abir is dying and Bassam is asked if (were the worse to happen) he would consent to an eye transplant. Via rubber bullets (one of which killed Abir) we visit the death of Goliath, the mushroom effect of suicide bombers. The book explores the tightrope walk of the high wire artist Phillipe Petit (the subject of one of the author’s earlier novels) across Jerusalem, following in the path of a cable used by the Jewish forces to sneak supplies over hostile territory in the 1948 War. Moti was a guard for this cable – and at night would patrol under the cable to ensure it was still working on a motorcycle (which in turn reminds us of Rami’s journey) which had its headlight disconnected – and which sat by his bedside “with its wires dangling”. Are these too many connections - not for this reader, and for me the concept of connection, of the constant search for commonality, of the need for unceasing dialogue - is absolutely crucial to the solution for peace that underlies the message of Rami, Bassam and this novel. The quotes above all show that. Ultimately no connection - and the resulting increase in empathy and diminishing of enmity - can be too many. Something the book’s title (a countably infinite sided polyhedral) acknowledges. At one point McCann discusses “The Conference of the Birds” (a story incidentally which is the second crucial inspiration for Salman Rushdie’s “Quichotte”) – a story in which a long journey seeking enlightenment ends with the birds finding only their own reflections – an analogy I think for Rami and Bassam’s realisation that only recognising something of your own reflection in “the other” will ever really bring peace, as a bumper sticker on Rami’s motorcycle says “It will not be over until we talk” And a final example – a lengthy section discusses the journey of an Dublin born Irishman – Christopher Costigin in 1835, tracing the River Jordan from the Sea of Gaillee to the Sea of Salt (Dead Sea), a rather foolhardy and ultimately doomed attempt to explore the region. This novel, by another Dubliner, another attempt to explore and understand the land via journeys is in my view anything but a foolhardy and doomed attempt. One final comment on the structure of the book. The page numbering (and some comments I have seen from the author) almost imply that the book could be read backwards - which given its travel underpinning of the journey to/from the talk, would mean something of a chronologically backward reading. Actually I think that would be appropriate. One of the many points that the book makes is that to understand current day conflict you have to return to historical roots - this is as true in Israel (for example a crucial point in Bassam's journey towards peace is when he watches a holocaust film in jail and suddenly realises what drove the Jewish need for a homeland) as for the Irish conflict analogies the author (understandably given his background) frequently draws, as in this passage (imagined as George Mitchell's thoughts). Eight hundred years of history here. Thirty-five years of oppression there. A treaty here, a massacre there, a siege elsewhere. What happened in ’68. What supermarket was torched in ’74. What happened last week on the Shankill Road. The bombings in Birmingham. The shootings in Gibraltar. The links with Libya. The Battle of the Boyne. The march of Cromwell. Very highly recommended. There may be books in 2020 which give an equally brilliant literary treatment to an equally powerful story and with an equally important message. If so then 2020 will be a vintage year for literature. My thanks to Bloomsbury Publishing for an ARC via NetGalley ...more |
Notes are private!
|
2
|
Sep 07, 2020
Feb 14, 2020
|
Sep 11, 2020
Feb 21, 2020
|
Feb 21, 2020
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
1526612143
| 9781526612144
| 1526612143
| 3.79
| 538,814
| Dec 31, 2019
| Jan 07, 2020
|
it was ok
|
Updated for my second read of the book after its Booker longlisting - a listing which came as a surprise to me and I think to most people who had read
Updated for my second read of the book after its Booker longlisting - a listing which came as a surprise to me and I think to most people who had read the book. The book has now won the Goodreads Choice Awards Best Debut Novel. Unlike many of the debut novels on the list, this was a book which was widely featured in book previews of 2020 (which I tend to read avidly), was published in the UK nearly 6 months prior to the longlist publication, was widely reviewed in the UK media and widely reviewed on Goodreads. The other lists I follow avidly are Goodreads, bloggers and You Tube reviewers predictions for the Booker longlist - and looking back over myriad predictions I can only find one list that included it. In my view it is both too lacking in literary merit and too US-centric too make a good addition to the longlist. The judges I think (based on an interview with three of them) enjoyed the book due to how it managed to be both fun and profound, how it was so insightful on transactional relationships and relationships across so many dimensions (race, class etc), how it mixed complexity with readability, how she cleverly pokes fun at every character but without assassinating any of them. One judge (Lemn Sissay) said there were lots of books submitted which set out to discuss race, many “high-falutin” (“one in particular which shall remain nameless" - my completely unsubstantiated guess "Water Dancer") but this was the one that carried it off. But it really should not be on the Booker list. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Now she sat in Philadelphia, participating in a losing game called “Which One of Us is Actually More Racist” SPOILER FREE DISCUSSION OF PLOT The book (I am almost tempted to say - long-form movie script - as that is surely its destiny) opens with a dramatic scene – which anyone vaguely familiar with the book from reviews or 2020 previews (or even the Goodreads blurb) will know in outline. Emira is the black 25-year old (this age is crucial) babysitter of 3-year old Briar, the daughter of Alix (a feminist influencer and blogger – now potential author - whose specialty is inspiring young women to confidently write letters/applications and whose breakthrough moment was breastfeeding Briar during a panel discussion); and Peter (a local TV news presenter). Peter makes a casual but racist sounding remark after a news clip causing their house to be attacked – Alix asks Emira (at a party at the time) to take Briar while they clear up. Emira heads to the nearby Market Depot but due to the incongruity of her appearance with Briar and slightly inebriated state is effectively accused by the white store guard of abducting her. She calls Peter who comes to explain the situation but not before a passing white man (Kelley) films the scene on his phone (agreeing afterwards to email it to her and delete it). Emira and Kelley meet again a few days later and start a relationship; while simultaneously Alix starts to try and build a relationship with someone (in Emira) she realises she does not really know. Both Emira and Alix are advised by a group of close girlfriends (Alix’s from her time in New York, somewhere she is desperate to return). Both in turn start to advise Emira on her life, future and even what action she could take over the potentially explosive confrontation. Emira though is non-confrontational and more focused on her future – particularly her upcoming 26th birthday and her need for steady income with health insurance. Less than a quarter of the way through the book, the first section ends with a sudden revelation (direct from the omniscient narrator to the reader) of a past link between Alix and Kelley (a link none of the characters have yet made). The second section includes two series of past revelations/secret sharing between Alix and her friends, and Emira/Kelley and Emira’s girlfriends – which rather clunkily we can guess are telling us about Alix’s past view of Kelley and Kelley’s past view of Alix. The second section ends with them meeting at the start of deliberately over-the-top Thanksgiving Party that Alix throws – and the events of that party in the third section only confirm the long-held prejudices that each character has about the other and their attitude to race. Emira then in the fourth section becomes the unwitting and unwilling battleground for their prejudices and the game in my opening quote (both convinced the other is acting out their worse latent racist tendencies through their relationship with Emira): although encouraged by her friends Emira finally takes on a sense of agency. The book ends on something of a tie-up-the-loose ends note but with a very clever and pointed final paragraph. DISCUSSION OF THEMES Thematically the book is interesting. It is much less didactic than I expected, both due to the author’s treatment of the issues in the book (the set piece only really acts as a way to establish the characters), and the way she sets up Emira not as a victim or someone constantly focused on the injustice of longstanding institutional racism (which instead forms more of a background to her life) but as someone who has more immediate concerns of her own which are very grounded and practical: how to get regular income, how do you decide what you want from your life, how in particular do you cope with the deadline of a 26th birthday and losing the benefit of your parent’s health insurance (which apparently is a thing in the US?). This is nicely contrasted with the preoccupations of Alix and Kelley on issues of racism but only in a self-interested way. And the two represent two different versions of white, liberal privilege: one obsessed with black culture (Kelley), the other largely indifferent (if not exploitative) to it except when it gives them an opportunity to burnish their woke credentials (Alix). Something which plays out in both of their relationships with Emira but with both hyper sensitive to seeing that in the other and completely blind to their own actions. DISCUSSION OF ISSUES But I had a number of issues with the book. A book which is at heart about book promotion will I assume pay some attention to the front cover blurbs – so the choice of Jojo Moyes should have acted as an early warning indicator to me I found the writing rather clunky and the dialogue clumsy. Reaching its nadir in the speech of Briar – there is only so much “I read dis now” or “I don’t like when Catherine bees the littlest favorite” I could take. I can see it if very hard to write for a three year old – my question would be why would you keep trying? I think the answer is that Emira's love for Briar is crucial to the plot (she would have taken different/earlier decisions if not for this) - but a little like when someone (other than a close friend or relative) shares their loveable toddler anecdotes to you (and I have been both perpetuator and victim) this tends to achieve the opposite effect to that intended. There was an over-reliance on coincidence in the plot - not just in the crucial connection but more unforgivably I think in the symmetry of the secret sharing. I also struggled with the periods where Emira and Alix were with their groups of girlfriends, I felt like an eavesdropper on a completely unrelatable and uninteresting conversation. I was going to add particularly with Alix and her friends – but it is perhaps a sign of how the book has impacted me that I am now wondering if I am saying that to sound woke. Overall therefore I found this an interesting read but not a great one and definitely not a literary one. Finally I think the book is too US-focused in its themes to really be appropriate for a UK book prize - its disappointing that the year after Girl, Woman, Other's success (a year when the Black Lives Matters protests took on an appropriately differently nuanced direction in the UK compared to the US; and a year when Girl, Woman, Other and Why I'm No Longer Talking to White People about Race both topped the UK bestseller charts - showing the UK reading public's thirst for fiction and non-fiction that address white privilege in the UK) - this year's Booker's judges picked a longlist where every UK/Irish author was white and where the three book's addressing racism were all US based and focused. Particularly when the books are also flawed - particularly this one. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
2
|
Aug 22, 2020
Jan 22, 2020
|
Aug 24, 2020
Jan 25, 2020
|
Jan 22, 2020
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
034901146X
| 9780349011462
| 034901146X
| 3.79
| 24,769
| Apr 07, 2020
| Apr 09, 2020
|
really liked it
|
I read this for the second time, 8 months after first reading it. My second reading was following its longlisting for the 2020 Booker Prize (something
I read this for the second time, 8 months after first reading it. My second reading was following its longlisting for the 2020 Booker Prize (something which as per my original review's ending did not surprise me at all). My views on a second read were similar to my own, although I did appreciate more the clear environmental message in the book this time around. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Because this land they live in is a land of missing things. A land stripped of its gold, its rivers, its buffalo, its Indians, its tigers, its jackals, its birds and its green and its living. To move through this land and believe Ba’s tales is to see each hill as a burial mound with its own crown of bones. Who could believe that and survive? Who could believe that and keep from looking, as Ba and Sam do, always toward the past? The genesis of this novel was in a short story (available here and which serves as a great introduction to the two key characters in the novel, its themes and its writing style: https://longreads.com/2017/08/03/and-...) which now forms the opening of the novel. Two just-orphaned Chinese-descent siblings, 12-year old Lucy (the third party narrator) and her 11-year old sister Sam (who dresses and largely identifies as a boy), head out into post Gold-rush ’62 California wilderness with a horse they stole from Lucy’s old schoolteacher and the body of their gold-prospector-turned-coal-miner-turned-secret-prospector father. The book is told in four sections: the first in ’62 tells of Lucy and Sam’s escape and Sam’s quest both for a burial place for their father and a hidden wilderness where he believes that giant buffalo and even tigers still roam. The second goes back to ’59 and tells of the events that lead to their escape: their mother having been buried in an unmarked grave by her father after the premature still-birth of their younger brother in a storm, shortly after a small fortune that the family had accumulated (so as to buy a passage back to China) had been taken from them, an event which lead to their father’s descent into despondency, alcoholism and domestic violence. Both sections are recounted in an evocative and descriptive prose, shot through with description of the still basic Wild American West (each section featuring chapters named Gold, Plum, Salt, Skull, Wind, Mud, Meat, Water or Blood and where each chapter’s title captures a crucial and elemental part of the essence of the life described in it), with Lucy’s memory of the Chinese folklore, snatches of language and Zodiacal 12-hour system (again that system often informing the events of the chapter). The motif a Tiger – precious to their mother – reoccurs frequently. The third section is a departure – a single-chapter posthumous account by their father of his and their mother’s backstory, an account which as it proceeds appears not so much as having been discovered and read posthumously as written posthumously and unread/undiscovered by Lucy. The fourth it set 5 years after the first (and returns to the chapter structure of the first two) – the now 17-year old Lucy living in a town, having been befriended by a Gold-mine heiress has her immersion into some form of domesticity thrown up in the air by the return of Sam after five years of gambling, prospecting, possibly stealing and adventure. Sam’s arrival is preceded by a rumoured Tiger hunting on the outskirts of the town – something which is not coincidental. Sam and Lucy then head for the Coast and passage to China as their past threatens to catch up on them. The American-West described in the tale has some seeming anomalies – not least the Tiger and Buffalo – and possesses something of a mythical nature. This is very deliberate; the author has said of the realisation that crucially inspired the writing of the book: Generations of authors have molded the mythology of the American West for their own purposes. I grew up on John Steinbeck’s East of Eden, Laura Ingalls Wilder’s Little House, Larry McMurtry’s Lonesome Dove. Awed, I believed the settings of those books to be gritty, factual, real. As an adult I’ve learned how much of the West in those stories is fiction or exaggeration – including their overwhelming whiteness. I don’t appreciate those books any less. Rather, I take from them the lesson that I, too, have the freedom and audacity to invent the lesson that we call history is not granite but sandstone – soft, given form by its carvers. And hasn’t that always been the way of the American West, epic and beautiful, conflicted and stolen, paradoxical and maddening, which has so captured the imagination that it is difficult to disentangle the myths from reality? In particular, her own myth-remolding serves as a way to examine two key aspects: the meaning of truth and history and who gets to tell it and the timeless pressures of the immigrant experience – particularly the second or third generational immigrant, caught between two lands. Both are captured in the passage which opens my review. Lucy over time realises the power of paper – and of who is writing the story. As a child she is temporarily taken under the wing of a school teacher who has travelled from the East Coast on a self-motivated charitable enterprise to teach the miner’s children (and to document his results) and sees Lucy as a special project The teacher smiles. “He who writes the past writes the future too.’ Do you know who said that?” He bows. “I did. I’m a historian myself, and may require your assistance in my newest monograph. When later, following Sam retaliating to some racist bullying, they are summarily expelled by him: “You may go,” the teacher says at last. “All the work we’ve done is useless now.” His voice is bitter. “You understand I’ll be removing you from the history—there’s no value in a half-finished chapter. Later in the town, the framed deeds to the Gold holdings of her friends father, stand in stark contrast to her father’s undocumented Gold discoveries and their different fates (her father dying in poverty, robbed of what he had, her friend’s father wealthy and powerful from what he has legally taken from others) act as a constant reminder of the power of paper and writing to control legitimacy In terms of the immigrant experience: Lucy herself is caught by conflicting pressures and yearnings. Her own conservative inclination is towards civilisation, safety, anonymity and she is most intrigued by the tales she hears from her short-term schoolteacher of the American East: But Lucy liked to hear about the next territory, and the next one, even farther East. Those flat plains where water is abundant and green stretches in every direction. Where towns have shade trees and paved roads, houses of wood and glass. Where instead of wet and dry there are seasons with names like song: autumn, winter, summer, spring. Where stores carry cloth in every color, candy in every shape. Civilization holds the word civil in its heart and so Lucy imagines kids who dress nice and speak nicer, storekeepers who smile, doors held open instead of slammed, and everything—handkerchiefs, floors, words—clean. A place unimaginable in these dry, unchanging hills. A place where two girls might be wholly unremarkable. In Lucy’s fondest dream, the one she doesn’t want to wake from, she braves no dragons and tigers. Finds no gold. She sees wonders from a distance, her face unnoticed in the crowd. When she walks down the long street that leads her home, no one pays her any mind at all. Repeatedly even in the melting-pot of the West she is made aware of her foreigness and lack of belonging (of course by those who have only just stolen the land from the Indians and the buffalo) – her appearance always marking her out, causing people to question her origins and making it clear: This land is not your land. Her thoughts are further confused by the different identities (and even tricks to remember them) that are drummed into her from a young age by her father (keen to make it clear that the land belongs to her and she to it) and her mother (keen to remind her of her family base) Ba taught this trick when Lucy was three or four. Playing, she’d lost sight of the wagon. The enormous lid of sky pinned her down. The grass’s ceaseless billow. She wasn’t like Sam, bold from birth, always wandering. She cried. When Ba found her hours later, he shook her. Then he told her to look up. Stand long enough under open sky in these parts, and a curious thing happens. At first the clouds meander, aimless. Then they start to turn, swirling toward you at their center. Stand long enough and it isn’t the hills that shrink—it’s you that grows. Like you could step over and reach the distant blue mountains, if you so chose. Like you were a giant and all this your land. You get lost again, you remember you belong to this place as much as anybody, Ba said. Don’t be afeared of it. Ting wo? Ting le? Ma asked, holding her hands over Lucy’s ears. Silence for that first moment. Then the throb and whoosh of Lucy’s own blood. It’s inside you. Where you come from. The sound of the ocean. A tension captured in: There’s no one like us here, Ma said sadly and Ba proudly. We come from across the ocean, she said. We’re the very first, he said. Special, he said. Overall an entertaining story, one which I can see featuring on prize lists this year. My thanks to Little Brown for an ARC via NetGalley ...more |
Notes are private!
|
2
|
Sep 2020
Jan 12, 2020
|
Sep 03, 2020
Jan 14, 2020
|
Jan 10, 2020
|
Hardcover
|
Loading...
13 of 13 loaded