Grotjahn GMBH Vs Inansi
Grotjahn GMBH Vs Inansi
ISNANI
August 10, 1994; G.R. No. 109272
FACTS:
Petitioner is a multinational corporation (employer). Private
respondent Lanchinebre (employee) worked as its sales
representative from 1983 to mid-1992. Employee obtained loans
and cash advances, a total of P12,170.37 remained unpaid.
ISSUE:
Whether or not the RTC has jurisdiction over the Collection Case.
HELD:
YES. While the loans and cash advances were contracted between
employee and employer during the subsistence of their relationship,
it does not follow that Article 217 of the Labor Code covers their
relationship.
The SC writes:
xxx
xxx
The order of the RTC was reversed and the collection case was
reinstated.