I read this book due to its longlisting for the 2020 Republic of Consciousness Prize for UK and Irish small presses - for which it has now been shortlI read this book due to its longlisting for the 2020 Republic of Consciousness Prize for UK and Irish small presses - for which it has now been shortlisted.
It is published by The 87: “a small press, publishing collective, events organiser, and platform for discussion” which is “especially interested in supporting writers from under-represented, minority groups”
The author’s background (which is relevant to this book) is described on her website
Minoli Salgado was born in Kuala Lumpur and grew up in Sri Lanka, South East Asia and England. She was educated at schools in Penang Hill, Colombo (briefly) and North Devon before going on to study English Literature at the universities of Sussex, Manchester and Warwick. After gaining her PhD in Indo-Anglian fiction, she returned to the University of Sussex where she taught postcolonial literature for many years as Tutorial Fellow, Lecturer, Senior Lecturer, Reader and Professor of English.
The book itself is a collection of short stories, whose themes and structure is described in an excellent introduction by the author:
Though only some of the stories … engage with the war, all of them were written during or soon after the political conflict [the Sri Lankan civil war] and are conditioned by that time … Written between 1990-2011, they are also underscored by an exilic perspective that attempts to give meaning, pattern and shape to a home that appears to be torn apart … The book is divided into two parts – “Rumours” and “Ventriloquy and Other Acts” – that mark the permeable boundaries between public and private selves …. In everyday life, rumours occupy the place where public secrets congregate, They expand and grow in contexts if suppression where official facts are known to be lies. And ventriloquy is … an act of displaced speech … of finding a voice in a new guise.
The first section “Rumours” consists of 15 short stories (the longest 15 pages, the shortest – and the most powerful – 1 to 2 page pieces of flash fiction). The first 9 directly address the war and I think where the collection really comes to life is when the author combines excellent short story and flash-fiction skills with a powerful message: this is seen as its finest (in my view) in “A Feast of Words” and “Breaking News”.
“Million Dollar Wounds” – a UN officer reflects on a visit to a villager with a severely wounded child
“The Map” – a wounded (and delirious) army captain is pressed on where an ambush took place
“Brushstrokes” – a subversive artist is forced under torture to paint a picture of (I think) President Mahinda Rajapaksa
“The Dictionary of National Humilation” – a more absurdist story of a journalist gathering the testimony of writers writing less in a sense of “in the event of my death … ” than “in the knowledge of my [inevitable] death”
“Breaking News” - on a superficial level an absurdist Schrodinger’s Cat account of an exiled man scanning the internet trying to let his Sri Lankan war zone based brother know if he (the brother) is alive or dead, killed in a bombing raid. On a deeper level though its about being an exile when your home country (and relatives still there) are caught in a vicious war and the anomaly that, due to censorship, you are better informed than them as to events but free of their terrible effects and powerless to save them.
“Too Many Legs” – a short but horrific tale of mixed body parts
“Releasing Maruis” – a fisherman’s son is abducted and murdered by security forces
Of the other stories, my favourites drew more directly on Sri Lanka:
“The Waves” is a short but powerful account of the Boxing Day Tsunami;
“Solitary Reaper” is of two Sri Lankans (a young man and a middle aged lady) who meet in exile in a Kent village, both haunted by the impact of the war on their fathers.
The other stories: “Getting To No” – a story of a woman preparing to reject her husband’s attentions; “Sassy” – a rather surreal story of an author under pressure to change her writing style, whose life is instead taken over by the new style; “Father’s Will” – a story of two sons returning to an uncertain inheritance; “Kethmuathie” (which I did not really understand) –
although showing good skill and imagination, I found much less appealing simply as I think they lacked the distinctiveness of the other stories.
The second section is a “fractured memoir” (with certainly auto-biographical elements) – with three sections (each of 10-15 pages) set respectively in Sri Lanka, Malaysia and England and setting out a childhood across those three countries. This is a story of growing up with a sense of displacement (shuttled from relatives to boarding schools by largely absent parents) and exile, and with language playing an important role: looking back on her time in Sri Lanka in the first section, the narrator can remember conversations in English even though she spoke Sinhalese at the time; later in an austere English boarding school she deliberately acquires (via mimicry) a cultivated English accent.
I must admit that I did not really connect to these sections – I could see what she was trying to do but the themes were for me obscured by the rather privileged (if not desirable) life described of houses with servants, and foreign private schools.
Overall though I found this a very good book and one of the strongest books on the longlist....more
“Can’t you just go, she thinks to herself. Find something to do, or play, or something”
I read this book due to its longlisting for the 2020 Republ
“Can’t you just go, she thinks to herself. Find something to do, or play, or something”
I read this book due to its longlisting for the 2020 Republic of Consciousness Prize for UK and Irish small presses - for which it has now been shortlisted.
And Other Stories is a small UK publisher which “publishes some of the best in contemporary writing, including many translations” and aims “to push people’s reading limits and help them discover authors of adventurous and inspiring writing”. They are set up as a not-for-profit Community Interest Company and operate on a subscriber model – with subscribers (of which they now have around 1000 in 40 countries) committing in advance to enable the publication of future books.
Famously and admirably, And Other Stories were the only publisher to respond to Kamilia Shamsie (subsequent winner of the 2018 Women’s Prize)’s 2016 challenge to only publish books by women in 2018 (https://www.theguardian.com/books/201...)).
This book, translated by Martin Aitken (most famously joint translator of the sixth and final volume of Knausgaard’s My Struggle series) and published in 2019, was originally written in 1997 (which is important to the plot as a 21st Century word of smartphones would render the plot even more implausible than it is).
The book ostensibly tells the story of a single Mum, Vibeke and her eight year old child Jon – they have recently moved to a small, remote Norwegian town – Vibeke is an Arts and Culture officer at the local authority.
Set over a single Winter’s night, the evening before Jon’s 9th birthday, and written in the present tense, it cleverly interleaves (without any marked breaks) the simultaneous third-person point-of-view accounts of Jon and Vibeke to create an atmospheric tale with a never-realised undercurrent of menace.
Flush with the success of her first presentation Vibeke decides to go into the village, initially to visit the library but then distracted by a travelling funfair, where she decides to go with one of the workers into the nearby town. Jon, convinced that his Mum is preparing for his birthday, goes for a walk around the village, following an older girl back to her house where the two fall asleep together and then finding the house locked around midnight walking some more.
At the fair, Vibeke meets an eccentric woman selling cuddly toy tombola tickets, and the same woman later picks up the wandering Jon.
Jon’s world is one of habit/obsession (particularly with not blinking) and imagination – like many 8 year olds at times he operates in a parallel world of his imaginings.
Vibeke’s world is one of love – but a search for love and the adult companionship that she does not get from Jon, rather than a giver of it. The quote with which I open my review is on page 17 and immediately after (even thought its unspoken) Jon does go out never to return. Vibeke does think about Jon occassionally for another 17 pages but as soon as she goes out he ceases to exist in her thoughts – despite thinking of the day of the week and searching for a newspaper (all I think clues that she knows full well what day it is) she has no idea it’s her only son’s 9th birthday and when she finally returns to the house she does not even think to check on him in bed.
I think there are different ways to view the book – either as a rather unbelievable tale : not just in Vibeke’s behaviour, but in that of others who interact with Jon (the girl who takes an 8 year old back to her room and then falls asleep, her parents who think nothing of an 8 year old being in their house late at night and don’t think to ask after his parents, and who then allow him to walk out into the cold night not long before midnight). The only person who does seem to realise the oddness of an 8 year old wandering around is the funfair-lady, herself a clear eccentric and also a rather unbelievable character as she works out who Jon’s mother is and then seemingly goes looking for Jon. And there seems to be a clue to the incongruity of this interaction when Jon (an 8 year old as a reminder) takes his first drag on a cigarette and does not cough. All of which I think leads to the more obvious conclusion – that the book is more of a fantasy and that perhaps Jon does not exist as a character, a theory which is also supported by the over-heavy use of perfectly remembered dream sequences in the book (which is never a literary device that I enjoy).
Despite my reservations, this is an absorbing novella and one what has already won several award nominations in the US and I can see it making the RoC shortlist....more
Now shortlisted for the 2020 Republic of Consciousness Prize for UK and Irish small presses.
This book published by Dostoyevsky Wannabe has been shortlNow shortlisted for the 2020 Republic of Consciousness Prize for UK and Irish small presses.
This book published by Dostoyevsky Wannabe has been shortlisted for the 2019 Goldsmith Prize – which I think could not be more appropriate, and in fact is overdue recognition of Isabel Waidner’s concept of a form of fiction which in line with the prize’s aims “breaks the mould … extends the possibility of the novel form …. embodies the spirit of invention that characterises the genre at its best”.
In 2018 I was one of the judges on the Republic of Consciousness Prize for small press fiction. One of the more unusual and challenging entries we received was “Gaudy Bauble” - their previous novel. I recall at the judges meeting that its shortlisting was quickly agreed as it so clearly fulfilled the aims of the prize – to highlight small presses publishing groundbreaking fiction.
In my review of that book I referenced the author’s thesis (https://pure.roehampton.ac.uk/portal/...) which helped considerably with my understanding of what they had achieved with the novel. In my own words I believe that Waidner’s key idea is to link two areas: conceptual art (something which she feels has only had limited cross over into literature) and post-identity gender fluidity – this leads to their concept and invention of trans-literature.
A key element of their writing I believe (again in my words) is the rejection of the traditional novelistic structure featuring a main character, other key characters, minor characters and then passive objects with which they interact.
I believe that Waidner implicitly equates this rigid and hierarchical structure with a traditional patriarchal, gender-rigid society. In their writing therefore the dominant character is a fluid concept – and just as an hierarchy starts to form (often to the relief of the tradition-bound reader, who finally starts to be able to identify the book with conventional concepts of plot and character and feels they are returning to something they know), Waidner very deliberately overturns this hierarchy and introduces a new main character, including in many cases what initially seemed inanimate objects – often based around patterns or illustrations on clothing (clothing often described in detail, and all it seems based on items that Waidner or their friends have worn).
Other thematic elements of Gaudy Bauble which stood out to me on my initial read (and before reading the thesis) were: the clear use of Google as a tool to take an idea and extend in a kind of free-association exploration of an initial concept and a search for links or word plays that can be incorporated to alter the course of the novel or to facilitate the introduction of new protagonists; the slightly odd narrative which at times can read like a rather literal translation from their native German.
To my interest, both of these elements (which I initially may have regarded as criticisms) are dwelt on and examined and explained in the thesis as intrinsic to their situation and to their new literary concept.
All of these concepts are explored in this book – which is perhaps a more approachable and accessible version of their first novel but very recognisably from the same genre.
I think part of that may be due to my familiarity with Waidner’s very distinctive techniques and style.
A second element is that the book has a clear overriding and very topical theme of Brexit to go alongside its exploration of: class in Britain, hostility to immigrants, polygenderism – interestingly all themes also explored in the 2019 Booker prize winner Girl, Woman, Other.
It would be appropriate if this book – more of a Person. Jumper, Other – joined that book by winning the 2019 Goldsmith....more
Now shortlisted for the 2020 Republic of Consciousness Prize and recommended by me (as Mr Brown) in the Guardian’s Book of The Year awards
https://wwwNow shortlisted for the 2020 Republic of Consciousness Prize and recommended by me (as Mr Brown) in the Guardian’s Book of The Year awards
I knew that one day all I would have was the memory of Jim and not Jim himself present in my peripheral vision making all my other senses go zing and now that time has indeed come and Jim is not present and has not been present for many years what I remember and want to record in long-hoarded words and word orders is not only the delicious presence of him Jim but also the delicious panic of that time during which I often told myself Calm down and take it all in but there was always too much world to take in because there was always more gorgeous detail than I had time or senses for and every caterpillar-of-a-When immediately became a butterfly-of-a-What and flew off into the flock of a thousand interplexing Whats whose air-dance of now being like this and now being like that was too delicate for anybody to remember but a god.
Elliott suffers from spastic cerebral palsy and has been left by his Mother in the care ward of a 1970s Catholic children’s institution. He can (barely) move his right hand but is otherwise paralysed and incapable of speech (although not of sound), he is however something of a musical savant, devourer and storer of words (both coming mainly from listening to radio and readings by the Nuns) – but almost all of this ability is hidden from others around him and only takes place in his mind, a mind that both we and Elliott visit.
Elliott himself is visiting from his future. The novel is written many years later (during which he is transferred on maturity to an associated male-run institution where he is literally left in a broom cupboard, but later rescued by a horrified Brother and then treated by a Doctor to reduce his muscle spams, enabling him to painstakingly type this account).
It tells of a seminal 50 day period in his younger life, when he forms a fleeting but, for Elliott, epochal friendship with a blind, mute boy Jim – one that enables Elliott to briefly experience some of his wildest (to him – painfully modest to us) wishes for a brief, but, for him, transcendent period .
Of course at the time despite my word-hoard I didn’t think it this way with these sentences in this order because often I was just a mute panic and a fantastic feeler-of-feelings. Even so it turns out didn’t do a bad job of remembering this or that butterfly of present-moment Jim with his warmth and goodwill towards all men but particularly it seemed towards me. And though I do have more language now thanks to the unlocking by Dr Masters and the books I am able to hear and the questions I am able to ask people I still know that even were I time-travelled as I am now back inside myself as I was during the Jim-time I would remember it no better because at the same time as watching air-dances of Whats I would be putting together words I wanted to remember in a particular order with a particular resplendence of rhythm and crumple of sounds and so the world would become lost to me trying to get it right in words rather than simply being the world of deliciously panicked now now galloping now giddily giddily galloping.
The situation and abandonment of the children on the ward can be heart tugging. The imagery in this passage will I think stay with me long after most books I have read this year are but vague memories.
Worship me mummy. Every child is Jesus for a while but every orphan is a single piece from a jigsaw puzzle the rest of which is somewhere else and so wherever it is is itself entirely ruined and frustrating … but the piece of the picture on that jigsaw piece may only be cloud-edge and sky or artificial blue and the orphan will spend useless hours of years of hours worrying over what complete painting or photograph they should form part of. I have seen in front of the doors of the lift as they finally closed I have seen little Jesuses be turned by the gap becoming a dark slit and a number counting down from 3 to 0 turned straight into jigsaw pieces I have seen and then heard them start crying as sons and daughters and finish crying as orphans
Elliott too desperately misses his Mother – counting down years by his annual Christmas card (the only time he learns of the births of other siblings from the addition of a new name to the card), but is a keen observer and consumer of everything around him – noise, sounds, characters, routines, relationships, the play of light and colour and the scattered but to him magical glimpses of the world outside, one he yearns to visit, an ambition he patiently nurtures, seeing Jim as giving him a fleeting opportunity to realise it.
The children on the ward are fed Catholicism alongside their meals – Elliott describing lunches as say “Cardinal Newman and mulligatawny soup with for me the bits strained out”.
At the age of nine and three quarters Elliott reflects that the “spastic and mongoloid and mental” conditions of the children was a sign of “not divine love but divine indiffernence or rather non-divine non-existence” but decides to put his trust “entirely completely” in God and test him by praying for a visit from his Mother in the next 12 months. When this does not materialise, Elliott loses his faith and very nearly his entire purpose for life, despairing of the ”atrocious selfishness of his mode of existence” – his physical condition rendering him he feels unable to offer any form of help to anyone else.
The reader though – particularly a Christian reader – cannot help but observe that Elliott’s life is far closer to the real Gospel, and his understanding of the teaching of Christ far greater, than that of some of the Nuns around him (albeit for many of them their care for the children is clearly sacrificial and motivated by service and mercy).
It is hard not to be reminded though in Elliott’s life of this list: (re ordered to fit the novel): self-control (of his mind, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, love (for Jim), finally joy (at the book’s end) and of course (throughout) patience.
Elliott’s greatest abilities and greatest lessons for us are to make so great an experience from so little, to examine even the most mundane and limiting circumstances for their variety, meaning and experience, to approach life with a wonderful mixture of optimism and hope while still being fully aware of its sadness and tragedy.
It says everything about the power of this novel that its most beautifully transcendent moment occurs with Elliott bleeding and dazed, tipped off his wheelchair and lying in a urine stained layby.
This is a desperately beautiful, emotionally intense, and uniquely moving novel....more
So I will just add a few thoughts and observations of my own.
The writing is earthy, scatalogically, viscerally evocative – I am not sure I have read many books where the effect of the writing goes beyond mental images to almost physical impact.
But it is also, particularly in the first part, written in a style which can only be described as florid (excessively elaborate) and complex, using English vocabulary the meaning of which I found myself having to check.
That first part is narrated by an unknown omniscient narrator (the start of the third part initially seemed to imply to me that the first two parts might be narrated by the elderly Eleonore to her great grandson Jerome, but I changed my view on this as I carried on reading.
Given the narrator does not seem to be a particular character looking back, and given the use of a continuous present tense, and that passages are described alongside characters being described as watching or observing, then I can only really see the passages as representing those same characters viewpoints.
Now it is very difficult for an educated, literary adult writer to voice either an uneducated peasant or a child, or particularly an uneducated peasant child, but I cannot see these two passages as representing anything even close to a successful attempt:
Animated by a fragile grace, his fingers race along the buttons like the tremulous legs of a moth, the death’s-head hawkmoths that eclose from chrysalides in the potato fields. Then he gets up, comes to the table and when the genetrix in turn sits down, raised his joined hands to his face, his proximal phalanges interlaced ….
Tegenaria spiders have woven and rewoven dense funnel webs, frozen by the sediment of time, swollen and made heavy as oriental hangings by dirt, sawdust, the husks of insects and the translucent chitin moulded by distant generations of arachnids.
In the third and fourth parts, the writing retains its evocative qualities while shedding its more florid tendencies and to my fascination (given these two passages were the ones that I noted in the first part as most troubling me) I found in the third part, almost the same passages re-written:
Serge sits back in his chair, steepling his fingers in front of his face.
.. spiders in shadowy haylofts that weave webs .. that .. are still there a year, a decade, even a century later, the web a little dustier, a little thicker, a little more forbidding
So is there something deliberate in this over-writing?
The strongest section for me, by far, was the second – that set in the First World War, as we see the impact on an male-dominated, sustenance farming society of the young men suddenly going to war, see the fear and tragedy felt by families as those young men do not return, the changed society to which the survivors do return, and the mental and physical legacy of violence with which they return, and the impact which that has in turn on society.
I enjoyed as passage - as the farmer sons come to terms with the violence they are now expected to enact for the sake of a war in a previously very distant world (a war, in which in my views, surely the horrendous loss of live, and the institutional indifference to it, had its origins in the world of industry not of agriculture)
Since birth they have watched killings. They have watched their fathers and mothers take the lives of animals. They learned the gestures and copied them. They in turn have killed hares, cocks, cattle, piglets, pigeons. They have shed blood and sometimes drunk it. They know the smell, the taste. But a Boche? How do you kill as Boche. Surely this would make them murderers, even if this is a war?
The third and fourth parts however were spoiled for me by the rather heavy handed and far from subtle denunciation of modern farming: if the aim is to convert or provoke the reader, I find this kind of literature-as-preaching typically tends to provoke a counter-reaction in me (in this case making myself a bacon butty). A sense of perspective seems to have been sacrificed for polemic.
As an example of the excessiveness is this key passage:
This coldness, this hard-won indifference to the animals has never quite managed to stifle in Joel a confused loathing that cannot be put into words, the impression – and, as he grew, the conviction – that there is a glitch – one in which pig rearing is at the heart of some much greater disturbance beyond his comprehension, like some machine that it unpredictable, out of kilter, by its nature uncontrollable, whose misaligned cogs are crushing them, spilling out into their lives, beyond their borders, the piggery as the cradle of their barbarism and that of the whole world.
Now in among the descriptions of the natural world, this section features both a grass snake (at two metres) and a male domesticated pig (at four metres) that seem to mirror the excessiveness of the writing – so again I ask is this deliberate?
Overall certainly a very interesting book - and one which makes the Man Booker International shortlisting of another polemical, pro animal rights, anti Catholic, book from the same publisher look even odder than it already was....more