District Attorney Will Not Re-Try The Penalty Phase For Defendant Scott Lee Peterson
District Attorney Will Not Re-Try The Penalty Phase For Defendant Scott Lee Peterson
10
Superior Court of the State of California
11 County of San Mateo
12
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CAPITAL CASE
13
Plaintiff,
14 Case No. SC55500
15
Stanislaus County Superior
vs.
16 Court Case No. 1056770
17
NOTICE OF DECISION ON
18 RETRIAL OF PENALTY PHASE
SCOTT LEE PETERSON,
19
Dept. 2M
Defendant. Hon. Anne-Christine Massullo
20
21 On September 24, 2020, the California Supreme Court remitted the case to the Trial
22 Court, following an opinion on August 24, 2020, affirming defendant's convictions for the first
23 and second degree murder of Laci and Conner with the special circumstances of multiple
24 murders and remanded the matter for penalty determination. The Defendant petitioned the
25 United States Supreme Court, asking that Court to find his conviction invalid and that Court
26 denied his petition. In this appeal , the highest courts of this state and the United States have now
27 settled the question of the defendant' s guilt, leaving only the question of his punishment. The
28 California Supreme Court indicated the People may retry the penalty phase if they so choose.
2 would involve, pursuant to their rights under Marsy 's Law. While the family of Laci and Conner
3 believe there is no doubt that defendant is guilty of these crimes and that his conduct warrants the
4 death penalty and defendant is deserving of the punishment of death, the family has decided this
5 process is simply too painful to endure once again . The decision to accept the sentence for
6 defendant of Life Without the Possibility of Parole followed discussions with the family of the
7 victims, Laci and Conner; they are aware that, if the penalty phase is not retried, the defendant
8 will be sentenced to Life Without the Possibility of Parole. THEREFORE, NOTICE IS HEREBY
9 GIVEN that the Office of the District Attorney will not re-try the penalty phase for defendant
11 Accordingly, the People respectfully request that this Court set a date for defendant's
12 sentencing.
14
15 ~:,;_k=¾-=y ------------
16 BrRGrT FLA~ ER \j
District Attorney
17 Stanislaus County District Attorney's Office
832 12th Street, Suite 300
18
Modesto, CA 95354
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3 I was at the time of service of the attached Notice of Decision on Retrial of Penalty Phase
4 over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the above-entitled action. I served a copy of the
5 above-entitled document on May 28, 2021 , to the following via electronic mail pursuant to CCP
6 1010.6(a)(6):
14 A courtesy copy was also sent via Federal Express (Tracking No. 816626702640) to the
15 following:
20
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
21
Executed this 28th day of May, 2021, in Modesto, California.
22
23
24
25
San Mateo Case No. SC055500A
26 Stanislaus County Case No. 1056770
27 People v. Peterson
28
Declaration of Service