Second Division Cornelio V. Yagong, A.C. No. 10333 Present
Second Division Cornelio V. Yagong, A.C. No. 10333 Present
SECOND DIVISION
DECISION
contended that Magno and Garcia were bias and partial, and into the scheme
of money-making for a favorable resolution. Thus, he filed the present
administrative complaint.
On the other hand, Magno and Garcia insisted that in resolving cases
filed before their office, they are only guided by the concepts of prevailing
laws and jurisprudence in conducting Preliminary Investigations. They filed
the proper Information against Yagong in the performance of their official
functions. As a matter of procedure, the complaint against Yagong and
Coronel was raffled among the associate prosecutors for Preliminary
Investigation. The case was then assigned to Garcia for evaluation as to the
existence of probable cause to warrant indictment. After a thorough
examination of all the evidence adduced by the parties, Garcia found the
existence of probable cause. In his capacity as the Approving Authority,
Magno authorized the consequent filing of the Criminal Information for
Violation of the Anti-Fencing Law against Yagong.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED.
The Court finds no compelling reason to deviate from the findings and
recommendation of the IBP that the instant administrative complaint must be
dismissed.
2
Report and Recommendation submitted by Commissioner Gilbert L. Macatangay, dated January
30, 2016; rollo, pp. 265-267.
ex
3
Rollo, p. 263.
Decision 3 A.C. No. 10333
4
Munar, et al. v. Atty. Bautista, A.C. No. 7424, February 8, 2017.
rJ
Chavez v. OMB, 543·Phil. 600, 616 (2007).
Decision 4 A.C. No. 10333
SO ORDERED.
Decision 5 A.C. No. 10333
WE CONCUR:
Associate Justice
Chairperson
J/()~~
ESTELA M: fERLAS-BERNABE
Associate Justice
fl
t.4
ANDRE REYES JR.
Asso e Justice