Lang was a man of science. But, in that first incision, a fleeting feeling arose; complex, multifaceted, yet fleeting nonetheless. All the compartm
Lang was a man of science. But, in that first incision, a fleeting feeling arose; complex, multifaceted, yet fleeting nonetheless. All the compartments of his life began to collapse into one another; his own flesh opening beneath his instrument, his insides mixing with the air around him. A word he hated: contamination. Exposure. He nearly pulled the scalpel away, but the thing passed – he relaxed. He’d had a coffee later than normal, he was just jittery. This body is very well preserved, remarkably so, but that is no cause for alarm. These things happen. He shook his head side to side a little, and as he returned steadily to the performance of tasks that had long ago become habitual – the slicing, the peeling back, the extracting, the measuring, the stitching back together – his mind began to wander, the film of memory beginning to play
This book is published by 87 Press, “South London’s radical publishing collective” and is the debut novel of the writer and academic Jessica Widner, currently a doctoral candidate at the University of Edinburgh working on a thesis that explores reading as an embodied, sensual process in contemporary women’s fiction.
The book, which moves between a series of appropriately interior first party perspectives, opens with a medical examiner - Noah Lang - performing an autopsy on the body of a young man whose death by drowning under a bridge is possibly a suicide (due to the heavy alcohol in his bloodstream) and possibly more suspicious (due to some head trauma).
Lang who professionally is always outwardly extremely composed (including to those who know him best such as his yoga-loving and secretly-Medium-visiting Therapist wife Kitty) has always secretly thought of himself as something of a psychopomp guiding the dead to the next life, but has also always successfully managed to largely insulate himself from any lingering impact of his autopsies.
Here however he finds himself both drawn to the dead body and also haunted by the memory of Lola(Lolita) a leading ballerina who came to identify the body as that of her closest friend – Owen (a poet). Owen we quickly realise when we switch (via Kitty) to Lola’s interior, was a lifelong friend (and she comes to realise occasional lover) of Lola’s now estranged husband Thomas – having left some time back he returned more recently (after Lola and Thomas split) and formed a deep friendship with Lola.
Our next shift takes us into the mind of Owen – post death and now in some form of limbo/purgatory/bardo (note that the book is very specifically non-categorical about religion and the idea of quantum immortality via parallel existences is also discussed in the novel). Owen is faced (in a scene reminiscent of the beginning and end of the 2022 Booker winner “The Seven Moons of Maali Almeida”) with the choices to go back, stay in the limbo (but face the dissolution of his existence) or go forward into the unknown.
Returning to Lang (known in most cases as “The Doctor” to the other characters – which I have to say is one of the rare missteps in the novel as it can make the book read a little too like a Dr Who script) he finds himself in a series of very vivid and real dreams where he meets with and talks with Owen – who seems to be looking for a “reader” who can help him make sense of his life, death and future.
And when Lang reaches out to Lola (the two both deeply impacted by their earlier encounter at the identification) he finds that she too is being visited by Owen, and later the initially sceptical Kitty (first assuming Lang’s claims are cover for an affair he intends to embark on with a very attractive ballerina) finds herself drawn in as well.
At the book’s climax Owen draws all three of them to visit his now seemingly corporeal self at a ruined abbey on an Irish island (Derrynane Abbey) – with the climax not perhaps fully living up to the earlier promise of what is a memorable and literally haunting novel which serves as a fascinating examination of both the inner life and what lives on after death.
That thing she was telling me the other day, what was it, something about redistributing matter – the redistribution of matter – yes, you know I couldn’t stop thinking about it after she said it! But then I started to feel worried, and I couldn’t stop thinking about all the things that are not matter – the immeasurable things, and I started to think about what is lost, other than matter, which as you know, breaks down, becomes other. But what about that which was not matter to begin with, you know, the inner life, all of that. All of that too becomes lost. And I couldn’t stop thinking that no, surely it isn’t lost, it can’t just be obliterated like that. A whole life – the dreams we don’t remember, the fantasies that unspool in our heads before we fall asleep. The thoughts we have that are too terrible to name. The memories, memories of things that happened when we were the only ones there to witness them. Things that leave no record. The invisible things that expand within the self. They cannot disappear, that can’t simply vanish. Tell me, Doctor, where do they go? I am not religious, I will not say the soul. But the inner life, that suffuses the whole body. The limbs, the organs… all the desire that animates the flesh and voice. Oh, I am very worried about it
The office worker relates to her output as a stranger does to her knuckles on a person’s door. The gesture is tentative, even slavish. A sheet of p
The office worker relates to her output as a stranger does to her knuckles on a person’s door. The gesture is tentative, even slavish. A sheet of paper, a file, some mail. She is alienated not just from her boss and co-workers, but from herself, because her work goes somewhere invisible. She might as well be an orange in a supermarket. Who judges and cares for her? The person who sucks her juices.
This book is published by Divided – a small press split between London and Brussels who “publish authors who cannot balance or resolve their contradictions. The experimental form of the writing comes out of a need.”
It is effectively the joint publication of two separate pieces by Fanny Howe, a 1940 born American poet, novelist and short story writer, both of which were largely written and effectively published in some form the previous century. Of these the first is a fragmentary novella, the second a series of poems.
London-rose was written in 1994 when the author was working in London. The narrator of the book (which is at least partly auto-fictional) has a job in the UK (but for a US firm) “correcting errors others had made. I took cross county trains every other week to visit young people and administrators to see if their grades were equivalent to grades in the US”. The novella is written in a very fragmentary form as she travels around the UK (but also further afield in Europe) and muses on among other things – alienation, the world of office work and interns (and in particular on the way in which the office work is increasingly alienated from their role due to the level of abstraction in the jobs they perform), spirituality, Marxism and its critiques of capitalism, WWII and the holocaust (she visits Buchenwald with a Professor), a number of literary and non-fictional references.
The elliptical and sometimes aphoristic style reminded me at times of say Jenny Offill or Patricia Lockwood (although its clear that if anything Howe would have inspired their writing) but with perhaps greater use of poetic description.
London-rose itself takes its name from when the writer misheard (or misread) the name of Lansdowne Park while in Dublin – and I have to say that my own inability to see how the two could easily be mixed-up (in either speech or words) probably acts as an apt metaphor for my inability to fully ollow the way in which the author mixes up or juxtaposes the different strands of this novella.
But I felt that the best way to appreciate this novella was as I would poetry – in an impressionistic sense, drawing on what connections I could but also appreciating some of the imagery and amorphisms in their own right and overall I found this an enjoyable if difficult read.
Beauty Will Save The World was previously published in a different version in 1985 as “Introduction to the World”. An introduction to the influences on the collection starts with “a course called Introduction to Spirituality which concentrated on the Gospel of John” and a Method section refers to “press[ing] order into the vast untamed thinking in John” but unfortunately despite my very strong familiarity with the wonderful writing in John’s Gospel, I was, beyond the superficial, struggling to see any real links to it in the poems or gain any real purchase on the meaning of the poetry (of which I felt I had lost the gist) – something which probably reflects more on my own inadequacies as a reader rather than any failing of a vastly experienced author.
The brown recluse wears a violin design No dolls but a prayer wheel. It's a spider Who trusts the fall like an expert This is a very old child's story Absolute otherness gives the weight to gravity Before the job was complete the Lord paid us Work's never been as good again Pass. All pass. The North cashed the ice in And seven days of solid mist Lay in which to plan well and lose the gist
Daniel James’ “The Unauthorised Biography of Ezra Maas” was one of the very best books I have read over the last 5 years – a book that is far more thaDaniel James’ “The Unauthorised Biography of Ezra Maas” was one of the very best books I have read over the last 5 years – a book that is far more than just a normal read but, for the willing reader, an immersive experience: just as one example anyone reading or reviewing the book on Twitter is likely to find themselves followed and even targeted by the shadowy Maas Foundation whose aim is to discredit the book and those who support it.
Some of the distinctive features of “The Unauthorised Biography of Ezra Maas” include: its heavy concentration on doubles/twins; its extensive use of footnotes to perhaps tell an even more important story than the main text; a feature of those who wish to conceal their true identity behind a pseudonym; its often lengthy description of pieces of artwork (from paintings to conceptual artpieces to books) whose authorship not to mention even existence is shrouded in disputed.
In 2022 it was re-published by Valley Press in a much enhanced version, achieving a deservedly greater recognition than in its first publication.
This book is something of an academic companion volume (also by Valley Press) to “The Unauthorised Biography of Ezra Maas”: a series of “essays, fictions, fragments and artefacts” by a variety of “scholars, artists and authors” which reflect on and explore the book, Ezra Maas and Daniel James and the interactions between all three often in a wider artistic context.
Examples include explorations of: the value-paradigm of modern art; fiction and non-fiction in a post-truth world; metaphysical detective stories; the role of gender and gender switching in art; reflection and doppelgangers (including some reflection on Maas and his relationship to my favourite book from University (*) – Douglas Hofstadter’s “Gödel, Escher, Bach”); a Soviet era spy story which brings a new dimension to the Maas phenomenon.
And I should say up front that even read as conventional academic pieces or fictional concepts they are excellent – but as with its predecessor there is so much more here.
(*) I should state here as it will become pertinent at the end of my review that I studied mathematics at Cambridge alongside my own twin brother
Early on in “The Unauthorised Biography of Ezra Maas” the anonymous editor of that book (who also bookends this volume) says:
Every reader changes the story, bringing it to life and making it real, every reader plays their part, just as I have played mine.
The part that I played in ““The Unauthorised Biography of Ezra Maas”: I was I believe something of an initial champion of the book; I described it in my review (the top ranked on Goodreads) as “A multi-layered examination of identity and myth and a magnificent hybrid of multiple literary forms that is never less than enthralling”; I was heavily involved (both in suggesting its nomination and then in BTL debates) on in its controversial non-winning of the Guardian’s “Not The Booker Award” (an award I had judged the year before when I had unsuccessfully backed Marc Nash’s brilliant “Three Dreams In the Key of G” (Marc subsequently first drawing me into the mysterious world of Maas).
Now bearing in mind my comments on the distinctive features of “The Unauthorised Biography of Ezra Maas” one can imagine my surprise to find while reading this brilliant volume that:
- The 11th, 12th and 17th footnotes feature my twin brother
- Pages 21- 25 contain a reproduction of Paul’s Goodreads review of the latest edition of “The Unauthorised Biography of Ezra Maas”
- Despite my attempts to maintain my anonymity (or at least slightly shield my identity) on my book related social media (Goodreads, Twitter, Instagram) (**) the 16th and 18th footnotes explicitly identify me by my real name
- The 16th footnote features my own reflections on the Guardian NTB controversy
- Page 26 has the same extract from my own review of the first edition of that book as I have reproduced above
(**) to the surprise of the authors of my Golden Reviewer Books of both 2021 and 2022 – Natasha Brown and Maddie Mortimer both of whom I had the pleasure to meet this year and both who knew my reviews of their books …….. and perhaps to you as a follower of my reviews ………. I am not in fact a Golden Retriever.
- The very detailed bibliography at the back of the book lists a book “Twin Psychologies and Fatal Symmetries” purportedly written by my twin brother and I but with one clear and I think deliberately signalled error – the book is claimed to be published by Oxford University Press.
Now the latter is simply inconceivable – in my maths undergraduate days if a lecturer unadvisedly listed a book by OUP in the recommended reading materials for the course, Paul and I would join in (if not lead) the justifiable jeering.
I therefore followed this up via Twitter with what at least purports to be the account of Daniel James (considerable doubt has been placed on the reliability of this account by the Maas foundation but they are of course the masters of disinformation), the listed author of the first book and one of two main subjects of this book - to which he replied
I did suspect [the Maas Foundation] had interfered with the typeset….. and that they were also responsible for some of the strange anomalies on the Maas Wikipedia page... I warned Valley Press they had to be mindful who had access to the files during the printing process, but VP have a tendency to underestimate the Foundation's reach........
Overall hugely recommended.
I can only urge you to read this book and its predecessor and prepare to play your own part....more
#14 of the Ruth Galloway novels – a series of crime novels featuring a Norfolk based forensic archaeologist and of particular interest to me given my #14 of the Ruth Galloway novels – a series of crime novels featuring a Norfolk based forensic archaeologist and of particular interest to me given my interests in both Norfolk and archaeology (see my review of “The Janus Stone”).
I have read all of the novels this year – and finally caught up to the latest in the series, which is set in 2020.
Probably the first 2/3 of the book are very much a slow burner. There is the usual combination of a modern day mystery and discovery of ancient bones but the mystery is more of a unease/hunch (a couple of suicides which seem out of character and where something seems slightly off - which leads the police to look for some further cases and then try to find a link) and the ancient bones (a possible plague victim in Norwich’s Tombland) more a chance to introduce two of Ruth’s new students and give them an obsession with the real life legend of the Grey Lady (said to be the ghost of a girl sealed in a house with her plague victim parents whose bodies she then ate to try and stay alive).
The additional complications are: a new neighbour for Ruth with who she forms an instant bond but who leaves others a little uneasy; a mysterious photo which Ruth finds when going through her mother’s effects which seems to be a photo of Ruth’s saltmarsh house before Ruth was even born. Even in the final 1/3rd neither story line has quite the over-dramatised impact of some of the earlier books in the series and the way in which one of the key characters is put into peril works rather more naturally in COVID.
I had mixed feelings on the treatment of COVID and lockdown – much of it was very good I thought and seemed to really capture the early and evolving days of COVID and the rapid developments into lockdown. Having it reflected through characters with whose daily routines and characters we are already familiar was advantageous as it allowed the reader to see the different impacts and reactions. I also think the implicit link between plague victims and COVID and the locked room and lockdown was well handled.
Where I was decidedly less keen was on the way in which so many of the characters seemed to blatantly flout the lockdown regulations – in particular given the over zealous way in which, in real life, the police (including I know the Norfolk police) enforced regulations even when they did not have the force of law, I think Nelson would almost certainly have been reported and forced to resign for basically treating it as a way to facilitate his continuing infidelity.
The final solutions to the mystery of the photo and to the student and suicide storylines seemed to me to respectively rely on a far-fetched (and unnecessary) coincidence and on rather implausible motive.
So overall one of the books in the series where the soap opera elements work and the mystery parts do not....more
This is how it always starts. Nelson asks for your advice and, the next thing you know, you're involved in some horrible murder case, being chased
This is how it always starts. Nelson asks for your advice and, the next thing you know, you're involved in some horrible murder case, being chased by some madman.'
#13 of the Ruth Galloway novels – a series of crime novels featuring a Norfolk based forensic archaeologist and of particular interest to me given my interests in both Norfolk and archaeology (see my review of “The Janus Stone”).
Ruth is now firmly to the relief of her daughter, cat and this reader back in Norfolk (promoted to head of her Department after Phil’s retirement) – although with a pushy new colleague who has taken her old role.
The book opens - in what is now a classical ancient body/modern body trope in this series - with an eponymous group of night-time metal detectorists out on Blakeney Point simultaneously finding what looks like a Bronze Age hoard (and a skeleton) and a recently deceased body floating in the sea nearby. Shortly after a policeman involved with the investigations dies of some type of infection, followed by the parents of one of the group being discovered dead in their remote farmhouse in what is seemingly a murder/suicide by the father and with a seeming suicide note which refers to a body buried in the garden.
From there three main strands intertwine in the narrative: the Norfolk legend of the Black Shuck (although it’s use here is straight out of the Scooby Doo plot line textbook); illegal medical research (a plot line left rather unexplained); the typically intertwined school pasts of the various members of the Night Hawks group and the links to Ruth’s new colleague
And of course inevitably there is the usual false jeopardy to the main characters (perhaps even more so in this book than others).
From a local colour viewpoint I enjoyed a trip Ruth, her new colleague and their children had to seal watch at Blakeney Point but remain unconvinced the author has really grasped the distance from the Wells Quay to the beach despite apparently drawing on an excellent book I read last year by the Wells Harbour Master.
#12 of the Ruth Galloway novels – a series of crime novels featuring a Norfolk based forensic archaeologist and of particular interest to me given my #12 of the Ruth Galloway novels – a series of crime novels featuring a Norfolk based forensic archaeologist and of particular interest to me given my interests in both Norfolk and archaeology (see my review of “The Janus Stone”).
The book opens with Nelson and colleagues celebrating the conviction of the enigmatic but Ivor March for the some time ago murder of two women (whose bodies with his DNA were found buried in the garden of his girlfriend) – but Nelson is convinced, due to similarities in the case, that March also murdered two other girls (with a similar appearance) more recently, while March still refuses to admit to the initial two murders.
At the same time Ruth is at a writing retreat – and it quickly becomes clear that the writing retreat is very connected to March, having initially been set up as almost a commune with a group of women who seemed drawn to (and still somewhat obsessed with March) and a group of men who took an eponymous nickname (based on a rather threatening Norfolk/fenland legend) and took it upon themselves to rescue females waifs and strays and bring them to the commune for a period.
Ruth has moved with Frank to Cambridge but firstly it is not far enough away to derail the series (unlike the ill-advised books set in Blackpool and Italy) and anyway she is summoned back when March offers to Nelson to tell him where the two other bodies are buried but only if Ruth carries out the excavation (with an implication that Ruth’s old boss Phil missed something in the excavation of the two initial bodies). That dig finds the two recently murdered girls but also a third body who seems to be that of an Eastern European backpacker who was one of the girls “rescued” by the Lantern Men. Meanwhile Phil is mugged for his laptop and has a subsequent heart attack.
The book culminates with a cycle race along the North Norfolk coast (including road and sand dunes) starting from Titchwell and heading East – with almost all of those involved in the old commune and March involved (including the Porter at Ruth’s Cambridge college), as well as Nelson’s daughter Laura – an increasingly major character) and with Ruth, Cathbad and various of the police in attendance – and that is combined with an unexpected return of Ruth to her now Saltmarsh old home and to almost a repeat of what happens to her at the end of the very first book of the series.
That ending has the usual lack of jeopardy which blights the series. Further the storyline itself seems far fetched and the motivations of March and those around him seems rather incomprehensible.
But the idea of a bike race finale as an alternative to the classic genre idea of gathering detective and suspects in a manor house was I thought very original (the race itself I thought was a neat idea if probably impractical with the beach sections and with a seeming misunderstanding of the distance from the coastal road to the beach/sea around Holkham).
I also enjoyed the strong local colour – particularly Cley Nature Reserve visitor centre, Dippy at Dinosaur Land, Wayland Prison and the QE2 hospital at Kings Lynn and I loved the book’s ending and the promise of a return to Norfolk....more
'Just like old times,' says Phil. 'You and Nelson hunting for a killer on the Saltmarsh.'
Ruth stares at him. Can he really be saying those words s
'Just like old times,' says Phil. 'You and Nelson hunting for a killer on the Saltmarsh.'
Ruth stares at him. Can he really be saying those words so lightly? Can anyone, even Phil, not be aware of how much the last case cost her, how many lives were lost or changed for ever?
Does the discovery of the bones mean that she is about to be involved in another murder investigation? What will it be like to be working closely with Nelson again, especially with Michelle's baby about to be born any day? The whole thing - the dig on the Saltmarsh, Erik's son materialising - feels uncomfortably like one of those dreams where the past replays itself but with certain details subtly altered. When she first dug on these marshes she was in her twenties, single, just about to embark on her academic career. Now she's still single but she has a seven year-old daughter and an extremely complicated romantic past. Her career, too, seems to have stalled. She's a senior lecturer at UNN but it's a fairly lowly institution in the middle of nowhere. She should really be looking for a new job at a better university. She has written two books which were well received in academic circles even if they didn't trouble the best-seller lists.
#11 of the Ruth Galloway novels – a series of crime novels featuring a Norfolk based forensic archaeologist and of particular interest to me given my interests in both Norfolk and archaeology (see my review of “The Janus Stone”).
Thankfully after the Steptoe-and-Son movie misstep of “The Dark Angel” this is perhaps Erik-and-Son - a return to the core of the series in North Norfolk – in fact if anything a little too much of a Back to Basics as the plot is a very explicit and deliberate re-run of the first book in the series “The Crossing Places” (as well as some of the events that took place before that book) with among the various repeats of that book: an excavated henge; an ancient burial; the discovery of the body of a long-missing modern day girl; the search for a recently-abducted girl (missing children being a slightly overused trope across all the series); mysterious and slightly threatening letters addressed to Nelson; mortal peril for some of the series key characters (another overused trope); and in particular a charismatic but seemingly slightly unhinged Scandinavian Archaeologist.
Erik’s son Leif is excavating a newly discovered Stonehenge with a bronze age body and a modern body is discovered which is quickly identified as a long missing girl who disappeared on the day of the Charles and Diana wedding, her disappearance never solved. At the same time Nelson receives letters which seem reminiscent of those he received in the “The Crossing Places” murder. The DNA of one of the original suspects – a loner and beachcomber – is found on the bones but not on the ropes used to originally bind the girl and it seems also that the body has only been recently moved having been originally been buried in Scarning Fen, but before this can be investigated he is found (professionally) murdered as well as being found to be the author of the letters.
Investigations then concentrate on the family members and friends of the recently discovered girl. As a complication the girl’s niece (daughter of the dead girl’s sister) befriends Michelle at a mother and baby group only for her own daughter to be abducted. Michelle and Nelson’s daughter – Laura – becomes a much more rounded and main character in this book.
One small comment: for all its Norfolk colour (the Tuesday market place in Kings Lynn, the Jack Valentine tradition, the beautiful saltmarsh descriptions) there is at least one misstep with tourists walking around Wells Quay taking pictures of the Beach Huts (which are probably around a mile away). I also wonder if the author has really understood North Norfolk Coast houseprices given the Wells based cottage that Cathbad and Judy live in.
Overall this was one of the more enjoyable books in the series if rather too derivative of the opening of the series....more
#10 of the Ruth Galloway novels – a series of crime novels featuring a Norfolk based forensic archaeologist and of particular interest to me given my #10 of the Ruth Galloway novels – a series of crime novels featuring a Norfolk based forensic archaeologist and of particular interest to me given my interests in both Norfolk and archaeology (see my review of “The Janus Stone”).
I would call this book in the series the equivalent of films such as “Holiday On The Buses”, “Are You Being Served”, “Steptoe and Son”: successful seventies sitcoms seeking an alternative setting – with the scriptwriters taking their familiar cast to a holiday location (with a more or less preposterous plot to explain why all the familiar cast of characters end up in the same place).
Because the author takes her cast to Italy (in the Lazio region) – Ruth asked by an Italian archaeologist (with who she had a one-night stand) to assist him with a Roman grave site travels with Shona (and their two children) and are later joined by Nelson and Cathbad (concerned to read of a nearby earthquake).
In Italy they walk into a multi-period historic tension which seems to largely revolve around the Partisan/Fascist split in WWII, but has aspects of tension as far back as the wars between Rome and the local tribes and as current day as the resented presence of a Syrian refugee (this multiperiod split was I think the best part of the novel) and which leads to the murder of the local priest (albeit this takes almost half the book to happen). Back home a criminal Nelson arrested for a house fire murder of his family has been released on parole – years before the criminal vowed vengeance on the police but now claims to be a born-again Christian.
Overall, I think this is probably the weakest of the series, at least for me.
Both sets of tension (in Italy and Norfolk) seem to take something of a back-seat to the character on holiday storyline – too many scenes seem to be a combination of what is becoming a rather repetitive Ruth/Norman soap opera (with a Tim/Michelle side story) and an excuse to write scenes set in Italy (with also rather too much watching of Disney DVDs). I did initially like the way that the book flipped between scenes in Italy and Norfolk but this did reach a rather poor climax with two identical gun-pointing scenes in each location.
The “sit” (the normal setting of the books) in North Norfolk is for me easily the main appeal of the books, which are in a genre I would not normally read – so a switch to what seems like a rather cliched (*) Italian setting takes away much of the book’s appeal as well as seeming to share the self-indulgence of the seventies sitcom movie idea. (*) I would note that the author’s real name is Domenica de Rosa and she wrote four books largely set in Italy before turning to Ruth Galloway so there is presumably some authenticity here)
One thing that I dislike about the series is Ruth’s dislike of organised religion (particularly Christianity) so it is fairly clear and disappointing where the born-again Christian storyline is heading.
Another criticism of the series for me has been both the coincidence and lack of jeopardy in having too many of the crimes featuring danger to the main characters of the series. Now here the coincidences continue but are at least better explained (with the vengeful ex-criminal) and to be fair this time the lack of jeopardy disappears in one case with a main character actually dying. However the choice of character is I think (at best) very disappointing particularly as a resolution of a storyline which bears a rather unfortunate resemblance to the ending of “Steptoe and Son” (unfortunate as it seems very dated).
Let’s hope for a return to North Norfolk next time around....more
#9 in my Booker Prize longlist rankings after reading all the longlist books twice. My Instagram post oShortlisted for the 2024 Dublin Literary Prize
#9 in my Booker Prize longlist rankings after reading all the longlist books twice. My Instagram post on what worked for me, what did not, my favourite quote and of course a book-themed Golden Retriever photo here:
Longlisted for the 2023 Booker Prize - which caused me to re-read the book 10 months after my first reading.
Enough time goes by and it is as if old things never happened. Things once fresh, immediate, terrible, receding away into old God's time, like the walkers walking so far along Killiney Strand that, as you watch them, there is a moment when they are only a black speck, and then they're gone. Maybe old God's time longs for the time when it was only time, the stuff of the clockface and the wristwatch. But that didn't mean it could be summoned back, or should be. He had been asked to reach back into memory, as if a person could truly do that.
On a re-read my thoughts were very similar to the first time.
The writing is undoubtedly consistently strong and not infrequently (small in joke there as Tom enjoys his double negatives) brilliant. On a descriptive/complex sentence level only Paul Harding and Paul Lynch from the longlist can compete with Sarah Bernstein taking a more enigmatic route to her excellence.
Some passages are, slightly oddly, written in a clear omniscient narrator voice and these (for example one on neutrinos) are some of the most transcendent. But much of the rest seems to be the close third person voice of Tom and while many very cleverly contain metaphors, similes and other imagery which closely match what we know of Tom and his lives experience, others - as seems effectively to be a repeated stylistic choice of Barry - seem much more the author’s voice than his character’s. And Barry himself it should be noted sees the voice as effectively Tom’s : He is reliable in the sense that he is actually experiencing what is being described (by me, in the third person). I felt my job was to be his witness and to see and hear what he was seeing and hearing, and to take it down faithfully, and not butt in.
In terms of my main reservations (and in fact let me add one - the choice of a native reservation and the fate of Joe seems an odd choice of cultural appropriation): the blurring of time and reality was less bothersome to me this time (and perhaps more clearly signposted than I remembered) as well as justified by Tom’s long term and accumulative PTSD; while by contrast the catalogue of horrors was if anything worse second time (not least as I had forgotten some of them). Barry has said of the graphicness of the revelations (particularly around clerical abuses) My understanding of abuse is, the survivor carries terrible imagery which is so hard to erase, and even harder to suppress. My prayer was that, by being forensic in my descriptions when necessary, readers might elect to take on some of those images and memories, as an act of solidarity - but I feel this does not address the frequency of horrors which also go much beyond this.
But overall I think this could well appear in the shortlist and while it will probably not make my own list I could not even begrudge this highly talented author a Booker win.
ORIGINAL REVIEW FROM OCTOBER 2022
Quoth the raven, never would be. Here was now, a light year removed from that reverberating day, and all the things that followed, all the hard things, the happy things, the happier things. The usual fog cleared a moment from his mind. The small hours were refining him down, like a rough whiskey. What would God want to take from his story, he wondered. St bloody Peter at his gate. What was important in all this, his life, his life, like any other life? He thought suddenly of all the detectives on the earth, and all the detectives that had been on the earth – would it be hundreds of thousands? Would they be herded into the detective enclosure? And made to race against each other like horses? All the detectives – the violent crimes, the rapes, the murders, the con jobs, the robberies, the frauds, the very waterspout, the waterfall, the great flood of crimes in human stories. The hubbub, the hubbub. That had so concerned them all. Like the waterfall in Powerscourt, pouring down, pouring down. And all these men, in all the languages of the world, all the races, all the forces, trying to peer in, to weigh up, to come to conclusions, to strike it lucky, cop a break, to squeak a case through by the skin of its teeth. What was their worth, their own weight? And what was at the heart of it? His life, his little life? The fog edged away from the shore of himself, the sea opened like the stage in a theatre, the helpful sun burned in its element, there was a truth told to him, a truth, in his curious age, in his palpable decay, that there at the heart of it, there at the heart of it, for ever and always, was June. Winnie and Joseph and June. But June.
Sebastian Barry is a much garlanded writer: most notably twice Costa Novel of The Year winner (both times then going on to win Costa Book of the Year across all categories) and four times longlisted for the Booker Prize (two of which books went on to be shortlisted), he has also won the Kerry Group Irish Fiction Prize, the Irish Book Awards Best Novel, the Walter Scott Prize, the Independent Booksellers Prize and the James Tait Black Memorial Prize.
This is his first novel since the widely acclaimed “Days Without End” and its sequel “A Thousand Moons”. Those excellent novels (the only ones I have read) featured a very distinctive writing style: one which mixes plain speaking characters, and descriptions of violence and harsh poverty, with beautifully poetic imagery conveying the grandeur, beauty and terror of the American landscape and weather. The books could I think be criticised on two aspects: a rather made-for-Hollywood plot (with rather too many improbable rescues) and an apparent disconnect between the writing style (clearly written as a first person reminiscence and not as an omniscient narrator) and the narrators background.
This book in short I would say: retains the evocative landscape writing - with the coast of Ireland substituted for the American plains; has a greater emphasis on interiority – but again conveyed in a beautifully crafted prose; retains the stark contrast between the beauty of the writing and the unpleasantness of much of what is being described (if anything I found that contrast stronger here); loses the made-for-Hollywood plot but retains a cinematic feel (more introspective art film than Hollywood Western); still has the slight disconnect that the beautiful prose is largely (not exclusively) the thoughts of the main character – even if this time expressed in the third person - and slightly incongruous to their background.
The set up of the book is relatively simple: Tom Kettle is a retired Irish policeman who has moved into a small lean-to on the side of a Castle on the Irish Sea Coast. He is widowed (having lost his beloved wife June) with two children – a daughter Winnie who is his solitary, occasional visitor and a son Joe who has emigrated to America (working as a locum on a pueblo in New Mexico) and seems set on a simple if melancholic life.
At the book’s opening two policeman visit him to ask for his help with a recently re-opened case concerning two allegedly abusive priests.
Immediately Tom is forced to revisit the ghosts of memories, feeling and actions that he had long suppressed, with the past effectively colonising the present and with both Tom and our views of what is real and what is dream or memory increasingly unclear among the gradually revealed horrors and truths.
On the strength side, in addition to the powerful writing, the book is a moving explanation of what it means to love and be loved, but one which is far from sentimental in its portrayal of the life long and generational impact of unpunished and unacknowledged abuse, and how even seeming justice can lead to an unbearable weight of guilt (particularly when coupled with the undeserved shame of a victim).
On the weaker side I did feel that the two key tropes of the book: the blurring of past/present and reality/memory/dreams; and the unspooling atrocities were both overdone (particularly the latter as ultimately the accumulative revelations end up dampening rather than reinforcing their impact).
But overall I think this is a book which will appeal hugely to existing Sebastian Barry fans – particularly those who enjoyed “Days Without End” as well as win him some new ones.
My thanks to Faber for an ARC via NetGalley
It was a story of atrocities, certainly. It was almost beyond description, and he had laboured for years not to describe it, to anyone else, and more importantly to himself. Never to allow the little sequence of horrors to play in his brain. Think everything else before he thought of those things. Think of things that did not exist, talk to the tumbleweeds of souls that did not exist. See ghosts before telling that story. Clamp his mind shut with heavy Victorian metal clamps. Now no more. It was no longer possible to be a citizen of grief, his passport to grief was cancelled, he couldn’t enter there. Now he must be brave. Of course, unbeknownst to him, he had been brave all his life. That was true, but not true for him. The main drone of the pipes he had heard under everything for sixty years and more was alarm and confusion, like the very pith of battle. Now that was not so, so much. He wondered was there God involved? Had he been released from his ordeal? He didn’t know. He could be suspicious of the brightness in him, in his limbs, in his almost ecstasy, as being something slipped into him by a medicinal god, like a needle with a vaccine in it. He didn't know. Something else knew. It might as well have phoned him on the telephone. Come in, come in, you can row that boat no more. The current was against you. Here is a little harbour. Rest up there.
Is this a story about a pony-tailed Chinaman bowler? Or a tale to go tell a pony-tailed Chinaman? That is for you to decide.
This is the first nov
Is this a story about a pony-tailed Chinaman bowler? Or a tale to go tell a pony-tailed Chinaman? That is for you to decide.
This is the first novel by the recent 2022 Booker laureate, first published in 2010 some 10 years before his second “Chats With The Dead” (the novel that after extensive editing by a UK publisher became the Booker winning “Seven Moons of Maali Almeida”) was published in India.
It has been voted the second greatest cricket book ever from a 150 book mainly non-fiction longlist by Wisden magazine (https://wisden.com/stories/magazine/b...) – and if you do not know what Wisden magazine is, then this may not be the book for you because this is a book which I think needs some detailed cricket knowledge to really enjoy it to its full.
Interestingly the unpublished and unedited manuscript of the prize won a Sri Lankan English language prize (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gratiae...) in 2008, but then failed to find either a local or international publisher willing to edit it, and so was self-published in 2010 by the author using his prize winnings; and then later republished (in India and internationally) by Penguin Random House in 2011 after nearly 100 pages were edited out – and I think (I am not sure) sections also added to the book to explain something of cricket and cricketing terms.
And it is perhaps even more interesting in that, in a meta-fictional conceit with which “The Chinaman” ends, there is extensive discussion of the edits needed to an earlier draft of the book we are reading (originally written by someone now deceased) to make it fit for publication, edits carried out by the original author’s son who chooses as a pen name “Shehan Karunatilaka” and who shares the real author’s penchant for playing bass.
I say interestingly because it feels like the author did not really learn either from his experience or his think though his own conceit: because while “Chats With The Dead” found a publisher and some success in India where Karunatilaka’s first novel had acquired something of a cult following, it completely failed to find an International publisher and was only eventually published outside of India after 2 years of rounds of editing to make it accessible for an international audience.
The title has a deliberate double meaning (as the opening quote implies) which cover the two key aspects of this book (extremely detailed discussion of cricket, and the intricacies and prejudices of Sri Lankan society):
A Chinaman is a (now for sensitivity reasons not really used term) for a wrong-un or Googly as bowled by a left arm wrist spinner
“Go tell a Chinaman with a ponytail” – is a Sri Lankan expression when confronted with an implausible tall story and it is very appropriate to have reference to the telling and receipt of tall tales for what is a book which is at heart a meta-fictional examination of the quest to find the truth behind the telling of cricketing legend.
That legend is Pradeep Sivanathan Mathew (see - pradeep.mathew.com, cric1nfo.com) – to those who saw him play one of the greatest Sri Lankan cricketers of all time, but now not just largely forgotten but seemingly erased from memory and record (as well as subject to official and unofficial suppression and discouragement when discussed) and more of a rumour or legend – it not even being known if he is dead or alive.
The quest is lead by our first party narrator – an chronically-ill with alcoholism. washed up (ex prize winning) sports journalist – WG (as in Grace) Karunasen also known as Wije (together with his next door neighbour).
As part of that quest we discover that Mathew is famous for among other things: a double bounce ball which almost impossibly manages to turn in two different directions; and an (again almost impossible) ability to bowl at top level not just left and right handed, but fast/medium/slow and to reproduce the distinctive bowling of other famous cricketers. We also discover an almost Forest Gump like ability to have influenced the course of Sri Lankan cricket (from some recommendations to the ICB followed through on organisational reform, to persuading Muralitharan to persist with his action to acting as a catalyst to Sri Lankan sledging skills).
It is a quest that brings in: a host of other characters (including two who later – although earlier in their fictional lives feature in Seven Moons – Jonny Gilhooley and IE Kugarajah, the first a benign but blighted presence here and the second a very threatening one very tied up in LTTE circles); a range of figures from the cricketing world including real ones (for example Kapil Dev, Javid Miandad, and a host of Sri Lankans), some made up ones often with deliberately composite names (an ex cricketer and commentator Graham Snow is key), some identifiable by titles or description (for example the GLOB – Great Lankan Opening batsman, or a miserable Yorkshire born ex-opener cricket commentator); a range of cricket matches and incidents some made up but many real (the ability to know which is which among both incidents and characters is a key reason a cricket knowledge is helpful); an overview of Sri Lankan cricket (including its racism, old school network, corruption and fixing); and a caustic but indirect examination of the many ills of Sri Lankan society (with cricket acting as a microcosm of wider societal issues and with the civil war and terrorism as more of a background than in “Seven Moons” while still very much present) and much more.
And so much more besides.
Overall, this is a very entertaining but chaotic novel – in many ways like its successor. But it is extremely appropriate that a book about a tricksy spinner is at times very difficult to read (with thanks to my brother for the joke).
“Wasting talent is a crime" says Graham. "A sin" concurs Ari. I think of Pradeep Mathew, the great unsung bowler. I think of Sri Lanka, the great underachieving nation. I think of W.G, Karunasena, the great unfulfilled writer. I think of all these ghosts and I can't help but agree
When released in the UK the novel was reviewed by Nicolas Lezard in the Guardian who, not surprisingly as a fan of cricket and champion of experimental literature, loved it and concluded his review “And the style ... well, I can hardly believe this is a first novel by someone self-described as a bass-player and advertising copywriter, the dumbest jobs in music and writing. He has with no apparent effort got into the mind of an articulate, wise, but despairing and cynical drunken old hack, and this long, languorous and winding novel has registers of tragedy, farce, laugh-out-loud humour and great grace. Karunatilaka is, I gather, writing another novel, but how it can be as good as this I can hardly imagine.”
Well I guess winning a Booker prize is a testament that the author managed – even if it did take 12 years. Unlike Mathews whose early promise lead to later fulfillment – in the shape of a story which, rather appropriately, used the ghosts of Sri Lanka to narrate its story....more
As I write about her, I'm tempted to describe her as she was before, specifically when I first met her, to put her back together at the moment of h
As I write about her, I'm tempted to describe her as she was before, specifically when I first met her, to put her back together at the moment of her greatest strength, instead of in the midst of her implosion. But that isn't the point, I remind myself, that is not the point: I'm not writing to patch up holes and make people (or myself) think that there's nothing to see here, but rather to bear witness to unintelligibilities and breaches and silences. That is my continuity, that of the scribe. But I'm comforted when she occasionally emerges from her detachment - itself perhaps a form of wisdom – with some impertinent remark that takes me back to how she used to be: witty, ironic, snobby, critical, at times even malicious. Can she have been all those things, or am I remembering wrong?
Charco Press is an Edinburgh-based small UK press – they focus on “finding outstanding contemporary Latin American literature and bringing it to new readers in the English-speaking world”.
This is the 8th (and final) book of their 6th year of publication, written by an Argentinian author (which still remain at the core of their publishing) – and is best I think described as a work of short fiction as the book has less than 90 pages (of which around 40 are blank) and is set out in around 45 short chapters (of which the paragraph above is an example of a typical chapter).
The book’s narrator is recording her regular, almost daily, visits to a close friend and ex-lover ML, suffering with Alzheimer’s and in its explores how ML’s memory, thoughts, language and even sense of personal identity change over time – at the same time the narrator herself, under the influence of the encounters, finds her own mind wandering, particularly during dreams at night.
I found this an enjoyable and affecting read although perhaps one better suited to being included in a short story collection than published stand alone.
The book is translated by the prolific Jennifer Croft, best known I think for her translations of Olga Tokarczuk and her campaign to have translators names on book covers (which has never been an issue with Charco who have always given translators equal billing to authors) – and reads very naturally (there are a few areas where the narrator discussed Spanish language concepts and I was unclear if these had needed additional exposition or whether the discussion had been expanded)....more
A fitting but flawed winner of the 2022 Goldsmith’s Prize.
It has at its heart the underreported injustice in the 1960s-1970s to the Chagossian peopleA fitting but flawed winner of the 2022 Goldsmith’s Prize.
It has at its heart the underreported injustice in the 1960s-1970s to the Chagossian people, forcibly deported from their archipelago which the British authorities partitioned from Mauritius immediately prior to the latter being granted its independence by the UK, making it a supposedly unpopulated new colony - the British Indian Ocean Territory as part of a decision to grant the US a cold war and later war-on-terror base on Diego Garcia.
My overall conclusion on the book is that it is an excellent fit for the Goldsmith’s Prize and Goldsmith’s University and a welcome challenge to past Goldsmith Prize practices – but did not quite work for me
It is a great fit for the Goldsmith’s Prize which looks to “reward fiction that breaks the mould or extends the possibilities of the novel form ……. [books that are] deemed genuinely novel and which embodies the spirit of invention that characterizes the genre at its best.” - as it has plenty of inventive elements not least in its treatment of its joint authorship – with two authorial stand in narrators, a melding of perspective and voices between he/she/we and at one stage literally side-by-side narratives of a day when the two characters part ways (other elements like email exchanges or transcribed interviews are I think more hackneyed).
It is a great fit for the Goldsmith’s University – known for its championing/celebration of (for its fans) thrillingly confrontational or (for its detractors) rather self-consciously parodiable performative art with a clear left-wing bias. For me this was most memorably signified when two weeks prior to a Goldsmith’s Prize shortlist announcement 30 tonnes of carrots were dumped beside the University “to provoke a discussion about the discord between rural and City life”. Here we have a novel which itself has layers of performative art – with the authorial stand-in narrators discussing the project which lies behind the book we are reading and whether performative art can really capture the experience of others but more so as the novel itself is only part of a wider project of tumblr performances, extract publications and so on.
The narrators seem to think the best way to fight injustice is to invent new nouns (honger, tubes, screens and blocks for hunger, cigarettes, smartphones and books) while doing no work at all, believing in wild conspiracy theories about the imminent collapse of the financial system and performing some desultory trading in bitcoins – all while complaining about a lack of money of course.
And the book is also a challenge to past practices of a Goldsmith Prize which in its previous 9 year history has shown a shocking lack of racial diversity in judging panels and shortlist/winner choices – with an excellent section in which one of the authorial stand-ins comments in amusing fashion on identical similar biases in a magazine prize for experimental writing.
But in terms of my own experience - it is telling that (due to a very long flight and overseas trip) I completed two books over the 24-36 hour period at which I started this one: one another of the Goldsmith shortlistees, the other a fictional account of the exact same historical injustice which fuels this book (and which incidentally even mentions this novel): both of those I devoured and hugely enjoyed.
This book despite being the intersection of the two forms - took me well over a week to read and even then I was flicking through pages – a combination I think of jet lag and my own disintetest in performative art and slight boredom with Wikipedia/fiction mashups which seems to have become too much of a trope in the more experimental end of literary fiction.
For, in my view, a more concise and focused treatment of the Chagossian read Philippe Sands “The Last Colony: A Tale of Race, Exile and Justice from Chagos to The Hague” – my review here (https://www.goodreads.com/review/show/5033337136). Interestingly and rather nicely Sands actually references this novel in his book.
Like I said, that was the plan. But I couldn't get a fix on Do Yeon-ssi's attention span at all. I felt her lose interest in our discussion. That h
Like I said, that was the plan. But I couldn't get a fix on Do Yeon-ssi's attention span at all. I felt her lose interest in our discussion. That happened fairly quickly. But--and here's the horror story--she lost interest without losing focus, continuing to respond to my inanities as if something was actually at stake. It's like this: At a marionette show you find four types of engaged audience - four different philosophies of enjoying the performance. There are those whose attention is reserved solely for the actions of the marionette: that's Arpad XXX, wishing to believe that the figure is alive in one way or another. Then there are the ones who can't and won't stop looking at the puppet master (or seeking signs of the puppet master, if that person is hidden): that's how Xavier is. There are those who watch the faces of their fellow audience members: my preference, obviously, since I'm the one here talking about the other types. And there are those who follow the strings and the strings alone. Do Yeon-ssi is a string watcher. She may not much care about the order of the strings – if they tangle, they tangle. Still, they express something to her, something about the nature of the illusion before her. That's enough of a reason for her to pursue the strings to their vanishing point.
I read this book due to its shortlisting for the 2022 Goldsmith Prize.
I had read the author’s previous novel “Gingerbread” about which I said “Oyeyemi is a master of what I can only call digressive description, never one to see a tangent and not want to go off on it, often building a fascinating side story … only to sate her imaginative appetite (if not always the readers interest) and return to the main narrative (if that can be even said to exist).” and “I was however reminded a little of the story of Hansel and Gretel’s second trip to the Gingerbread cottage: at times I would feel that I was starting to follow the trail of the narrative only to retrace my steps and see that those crumbs had been snatched away.” Adopting the author’s clear invitation to adopt four different philosophies to examine the book.
MARIONETTES
These major (there are a whole host of side characters) on a series of characters who converge on a train journey (and one who may or may not be present – more later) – an ex-tea smuggling train called The Lucky Day which for me had strong Faraway Tree vibes with a series of carriages each with their own distinctive set up and world, as well as in its old-fashioned winding journey Orient Express links (and the twin solutions to Christie’s novel – a stranger boarding the train and then exiting at risk, and every one on the train being responsible for the erasure of a person are both I think relevant to the novel).
The owner and permanent member of the train is Ava Kapoor, a theremin player and potential heiress (if only she can pass a sanity test) and she is joined there by her girlfriend and composer Allegra Yu and more recently by Laura de Souza a released convict (after a series of incidents including one in which she stalked and threatened the ex-North American Go Champion – wanting him to acknowledge a past victory she achieved over him which was dismissed by onlookers) who is now acting on behalf of a money lender with whom Ava has taken out a punitive loan on the security of her conditional inheritance.
Two others join this particular journey – Otto Shin (nee Montague) now a hypnotist and the first party narrator of the story and Xavier Shin (a ghostwriter and inadvertent plagiarist novelist): Otto and Xavier have recently cemented their relationship by deed poll and are on a “non-honeymoon honeymoon” paid for Xavier’s Auntie Do Yeon-ssi.
The humans are accompanied by two mongooses Otto’s Arpad (technically Arpad XXX from a long line of family mongooeses) and Ava’s purloined Chela.
PUPPET MASTER(S)
As in Gingerbread Oyeyemi’s adopted home of Prague and her love of K-Drama infuse the book with Czech and Korean references. Another key theme to the book is the female recluse – the epigraph is from Emily Dickinson, one interpreted by Oyeyemi in titular form as referring to the illusory peace of apparently stable relationships – and Oyeyemi has talked in an interview of how she wanted to explore her own female reclusiveness through the novel and the lens of Dickinson’s writing and life.
But the book has its own puppet master – or possible puppet in the mysterious person of Prem who seems (as we guess as the book progresses but have confirmed in a series of letters) to have interacted with each person on the train – although whether he is using them or each has in some ways used him is unclear (including to the characters). Most crucially Ava is literally unable to see Prem and does not believe in his existence – and her sanity test (for the inheritance from Prem’s father) seems to hinge on her final views here as well as the actuality of Prem’s existence or non-existence.
AUDIENCE MEMBERS
I have to commend the four fellow audience members who invited me to this marionette show. The Goldsmith judges: Ali Smith (something of a champion of Oyeyemi and herself of course a wonderful writer not least in the Seasonal Quartet and recent “Companion Piece”, Natasha Brown (author of my Golden Reviewer Best Book of 2022 – “Assembly”, Tom Gatti (New Statesman literary/culture editor) and Tim Parnell (of the University and Literary Director of the Prize) have picked an excellent shortlist.
Ali Smith, on behalf of the judges said of the book: "In a blast of visionary life and energy, and with a kind of jovial panache that casually analyses narrative while simultaneously shaking itself free of all preconceived expectations of narrative, Peaces busts us out of isolation, drops us into a train carriage with a bunch of strangers who aren't strangers after all (plus a couple of mongooses), and sends us on a journey of the psyche that liberates its readers into a state of brilliant rich-and-strangeness. ‘Here’s to unseeing the world.’ This novel unfixes everything and sends us out renewed."
Views of other invited audience members will be interesting – I think, in keeping with the prizes aim, this is a book which will appeal (in meta fashion) to those interested in the strings far more so than those interested in marionettes (particularly character and plot coherence).
STRINGS
I guess a key here is – does the book express something?
There are many sub-themes and ideas which could be explored – for example the link (if any) between the younger Laura (witnessed by Xaiver as a child on a different train journey) stuffing her mouth with Go stones and a mysterious Sichuan affair (part of Ava’s family history) which ended with one of her family stuffing her mouth with emeralds.
For me one of the key themes of the book is relationships and what it means to be seen and validated through the eyes of another, and equally importantly the dissolution of relationships and what it means to be unseen (particularly if such breaks are absolute – the book opens with the question “Have you ever had an almost offensively easy breakup?” – Otto believes he is the victim of one such breakup but as the novel progresses we more come to believe that Otto and Xavier were perpetrators).
In one crucial part, the characters view a series of paintings gifted to Ava which are ostensibly pure white frames but on which seemingly each can vocalise a description of the same image despite being unable to “see” it. Otto’s move into hypnosis (and helping other people unsee ideas or obsessions) has its roots in an incident when he nearly died trying to save someone he had “seen” from a fire in what was it seems an empty flat.
The author herself places some of these ideas, as well as her digressive nested story approach in a wider context of her overall project:
I feel like the whole stories within stories approach is part of what I think of as my big project as a writer. Ultimately, what I want to do is to try and find out what stories are actually made of, why we believe them, why they take hold of us, and why no matter what we do to try and control the story, or even to create a story, there’s some element of it that is just wild and almost seems to make itself. And also, I guess, whether stories are our friends or our enemies. I just have a lot of questions about what stories are, and the only way to try and interrogate or possibly persuade stories to reveal something about themselves is to make all these provocations and assaults on them, and try and unpack them and unpick their seams and see if they react. Will the story bite you back? Sometimes it does, and then you do sort of run off, but then you come back and have another approach.
So I think that in Peaces, in particular, there was an interesting new angle in that you have a character who almost is a story, and is trying very hard to move out of storyhood and into personhood, and is somehow being prevented and limited by… well, mainly by Ava. I found Ava so inscrutable. I kept wanting to see if she would wink or something. I really couldn’t figure out what she was doing with this whole, There is no Přem. I honestly couldn’t tell you the answer to what is going on there. But at times I was like, Can you really see him? Like, what are you doing, Ava? What are you doing to this poor Přem? And then other times I just thought, I know whatever’s going on in this group dynamic is interesting. And it’s something to do with stories and stories about a story about a person, a kind of hall of mirrors type investigation.
Overall I am not sure I really fully understood any of the aspects of the novel – but I did remain engaged and appreciative throughout and willing to pursue the pages of the novel to the vanishing point of the last page of what was a fantastical (in various senses) train journey....more
I had previously read the author’s “East West Street” an account of the concept of “Genocide and “Crimes Against Humanity” from the Nurnberg trials toI had previously read the author’s “East West Street” an account of the concept of “Genocide and “Crimes Against Humanity” from the Nurnberg trials to the establishment of the International Criminal Court which had added poignancy and relevance from the author’s personal links to the first and professional links to the second.
This book is also based around International Law – here centring in particular on the way in which International (or supranational – albeit the determination of sovereign nations to ignore unfavorable rulings in International courts is a key part of the book) bodies from the UN to the International Court of Justice (which is the key focus of the book) addressed the legacy of colonalisation.
The case at the heart of the book is one referred to the court by the UN at the behest of the Mauritian government (with Sands acting in the referral and the case before the court) basically claiming that the Chagos archipelago was illegally partitioned from Mauritius immediately prior to the latter being granted its independence by the UK – and further that the Chagos (which was set up by the British as a new colony – the British Indian Ocean Territory as part of a decision to grant the US a cold war and later war-on-terror base on Diego Garcia) Islanders were illegally deported when in 1973 they were forced to leave the Island and explicitly forbidden to return).
Some excellent detail on the situation and the plight of those deported (and their descendants – which include a large community around 10 miles from my home) was covered in an article I read in the US magazine The Atlantic in the Summer and which (subject to paywalls) is here:
Sands own account is an interesting one – he is clearly very interested both in the development of general law in this area (with the book set out chronologically back to the last days of World War II) and in the various machinations of the case (and particularly the manouvering of various countries and the way in which the make up of the court changes decision). It is also a passionate account – its clear that he has taken a strong personal interest in the case and he builds a very strong relationship with Liseby Elyse (who was 20 in 1973 and lost her child on the forced deportation to Mauritius) who is a key witness at the Hague.
Overall I found this a fairly dispiriting tale – perhaps even more so than the author intends. He tends to paint the situation in fairly black and white/good guys and bad guys terms (so that he is pretty clear on what he thinks of the actions of the UK, US and the limited countries that support them). However it seemed clear to me that pretty well all the nations involved in the case were acting from self-interest/Realpolitik terms (effectively interested in making sure their own misdemeanours were not compromised while looking to cause maximum embarrassment to countries that they opposed or simply wanted to temporarily punish e.g. the UK for Brexit). And similarly, with some of the judgements of the court I was rather depressingly reminded of the US Supreme Court where judges positions on cases seem almost pre-determined by their allegiances rather than the real merits of the case (while of course still dressed up as judging the latter).
Nevertheless, it was a worthwhile read – although the political cartoon/caricatures/illustrations by Martin Rowson added nothing to the story for me....more
#9 of the Ruth Galloway novels – a series of crime novels featuring a Norfolk based forensic archaeologist and of particular interest to me given my i#9 of the Ruth Galloway novels – a series of crime novels featuring a Norfolk based forensic archaeologist and of particular interest to me given my interests in both Norfolk and archaeology (see my review of “The Janus Stone”).
This book is split across Norwich and (my birthplace of) Kings Lynn.
The book opens with a scene where some University students (one an acquaintance of Nelson’s daughter) spot a Jesus-style man in the middle of the road who then disappears – at the same place as a ground collapse reveals some underground tunnels. This is then followed by the disappearance of a homeless woman (who is claimed to have “gone underground” – with rumours of some kind of underground group who have dropped out from society and live in the tunnels under Norwich) and the murder of two homeless men who were trying to assist the police. Then another woman disappears –who attended a mother and toddler group run in Kings Lynn by the wife of an ex-bank robber now born-again Christian who runs a homeless centre that the three crime victims used.
Ruth meanwhile has been called in to investigate some bones uncovered in the excavations of a property developer (a favourite trope of the series) trying to set up an underground dining concept in Norwich – the bones seeming much more modern than first assumed (and with some possible hint of cannibalism). Several her colleagues also enter the book – one something of an expert on the tunnels, and one who is researching the rumours of an underground society.
Somewhat like “The Outcast Dead” the author is unable to avoid rather piling on the underground analogies and links –most gratuitously Clough’s fiancée Cassandra (of the Blackstocks of “The Ghost Field”) appearing in a modern rendition (from a playwright whose Janus-based play is in the second book of the series) of “Alice Goes Underground” and asking Kate to play her younger self.
Cassandra and Nelson take the turn to be the main characters caught up in danger or harm.
Ruth’s mother has a stroke, and she is called back to London to visit her in hospital – which had tricky memories for me of time spent in Kings Lynn – and this in turn exposes Nelson’s older daughters (one of who is living at home) to Kate. Her relationship with Nelson reaches yet another crisis point.
The resolution of the mysteries seems, if that is possible, to be getting more far-fetched as the series progresses and this one seems particularly bizarre (as well as solved by Ruth/the police with very limited logic).
Nelson’s new boss does provide some light relief.
However, what makes this book perhaps my favourite of the series is the empathetic portrayal of the homeless community – including the inclusion of an obituary for one of the murder victims written by Judy to honour his memory....more
#8 of the Ruth Galloway novels – a series of crime novels featuring a Norfolk based forensic archaeologist and of particular interest to me given my i#8 of the Ruth Galloway novels – a series of crime novels featuring a Norfolk based forensic archaeologist and of particular interest to me given my interests in both Norfolk and archaeology (see my review of “The Janus Stone”).
This novel in the sequence is set in and around the North Norfolk Marian Pilgrimage site of Walsingham. As an aside every time I visit the beautiful North Norfolk Coast at Wells and Holkham we drive through Walsingham where we play a game of “count how many religious figures you can see” – a game to which it is impossible not to score something as the lowest possible answer is “nun”.
The book opens with Cathbad house and cat sitting in the village and spotting a mysterious white and blue dressed figure in a nearby graveyard – the next day the same person is found dead (by strangulation) in a nearby ditch and turns out to be a model recovering from addiction at a (fictional) nearby private recovery hospital (The Sanctuary) – who was once it seems childminded by the mother of the local priest (also a prolific foster mother). Meanwhile Ruth is approached by an old student friend who is travelling to Walsingham and who, now a woman priest (and going to Walsingham for a course on possible Women Bishops), is receiving threatening letters.
As always the author cannot resist having one of the main and recurring characters placed in a sense of danger – albeit this is relatively minor compared to some of the other books – Michelle being the person of choice this time.
I thought that the sense of place in this book was perhaps stronger and more accurate than in many of the Norfolk books (I will pass over the reference to an RAF Skulthorpe) – with Walsingham captured really well.
I was reminded a little in this book of the Kate Charles “Book of Psalms Mystery” series – a set of five ecclesiastical crime novels set in the Church of England (two in Norfolk including one in Walsingham). Charles is much more sympathetic and insightful in her understanding of the church – one of the things I don’t like about Griffith’s series is the anti-church views of Ruth. At least though given Ruth’s equally deplorable love of cats, Norman (who I tend to dislike due to his frankly bizarre preference for Blackpool over Norfolk) does end the book buying a puppy.
The central mystery itself has a rather implausible explanation – albeit it was a step up on the Scooby Doo level plot of its predecessor.
Unusually for the series Ruth’s archaeological expertise is not required at all (although she does do a piece of tangential historical sleuthing) – which makes an interesting contrast to the previous two books where her development into book writing and TV producing were emphasised.
But this does give space for the Tim/Michelle/Nelson/Ruth relationship to continue to play out – and Griffiths does handle this well and this was one of the better of the series....more
#7 of the Ruth Galloway novels – a series of crime novels featuring a Norfolk based forensic archaeologist and of particular interest to me given my i#7 of the Ruth Galloway novels – a series of crime novels featuring a Norfolk based forensic archaeologist and of particular interest to me given my interests in both Norfolk and archaeology (see my review of “The Janus Stone”).
When interviewed recently about her latest book in the series (#14) and asked for her personal favourite the author said “I have a soft spot for The Ghost Fields. I’ve always wanted to write a book where an ill-assorted group of people are marooned in a country house. It also includes my favourite line: ‘Ruth! Get behind the duck!’”
The setting is the West Norfolk Coast – near to Hunstanton (location of one of the familial legendary exploits of my childhood) and a local gentry family the Blackstocks (for the first time in the series a family tree features as the story ranges across generations of the family) who mainly congregate around their familial Hall.
And the story opens with the discovery of the dead body of one of the family members – who emigrated to the US just before WWII and then returned to Norfolk as a US fighter pilot only to be lost in the war when his Bomber crashes into the sea. The family seem remarkably unsurprised when his body is found in a different WWII plane (one which was known to have crashed but with its pilot ejected) which is excavated as part of a controversial set of digging on some land sold to the Property developer from Janus Stone. Further complications include what seems to be recent excavations in the family’s pet cemetery and some human bones uncovered at a pig farm run by one of the youngest generation of the family at the disused US air base (one of the Ghost Fields of the title – as an aside one such base is only a mile or so from where I grew up and put me off Go Karting for life).
Meanwhile Ruth (and Neldon’s) daughter has started school, Ruth’s television career continues to develop (and her tentative relationship with a US presenter) and she is carrying out a nearby dig for Bronze age bones.
In the last book I remarked on enjoying Tim as a new character and Clough emerging as less of carboard cut out. I perhaps should have remembered the series infatuation with infidelity (and heeded some warning signs in the previous novel) and with the storylines dragging in danger to recurring cast members – as both develop disappointingly this time around. However it was good to see the Cathbad make two errors (one of prophecy and one of judgement).
But ultimately I also felt that this was the first of the novels which seemed to me to resemble perhaps a little too much an episode Scooby Doo for its plot and denoument – and was overall something of a disappointment....more
The author was recently selected for the decennial Granta Best of Young British Novelists list (2023 edition).
This novel was longlisted for the 2023 JThe author was recently selected for the decennial Granta Best of Young British Novelists list (2023 edition).
This novel was longlisted for the 2023 Jhalak and Dylan Thomas prizes.
Time collapses as the value rises, bossman turning away complaints, a fifty pence scratching through the code quickly becomes a ten pence dragged across the numbers that disclose.
A day becomes every other and weekly silences quiet her enthusiasm for home. They are too busy, she thinks, but it’s her, she’s the one who is here.
The distance between death and life proclaims absences unbearable. Distant glimpses of waning villages assuage the emotions of scarcity.
She stops calling and spends more time with her brood of thoughts; she finds extra shifts to take her mind off what she’s lost.
Derek Owusu is a poet whose simultaneously searing and experimental debut novel “That Reminds Me” was the deserved winner of the 2020 Desmond Elliott Prize for debut fiction (a prize he judged this year picking an excellent shortlist and outstanding winner in “Maps of Our Spectacular Bodies”).
I said in my review of that novel: “the book is written in a series of .. short verses, told in a mixture of present and past tense, each representing a fragmentary and impressionistic memory, necessarily distorted through the acts of remembering and forgetting. These can on a first and even second read (on finishing the book I went back and immediately read it a second time) seem jumbled and confusing, but they accumulate to a picture of [the protagnoist] who [they are], what [they have] become, what [they believe] about [themselves] and the formative experiences and traumas that have lead to that position” and that reminds me (sic) of this equally experimental and equally impactful novel also.
The novel is in effect an imagined family biography of the story of Owusu’s Mum, an attempt to understand her life and her journey from her arrival in the UK (from Ghana) up to the present day. An epilogue contains the 2019 transcript of what Owusu calls a “factless interview”, a rather fruitless attempt to “give me everything I needed to write and understand my mother’s story” which falters in the face of his mother’s vague or deliberately evasive answers.
It is written in 60 short (sometimes very short) chapters, arranged in three sections - Landing, Disembarking, Customs and Immigration. Mainly written from the viewpoint of his mother, but with other voices including his own in the main narrative.
As with his previous novel the style is fragmentary and impressionistic, and the reader’s (or at least this reader’s) understanding accumulative rather than immediate as we see something of his mother’s experience of: her flight and arrival, London (living in a bedsit in the Tottenham area), work (in various cleaning jobs), relationships (including two marriages), motherhood (a son and a daughter), church (Charismatic) and English society as well as her memories of her childhood in Ghana and her experience of exile from her original home.
The chapters are in a mix of English and untranslated Twi – the English itself often a part translation of Twi (an afterword says “The languages spoken by the protagonist are English and Twi. These translations are approximations and a lot of their meaning and changing connotations may be lost”). Untranslated Twi words are typically followed by a footnote indicator, with the footnotes (I believe largely related to the Twi word) allowing the direct voice of the son as he sets out his own memories of his mother, her behaviour, attitudes, fears and strengths.
Another great novel from one of the best literary talents around. I would hope to see this on the Goldsmith’s shortlist next year and would love to see it on the Booker longlist also.
A book that will repay multiple re-reads and which also shows how when skilfully written novels lose the conventional trappings of plot they can gain in profound insight and empathy and in the exploration of languages and inheritance.
My thanks to Canongate for an ARC via NetGalley
This isn’t it, though – he thinks of who should be the one to care for her.
Norm-switching form and a Union Jack sways outside the home she’ll die in.
Does she know who he is, does she not care or has the atrophy made her unaware, who is there, a few drops left of memory.
He can’t take it, her, what is this, Ghanaian or not she planted her seed to bloom over here, wafts of western idiosyncrasies pungent to her frail identity.
On Sundays her hand slips into his, a light renewal of platonic perfection, until her son becomes someone else’s reflection, the face of so many she loved but could never tell, though she always shows warmth to whoever approaches her church. To watch a mother become a woman, deteriorate to become a girl, an infant who can’t be held, waiting, unaware, to submerge with a family’s final and stifled breath.
This is where she should be. Briefly, to see him smile she’ll remember it was him, and she’ll stretch her arms, an embrace with no charm, ingratiated with this terra, hell, an immigrant mother who will die here alone and can only rise with the body of work her son has done well.
Now and fascinatingly given my comments below winner of the British Book Awards - both for best book and best marketing strategy of the year.
The noveNow and fascinatingly given my comments below winner of the British Book Awards - both for best book and best marketing strategy of the year.
The novel is told in a rather breathless present tense first person by June Hayward (named by her hippy mother Juniper Song Hayward) a white-ish American novelist whose career already seems to be largely over after an underwhelming response to her first novel (her dreams of literary stardom after securing an agent and book deal rapidly quashed) but who remains friends with Chinese-descended Athena Liu who by contrast is something of a novelist superstar with her sales only matched by her literary acclaim.
The set up is simple: June is on her first visit to Athena’s luxury flat. After a night of drinking, Athena chokes on a pancake – June fails to carry out even a part-functioning Heimlich maneuver but when later leaving the death scene does manage to carry out a part-finished historical-fiction manuscript: Athena’s next novel which she has been writing in almost total secrecy, about the WWI Chinese Labour Corps.
What starts as a writing exercise – filling out and polishing Athena’s incomplete draft turns into a fully fledged completion of the novel-in-progress and then an impulsive decision to submit the novel as her own.
From there – and especially after a publishing decision to face up to appropriation claims by playing up June’s nomadic childhood and for her to publish under her quirky and ethnically ambiguous first and second names, the literary stardom that June craves (and at times implies was denied to her due her lack of diversity) arrives at a breathtaking speed matched only by the pacing and immediacy of the novel’s writing
This is then inevitably accompanied by a backlash featuring, among others, a junior editorial assistant (who publishes the first negative Goodreads review), a LARB reviewer who specialises in taking down the latest literary darlings, barbed Goodreads reviews and comments, You Tube critiques, online activists, awkward event panels and Twitter storms. Despite her fear of detection, June decides to double down on both her claims and on her literary borrowing – partly supported by a culture-war backlash against the backlash.
Of course meta-fictional conceit’s abound: the book is of course written by a Chinese-American author pretending to be a white author pretending to be a Chinese-American author, as well as by an author writing something very different to her usual (fantasy) fare.
From the Goodreads reviews I have read (although I would not put in past the book for some of these to be fake or sock-puppet accounts – and the author herself does seem strangely fond for a cult author of 5* reviewing her own books) some of the criticisms which are aimed at Athena’s writing have been aimed at the author.
She recently (2013) won the best fiction category British Book Awards for her previous book - a prestigious industry award which is more focused on the marketing of books and whose citation refers to the BookTok campaign and special purpose editions tailored to different audiences rather than the book’s content. And this book seems to be sweeping Bookstagram as well as bookshops and billboards.
The author even manages some cultural appropriation by taking my own name for the rooftop bar where the novel’s opening scene is set – and I only too aware of my own “Goldenface” attempts to hide behind an Avatar which hides my middle aged white male identity.
Overall I think this is a novel with a simple if clever premise, and with entertaining if simple execution.
Very much a novel I found easy to read in a day it will I think appeal to anyone interested in the book industry – and particularly those who enjoy debates in the comments section of Goodreads, book event panels, literary controversies and the resulting Twitter spats – which is I think many keen readers.
My thanks to The Borough Press, Harper Collins UK for an ARC via NetGalley...more