Gumble's Yard - Golden Reviewer > Books: 2019-booker-longlist (13)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
my rating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1324001631
| 9781324001638
| 1324001631
| 3.58
| 18,083
| Jan 17, 2019
| Mar 05, 2019
|
liked it
|
I read this book due to its long listing for the 2019 Booker Prize, although I have in fact read all four of the author’ should previous novels and hi
I read this book due to its long listing for the 2019 Booker Prize, although I have in fact read all four of the author’ should previous novels and his most famous work of non-fiction. I loved his Whitbread (now Costa) First `novel prize winning “The Debt to Pleasure” but struggled to engage with much of his writing since and had decided to skip this book (unless prize nominated) based on that and on the early reviews I had read of the book. So now it had been prize nominated, here goes .. Climate change is clearly a subject in which the author is interested. As far back as 2007 he wrote an article for the London Review of Books reviewing the two most famous reports at the time on the topic (the IPCC report and the stern review), and books by two of the then most provocative books on the topic (George Monbiot and James Lovelock, the IPCC report). In the article he discussed the risk of catastrophic climate change including the reversal of the Gulf Stream. And it is catastrophic climate change that forms the backdrop for this near future (but also allegorical) dystopian novel. A one off tipping-point event - known as The Change (and probably, although not stated, related to the reversal of the Gulf Stream) has led to sea levels rising and created millions of desperate refugees. The idea of the refugee/migrant problem reaching huge proportions is one that underlay the Booker longlisted Exit West, but there the books diverge. Exit West posited a scenario in which any barriers that the Western World erected to migration were completely undermined by the existence of doors allowing effectively unlimited migration and examined, in an eventually utopian way, how Western society might ultimately develop in that scenario. In this book the opposite occurs - the resistance of Western society to immigration takes a physical and tangible form, via the erection of walls. Britain (curiously not named although both Scotland and London are and the book is scattered with references which make it clear the island is Britain) erects a giant wall (officially the National Coastal Defence Structure but colloquially known as The Wall) around its entire coastline. The Wall is in turn manned, via compulsory two year conscription, by Defenders - backed up by a repurposed coastguard and by air patrols. The latter try to intercept and kill migrants (known as the Others) at sea but occasionally the reach the wall engaging in hand to hand combat with The Defenders. Any who do make it through are quickly captured (mainly due to their lack of the biometric implants necessary for functioning in society) and given the choice of euthanasia, being returned to the sea or becoming Help (state supervised servants for The Elite and those of the normal populace who can afford to give them board and lodgings). For any of Other that breaches the wall, a Defender (judged to be most culpable for the breach) is expelled to sea. It is clear at this point that a key inspiration for the book is George Martin’s A Song of Ice and Fire, about which the author has written at length. https://www.lrb.co.uk/v35/n07/john-la... Although the ultimate inspirations for the novel were: - an article the author read about climate departure (see for example https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.tr...) - a recurring dream of a man standing guard on a wall - which he eventually interpreted as taking place in a post climate change catastrophe world The book is narrated in the first person by Joseph Kavanagh - Joseph K in a clear Kafka link with the Celtic surname a deliberate nod to the fact that once in Britain the Anglo-Saxons were the invaders who then called the displaced Celts the Welsh meaning “foreigners”. The narration begins on the day he starts his duty as a Defender. Joseph’s reflections during his isolated and often boring 12 hour shifts on The Wall giving Lanchester every excuse needed to bring in exposition on both the Wall and the functioning of British society. Some of this is clever. Lanchester does an excellent job of bringing out the generational divide caused by The Change (incomprehension and resentment by the youngsters and a refusal to take any advice from elders who not only allowed the world to be ruined, but who can or relate to the most formative experience of their lives - being a Defender; mass guilt on behalf of their parents’ generation). Similarly he examines a generational rejection of bringing children into the world which has lead to a special status given to Breeders who agree to try for children (thus maintain population levels and more to the point future supplies of Defenders). What lets this part down is the rather too common lack of consistency and coherence in the world view created and even in the functioning of The Defenders in manning the wall - but I was able to forgive this in a book which functions not just as dystopian fiction but also very much as fable or allegory. The idea of a Wall to keep out migrants clearly has parallels with Donald Trump; and Britain turning in on itself clearly has Brexit parallels. One can of course imagine that the publishers would want to play up these links and they must have influenced the title. The origins of the book although, in fact, lie in a repeated dream the author had of a man watching at a wall - one he came to understand as being set in a post climate change world. And the ideas of barriers to migration and a divide between those on one side and those desperate to join them, owes more to the author’s childhood in Hong Kong. However there is no doubting the author has produced an extremely prescient novel and one can understand the Booker judges long listing this book given their concentration on topicality. What he has not produced is a beautifully written one - instead it is both basic and prosaic in writing quality (another contrast to Exit West). This does not make for a terribly literary reading experience and seems out of keeping with what I might expect from a Booker nominee - but does increase its accessibility and again this may have appealed to the judges. Further I believe that the style (which reads much like books aimed at teenagers) is both deliberate and appropriate. This is not the author’s universal writing style. “A Debt to Pleasure” (from my review) is ”Written in image filled language with erudite classical references, musings, snobbery and opinionated writing on themes in world cuisine ... we also gradually understand Tarquin’s character – part deluded as to his own inadequacies and the reactions of others to him, part a calculating psychopath ..... almost every page has a striking image, opinion or turn of language”. Note the huge contrast in style but the huge contrast in the world and characters being portrayed. And note the internal correspondence in each case. A number of Booker nominated books have been criticised by readers for a writing style which is beautiful but out of keeping with the characters in the book own lack of education, learning, age or society. My particular bugbear was Sebastian Barry’s “Days Without End” but I recall similar points being made against Exit West. Here I think Lanchester is reflecting the character and society in which he is writing. And ultimately I think this is a literary reflection that if a society becomes grimly obsessed with selfishness, with excluding others and holding on to what they have - then along with goodness and compassion; beauty, humour, language and imagination all are lost also. Where however I stopped being a Defender of the book and found myself aligned with The Others who have criticised it was the final third or so of the book. The idea of Lanchester abandoning his examination of the society behind the wall would I think have been fine (in fact strongly justified) had he provided some (or any) insight into life on the other side of the Wall; instead we get a rather clumsily section which feels like a series of hastily assembled film vignettes - marooning at sea, survival camp, pirate attack, post-catastrophe isolation. In the book being out to sea is a punishment and so it seemed for this reader. I was also disappointed to hear the US version had removed some of the very obvious British references - presumably in an attempt to make links to Trump’s Mexican Wall - while leaving many behind in a rather inconsistent mix-up. Finally I re-read this book as a nighttime story to my 11 year old daughter. Her view was that it was an interesting book with a very good initial idea (the wall and the events that lead to it) but that it stopped being good when moving from The Wall (early on she asked "is there any point to this section") and that it was also a fairly simple read. 2.5 stars rounded up. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
2
|
Oct 24, 2019
Jul 29, 2019
|
Oct 30, 2019
Jul 29, 2019
|
Jul 28, 2019
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
4.19
| 363,408
| Sep 10, 2019
| Sep 10, 2019
|
liked it
|
Joint Winner of the 2019 Booker Prize - which I captured in this photo. [image] You’ll labour over this manuscript of mine, reading and rereading, piJoint Winner of the 2019 Booker Prize - which I captured in this photo. [image] You’ll labour over this manuscript of mine, reading and rereading, picking nits as you go. I was fortunate enough to attend one of the live cinema screenings of the readings and author Q&A from the National Theatre on the evening of the book's official publication, managing to complete my first read of the book just as the event started. The event was excellent - and I think only reinforced my view that Handmaid's Tale is a great works of fiction. Great firstly because it proved so prescient - I always felt that Brave New World was a better written book than 1984, but only one is still widely quoted and referred to today - and Handmaid's Tale has I think equalled if not eclipsed 1984. And great also because it has inspired and resonated with so many people. Trump and anti-abortion male legislatures (Atwood remarked that young, fertile women - a minority in any society have across so many civilisations and cultures been a resource that society feels it can shape for its own purpose and without their consent) have been subject to the silent but dramatically effective protest of the Handmaids. Even these last two weeks in the light of the proposed (and now executed) prorogation of the UK parliament a quote from the Handmaid's Tale is going viral: "That was when they suspended the Constitution. They said it would be temporary. There wasn't even any rioting in the street. People stayed at home at night, watching television" So to the extent that the publication of the Testaments causes people to revisit the novel - address some of the misconceptions around its message, celebrate Atwood as a writer then I welcome it. But it is the novel itself where I start to pick nits: Atwood has said that she was inspired to write the novel as she wanted to examine how oppressive regimes fall, and perhaps secondarily to explore how people survive in those regimes and even what causes people to resist the regimes. On the second front I think she does succeed. The Aunt Lydia character is an excellent one - inspired heavily by Thomas Cromwell. From the event this evening Atwood is fascinated by the paralles between Gilead and Henry VIIs court and particularly the way in which Thomas Cromwell navigated his way to a position of power while carrying out his own schemings. She is obviously familiar with and a fan of both the Mantel trilogy (well the two published and knows of the one to come - she jokingly stage whispered "it doesn't end well for him") and the Diarmaid MacCulloch biography last year (she did not mention the author). On the first though I struggle really to see the insights she brings. Atwood has made a big thing - in both books (and as a pre-condition for the TV serialisation of the Gilead world) that all events must have a basis in real life events. However I am struggling to tie the way in which the Gilead regime to the downfall of various regimes that she references heavily as inspirations for the book. These include USSR (where the Stalinist purges are a key inspiration for this novel), East Germany (more of an inspiration for the first), Pinochet's Chile, the Argentina Junta (the latter two inspiring the stadium scenes in this book and the disappeared babies of Argentina having clear parallels with one of the characters here). In most if not all the cases the actual abuses of the regime I think emerged as a result of (and post) their fall rather than precipitating it. And the resistance part of the novel ends more as a rather simplistic adventure story - I don't really read literary fiction for passages like this “Glad you made it,” said Captain Mishimengo. He shook our hands; he had two fingers missing. He was stocky, about sixty, with tanned skin and a short black beard. “Now here’s our story, supposing you’re asked: this is a cod schooner, solar, with fuel backup. Flag of convenience is Lebanon. We’ve delivered a cargo of cod and lemons by special licence, which means the grey market, and now we’re heading back out. You’ll need to stay out of sight during the day: I heard from my contact, via Bert who dropped you at the dock, that they’re bound to be looking for you soon. There’s a place for you to sleep, in the hold. If there’s an inspection, coast guard, it won’t be thorough, it’s guys we know.” He rubbed his fingers together, which I knew meant money. I also felt that rather than illuminating how things in Gilead worked, the book at times struggled to maintain a coherent and consistent world view (for example I was not entirely convinced how the extreme punitive emphasis on the sanctity of the handmaids tied with the dentists ability to abuse children; the food shortages did not always seem prevalent; the continuing use of "MayDay" as a password by an organisation known to everyone as MayDay, and the addition of "June Moon" to add more secrecy is just silly) and other than the Pearl Girls I did not gain as much additional understanding of new depths to the societal picture as I had wished. And whereas I liked the Aunt Lydia character - her depth and complexity, the other characters seemed far more one-dimensional. While I think I can excuse this for the Gilead based girl (and I think she does give a sense of how people can rapidly become assimilated to any culture if they have grown up with it); the Canadian girl was much less convincing - the device of having her unable to curb her language, attitude or atheism was significantly over-used and her (lack of) reaction to the murder of the people she thought were her parents for the first 16 years of her life was simply implausible. The book ends - like Handmaid's Tale - with a 22nd Century Symposium looking back at the events of Gilead and using source materials (which are effectively the book we have been reading). This is one area where The Testaments is better constructed than its predecessor - we are given more convincing explanations of the provenance of the documents that make the novel and even a clever hint by Atwood (via a link with Mary Queen of Scots and the Casket Letters) that the Aunt Lydia piece may even be a fake - Atwood left a rather hanging comment in the launch event that she is "fascinated by forgeries". The character links between this book and its predecessor (taken for granted in pretty well every review - not least due to the influence of the TV series) are instead described as "not definitively excluded .... jumping to conclusions .... [for] future scholars to examine" We are also told that the Professor and his assistant prepared a "facsimile edition of the three batches of materials, which we have interleaved in an order that made approximate narrative sense to us" - initially for the symposium attendees but also for the "benefit of a broader audience". And here I think is the crux of my dilemma with this novel. The Handmaid's Tale even as a novel had moved well beyond the literary fiction space, and the TV series took it into popular culture. Atwood has I think written a novel which is deliberately broad in its appeal: it cleverly builds on the novel, fan theories and the TV series while adding her own stamp; it is also much more clearly an adventure type book and less literary. But its those very strengths which I think will lessen its appeal to fans of literary fiction. So on the day of its publication I am: more convinced then ever of the greatness of its predecessor; glad I read this book; pleased it has been written; unconvinced of its individual literary merits; of the view that a lifetime achievement Nobel Prize would be a more appropriate recognition for the author than the Booker would be for this book. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Sep 10, 2019
|
Sep 10, 2019
|
Jul 24, 2019
|
Hardcover
| ||||||||||||||||||
1787331911
| 9781787331914
| 1787331911
| 3.81
| 10,036
| Aug 29, 2019
| Aug 29, 2019
|
it was amazing
|
Re-read ahead of my brief opportunity to ask the author about his book on BBC’s Front Row. https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m00... He talked aboutRe-read ahead of my brief opportunity to ask the author about his book on BBC’s Front Row. https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m00... He talked about wanting to take on the destructive, mind-numbing junk culture of his time just as Cervantes had gone to war with the junk culture of his own age. He said he was trying to write about impossible, obsessional love, father-son relationships, sibling quarrels and, yes, unforgivable things: about Indian immigration, racism towards them, crooks among them; about cyber-spies, science fiction, the intertwining of fictional and “real” realities, the death of the author, the end of the world. He told her he wanted to incorporate elements of the parodic, and of satire and pastiche …. And it’s about opioid addiction, too he added. Now shortlisted for the 2019 Booker Prize. See also my other review for further notes on the book from a public interview Rushdie gave on the day of the book's publication https://www.goodreads.com/review/show... In 2002 Salman Rushdie as part of a group of 100 of the World’s best authors voted Cervantes “Don Quixote” as the greatest novel of all time. In Guardian interview in 2018 (https://www.theguardian.com/books/201...) Rushdie revealed that he was re-reading the novel – the emphasis is mine “I now find myself about halfway through the first book of Don Quixote, in the terrific Edith Grossman translation. This is proving to be a more complicated encounter. On the one hand, the characters of Quixote and Sancho Panza are as beautifully realised as I remember them, and the idea of a man determinedly seeing the world according to his own vision, in spite of all evidence to the contrary, feels strikingly contemporary. On the other hand, how many more times are the Knight of the Dolorous Countenance and Sancho going to get beaten up and left in pain in various roadside ditches? The “greatest novel ever written” – I voted for it myself once – turns out to be just a little bit repetitive.” And Don Quixote forms the obvious inspiration for this novel – a man who has read so many chivalric romances that he loses his mind and is unable to distinguish the world they portray from reality, and a tale which starts, in perhaps the most famous line in Spanish literature “Somewhere in La Mancha, in a place whose name I do not care to remember” is replaced by the opening “There once lived, at a series of temporary addresses across the United States of America, a travelling man of Indian origins, advancing years, and retreating mental powers, who on account of his love for mindless television … has suffered a peculiar form of brain damage as a result” After a very lengthy Rushdie-style list of examples of this mindless television (not exactly the only list to appear in the book) we are then told “As a consequence of his near total preoccupation with the material offered up to him … he feel victim to that increasingly prevalent psychological disorder in which the boundary between truth and lies became smudged and indistinct ….. and began to think of himself as a natural citizen (and potential inhabitant) of that imaginary world beyond the screen” And our link to the original is established with cable TV substituting for the chivalric romances. (together with a fairly unsubtle allusion – not the last – to current politics and Fake News) Our character – Ismail Smile (Smile itself an Anglicization of Ismail) is a travelling salesman for the family owned Pharma conglomerate (Smile Pharma) which has recently made it big due to the development of an under the tongue method for delivering powerful opioids, as well as an aggressive sales approach towards incentivising doctors to take a rather relaxed approach to prescribing the drug for those not suffering from unbearable cancer related pain. Ismail himself is estranged from his activist Sister – the Human Trampoline (https://genius.com/Paul-simon-gracela...) . Ismail is obsessed with a Bollywood actress turned US television chat show star – Miss Salma R, and decides to set off on a quest to prove himself worthy of her love, not before renaming himself Quichotte after listening to his favourite recording – Jules Massanet’s “Don Quichotte” (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don_Qui...) which he is told is “Only loosely based on the great Masterpiece of Cervantes … [Like] you’re a little loosely based yourself”. Wiki lists a main change from the original as being that the “the simple farm girl Aldonza (Dulcinea) of the original novel becomes the more sophisticated Dulcinée, a flirtatious local beauty inspiring the infatuated old man's exploits” – which more fits the Miss Salma R character (whose background we learn more about in the third chapter – as well as learning of her present day addition to prescription drugs, an addiction which ends up drawing her to the Smile company). Quichotte as an aside being pronouned key-SHOT (https://www.urbandictionary.com/defin...) – another link to the abuse of drugs. Just as Don Quixote took much more of a meta-fictional turn in its second part, so this book takes a metafictional turn in its second chapter – the first chapter we learn was written by Brother – an Indian now living in the US who writes Five Eyes (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five_Eyes) based spy fiction under the pen name of Sam DuChamp. Brother is alienated from his Sister (a prominent human rights lawyer in London – who we learn about starting in the fourth chapter including her near miss as speaker of the House of Lords, her cross-dressing High Court judge husband and her cancer) and his Son (who we later find is a hacker). Quichotte himself in a later chapter imagines a son – Sancho – who quickly becomes more real (aided by an Italian cricket and blue fairy straight from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pinocch...) and increasingly we and Brother realise that much of Quichotte’s life is a fictionalised reimagining of Brother’s life. Other inspirations for the book, explicitly acknowledged by Rushdie at the end but which are worth, like I did, reading in advance are two classic science fiction short stories - https://www.gutenberg.org/files/51193... - a story which is referenced perhaps a little too much in the novel, with simultaneously the novel’s summary rather spoiling the delight of the short story and the short story itself rather obviously telegraphing the novel’s end and https://urbigenous.net/library/nine_b... which is nicely appropriated for Quichotte’s quest (as his fictional universe only exists to sustain his quest). Quichotte himself bases his quest around the Seven Valleys in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Con... and his increasingly surreal story includes a detour to the town of Berenger, not terribly subtly named after the protagonist of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhinoce... - a play Rushdie had already referenced in ““Two Years, Eight Months and Twenty-Eight Nights” and which in this 1985 Granta article https://granta.com/on-gunter-grass/ Rushdie references (alongside “Tin Drum”, Tristram Shandy, Eisenstin, Borges, Ted Hughes Crow poems) as giving him “permission to be the sort of writer” he had “it in himself to be”. And the lack of subtlety transfers to the events in Berenger as the town’s inhabitants revert to Mastadon status, and just to make sure we get the picture we are much later told “maybe they said something about our growing dehumanization, about how as a species, we, or some of us, might be losing our moral compass and becoming, simultaneously, creatures out of a barbaric, pre-human, long-toothed past, and also monsters tormenting the human present.” A final inspiration (not acknowledged) seems to be a science fiction series Rushdie was widely announced to be developing a few years ago – which seems to have gone nowhere – but which he said was a “kind of a parallel world story, in which it was our earth and another variation of it, and they somehow come into contact with each other” – Rushdie referred to the series in interviews on “Golden House” and mused it was “interesting preparatory work for the way [that] book turned out.” The influences here are clearer with another main character Evel Cent being a Elon Musk type visionary who suddenly announces that the world (Quichotte’s one) is being destroyed and that the only hope is a portal he is building allowing escape to a parallel earth, something Quichotte and his talking gun (yes really) seek to find. The above is a vastly simplified version of the book’s crude topical commentary and its bizarre plot. It is also a vastly shortened version of the copious references to classic and popular culture it contains. If at any stage during the book’s writing Rushdie felt he had taken any aspect (the lack of political subtlety, the surreal nature of the happenings, the randomness of the plot, the levels of allusion) to excess – then rather than drawing back and adding more foundations on which to build his often teetering edifice, Rushdie clearly chose to add yet another layer. But for all its sprawling complexity it is also a book which is very explicit in what it is trying to achieve - Rushdie frequently literally putting words into his characters mouths to explain what is happening. The opening quote is an example or later when criticised by his Son about what he has really achieved He told the young man about the mastodons, and his indebtedness to Ionesco’s Rhinoceros. “So many great writers have guided me along the way” he said, and mentioned, further, Cervantes and Arthur C Clarke. “Is that okay to do” asked “That kind of borrowing?”. He had replied by quoting Newton, who said he had been able to see further because he was standing on the shoulders of giants. Son looked doubtful “Yeah but Newton would up discovering gravity” he said, unkindly “You haven’t got anywhere close to that” Brother responds “I think it’s legitimate for a work of art made in the present time to say, we are being crippled by the culture we have made, by its popular elements above all …. And by stupidity and ignorance and bigotry” Rushdie is an author that can infuriate some people with the pretentiousness of his prose, or exhilarate and entertain some people with his imagination of his writing; often the same readers, in the same book, sometimes in the same page. On most of his books I find myself trying to work out where on the infuriation/exhilaration scale I have landed – and here I was very much at the exhilaration end. I have heard this describes as a mess of a book, one that is inspired by rather elitist viewpoint, as well as drawing on tradition. But traditional, elitist messes can, depending on your tastes, be extremely enjoyable, for example https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eton_mess And this book was most definitely to my literary taste. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Aug 27, 2019
|
Aug 28, 2019
|
Jul 24, 2019
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
0241293863
| 9780241293867
| 0241293863
| 4.09
| 66,776
| Jun 2019
| Jan 01, 2019
|
really liked it
|
Now shortlisted for the 2019 Booker Prize after having been re read following its longlisting - my final comment proving prescient - and with addition
Now shortlisted for the 2019 Booker Prize after having been re read following its longlisting - my final comment proving prescient - and with additional comments added. The book takes its cue from research that shows (as a medical examiner in the book reflects during an autopsy) which “observed persistent brain activity in people who had died …. for as much as ten minutes and thirty-eight seconds.” The subject of the autopsy is Leyla Akarsu, a mid-40s (albeit claiming to be ten years younger) Pera-based prostitute (who changed the spelling of her first name – trading the y of yesterday for the i of infinity – and was given the nickname Tequila by her madam), who was reported abducted and was found battered to death and dumped in a wheelie bin. The book opens immediately after her death in 1990: In the first minute following her death, Tequila Leila’s consciousness began to ebb, slowly and steadily, like a tide receding from the shore. Her brain cells, having run out of blood, were now completely deprived of oxygen. But they did not shut down. Not right away. One last reserve of energy activated countless neurons, connecting them as though for the first time. Although her heart had stopped beating, her brain was resisting, a fighter till the end. It entered a state of heightened awareness, observing the demise of her body but not ready to accept its own end. Her memory surged forth, eager and diligent, collecting pieces of a life that she was speeding to a close. She recalled things she did not even know she was capable of remembering, things she believed to be lost forever. Time became fluid, a fast flow of recollections seeping into one another, the past and present inseparable. And the first section of the book (Mind) has each chapter taking place over one minute of her surging memories and fluid recollections (with one chapter for the thirty seconds, and one for the last eight), the Proustian nature of which takes its cue from the many conversations she had over nine years with a student activist and artist Ali (who defiantly adopted the nickname with which his racist German classmates had taunted him when they found out his artistic ambitions) who stumbles into the brothel after fleeing the police on the day of the riots following the visit of the US Sixth Fleet to Istanbul in 1968. ‘How did you end up here [in a brothel]” men always asked. And each time Leila told them a different story, depending on whatever she thought they might like to hear … But she wouldn’t do that with D/Ali and he never asked the question anyhow. Instead he wanted to know other things about her - what did breakfasts taste like when she was a child in Van, what were the aromas that she remembered most vividly from winters long gone, and if she were to give cities a scent, what would be the scent of Istanbul. If ‘freedom’ were a type of food .. how did she think she would experience it on the tongue? And how about ‘fatherland”. D/Ali seemed to perceive the world through favours and scents, even the abstract things in life, such as love and happiness. Over time it became a game they played together, a currency of their own: they took memories and moments, and converted them into tastes and smells. Each chapter starts with a different taste or smell – salt, lemon and sugar, cardamom coffee, watermelon, spice goat stew, wood burning stove, soil, Sulphuric acid, chocolate bonbons, deep fried street-food mussels, wedding cake, malt whisky, homemade strawberry cake - which unspool one of a series of seminal moments in Leila’s life, starting from her birth through to just before her death, as Leila’s life plays out against an occasional background of world and Istanbul events, and she answers for herself the question “How did you end up here [murdered]”. We also meet “the five”, Leila’s five closest friends – Sabotage Sinan (a childhood friend), Nostalgia Nalan (a trans woman), Jameelah (a fellow prostitute people-trafficked from Somalia), Zaynabi122 (cleaner in the brothel, fortune telling Lebanese dwarf), and Hollywood Humeyra (a bar singer) – and learn in separate chapters about the tales of rejection, prejudice, trafficking, forced marriage and (in one case) unrequited love that lead them to Istanbul. These sections in particular seem designed to include many of the themes around which Shafak admirably campaigns, but this did not feel excessively forced. The second section of the book “Body” is more conventional in its style and plot (and is based around a plot – in the (real life) Cemetery of the Companionless), if not in its ensemble. The five friends work together to give Leila’s body the end they believe it deserves and to prove that she is not companionless (with her "water" family stronger than her "blood" ones), in what ends as a brief but madcap grave robbing escapade culminating in a scene on the Bosphorus Bridge (which plays an important role in the novel). The brief closing section follows her Soul on its journey into a peace she never found in her life. The other key character in the book is Istanbul variously described as: a liquid city; a mighty metropolis ... still not solidified .. water .. shifting, whirling, searching; [a city which] made killing easy, and dying even easier; an illusion, a magicians trick gone wrong; multiple Istanbul’s - struggling, competing, clashing ... [which] lived and breathed inside one another like matryoshka dollar”. A city which attracts Leila and her friends when the flee their former lives but which turns out very differently to their expectations and very hostile to the marginalised (despite adding as a magnet for them) and for women. This is the third Shafak book I have read – she is always an author I have been disposed to like. She writes about one of my favourite cities (which I used to visit for work); her talks and essays are clearly written and insightful; her activism across a whole range of causes admirable (as shown by the opposition she attracts, even recently from Turkish conservative authorities); her literary involvement shows great taste (most recently as Goldsmith judge and Wellcome Prize chair – both of which recognised the brilliant “Murmur” by Will Eaves and where she must have been the common factor). And yet … my previous reads have been three stars – due to their implausibility of plot, rather overtly forced themes and really poor endings. As a writer I am reminded of Zadie Smith – brilliant and admirable in so many ways, and yet just not quite able to convince me in a novel. However this is the strongest of Shafak’s novels that I have read – the central conceit of the novel is an ingenious new way of approaching an old technique which goes back beyond Proust (memories evoked by sense) even to Lawrence Sterne (memories stretching back to birth), and functions as an excellent way to examine her themes. The key moments that made Leila’s fate seemingly inevitable, which led to her lifelong but fully unjustified sense of guilt, and her perpetual status as undeserved victim, were I thought conveyed in a subtle but powerful way. I was less enamored with the five, their backstories and with the Body part of the novel. This was I think, meant to be a deliberate, enlightened (if not entirely successful) twist on the Hollywood ensemble/buddy quest movie and which was designed to include two things that Shafak is keen to address in this book (and in much of her writing) - Writing from the viewpoint of the outcasts, those on the peripheries of Turkish society - Trying to reclaim urban Istanbul as a feminine space - the city always being seen as female in Byzantine days - e.g. (my example here rather then hers) the church of St Sophia as the most important in the City compared to St Peter's in Rome. So overall a strong and enjoyable novel – and I would not be surprised to see the author this year receiving rather than giving out literary prize longlistings. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
2
|
Aug 02, 2019
Jul 08, 2019
|
Aug 03, 2019
Jul 08, 2019
|
Jun 21, 2019
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
191029697X
| 9781910296974
| 3.97
| 5,361
| Jul 04, 2019
| Jul 04, 2019
|
it was amazing
|
the fact this won the 2019 Goldsmith prize, Golden Syrup, Golden Retriever the fact that this is shortlisted for the 2019 Booker Prize, shortlist, shor the fact this won the 2019 Goldsmith prize, Golden Syrup, Golden Retriever the fact that this is shortlisted for the 2019 Booker Prize, shortlist, shortbread the fact that this is longlisted for the 2019 booker prize, longlisted, longleat, lions of longleat, mountain lion the fact that madeleines are like little memory sticks, but when you bite into one you get closure, the fact that all her life that mountain lion has been alone and free and unnamed, and now she has a name and she’s not free anymore, and that’s sort of spooky, or is it just the thought of the way she lived before, so alone and hidden from the world, that spooks me, the fact that I’m pretty alone and hidden from the world myself a lot of the time, but not the way a mountain lion, the fact that I think it’d be great if the right to bear arms thing turned out to be about wearing short sleeves, the right to bare arms, or else maybe they meant heraldry, like the right to a family crest, the fact that you get to have a pennant with a lion rampant or dormant on it, armorial, armed conflict, Ben’s book on heraldry, dormant, torpor, the fact that it would be really nice to see all these gun nuts just settle down and design their own coat of arms and get some plaques made, the fact that maybe they could have their own tartan too, get a whole Scottish thing going, a family clan, kilts, swordies, the fact that I wouldn’t even mind bagpipes if they’d just quit talking about the 2A for a while, and stopped killing people too the fact that I started reading Ducks, Newburyport in Gander, Newfoundland, the fact that I came home and my daughter was reading Laura Ingalls Wilder, the fact that Mr Darcy, Darcey, the fact that BTP, MTBE, CTE, KRW, AES are all things I discussed while reading the book which featured in the book, the fact that Mary Ellman wrote the seminal Thinking About Women and this book will become the seminal A Woman Thinking, the fact that this book is in the tradition of Joyce and Proust but with a fierce anger purely of its own, the fact that Edna O’Brien said she had yet to meet anyone who has read and digested the whole of Finnegan’s Wake except Richard Ellmann, the fact that unlike Proust Lucy Ellman’s narrator bakes as well as eats madeleines, the fact that I finished the book and my daughter bought a madeleine back from her school trip to France, the fact that Open Carry, Daily Carry, the ability to carry off a 1000 page sentence, the fact that baking and shooting in the kitchen, Galley Kitchens, Galley Beggar, the gall to publish such a rule-breaking fiercely-blazing book, the fact is Galley Beggar, beggars, beg/borrow/steal but best of all buy a copy, the fact that Jane Austen, Persuasion, I hope I have persuaded you to read the book, the fact that the Lucy Ellman does so much better a job https://www.irishtimes.com/culture/bo... ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Jun 22, 2019
|
Jun 27, 2019
|
Jun 21, 2019
|
Paperback
| ||||||||||||||||
1782116176
| 9781782116172
| 1782116176
| 3.62
| 19,718
| Jun 20, 2019
| Jun 20, 2019
|
liked it
|
Now longlisted for the 2019 Man Booker Prize and re-read accordingly. This brilliant review in the Dublin Review of Books expresses my views much bett Now longlisted for the 2019 Man Booker Prize and re-read accordingly. This brilliant review in the Dublin Review of Books expresses my views much better than I can http://www.drb.ie/essays/waiting-for-... The author’s two previous novels each won a major prize (the Dublin Literary Award and the Goldsmith Prize) and the author, just after the Booker longlisting of this book, had a short story short listed for the prestigious Sunday Times Short Story Prize. This book started as a screenplay – commissioned for Dublin Abbey Theatre – but never performed it seems, and has ended up as a slightly odd hybrid. Alternate chapters are set in the seedy Spanish port of Algeciras and are in large part effectively the play (with what seem to be stage instructions and a mainly two part dialogue) loosely disguised as chapters of a novel. The dialogue itself is Beckett-inspired with a sharp ear for two way dialogue between characters fully conversant with each other’s history and character, and how that can be conveyed both in words and in unspoken or unfinished sentences. Much of it however is too masculine and in particular two sub-UK gangster movie for my tastes – and by the end on my first reading I rather tired of “You wouldn’t be right in yourself Maurice”, “Which is the what Charlie” and of the rather repetitive use of a single four letter word. A second read bought out more of the pathos and sense of loss that underlies the macho posturing. The second part roams backwards in time and across Europe to provide the back story to the two parter, and features some simply brilliant writing in its descriptions of countryside or weather. The two characters in the first part are two 50+ Irish gangsters/drug smugglers - Maurice Hearne and Charlie Redmond – they are searching for Maurice’s early 20’s daughter Dilly who they believe will be passing through the port that evening on a Night Boat either to or from Tangier with a group of other “crusties”. Alternate chapters fill in some of the back story of the two characters, Dilly and her mother (Maurice’s wife) Cynthia. Now the author clearly has an outstanding talent for description – particularly of weather or countryside, take for example: “October. The month of slant beauty. Knives of melancholy flung in slivers from the sea. The mountains dreamed of the winter soon to come. The morning sounded hoarsely from the caverns of the bay. The birds were insane again” Or The peninsula ran its flank along the line of the coast road. The mountain absorbed the evening light and glowed morbidly. A roadside grotto showed the blue virgin. For the souls of the vehicular dead. By ten the moon was visible and drew her strangely. A vivid, late-summer moon. A xanthic was the word moon. She stopped the car and buzzed the window to hear the breath of sea; a strimmer vexed late in a high field; somewhere too the vixen screamed. On the ribs of the sea the last of the evening sun made bone-white marks. The hills for their part vibrated royally. It was close to night and oh-so-quiet again And for evocative sentences – written in a distinctive style “And the pattern sound of the family at plan down on the strand – shrieks, soft coaxing, recrimination” The latter quote substituting for page after page of turgid dialogue in John Lanchester’s “The Wall” (also Booker longlisted). Which makes the profane-laden and rather clichéd nature of so much of the dialogue such a shame. I have seen it described as pastiche/homage but that is just another way of saying derivative and unimaginative. The book does provide a mature update to gangster fiction - showing the figurative (as well as literal) hangover and cold turkey of the excesses of drink and drugs as well as the shallow and ephemeral nature of the rewards of crime and their corrosive effect on longer term relationships. The way in which past actions haunt the present is conveyed well in the more mystical elements of the book. But even here the concentration is on the criminals (and their families) not the real victims. And in a year when the Booker has a great book - Girl, Woman, Other - concentrating on under-represented groups in art and literature, the gangster seems to me the exact opposite - ludicrously over-represented. I was partly reminded of Lisa McInerney’s two novels – Glorious Heresies where I wrote (https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...) that “the often depressing subject matter, violence, nastiness of characters and behaviour, sex, drug taking and swearing is offset by the author's empathetic portrayal of the characters and their inner struggles, and her ear for dialogue and her vivid and original use of imagery and language” and “The Blood Miracles” (https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...) where the balance shifted too far the other way. This is somewhere in the middle in terms of the balance, although there is little doubt that Barry’s astonishing ear for language is some way ahead of McInerney’s and to be honest ahead of most of his contemporaries. Overall my conclusion was that this was a talented author using a mash up of a gangster love story and Beckettian dialogue as a (sometimes slightly rickety) frame on which to display his literary talent. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
2
|
Jul 29, 2019
Jul 2019
|
Jul 29, 2019
Jul 2019
|
Jun 20, 2019
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
1473563259
| 9781473563254
| 1473563259
| 3.54
| 13,194
| May 28, 2019
| May 28, 2019
|
really liked it
|
Now re-read, and with additional detail in my review, following its longlisting for the 2019 Booker Prize. “I am what I am. But what I am is not oneNow re-read, and with additional detail in my review, following its longlisting for the 2019 Booker Prize. “I am what I am. But what I am is not one thing, not one gender. I live with doubleness” The book takes place in two timelines: The first starts in 1816. in the rainy mid-year months in Geneva – a bored group of Lord Byron, Mary Shelley, her then lover and future husband Percy Shelley, Mary’s stepsister Claire Clairmont (Byron’s lover) and Byron’s doctor Polidori, agree on a challenge to write a ghost story – the famous genesis of Mary’s novel Frankenstein. (As an aside, given this is a book where the author seems unable to see a parallel without cramming into the already overladen plot, I was surprised that some modern day climate change link was not drawn with the volcanic eruption induced “year without a summer” of 1816.) The second is in Modern day Brexit UK and Trumpian US (and Bolsanaron Brazil). A unlikely group - Ron Lord (an increasingly successful producer of sexbots), (Ma)Ry(an) Shelley (a young transgender doctor), Clare (a Christian working almost underground) as the PA to the owner of a cryonics facility, Polly Dory (a Vanity Fair journalist) - coalesce around Victor Stein. Stein is an artificial intelligence visionary who is turning his TED talks into practice by reanimating human limbs and even heads as an interim stage towards advancing cryonics into the downloading of human minds. Ron is interested in investing and in seeing if there is an angle for his sexbots, Polly in getting an interview and scoop, Claire in ensuring a Christian angle to the various projects, Ry as his lover and also supplier of body parts. The two stories progress in parallel –with Mary and Ry as their main first party narrators. The older story starts as a relatively straight retelling of the genesis of the novel, going over well trodden ground albeit with sympathy and insight. Winterson is keen to draw out the influences on Shelley’s conception of her novel and her subsequent thinking: Artisitic (for example Ovid’s Pygmalion, Shakespeare’s Hermione and Hobbes Leviathan: Political (the machine breakers and the Peterloo riots); Personal (the loss of her children and later her husband) Some of the unattributed quotes she uses though are from later writers - TS Eliot, Wilfred Owen, Gertrude Stein - hinting at some form of fluidity of time. Best of all is a quote from Jeannette Winterson. And it is perhaps appropriate that a writer who famously voted for herself as the greatest living writer and nominated her own book for a Book of the year feature places herself among such giants. Parallels are also drawn with the ideas that are explored in the modern storyline. Pygmalion’s statue has “a double transformation from lifeless to life and from male to female” . Thinking on artificial life she muses “Is there such a thing as artificial intelligence? Clockwork has no thoughts. What is the spark of the mind? Could it be made? Made by us?” That modern story starts as a mix of: exposition heavy dialogue (not entirely absent from the first section where for example the Peterloo riots are explained by way of a clumsy dialogue between the Shelley’s over a newspaper article) – Victor Stein in particular channels his inner TED talk to muse on various developments and ideas in artificial intelligence; characters which could be lifted from a Dan Brown novel (Victor Stein in particular, a sexually magnetic, loft dwelling professor); an exploration of the world of sexbots delivered largely by the outrageously politically incorrect Ron which sometimes tips over the border from humour into prurience. To be fair to Winterson she very consciously either signals or later acknowledges her intents here: Victor is introduced as having a huge TED following; much later (and well after I had written down the Dan Brown comparison in my notes) we are told “Don’t believe everything you read in Dan Brown”; Ry observes at one point when Ron is in full flow demonstrating his own first sexbot (rather also named Claire)“Some of the boys are enjoying this; I can tell from the rise in their jeans”. As Stein says to Ry twice ”The future always brings something from the past” and there are numerous echoes of the historic storyline in the modern storyline. Over time both plot lines evolve. The past story rather cleverly as in a series of parts narrated by the Director of the Bedlam lunatic asylum, Mary meets her own creation, as Victor Frankenstein is deposited at the hospital by Captain Walton. The modern story turning (again very consciously and explicitly signalled by Winterson) into an episode of Dr Who ”The room had the look of a bad set from an early episode of Doctor Who” (drawing also on schlock horror B-movie Frankenstein remakes) in the nuclear war tunnels under Manchester as Victor Stein tries to bring an old friend’s head back to life. One of the key themes of the book is the potential future development of artificial intelligence and human/machine interfaces and hybrids. Winterson explores what that future might look like - will it be designed by misogynistic geeks, will it be for the benefit of the rootless diaspora of the rich and privileged, or more likely will man in fact have no choice in how the future plays out once a singularity is passed. Winterson identifies how the future of AI and of mind and body separation actually goes back to ancient views that underlie almost every religion which all tell the same story ”in one form or another: the earth is fallen, reality is an illusion, our souls will live forever. Our bodies are a front - or perhaps more accurately, an affront, to the beauty of our nature as beings of light” Rather controversially (or is that boldly? Or inappropratiely?) Winterson chooses to link this theme, via the concept of duality and blurring of boundaries (and in choosing to remake your body into the form that your mind wishes it to be) to transgenderism. And overall it is the theme of duality/doubleness/blurring that as well as giving the book its structure gives it its recurring theme: male and female, mind and body, human and machine, Frankenstein and his monster, an author and their work, life and death, consciousness and body, citizens of somewhere and citizens of nowhere, nationalism and globalisation, ideas and actions. (One is tempted to add Google and Wikipedia - from which large parts of the text appear to have been extracted - although perhaps even here this patching together of old borrowed parts into a rather monstrous creation is a piece of deliberate signalling on Winterson’s part). And perhaps most importantly the duality between the past and present and the fluidity of movement between the two. Winterson signals that the real story lies at their intersection ”My story is circular. It has a beginning. It has a middle. It has an end. Yet it does not run as a Roman road from a journey’s start unto its destination. I am, at present, uncertain of the destination. I am sure that the meaning if there is one, lies in the centre. But the book is subtitled “A Love Story” and it can be seen as that. The historical part is in many parts an examination of the marriage of the Shelley’s and the modern part focuses on the intense relationship between Ry and Stein. Many other relationships are bought in as analogies: M and James Bond; Salome and John The Baptist: King Kong and Fay Wray: Pygmalion and Ovid: Leontes and Hermione; Conrad Dippel (owner of The original Castle Frankenstein) and his wife; Epimetheus and Pandora; Superman and Lois Lane: 0 and 1. And further we realise that this may not just be two relationships but one. When Stein first meets Ry we read this exchange: ”Have we met. And the strange, split-second other-world answer is yes.”. When Shelley discussed death of a loved one with Mary he asks ”Who does not hold the body in her arms, frantic to bestow heat and reanimate the corpse.” and we start to see that perhaps Mary partly recast Shelley in the form of her literary creation Frankenstein who she meets again at a party at the close of the historical section. Mary Shelley ending up in love with her own literary creation and that relationship reappearing in the modern day. There are passages of time that tell more like text than time, when we sense a story we repeat, or a story that is told .... The teller or the tale? I don’t know This is my first book by Jeanette Winterson and it is certainly an interesting and entertaining one – while not always entirely successful. At times it’s hard not to have the impression that Winterson is also in love with her own literary creation. Of course some of the themes – in particular man and machine, artificial intelligence, Turing are exactly those examined in Ian McEwan’s “Machines Like Me” and while this is a much better book, my overall conclusion is the same: If you are looking for challenging literature, and for a real examination of these topics, then look no further than the joint-winner of the 2019 Republic of Consciousness Prize (now going on to sweep other award nominations) Will Eaves Murmur. . ...more |
Notes are private!
|
2
|
Jul 31, 2019
Jun 09, 2019
|
Aug 2019
Jun 13, 2019
|
May 31, 2019
|
ebook
| |||||||||||||||
0241364906
| 9780241364901
| 0241364906
| 4.28
| 240,104
| May 02, 2019
| May 02, 2019
|
it was amazing
|
Now shortlisted for the prestigious international 2021 Dublin Literary Award Winner (jointly) of the 2019 Booker Prize - perhaps appropriately given it Now shortlisted for the prestigious international 2021 Dublin Literary Award Winner (jointly) of the 2019 Booker Prize - perhaps appropriately given its closing words this is about being A book I have read and loved three times so I was delighted to be present for its win and to get these photos [image] [image] When hearing the winner announcement I immediately thought of a passage very early in the book when it says Amma then spent decades on the fringe, a renegade lobbing hand grenades at the establishment that excluded her At the Foyles/New Statesman Booker Winner reading on the Thursday of the award I asked the author if she had also reflected on that passage when the announcement was made and how it applied to her own situation. Her answer was: that she had in fact been reflecting on it for some time (including when she was completing the book), but crucially that when she first started writing the book she did not think it was true for her at all - she did not expect any positive reception from the mainstream as she did not think it had moved far enough or the book would be seen as topical enough. However the #metoo and #blacklivesmatter movements shifted the ground significantly in her view and meant that the mainstream was ready for a black woman writing about black women. MAIN REVIEW The book is written as a series of twelve chapters, each featuring a named character. These characters are Black (although in one case not aware), British (although in one case no longer thinking of themselves as such) and Female (although in one case no longer identifying as such) They are however of different age, sexuality and sexual identity, formative experience, family unit structure (both parental unit and their own family unit), ethnic make-up, ancestral origin, shade, region, occupation, cultural background, class, and degree of activism (as well as journey along the activist/conventional spectrum over time). This is a novel of polyphony, polygenetics, polygenderism. But crucially it was not one that at any time I felt was a forced attempt to represent diversity but more of a natural attempt to examine the core shared identity of the characters alongside their differences and their journey; and more crucially an attempt to give visibility to black British women in literature. The author has described the style she chose to adopt here as “fusion fiction” – a fluid form of prose poetry, with a dearth of conventional sentences with capital letter openings and full stop endings I found this style very effective – form matching content, style matching theme. Evaristo has always been someone who challenges convention in art (as captured in Amma – the most autobiographical of the characters). The fluidity of the prose enables her to range within the characters thoughts and across time, and between stories and characters. The characters are grouped in four sets of three – with clear and immediate links between the characters in each set, but less obvious and emerging links between the characters in different sets. The first set has Amma (a provocative theatre director), her daughter Yazz (studying literature at the UEA) and Dominique (now based in the US but at Amma’s original partner in disrupting theatrical culture). The second Carole (who pulled herself from difficult origins, via a Maths degree at Oxford to a banking job in the City), Bummi (her mother) and La Tisha (her one time schoolfriend now working in a supermarket as a young Mum of three children by three absent fathers). The third has Shirley (a friend of Amma’s since school, now veteran teacher whose greatest project as a teacher was Carole), Shirley’s mother Winsome (now retired in Barbados) and Penelope (a now retired colleague of Shirley’s who resented the increasing multi-culturalism of their school for many years, while secretly struggling with finding out on her 16th birthday she was a foundling). The last has non-binary Megan/Morgan (they are a social media influencer and activist), Hattie (their great-grandmother, a 90-something Northumberland farmer) and Grace (Hattie’s mother). Thee are only the main characters though and Evaristo also brings in the backstories of their parents, their closest friends and even the parents of their closest friends. She has said in an interview ”At one point I thought maybe I could have one hundred protagonists. Toni Morrison has a quote: ‘Try to think the unthinkable’. That’s unthinkable. One hundred black women characters? How can I do that? I need a more poetic form. Now there are only twelve main characters.” and while adopting the poetic form the novel still retains strong elements of her centurion ambitions. And the backstories are important I believe in what the author is trying to achieve. From the same interview: ”Even though I don’t have a protagonist who’s a young teenager, a lot of the characters went through that stage. So you have a sense of who they were as children, how they became adults, and then how they are as mothers. I’m deeply interested in how we become the people we are. Coming from a radical feminist alternative community in my 20s, and then seeing these people in their 40s and 50s, I’ve seen people become extremely, almost, conservative, establishment, having lost all the free-spiritedness, oppositionality and rebelliousness of their younger years. To me that’s fascinating. When I meet young people today and they are a certain way, I think: ‘You don’t know who you’re going to be.’ That feeds into the fiction. How do we parent our children? What are our ambitions for our children? How does that link to how we were raised? How does gender play out?” Amma is perhaps also the most central character - and it is in the after-party on the opening night of her first play at the National Theatre “The Last Amazon of Dahomey”, that the various characters and their stories converge and interact (Carole as her partner is a sponsor of the National, Morgan invited to review the play by tweet for example). A final epilogue reveals a final link via an examination of hybridity of origins and finishes with the quote with which I open my review. I found this a strong novel – there is polemic and challenge, but also warmth, humour and self-awareness. Carol’s idea of bed-time reading includes “also monitoring the international news that affects market conditions, the weather conditions that affect crops, the terrorism that destabilizes countries, the elections that effect trading agreements, the natural disasters that can wipe out whole industries” which could simply not be closer to my own work-related reading, but she also comments “and if it isn’t related to work, it’s not worth reading” which could simply not be further from my own view of literature – and a book like this is why wider reading is worthwhile. At the after-party we are told: a five-star review has already been uploaded online from one usually savage pit-bull of a critic who’s been uncharacteristically gushing: astonishing, moving, controversial, original Well as my profile picture shows I am more Golden Retriever (incidentally one such Humperdinck features as Penelope’s loyal companion – “always there for her, always eagle for a cuddle, who’ll listen to her for hours without interruption .. greets her as soon as she steps in the door”) than savage pit-bull of a critic (although I have my moments) but five stars from me. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
3
|
Sep 27, 2019
Aug 2019
Jun 21, 2019
|
Sep 30, 2019
Aug 02, 2019
Jun 22, 2019
|
May 31, 2019
|
Kindle Edition
| |||||||||||||||
1632869845
| 9781632869845
| 1632869845
| 3.67
| 10,212
| Aug 01, 2014
| Oct 15, 2019
|
it was amazing
|
Now unsurprisingly shortlisted for the 2019 Goldsmith Prize - perhaps a better fit for this brilliant book than the Booker Prize. Re-read following its Now unsurprisingly shortlisted for the 2019 Goldsmith Prize - perhaps a better fit for this brilliant book than the Booker Prize. Re-read following its longlisting for the 2019 Booker Prize and upgraded twice to 5* as this is a book which relays multiple re-reads and has proved to be the most enigmatic and thought provoking on the longlist. In three days I was travelling to East Germany, the GDR, to research cultural opposition to the rise of fascism in the 1930s at the Humboldt University. Although my German was reasonably fluent they had assigned me a translator. His name was Walter Müller. I was to stay for two weeks in East Berlin with his mother and sister, who had offered me a room in their tenement apartment near the university. Walter Müller was part of the reason I had nearly been run over on the zebra crossing. He had written to say that his sister, whose name was Katrin – but the family called her Luna – was a big Beatles fan. ….. It had been Jennifer’s idea to take a photograph of myself crossing the zebra on Abbey Road to give to Luna. The book begins, seemingly conventionally in 1988. The first party narrator is Saul Adler is a 28-year old, narcissistic historian, son of a recently deceased, domineering communist father. Saul’s mother was the Jewish daughter of a German University professor, and who was an escapee from Nazi Germany at the age of 8, Saul’s grandmother having given her a string of pearls together with her one suitcase. When Saul’s mother dies, Saul’s father gives him the pearls, only for Saul to insist on wearing them at all times, a sign of his emerging bisexuality, which alienates him from his working class father and bullying working class brother Matthew. At the book’s opening Saul is lightly struck and flesh-wounded by a car on the Abbey Road zebra crossing under the gaze and lens of his photographer girlfriend Jennifer Moreau – while attempting to reproduce the Beatles famous Album cover. As the German driver asks if he is OK and explains what happens three things strike us: alternative versions of history; a small anachronism; and perhaps an anomaly in the integrity of Saul’s account (numbering mine): 1 I smiled at his careful reconstruction of history, blatantly told in his favour …… Saul and Jennifer make love (Saul later finding some unused condoms), and then after he abruptly and rather unconvincingly asks Jennifer to marry him, she even more abruptly curtails their relationship, saying she is moving to America. We, but not Saul, gain a hint of Saul’s narcissism and self-centeredness. He is for example convinced that Jennifer is obsessed with his appearance and body and that he is the muse for her photography (about other aspects of which he expresses a complete lack of interest). We also see increasing temporal dissonance starting to emerge in Saul’s account – he is very confused that a local shop now seems to specialise in Polish food; he also starts seeing echoes of events in America and a son called Isaac. In line with the opening quote, Saul goes to the GDR, starts an affair with Walter, buries his father’s ashes (which he carries in a matchbox) on his beloved communist soil, and is seduced by Walter’s sister Luna. Luna, an intense ballerina, is obsessed with a Jaguar she believes is roaming near the family’s dacha (one Saul believes is silver rather than black). She is bitterly disappointed that Saul forgot to bring a tin of pineapple chunks he had promised to help feed her insatiable taste for the West (pineapple is mentioned no fewer than 30 times in Saul’s account of his trip); her seduction of Saul is effectively blackmail to secure a temporary marriage and permanent trip to the West. Instead of helping her escape Saul tries, via Rainer (a University colleague of Walter’s) to arrange for Walter to escape, although realising too late that instead he has betrayed Walter to the Stasi. But again during this tale, we see some apparent oddities and mixings of time: A light breeze blew into the GDR, but I knew it came from America. A wind from another time. It brought with it the salt scent of seaweed and oysters. And wool. A child’s knitted blanket. Folded over the back of a chair. Time and place all mixed up. Now. Then. There. Here. The book then shifts to 2016. Saul Adler steps onto Abbey Road and is struck by a German driver Wolfgang who attempts to blame Saul for the accident, while trying to ignore his own distracted driving and echoes of each of the same three issues as before emerge: 1 I smiled at his careful reconstruction of history, blatantly told in his favour …… And then, in what is the final disintegration of any attempt at a conventional narrative, Saul finds himself in hospital, no longer sure of what time period he is in, surrounded by Stasi agents, with again history being disputed I could hear him explaining to my doctor, who might also be a Stasi informer, that I was a historian. My subject was communist Eastern Europe and somehow I had transported myself back to the GDR, a trip I had made when I was twenty-eight in the year 1988. Now, nearly thirty years later, while I was lying on my back in University College Hospital, I seemed to have gone back in time to that trip in the GDR in my youth. Saul is visited by a number of people: Jennifer Moreau, now a famous artist, who has oddly aged 30 years whereas Saul believes he is still 28 His elderly and dying (but apparently not dead) father; when Saul points out he buried him in a matchbox some 30 years ago, his father says “I think you were remembering a very small coffin”. Jennifer we learn, as a single mother, had Saul’s son Isaac. Isaac then died suddenly at the age of 4, Saul having visited Jennifer in America when Isaac fell ill, but then deserting her for a quick fling with her neighbour, just before their son died in Jennifer’s arms – something which lead to a final breach between them. Jack – his lover, who lives, and gardens, with him in East Anglia And we realise, if we did not already, that Saul’s accident has shattered his memory, leading fragments of different periods of history to flow through his mind, that his narcissism has turned into literal mental self-absorption, that even oddities are reflections of what he has seen. A few minutes after he left, I head a mirror shatter. It was an echo of something that had happened on the Abbey Road crossing. I had glanced at myself in the wing mirror of the car, Wolfgang’s car, and it had exploded into a heap or reflective shards. Some of these were inside my head. At times it is almost impossible to know whether memories are altering perception of reality, present day reality is distorting past memories, or whether both are bring influenced by something external. An example is a lady in a blue dress Saul chats to when he revisits Abbey Road in 1988: a blue dress also appearing in East Germany and in the hospital (where he reads the same poem to a Nurse as he shares with the lady) but all three of these perhaps being inspired by the famous blue dress on the back cover of the “Abbey Road” album. This is an intriguing book. It is not a book about narrative, the story itself could be said to lack interest but that is because it has been sacrificed on the altars of ideas (for example the binary offset of feminine/masculine, East/West, past/present) and analogy (at one point for example Saul mentions that while he was oppressed by his father, Walter was oppressed by his fatherland). Saul is a very unlikable character – convinced that everyone loves him other than those who cannot cope with his exoticism and physical beauty (and missing his own selfishness and snobbery) I had been proud to have glamorous Jennifer Moreau on my arm, what with her exotic French surname, vintage powder-blue trouser suit and matching suede platform boots. I had watched Fat Matt and his shabby wife and their two young sons sitting in the front pew like they were the royals of the family, and wondered what it was that I had done so wrong in their eyes, apart from wearing a pearl necklace. And the repeated motif underlying the dialogue between Saul and Jennifer only increases this sense It’s like this Gumble’s Yard, this is how people talk to each other However this is an intelligent and deep book – with multiple possible interpretations. One key idea is of a spectre - the spectre of the past haunting the present. Early on Saul mentions Marx comment on the spectre haunting Europe; Jennifer we are told believes that “A spectre was inside every photograph she developed in the dark room” – her own photos designed (like so much of the book) to mix “then and now” . In total the word “spectre” is mentioned twenty times in the book. But spectres are everywhere - subjects haunting photographs, associations haunting objects, past relationships haunting current ones. A key theme for me then is the idea that our memories/views of the past are inevitably interpreted in light of the present; while our views of the present are necessarily coloured by our believes or memories of the past. And I think that Levy uses this theme to obliquely examine Brexit and the attitudes and believes behind it – answering the challenge that Karel Tiege poses in the epigraph “Poetic thought, unlike rootless orchids, did not grow in a greenhouse and did not faint when confronted with today’s traumas” My thanks to Penguin/Hamish Hamilton for an ARC via NetGalley. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
2
|
Aug 17, 2019
Apr 09, 2019
|
Aug 18, 2019
Apr 12, 2019
|
Apr 04, 2019
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
0385544235
| 9780385544238
| 0385544235
| 3.66
| 305,960
| Jul 17, 2018
| Nov 20, 2018
|
liked it
|
Now re-read following its longlisting for the 2019 Booker Prize. A second read through proved as entertaining as the first but did not reveal any addi
Now re-read following its longlisting for the 2019 Booker Prize. A second read through proved as entertaining as the first but did not reveal any additional depth to this novel. No, there is no point in involving my mother. It would be the death of her, or she would flat out deny that it could have happened. She would deny it even if she was the one who had been called upon to bury the body. Then she would blame me for it because I am the older sister—I am responsible for Ayoola. That’s how it has always been. Ayoola would break a glass, and I would receive the blame for giving her the drink. Ayoola would fail a class, and I would be blamed for not coaching her. Ayoola would take an apple and leave the store without paying for it, and I would be blamed for letting her get hungry. Originally read due to its longlisting and subsequent shortlisting for the 2019 Women’s Prize. The Women’s Prize is my favourite mainstream literary prize - under the active involvement of its founder Kate Mosse it retains a large following among readers and Book Groups (much more so than the Booker in my view) and a high level of consistency from year to year (in complete contrast to the Booker). One of its strengths is the ability to combine on the same longlist, relatively lightweight and enjoyable fiction (to attract more casual readers) alongside experimental or challenging books (to introduce the same readers to new literary experiences). This year’s longlist is no exception, with two novels about young and troubled Nigerian women. Freshwater was the most disturbing and unconventional novel I read in 2018 and one which I don’t think I have the ability or even right to fully review. The most surprising things about this novel, a tale of a psychopathic serial killer, narrated by her older sister around her on-going attempts to assist her with the disposal of the bodies, both of their behaviours rooted in childhood abuse, is that it actually falls into the lightweight and enjoyable camp, being more of a comedy and somehow, despite the subject matter, not even a particularly dark comedy. The novel is dictated by Korede, older sister to Ayoola. Their respective fates and identities were sealed from the latter‘s birth. According to family lore, the first time I laid eyes on Ayoola I thought she was a doll. Mum cradled her before me and I stood on my toes, pulling Mum’s arm down closer to get a better look. She was tiny, barely taking up space in the hammock Mum had created with her arms. Her eyes were shut and took up half her face. She had a button nose and lips that were permanently pursed. I touched her hair; it was soft and curly. Ayoola grows up to be small (doll like) and beautiful - with men entranced by her appearance and blind to the reality of her real identity and character, desperately hoping that she will be theirs, but falling backwards (unfortunately never to rise again) when they find out her real identity. Korede is of very different appearance and temperament, and she takes on the big sister duty that her mother has imposed on her. After all, Ayoola is short—her only flaw, if you consider that to be a flaw—whereas I am almost six feet tall; Ayoola’s skin is a color that sits comfortably between cream and caramel and I am the color of a Brazil nut, before it is peeled; she is made wholly of curves and I am composed only of hard edges. Korede is a senior nurse in a hospital, exasperated with patients, visitors, colleagues alike (many of whom in turn seem to hate or pity her), a character that had elements of Eleanor Oliphant and shades of the writing of Ottessa Moshfegh. She rails internally against the pettiness and corruption of the traditional, family bound and patriarchal Lagos society; often though forced to compromise to continue to protect her sister. The only person in who she confides is an unresponsive coma victim - and again we are reminded of Eleanor Oliphant and her calls to her mother, and both books come with a twist on the relationships (albeit the twist being almost exactly reversed between the two books). Ayoola trades off her looks and an innate sense of entitlement, exploiting the sexism of the society and its effect on the behaviour of men (and women) for her own ends. She designs clothes which she then models and sells via Social media to girls convinced her clothes will fit them like they fit her. Her living expenses, lavish lifestyle and even the capital to her business are supplied by a string of (often married) lovers - of whom rather too many seem to come to a sticky end in a series of unfortunate incidents which goes beyond he coincidental. The author had said that the character of Ayoola is based on that of a black widow spider and the female spider’s cannibalisation of its mate, an idea she has explored in poetry and in a number of short stories: I thought it was hilarious: the fact that the female will mate with the male, and if she happens to be hungry afterwards and the guy is still hanging around, she’ll eat him ..... What really fascinated me about the black widow spider was that the males are not prey until the females are hungry, and if they’re not hungry, the males get away. They’re fine. That’s something I love about Ayoola — I don’t think her actions are always from a place of pain or revenge or self protection. Sometimes, she just does it because she can. There’s something freeing about that. She’s not this broken female who’s acting from a place of hurt. She has no sympathy for her victims, no remorse, no sense of consequence. She just does what she wants to do when she wants to do it. Out of every character in the novel, she’s the one having the best time. She has also said that the world of Anime inspired her with its concentration on extreme plots and extreme characters but embedded in an entertainment medium. Korede is the first party narrator of the book, albeit her voice is perhaps at times closer to a more limited third party narrator, reflecting her at times surprisingly passive approach of dealing with the consequences of her sister’s continuing behaviour rather than trying to prevent it reoccurring. Although much of the narrative tension in the book comes when Ayoola starts dating a Doctor that Korede loves unrequitedly. Ayoola exists with a sense of both entitlement and almost complete and often near comic lack of remorse - happily seeing herself as the real victim. “You’re not the only one suffering, you know. You act like you are carrying this big thing all by yourself, but I worry too.” And, perhaps in the book’s highlight, merrily insisting on a game of Cluedo with her sister and the Doctor. It becomes clear as the book progresses that some of Ayoola’s behaviour comes from the now-deceased abusive father who operated with a similar lack of care for the consequences of his action. It also seems that Korede’s willingness to cover up violence to protect her sister began with her father’s abuse and crystallised with the events around his death. Albeit in an interesting late twist we are confronted with the fact that, at least early in life, he exhibited admirable judgement. Yoruba people have a custom of naming twins Taiwo and Kehinde. Taiwo is the older twin, the one who comes out first. Kehinde, therefore, is the second-born twin. But Kehinde is also the older twin, because he says to Taiwo, “Go out first and test the world for me.” This is certainly how Father considered his position as the second twin. Overall a surprisingly and perhaps disturbingly enjoyable novel - not one to be taken as serious literary fiction, although it does make some serious points about sexual power relations, and not one designed to be read in that way, but a welcome addition to the Women’s Prize longlist. I do however find its subsequent shortlisting and inclusion in the Booker unwarranted. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
2
|
Jul 29, 2019
Mar 05, 2019
|
Jul 29, 2019
Mar 06, 2019
|
Mar 03, 2019
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
0525520619
| 0525520619
| 3.81
| 23,492
| Feb 12, 2019
| Feb 12, 2019
|
it was amazing
|
Finally rewarded for its brilliance as the winner of the 2021 International Dublin Literary Award having already won the 2020 Folio Prize but having b
Finally rewarded for its brilliance as the winner of the 2021 International Dublin Literary Award having already won the 2020 Folio Prize but having been previously discarded at the shortlist stage for the Booker and Women's Prize. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Now longlisted for the 2019 Booker, interestingly alongside one of the other Women’s prize books that I reference in my original review. As i had already read 10 of the longlist (with two unavailable) at the time it was announced I decided to re read them all in turn. I really enjoyed the experience of a re-read of what I think is an excellent longlist, but in almost all cases felt that I was simply repeating my earlier reading experience. In this case though a second read revealed new aspects of the book, or perhaps more accurately opened the possibility to read the book in different ways concentrating on different aspects. I feel that a third read would allow new aspects to be considered. The re-read also highlighted (see my conclusion below) more of the triumphs of the book and diminished some of the flaws (albeit they still remain). I sincerely hope that the judges have a similar experience when considering their choice of shortlist. I also enjoyed reading the many interviews that the author has given about the book I felt that by reading and reproducing samples of them I was documenting my own archive around the book. REVIEW 2 - INTERVIEW QUOTES One thing I found interesting was that my experience of reading the book, breaking off to read her non-fiction book and then returning to the fiction, seemed to exactly mirror the writing experience. I started writing Lost Children before I wrote Tell Me, which was an appendix that grew out of writing Lost Children. I stopped writing Lost Children for about six months when I realized I was using the novel as a vehicle for my political frustration and rage, which is not what fiction does best. So I stopped and wrote this essay instead. Once I had been able to do that, I could go back and continue writing something as porous and ambivalent as a novel. I enjoyed on a second read understanding the importance of documentation and storytelling: the various archives, the family sharing their own story as a family unit, the mother desperate to represent the story of the Laos Children, the Father sharing the story of the Apaches, the Mother keen to emphasise the historical and present day interaction of America and Mexico, the stories the family listen to in the car, the pictures the boy takes and the recording he makes to preserve the story for his sister knowing that their family unit is to break up, the stories the lost children share in the elegy chapters, the different approaches used by the Father (recording all sounds using a boom microphone and gradually allowing a story to emerge, including looking for echoes of the past) and the Mother (using a handheld microphone to record specific sounds in line with a pre-imposed narrative). I decided on this method because the novel is essentially about ways of documenting, ways of telling, and ways of creating an archive—whether truthful or fictitious—to hand a story down from parents to kids, from kids to kids, and from kids to parents. Everyone in this novel is creating an archive to tell a story they want to tell in their own way And I reflected more on the voice of the children and especially the boy. For all the criticism of this voice, including in my original review, it is clearly one that the author has taken care over. It’s also clear to me that she has drawn heavily on real experience. In particular I enjoyed the link and contrast with “Tell Me How it Ends” where her first and main engagement with the issues underlying both books was by taking children’s stories and translating them into adult terms to be fit for court. Here she is trying to use a child’s perspective to translate and make sense of adult stories. The boy was just at the right age in terms of allowing me an entry into a voice and an imagination. He's a very smart boy, and well-read and sophisticated, but he sometimes uses words completely out of context and in many ways is still small. And because the brother is also addressing his younger sister, his voice is directed. It's almost epistolary in its nature. It's got that closeness and that warmth because he's telling his sister a story ORIGINAL REVIEW What ties me to where? There’s the story about the lost children on their crusade, and their march across jungles and barrenlands, which I read and reread, sometimes absentmindedly, other times in a kind of rapture, recording it; and now I am reading parts to the boy. And then there’s also the story of the real lost children, some of whom are about to board a plane. There are many other children, too, crossing the border or still on their way here, riding trains, hiding from dangers. There are Manuela’s two girls, lost somewhere, waiting to be found. And of course, finally, there are my own children, one of whom I might soon lose, and both of whom are now always pretending to be lost children, having to run away, either fleeing from white-eyes, riding horses in bands of Apache children, or riding trains, hiding from the Border Patrol. I originally read this book due to its long listing for the 2019 Women’s Prize. The Women’s Prize longlist is always marked by its mixture of the entertaining (if lightweight) and the ambitious (if not always successful). Last year for example placed the up-lit Three Things About Elsie alongside Jessie Greengrass’s wonderful (if not universally appreciated) Sight. And on a 2019 longlist that includes explicit Mer-otica as well as a light hearted examination of how siblings bonds hold up when one sibling draws post coital inspiration from the Black Widow Spider; this book represents, alongside Milkman, the most formally and thematically ambitious entry. I approached the book with some trepidation: I was familiar with the ARC reviews of some very respected Goodreads friends who had pronounced it a strong disappointment despite its worthy subject matter; and I ranked my only previous experience with the author’s writing The Story of My Teeth as 1*. Starting this book though I was immediately taken with: the breadth of ambition exhibited; the literary and meta-fictional conceit involved - including the archives, the embedded literary and lyrical references; and the writing which was at once lyrical (with beautiful descriptions) and harshly self-examining (of the disintegration of the author's marriage). Albeit conscious of simultaneously feeling that the novel was simultaneously: teetering on the edge of being overly-worthy and politically correct in ambition; pretentious in its conceit; over written (particularly when describing or voicing the narrators children, who seemed to temporarily age five years each time they were actively involved in the narrative). I was also (and remain) uncomfortable at the constant repetition of blasphemy in the mouth of a five year old, for crude comedy effect. I broke off after 100 pages and decided to read the author’s brief non-fictional essay Tell Me How It Ends: An Essay in Forty Questions and then went back to the start of the book. I would say that a reading of that essay is essential to any full appreciation of the novel. A fundamental part of the novel is the concept of textual embedding and referencing and the essay forms the ur-text for the novel - with background facts, characters, incidents, images and expressions from the essay being repurposed throughout the text of the novel. The essay I feel also explains one of the key messages behind the novel - the idea of the refugee crisis being the consequences of a shared hemispheric war in which the United States governments of all shades has participated over a half century or more. While the coda to the essay makes the author’s horrors at the election of Trump plain, the essay and novel are set in the Obama administration and that the author’s own decision to get personally involved in the crisis was precipitated by what she sees as a deliberate and callous legal act by that administration. One of the justifiably controversial aspects of the book, notwithstanding its endorsement by Tommy Orange, is its treatment of Native Americans as a historical people, vanquished by the iniquity of the “white-eyes” (rather than as a modern day community living with the long lasting consequences of that history). Partly I think this is simply factual - the author’s ex-husband (and by extension the narrators husband at the time of the novel, as their marriage disintegrates) is obsessed with the fate of the last Indians to be conquered and the road trip around which the novel is based is motivated partly (in the novel) but entirely (in fact) by his desire to research the places where the last of the Apaches were captured and taken. But I also felt that it enables the author (a Mexican seeking at the time of the essay a Green Card) to explore again the idea of shared responsibility for a tragic hemispheric war - the novel explores the equal role of the Mexican government in the war on the Native North American’s, and reminders that the area now North of the border in which the novel is set, was then part of Mexico. The ending of the book – as the story within a story (a story which to add a further layer of meta-ness draws its text from a series of other novels; and which also draws parallels from the child migrant journeys back over many centuries to the Children’s crusades) merges into the real story added a real power to the novel. Overall I still retain some of my ambiguities about the book - for much of the time as it read it I felt it could be a heroic failure, I think I ended concluding it was a flawed triumph. And it is to the author's credit, and a sign of her continual self-evaluation that she was aware of many of the potential pitfalls in this novel. Political concern: How can a radio documentary be useful in helping more undocumented children find asylum? Aesthetic problem: On the other hand, why should a sound piece, or any other form of storytelling, for that matter, be a means to a specific end? I should know, by now, that instrumentalism, applied to any art form, is a way of guaranteeing really [bad] results: light pedagogic material, moralistic young-adult novels, boring art in general. Professional hesitance: But then again, isn’t art for art’s sake so often an absolutely ridiculous display of intellectual arrogance? Ethical concern: And why would I even think that I can or should make art with someone else’s suffering? Pragmatic concern: Shouldn’t I simply document, like the serious journalist I was when I first started working in radio and sound production? Realistic concern: Maybe it is better to keep the children’s stories as far away from the media as possible, anyway, because the more attention a potentially controversial issue receives in the media, the more susceptible it is to becoming politicized, and in these times, a politicized issue is no longer a matter that urgently calls for committed debate in the public arena but rather a bargaining chip that parties use frivolously in order to move their own agendas forward. Constant concerns: Cultural appropriation ............ who am I to tell this story, micromanaging identity politics, heavy-handedness, am I too angry...more |
Notes are private!
|
2
|
Aug 03, 2019
Mar 09, 2019
|
Aug 04, 2019
Mar 29, 2019
|
Feb 08, 2019
|
Hardcover
| ||||||||||||||||
0571340288
| 9780571340286
| 0571340288
| 4.06
| 27,533
| Mar 05, 2019
| Mar 07, 2019
|
it was amazing
|
Now re-read following its longlisting for the 2019 Booker; on a first read I predicted that this will be my favourite book of 2019 - alongside "Spring
Now re-read following its longlisting for the 2019 Booker; on a first read I predicted that this will be my favourite book of 2019 - alongside "Spring"; a second read only confirms my views. Will it win the Booker (or The Goldsmith), will it convinces those who seem to prefer books which celebrate cynicism and unpleasantness. Do I care, not really, as Pete says “Really though, a pox on every test and standard and criteria of normality that Lanny will flummox in his long and glorious lifetime” One part “Missing Fay” – looking at how a child’s disappearance in a country village exposes class, immigration and town-country divisions One-part “Reservoir Tapes” (not “Reservoir 13”) with a chorus of village voices reflecting on that disappearance One – perhaps several - parts Ali Smith (with a fey child, of a type that Olivia Laing has called Smith’s “disrupters”; with a beautiful love for language, and with a mix of the modern and mundane with the timeless and poetic) One part Max Porter – a book clearly reflecting the author’s ability to mix prose and poetry, to allow words to spill out, over and around pages – something he explored in his debut “A Grief Is a Thing With Feathers” (a book with which I will admit I was unable to connect - but now feel I should revisit) One part – really quite bonkers rural folklore of Green Men Altogether - really quite wonderful. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
2
|
Aug 02, 2019
Mar 31, 2019
|
Aug 02, 2019
Apr 03, 2019
|
Feb 03, 2019
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
0316412392
| 9780316412391
| 0316412392
| 3.68
| 5,899
| Jan 08, 2019
| Jan 08, 2019
|
really liked it
|
Now shortlisted for the 2019 Booker Prize having been re-read following its longlisting. As part of my re-read I came across two articles in the Millio Now shortlisted for the 2019 Booker Prize having been re-read following its longlisting. As part of my re-read I came across two articles in the Millions by the author which I found very helpful for understanding the writing style that the author has deployed is and it’s very deliberate contrast in its expansive prose and layers of reality to what he sees as the minimalism and literalness that has come to dominate much Western literature. Both articles locate his writing firmly in a Nigerian tradition and appear a conscious effort to portray himself as a successor to Chinua Achebe. Given a number of the expansive books on the longlist I feel that the judges may agree with his take. https://themillions.com/2015/06/the-a... which is a fascinating read and starts In one of his essays, the late Nigerian writer Chinua Achebe stated that “no one be fooled by the fact that we write in English, for we intend to do unheard-of things with it.” That “we” is, in essence, an authoritative oratorical posture that cast him as a representative of a group, a kindred of writers who — either by design or fate — have adopted English as the language of literary composition. With these words, it seems that to Achebe the intention to do “unheard-of” things with language is a primary factor in literary creation. He is right. And this should be the most important factor https://themillions.com/2017/02/93351... which starts Like most other art forms, fiction has undergone many configurations over the years, but its core has remained, as always, the aesthetic pleasure of reading. When we read, we connect to the immaterial source of the story through its outstretched limbs. The “limb” or variants of it are what the writer has deemed fit for us to see, to gaze at and admire. It is not often the whole. But one of the major ways in which fiction has changed today — from the second half of the 20th century especially — is that most of its fiction reveals all its limbs to us all at once. Nothing is hidden behind the esoteric wall of mystery or metaphysics. ORIGINAL REVIEW “A poultry farmer named Jamike Nwaorji, having groomed him for some time, having plucked excess feathers from his body, having fed him with mash and millet, having let him graze about gaily, having probably staunched a leg wounded by a stray nail, had now sealed him up in a cage. And all he could do now, all there was to do now, was cry and wail. He had now joined many others, all the people Tobe had listed who have been defrauded of their belongings –the Nigerian girl near the police station, the man at the airport, all those who have been captured against their will to do what they did not want to do either in the past or the present, all who have been forced into joining an entity they do not wish to belong to, and countless others. All who have been chained and beaten, whose lands have been plundered, whose civilisations have been destroyed, who have been silenced, raped, shamed and killed. With all these people, he’d come to share a common fate. They were the minorities of this world whose only recourse was to join this universal orchestra in which all there was to do was cry and wail.” The author’s first book and debut novel, “The Fishermen” prize, a deeply allegorical but simply narrated story set in Nigeria, was, perhaps surprisingly, shortlisted for the 2015 Man Booker Prize. This is his second novel and more ambitious in scope. The genesis of the novel is contained in this 2016 article written by the author for the Guardian https://www.theguardian.com/world/201... The author recounts his own experience as a Nigerian student in (the largely unrecognised state of Turkish) Northern Cyprus and his realisation that many if not most of the other Nigerian students there had been swindled out of money they had paid in advance for fees and accommodation; and also deceived into believing that entry to Northern Cyprus would give them jobs, prosperity and the right to move anywhere in the EU. The author himself had been able, via his family, to pay his fees direct to the University and from his degree was able to gain a place as a Creative Writing lecturer in the US. However his experience was very much the exception and one of his fellow students Jay (who appears as a character in this book) committed suicide as a result of his despair on arriving in Cyprus and realising the way he had been deceived. The author was clearly hugely affected by this incident and wondered about the Nigerian who had carried out the swindle, who was presumably unaware that his small momentary gain had such cataclysmic consequences. The article also covers an image of Northern Cyprus which stuck with the author - trapped birds trying to escape their fate. In interviews about the book, the author has also talked about how this incident and other things he witnessed in Cyprus caused him to examine what he sees as the great topic of literature - the contradiction between free will and fate and how he interprets them through, not so much traditional Western views, but through the prism of the ancient Igbo philosophy of his ancestors: “I think it’s the question of fate’s unknowingness, its unquestionability, its irrationality, its madness, its unpredictability, its mercy, its brutality, its generosity, its elusiveness, its banality, its vitality, and all the things you can ascribe to it. It is the most metaphysical of all phenomena—if we can call it a phenomenon. I cannot conceive of a greater topic for great literature ............. I’m more chiefly concerned with metaphysics of existence and essence as they relate to the Igbo philosophy of being. We believe that life is in essence a dialectic between free will and destiny. It is a paradox: that you can make a choice, yet, that everything is preordained? And it is in this space that I anchor my stories.’ The novel that he produced (originally conceived as per the 2016 Guardian article, as “The Falconer”) features a young Nigerian man Chinoso - his mother having died in his childhood, the recent death of his father has left him newly orphaned and in sole charge of a the poultry farming business he and his father developed. Somewhat at a loss in live, one day he persuades a girl against committing suicide by jumping from a bridge into a torrential river, sacrificing two of his precious newly purchased birds to shock her with the physical horror of what she is contemplating. Later the woman seeks him out and realising what he sacrificed for her, as well as being hugely affected by an incident when he shows the lengths to which he is prepared to go for what he loves, by attacking a hawk which is protecting his fowl, begins a relationship with him. She however is studying for a Pharmacy degree and the daughter of a tribal Chief, and her family violently reject both his poverty and, more tellingly, lack of education. The latter leads him to the fateful decision to take up an invite from an old school acquaintance (one he used to bully at school) that he will arrange a place to study at a European university (in Northern Cyprus),a one thing he funds by selling his beloved poultry and his family home. The conventional part of the narrative follows his arrival in Northern Cyprus as the scam played out on him becomes immediately apparent, the tragic spiral of events that follows and his eventual return to Nigeria to confront his past. A story which while conventional and, explicitly drawing on the Odyssey, is also told in a vibrant way, with pidgin English and Igbo (both translated and untranslated) sitting alongside vivid descriptions. But what really distinguishes the book is its unconventional part - which is based in Igbo cosmology and philosophy. The book is narrated by Chinoso’s guardian spirit - his chi. Chapters are told in flashback, effectively in the form of a defense statement drawn up by the chi to the higher powers, setting out Chinoso’s fate and his resulting actions, drawing on ancient Igbo parables, sayings and beliefs in an attempt to explain both, and with the ultimate aim of pleading for divine clemency for Chinoso’s actions, in particular his unwitting harming of a pregnant woman. On the whole I think this approach works - the chi functions as a form of partial omniscient narrator, successfully re-appropriating the standard (but often criticised) form of third-party Western novelistic narration into a more ancient tradition of African story telling. And the chi explores dialectic themes, first of loneliness and love in the opening Nigerian section; then fate and destiny, despair and hope in the Cypriot parts; then the ideas of hatred and forgiveness in the closing section. All the time indulging in vivid imagery: Most of what he said pivoted around the perils of loneliness and the need for a woman. And his words were true, for I had lived among mankind long enough to know that loneliness is the violent dog that barks interminably through the long night of grief. I have seen it many times. Where I felt it did not succeed so well, at least for my own enjoyment, was when the chi character itself and its own parallel cosmological world took prominence - lacking any real context (and with the author seemingly unwilling to provide it) I often found myself skipping these sections (especially a lengthy sectional the end to the Cypriot part of the novel which ultimately seems to lead nowhere) in a mix of bewilderment and impatience. I was again mystified by the fact that, despite the dozen or so childish spirits playing, a market went on undisrupted below them. The market continued to teem with women haggling, people driving in cars, a masquerade swinging through the place to the music of an uja and the sound of an ekwe. None of them was aware of what was above them, and those above paid no heed to those below, either. I had been so carried away by the frolicking spirits that the masquerade and its entourage were gone by the time I returned to my host. Because of the fluidity of time in the spirit realm, what may seem like a long time to man is in fact the snap of a finger. This was why, by the time I was back into him, he was already in his van driving back to Umuahia. Because of this distraction, I was unable to bear witness to everything my host did at the market, and for this I plead your forgiveness.. I often struggled to see this element of the book as much more than a unnecessary and only partly forgivable distraction from the power of the main story. I also felt that a recurring theme, of a Gosling that Chinoso raised as a child, simultaneously loving but holding in captivity, but which was then stolen from him and which he destroyed while taking revenge; was rather over-laboured. Stronger though was the link between the distress of the poultry during the hawk attack, and other traumatic incidents, and the helplessness of Chinoso and others in the face of oppression and injustice. Er-he, Nonso, I have been wondering all day: what is the sound that the chickens were making after the hawk took the small one? It was like they all gathered –er, together.’ She coughed, and he heard the sound of phlegm within her throat. ‘It was like they were all saying the same thing, the same sound.’ He started to speak, but she spoke on. ‘It was strange. Did you notice it, Obim?’ ‘Yes, Mommy,’ he said. ‘Tell me, what is it? Is it crying? Are they crying?’ He inhaled. It was hard for him to talk about this phenomenon because it often moved him. For it was one of the things that he cherished about the domestic birds –their fragility, how they relied chiefly on him for their protection, sustenance, and everything. In this they were unlike the wild birds. ‘It is true, Mommy, it is cry,’ he said. ‘Really?’ ‘That is so, Mommy.’ ‘Oh, God, Nonso! No wonder! Because of the small one—’ ‘That is so.’ ‘That the hawk took?’ ‘That is so, Mommy.’ ‘That is very sad, Nonso,’ she said after a moment’s quiet. ‘But how did you know they were crying?’ ‘My father told me. He was always saying it is like a burial song for the one that has gone. He called it Egwu umu-obereihe. You understand? I don’t know umu-obere-ihe in English.’ ‘Little things,’ she said. ‘No, minorities.’ ‘Yes, yes, that is so. That is the translation my father said. That’s how he said it in English: minorities. He was always saying it is like their “okestra”.’ ‘Orchestra,’ she said. ‘O-r-c-h-e-s-t-r-a.’ ‘That is so, that is how he pronounced it, Mommy. He was always saying the chickens know that is all they can do: crying and making the sound ukuuukuu! Ukuuukuu!’ Overall a book which while not entirely successful represents a worthy and ambitious second novel. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
2
|
Jul 30, 2019
Mar 19, 2019
|
Jul 31, 2019
Mar 19, 2019
|
Jan 04, 2019
|
Hardcover
|
Loading...
13 of 13 loaded